In previous reports, I have presented timely information on the non-existent pandemic as the facts have surfaced. As more facts come to light, the complete integration must be made and evaluated to reveal the true bigger picture separated from the countless lies.
The facts are obvious; the entire response to the global pandemic was facilitated by the World Health Organization, the WHO, a division of the UN. Their recommendations were followed lock-step by virtually every government on Earth. No one will dispute this fact.
The next data point is: Who controls the WHO? Some will dispute this, but the evidence is pretty clear and solid. It is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who became the WHO’s biggest funder when then-President Trump removed U.S. support last year. Gates is one of the many shills who are front men for the UN. The UN Agenda 21 is the plan to take down the US and its cronies as part of the RESET 2020. At least, Trump was smart enough to withdraw US funding from the organization working to destroy it.
The maniacal suppression and censorship of any inexpensive natural alternative for COVID-19 makes perfect sense now. Since COVID is just re-hashed colds and flus, it would quickly lose its mysterious aura of a ‘disastrous new calamity’ if the truth was revealed.
Knowledge of the truth would completely remove any incentive for even the most foolish people to accept experimental vaccines. If everyone knew that the same over-the-counter drug store remedies which are readily available, as effective as ever, and practically free, who would risk their life for a vaccine? Virtually no one. It all makes perfect sense.
In the video embedded below, the founding members, led by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, interviews Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, about what she discovered about Bill Gates and GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance.
According to her bio, she “is an internationally recognized expert on issues related to evaluating scientific research for policymakers, in particular in health and innovation assessment, pandemic and emergency management training and in optimizing individual and population health and well-being.”
Stuckelberger points out that much of the research done was and still is highly politicized and primarily done to support and justify political decisions. This is common practice for all governments, who use the incentives of research ‘grant’ money to buy the results they wish to use to dupe their constituents into believing their lies.
For the past 20 years, since 2000, she’s been involved with public health at the WHO, and was part of their research ethics committee for four years. In 2009, she got involved with the WHO’s international health regulations.
Stuckelberger points out that the whole purpose of WHO’s international health regulations is to prepare member states to be ready for a pandemic, to be able to not only prevent outbreaks but also respond swiftly when an outbreak occurs. Since all plagues and pandemics are literally the creations of government, the knowledge of an ‘outbreak’ is derived from pre-planning and implementation of devious plots to steer the herds of sheeples to make the plans unfold “as planned”.
According to Stuckelberger, Switzerland is at the heart of the corruption, largely thanks to it being the headquarters for GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, founded by Bill Gates. In 2009, the GAVI Alliance was recognized as an international institution and granted total blanket immunity.
As explained by Justus Hoffmann, Ph.D., one of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee members, GAVI has “qualified diplomatic immunity,” which is odd, considering the organization has no state political power that would warrant diplomatic immunity.
“They can do whatever they want,” Stuckelberger says, without repercussions. The police, for example, are barred from conducting an investigation and collecting evidence if GAVI were to be implicated in a criminal investigation.
Essentially, GAVI is a nongovernmental organization (NGO) that is allowed to operate without paying any taxes, while also having total immunity for anything they do wrong, willfully or otherwise. This is rather unprecedented, and raises a whole host of questions.
Furthermore, documents cited by Stuckelberger show the UN WHO has assumed what amounts to dictatorial power over the whole world. The director general has the sole power to make decisions — including decisions about which tests or pandemic medications to use — that all member states must then obey.
What’s more, Stuckelberger discovered that, in 2017, Gates actually requested to be part of the WHO’s executive board — like a member state — ostensibly because he gives them so much money. Indeed, his funding exceeds that of many individual member states.
Like Stuckelberger says, this is truly incredible — the idea that a single man would have the same power and influence over the WHO as that of an entire nation. It’s a brazen power grab, to say the least.
One thing that raises Stuckelberger’s suspicion is the fact that Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, has entered into a three-way contract agreement with Gates and the WHO. “This is highly abnormal,” she says.
Essentially, in summary, it appears that when he did not get voted in as a one-man nation state, Gates created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO.
When you look back over the past year, it seems Gates has often been the first to announce what the world needs to do to address the scandemic, and then the WHO comes out with an identical message, which is then parroted by world leaders, more or less verbatim.
Feullmich naively says, “A complete review and overhaul of the United Nations, which established the WHO, is also required as the U.N. has done nothing to prevent or rein in undemocratic and illegal activity. As noted by Fuellmich, we probably need to reconsider whether we even need them”. Obviously he doesn’t get it, as to who is wagging which tail.
In the interview, they also highlight the WHO’s role in setting the stage for a global health dictatorship by changing the definition of “pandemic.” The WHO’s original definition, pre-2009, of a pandemic was:
This switch in definition is why COVID-19 was and still is promoted as a pandemic even though it, at no point, has caused any excess mortality. Statistics of deaths in all countries worldwide show absolutely no spikes or excess mortality.
We now have plenty of data showing the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu. It is not different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual lethality is the same. Yet we’re told the price we must all pay to keep ourselves and others safe from this virus is the relinquishing of our civil rights and liberties on an unprecedented scale.
In short, by removing the criteria of severe illness causing high morbidity, leaving geographically widespread infection as the only criteria for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world were able to bamboozle the global population into giving up their lives and livelihoods.
The WHO has also radically altered the definition of “herd immunity.” Herd immunity occurs when enough people acquire immunity to an infectious disease such that it can no longer spread widely in the community. When the number susceptible is low enough to prevent epidemic growth, herd immunity is said to have been reached.
Eventually, as vaccination became widespread, the concept of herd immunity evolved to include not only the naturally acquired immunity that comes from prior illness, but also the temporary vaccine-acquired immunity that is claimed to occur after vaccination. A simple study of diseases will reveal that the various illnesses have always subsided without vaccines, which come along after the outbreak and claim credit for its disappearance.
As late as June 2020, the WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was in line with the widely-accepted concept that has been the standard for infectious diseases for decades. Here’s what it originally said:
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it. This all nonsense. The original idea of vaccine was to give the subjects a small survivable dose of the pathogen to create the immunity, as it had been noticed that survivors of the illnesses seemed to have developed on-going immunity from the experience. Actual experience has shown that survivors of a given disease have immunity, but those vaccinated from the same disease can be infected.
Vaccines train our immune systems to create proteins that fight disease, known as ‘antibodies’, just as would happen when we are exposed to a disease but — crucially — vaccines work without making us sick. This has been demonstrated to be untrue. Many cases have been in the news where a classroom of students who were all vaccinated all came down with the measles, for instance.
With herd immunity, the psychological aspects of sympathetic contraction of disease is lessened and the herd that hangs out together has a similar diet and life-style, which, if sound, will produce specimens with good immune systems, all that is necessary to avoid these types of arbitrary infections.
After public — and no doubt embarrassing — backlash, the WHO revised its definition again December 31, 2020, to again include the mention of natural infection, while still emphasizing vaccine-acquired immunity. It now reads:
“’Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity,’ is the indirect protection from an infectious disease that happens when a population is less susceptible through immunity developed by means if healthy living.
WHO supports achieving ‘herd immunity’ through vaccination, not by allowing a disease to spread through any segment of the population, and certainly not through education to help increase natural immune system function. Herd immunity against COVID-19 should be achieved by protecting people through inoculation with experimental mRNA gene alteration, not by exposing them to the pathogen that causes the disease.”
Stuckelberger also shocks the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee by pointing out that twice — December 7, 2020,21,22 and January 13, 202123 — the WHO issued medical alerts for PCR testing, warning that use of high cycle thresholds (CT) will produce high rates of false positives, that the CT value should be reported to the health care provider and that test results be considered only an indication, with clinical observations, health history and other epidemiological information.
The PCR test is so unreliable that it should never be used as the sole diagnostic test. When used, the PCR should have been verified to yield results of some certain validity and the settings for such reliability must be provided to users. The inventor of the PCR device has published his concern that it was never intended to be used for testing patients and is totally unable to perform reliably for this application.
Yet since the beginning of the pandemic, WHO has pushed PCR testing as the best way to detect and diagnose infection. This, she says, makes it intentionally criminal. If it is commonly known that a test method produces unreliable results, and people’s state of health is at stake, yet the method is demanded by the top authority, then that is a crime.
In this alert, the WHO stressed that the “CT needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load,” and that “Where test results do not correspond with the clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested.”
It also reminds users that “disease prevalence alters the predictive value of test results,” so that “as disease prevalence decreases, the risk of false positive increases.” The alert goes on to explain:
“This means that the probability that a person who has a positive result (SARS-CoV-2 detected) is truly infected with SARS-CoV-2 decreases as prevalence decreases, irrespective of the claimed specificity. Most PCR assays are indicated as an aid for diagnosis, therefore, health care providers must consider any result in combination with timing of sampling, specimen type, assay specifics, clinical observations, patient history, confirmed status of any contacts, and epidemiological information.” It should also be noted that this alleged COVID disease, if it even exists at all, is proven to be non-contagious.
Taking a patient’s symptoms into account and using a scientifically defensible CT count should have been routine practice from the beginning. It just didn’t fit the real geopolitical narrative and could not generate the fear factor needed to line up the vacciners.
Since the start of the pandemic, the WHO has recommended using an amplification cycle count, CT, of 45,27,28 and29 which guarantees an enormous number of false positives, and therefore “cases.” This alone is how they kept the casedemic fearmongering going. If one were to use the PCR test, 25 would be a good CT setting, but would still have problems with overcounts of ‘positives’. It could be considered an indicator warranting further diagnostics, but not a case-positive.
The scientific consensus has long been that anything over 35 CTs renders the PCR test useless,30,31,32 as the accuracy will be only 3%. 97% are false positives. By finally recommending lower CTs and more precise criteria for diagnosis, the WHO can engineer any desired count for the caseload at any desired time.
Coincidentally, the next day, January 21, 2021, President Biden announced he would reinstate the U.S.’ financial support for the WHO. This is not due to anything other than Biden being the ultimate ‘yes man’.
The WHO was created as a specialized agency of the U.N., established in 1948 to ostensibly further international cooperation for improved public health conditions. It was given a broad mandate under its constitution to promote the attainment of “the highest possible level of health” by all peoples. 1948 may seem like a long ways back, but the planned RESET was already well under way by then.
It is now beyond dispute that the WHO is totally compromised. Because of its funding, it has one purpose, in reality, which is to enable the UN’s medical authority in support of the UN’s mandate, RESET 2020.
Of course, WHO serves its corporate masters through its dictatorial powers and is essentially destroying, not improving, the health of the world while staging the fraud necessary to get the RESET done.
In June 2010, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) issued a report on the WHO’s handling of the 2009 pandemic of novel influenza A (H1N1), which included the recommendation to use a fast-tracked vaccine that ended up causing disability and death around the world.
PACE concluded “the handling of the pandemic by the WHO, EU health agencies and national governments led to a waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”
Specifically, PACE found “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was vastly overstated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the organization’s decision-making — a claim echoed by other investigators as well.
The Assembly made a number of recommendations, including greater transparency, better governance of public health, safeguards against undue influence by vested interests, public funding of independent research, and last but not least, for the media to “avoid sensationalism and scaremongering in the public health domain.”
While the WHO is recognized as being uniquely suited to carry out key functions necessary in a global pandemic, experts at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and the Harvard Global Health Institute, have pointed out, years ago, that the WHO has eroded so much trust that radical reforms would be required before it could assume an authoritative role.
Yet here we are, still, and no reforms ever took place. Instead, the corruption festered and metastasized, and the WHO turned into a power hub for the technocratic deep state that seeks to assume power and control over all nations in the era of the new RESET.