Most Farmland in US Owned by UN

The alleged fourth richest person in the world and the alleged top financier of the UN’s World Health Organization, Bill Gates, has silently made the UN into the biggest farmland owner in the United States. In his role as ‘Mr. Big Spender’, Gates has used his position as a UN puppet once again to further the UN Agenda 21.

The UN billionaire has quietly bought up 242,000 acres of farmland in 18 states – and 268,984 of multi-use land in 19 states in total, making the UN the biggest agricultural landowner in the US, though far short of the biggest overall landowner in the country.

The man himself is the farthest thing from a farmer, however. He couldn’t even lift a bale of hay, let alone grip the two strands of bailing twine together with his bare hands.

Nevertheless, Gates now claims to own tens of thousands of acres of farmland across eighteen states.

He owns the most farmland in Louisiana – a stunning 69,071-acre portfolio, another 47,927 acres in Arkansas, and 20,588 acres in Nebraska, and has a stake in a 25,750-acre swath of land on the west side of Phoenix, Arizona.

So why is Bill Gates ‘frontin’ the buying up farmland across America for the UN?

Bill Gates and The UN’s Agricultural Experiments

Bill Gate’s (UN’s) investment vehicle, Cascade Investments, has gone to great lengths to conceal his large farmland purchases, and have tried to cover their tracks with each monstrous deal.

One of the deals was a $171 million acquisition, concealed by an LLC with two employees, in a metal-sided building down a dirt road off the Bayou Teche.

Bill Gates, via his UN funded foundations, prides himself in philanthropy, so why would he be directing his personal investment vehicle to invest in farmland across the country and keep it a secret?  When starvation hits the US, everyone will suddenly realize the reason.

In 2008, his personal UN foundation invested $306 million to direct the farming operations of small holder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa and Southern Asia.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation used the grant money to support high-yield, “sustainable” agriculture.

Ten years later, Bill launched ‘Gates Ag One’ to advance these efforts. Now, Cascade Investments coordinates with a subsidiary, Cottonwood Ag Management, which is part of the ‘Leading Harvest’ network, a nonprofit that promotes sustainable agriculture.

The Harvest network now represents 2 million acres in 22 states and another 2 million acres across seven other countries. ‘The Sustainable Agriculture Working Group’ is behind this transformation of agriculture and Bill Gates is one of the main investors.

This 13-member group includes foreign investors looking to change food and crop production in the US, including: Ceres Partners, Hancock Natural Resources Group, The Rohayton Group, and UBS Farmland Investors.

Is Gates preparing to control US farmers and dictate the direction of US farming in accordance with the United Nations? Is he preparing to launch experimental GMOs across hundreds of thousands of acres of US farmland, dictating the type of seeds and animal breeds that farmers use?  This would follow in-line with his covid mRNA vaccination plan to GMO all humans on the planet. GMO’d humans eating GMO’d food.

It’s unclear whether his UN farmland is being used for conservation purposes or whether he intends to invite foreign influence and experimental gene-altering technologies into the US agriculture space.

In Scotland, Bill Gates teamed up with the United Kingdom to develop “super crops” and to breed high-yield cows.

The two entities invested $174 million into experimental breeding programs that aim to make cows produce more milk, make chickens lay more eggs, and make genetically modified crops better withstand diseases

.

The experiments are intended to “help” 100 million African farmers so they can produce higher yields from their small-scale farming operations.

Do these international land grabs and globalist’s experiments coincide with the FDA’s efforts to shutdown raw milk farmers and the Bureau of Land Management’s war against independent ranchers?

Also read: Bill Gates Buying Up Huge Amount Of Farmland While ‘UN Great Reset’ is telling Americans the ‘Future Excludes Private Property Ownership’.

Bill Gates and The Rise of Smart Cities

Another reason Bill Gates is buying up land is to provide for the UN’s upcoming smart cities. The land he owns just west of Phoenix is being developed into a new metropolis called Belmont. When complete, it is claimed it will boast 80,000 homes, 3,800 acres of industrial, office and retail space; 3,400 acres of open space; and 470 acres for public schools.

The acreage is strategically located off Interstate 10 and will be accessible to Interstate 11 as well. The 40 square miles is projected to house 200,000 or more residents, who will undoubtedly be subjected to 24/7 surveillance and personal data harvesting in everything they do within the hyper-connected smart city.

Bill Gate’s sardonic influence is part of a greater UN INFLUENCE that seeks to use Americans and their resources for international control and exploitation.

Bill Gates and Neo-Feudalism: A Closer Look at Farmer Bill

Lord Gates

Bill Gates is a poster-child for the UN’s Technocracy. He clearly has his eye on monopoly-power over humanity’s health with mass vaccines, but is he also trying to gain monopoly control over food?

The global lockdowns that Bill Gates helped orchestrate and cheerlead have bankrupted more than 100,000 businesses in the U.S. alone and plunged a billion people into poverty and deadly food insecurity that, among other devastating harms, kill 10,000 African children monthly — while increasing Gates’ wealth by $20 billion

Gates has been using his power over global populations by buying devalued assets at fire-sale prices and maneuvering for monopoly control over public healthprivatizing prisonsonline education and global communications while promoting digital currencieshigh tech surveillancedata harvesting systems and artificial intelligence.

According to the newest issue of The Land Report, Gates has quietly made the UN the largest owner of farmland in the United States. Gates’ portfolio now comprises about 242,000 acres of American farmland and nearly 27,000 acres of other land across Louisiana, Arkansas, Nebraska, Arizona, Florida, Washington and 18 other states.

The 1812 Global RESET set up the MATRIX to enable the new North American venture, that being the US, to create the illusion of democracy, property ownership and freedom from European feudalism. A noble experiment in self-governance depended on the perpetual control of the nation’s land base by tens of thousands of independent farmers, each with the illusion of a stake in democracy.

So, at best, Gates’ campaign to scarf up America’s agricultural real estate is a signal that feudalism is again in vogue in the era of the RESET 2020. It is a harbinger of something far more alarming — the control of global food supplies by a brutal new agenda called UN Agenda 21.

UN puppet Gates’ stealth purchases are part of the long-term strategy of mastery over agriculture and food production globally.

Beginning in 1994, the UN’s man,Gates, launched an international biopiracy campaign to achieve vertically integrated dominion over global agricultural production. The empire now includes vast agricultural lands and hefty investments in GMO cropsseed patents, synthetic foods, artificial intelligence including robotic farm workers, and commanding positions in food behemoths including Coca-Cola, Unilever, Philip Morris (KraftGeneral Foods), Kellogg’sProcter & Gamble and Amazon (Whole Foods), and in multinationals like Monsanto and Bayer that market chemical pesticides and petrochemical fertilizers.

The funding is occluded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the richest and most powerful organization in all of international philanthropy.

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, a protégé and partner to David Rockefeller, observed that, “Who controls the food supply controls the people.” Reminds us of the Rothschild’s claim that whoever controls the currency controls the world.  In 2006, the Bill & Melinda Gates and Rockefeller Foundations launched the $424 million Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) promising to double crop productivity and boost incomes for 30 million small farmers by 2020 while cutting food insecurity in half.

Characteristically, the UN approach to global problems puts technocracy, chemical, pharmaceutical and oil industry partners at the center of every solution. As it turned out, the UN’s “innovative strategy” for food production was to force America’s failed system of GMO, chemical and fossil fuel-based agriculture on poor African farmers.  The food system, in conjunction with the medical care/pharmaceutical system have brought disease to an all new level in social control and exploitation of national economies, to the point that it now represents almost half of the GDP in the US, while still climbing rapidly.  The MATRIX control system could hardly have been so successful without it.

African agricultural practices have evolved from the land over 10,000 years in forms that promote crop diversity, decentralization, sustainability, private property, self-organization and local control of seeds. The personal freedom inherent in these localized systems leaves farm families making their own decisions: the masters on their lands, the sovereigns of their destinies. Continuous innovation by millions of small farmers maximized sustainable yields and biodiversity.  Unchecked population growth and government tyranny has overwhelmed the agricultural system allowing poverty to win the day.

The UN spent $4.9 billion dollars to dismantle this ancient system and replace it with high-tech corporatized and industrialized agriculture, chemically dependent monocultures, extreme centralization and top-down control. This forced small African farms to transition to imported commercial seedspetroleum fertilizers and pesticides.

The UN built the supply chain infrastructure for chemicals and seeds and pressured African governments to spend huge sums on subsidies and to use draconian penalties and authoritarian control to force farmers to buy these expensive provisions and comply with their dictates. They made farmers replace traditional nutritious subsistence crops like sorghum, millet, sweet potato and cassava with high-yield industrial cash crops, like soy and corn, which benefit elite commodity traders but leave poor Africans with little to eat. Both nutrition and productivity plummeted. Soils grew more acidic with every application of petrochemical fertilizers.

As with UN’ African vaccine enterprise, there was neither internal evaluation nor public accountability. The 2020 study “False Promises: The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)” is the report card on the UN’ cartel’s 14-year effort. The investigation concludes that the number of Africans suffering extreme hunger has increased by 30 percent in the 18 countries that Gates targeted. Rural poverty has metastasized dramatically, and the number of hungry people in these nations has risen to 131 million.

Under the UN’ plantation system, Africa’s rural populations have become slaves on their own land to a tyrannical serfdom of high-tech inputs, mechanization, rigid schedules, burdensome conditionalities, credits and subsidies that are the defining features of the UN’ “Green Revolution.”

The only entities benefiting from this program are the international corporate partners — and particularly Monsanto, in which the Gates Foundation Trust purchased 500,000 shares worth $23 million in 2010 (but later divested those shares after pressure from civil society groups). Gates himself even filmed commercials for Monsanto’s GMOs, touting them as the “solution” to world hunger.

In a typical example of Gates’ strange largess, his foundation apparently made his taxpayer-subsidized “charitable” grants amounting to $10 million to the Big Ag behemoth, Cargill, to build his supply chains for GMO soy in South Africa. Africans call Gates’ program “Neocolonialism” or “Corporate Colonialism.”

The AGRA Watch initiative of Seattle-based Community Alliance for Global Justice follows Gates’ UN agricultural and food policies. According to Heather Day, an AGRA Watch spokesperson, AGRA is a trojan horse for corporate kleptocracy.

“The Gates Foundation and AGRA claim to be ‘pro-farmer,’ ‘pro-poor’ and ‘pro-environment,’” we’re told . “But their approach is closely aligned with transnational corporations, like Monsanto, and foreign policy actors like USAID [United States Agency for International Development].They take advantage of food and global climate crises to promote high-tech, centralized, industrial agriculture that generate profits for the corporate partners while degrading the environment and disempowering farmers. Their programs are a dark form of philanthrocapitalism based on biopiracy and corporate biopiracy.”

There are many other facets to the RESET 2020, but this covers a big element.

There is no COVID-19, so what is the PCR test looking for?

If you mistakenly believe that SARS-CoV-2 exists, you discover immediately that the PCR test is fucked up and simply not able to determine anything about this alleged-to-exist virus.  If you realize even the very the existence of this virus is unproven to begin with, you’re driven to the conclusion that the test results—positive or negative—are completely meaningless, because you can’t make a test for a non-existent entity. Don’t misunderstand what I am telling you. Viruses are plentiful, no doubt. They are all dead organic matter, number one. They are not capable of causing disease or infection, number two.

The PCR test is not worth further discussion, as it simply does not work. It is a bogey man that gives whatever answer it is set it to produce.  Even the designer of the tester says he never made it capable of being a tester for some specific mRNA molecule.  He wonders why the criminals at the CDC and WHO are using it to pronounce results of viral infection. Since you don’t have an isolated purified specimen of the virus itself, all assumptions about that piece of mRNA are totally meaningless and void.

Therefore, the COVID case numbers, which are based on the test results, are meaningless. So are the death numbers.  So is any claim of viral infection, viral disease and pandemic equally invalid and meaningless.

The masks, the distancing, the lockdowns—which are based on case numbers—are absurd, destructive and useless.

This is certainly not the first time a medical diagnostic test has been revealed as meaningless. The existence of HIV is also unproven. The various antibody tests designed to register the presence of HIV are as absurd and meaningless as for the COVID.

Here is how the medical bullshit trick works. Arbitrarily take a group of symptoms, lump them together, claim they add up to a specific disease with a meaningless assigned name; assert, without evidence, that the cause is a ‘germ’; devise a test for the germ that will register positive and negative based on how the operator sets a parameter; claim the test is detecting the germ whose very existence is actually a made-up fiction.

Since you have full government authority to perpetrate this sleazy lie, and you own all the public media outlets, you can proclaim this lie to be a fact. Out of nowhere, you’ve become “official.”

Consider the example of pellagra, a horrible skin disease that was plaguing the American South a hundred years ago. It affected several million people. Medical authorities insisted a germ was the cause. Effort after effort was mounted to find the germ. Zero results. Finally, after decades, a small band of independent researchers won the day. Their contention that pellagra was actually a niacin deficiency was shown to be correct. There was no germ.

Sometimes, the very test which so-called medical authorities devise to detect “the germ causing a disease” backfires on them. Such was the case with Swine Flu, as an example.

In the summer of 2009, while the CDC was claiming there were thousands of cases of Swine Flu in America, the overwhelming percentage of test samples taken from patients were coming back, from labs, with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu. The lab tests were contradicting the CDC’s assertion that there was a pandemic. 

You may be astute enough to recognize that there eventually was a rectification of the bullshit story in these examples.  So, why will this same situation, the covid, not end up being rectified as well?

The answer is simple.  The Global RESET of society is occurring now.  Not then.  That was just to practice setting you up for the real event, which the UN had already designed and set the date. Now, it’s for real.

Tests are terrific propaganda tools. That’s all some of them are. “Well, the doctor ran my tests and he gave me a diagnosis of X. The treatment involves taking three [toxic] drugs. So, I’ve started on the regimen.”

“Are you sure you want to take those drugs?”

“Of course. The tests showed I need them.”

“One of those drugs stops all cells in the body from replicating.”

“Doesn’t matter. The tests say I need the drug.”

Sometimes, there is no test, but doctors use a blizzard of arcane labels to pretend their diagnoses are about something real.

Such is the case with psychiatry, one of the great cons loosed upon the human race. The official bible of the profession, the DSM, lists some 300 distinct and separate and named “mental disorders.”

THERE IS NO DEFINING LAB TEST FOR ANY OF THESE “DISORDERS.”

It’s up to the psychiatrist to make his diagnosis seem legitimate to the patient.

If the hidden history of medicine were taught in schools and colleges, it would come as no surprise that the COVID test is a complete hustle and con.

But schools wouldn’t touch that history with a hundred-foot pole.

Dr. Barbara Starfield, a revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, talked about her July 26, 2000 review, “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.”

Starfield concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. 106,000 from the effects of FDA approved medicines, and 119,000 from mistreatment and errors in hospitals.

As you read an excerpt from her interview, keep in mind that most of these deaths were preceded by a diagnostic test of some kind—which speaks volumes about how the tests are interpreted and used.

Starfield: The American public appears to have been hoodwinked into believing that more interventions lead to better health, and most people that I meet are completely unaware that the US does not have the ‘best health in the world’.  The US is ranked by the WHO among other countries and places 35th, even though providing a heavy degree of funding for the WHO.

The UN organizations have been meeting in Davos, Switzerland this month to kick off the full blown RESET.  The UN is no friend to the US and its Western allies.  After all, its purpose for existing is to bring full implementation of its agendas, conceived, designed and brought to life from its headquarters in NYC, provided by the Rockefeller Foundation.

You can read more from my recent blogs on the details of the RESET and the UN.

The Government (non-elected) has created a global crisis of fear,  Humans can not lead any kind of productive life while in a state of fear.  Fear is the largest and most vicious cause of human disease known.  The mechanism is the involuntary nervous system, which shuts down all bodily system functions that are not absolutely required at the moment to survive the threat causing the fear.  This mechanism is supposed to be brief, as the threat plays out in rapid fashion. The body’s immune system is one of the systems that are shut down.  When this state of fear is prolonged, the body is susceptible to most any pathogenic threat that the immune system would normally deal with.

Humans are beings of love.  Fear is the opposite of love.  Fear is pathogenic, in and of itself.  It is imperative that fear from occult sources be addressed and rationalized, so that understanding can replace fear and allow a state of love to be re-established. 

They tell you to get your ‘vaccine’ and soon things will return to normal.  First of all, vaccines have a legal and medical definition.  What they are calling a vaccine is certainly not a vaccine by any known definitions.  It is an experimental process to insert foreign mRNA into your body, the idea being to revise your genetic composition.  If your immune system is functioning, an auto-immune response will be the result. If you have seen the mini-series called ‘The Walking Dead’, you have seen some viable hints about this situation. We frequently receive viable information from the movies, as these monsters seem to be under some obligation to pre-inform us regarding what they are doing or are going to do to us.

Recall, it was not the virus that yielded the ‘walking dead’, it was the alleged ‘vaccine’. An experimental genetic vaccine that many unfortunate people received and become zombies, as a result. It is likely that this is not nearly as bizzare as it seemed at first in the movie. Zombies may come in covid varieties. The whole thing is a prefabricated horror show.

Many reports are in and more on the way, of deaths following the inoculation in short order.  In addition, many serious side effects are manifesting in those who do not die.  These seem to be neurological or brain related.  People are being paralyzed, or rendered dysfunctional, unable to sustain normal control of bodily functions.  Those supposedly in-the-know suggest that conditions from this genetic invasion are going to worsen over time.  Victims may become ‘android-like’ or zombified and require programming or simple instruction just to to operate their bodies.

If this seems strange to you, remember that no virus exists that matches what they are calling a covid disease. They have nothing upon which to determine how to make a test. The genetic experiment that participants think are vaccines are not vaccines, and they are not about saving you.  Even they admit that you will still be susceptible to the illness, you will still be contagious, you will still need to wear 2 or 3 masks, you will still need to isolate or distance from others.  So, why?  The only reason is coercion.  A very bad trade-off.

If you can leave fear and go back to love, you will be able to see what is happening here.  You will be able to understand and make rational decisions.  No matter what evil is being sent against you, you will always be much better off in a state of love.  Forget what these stupid assholes are pitching to you and rejoin you friends, family and the human race in a state of love. Give some evidence of affection, like hugs and kisses.

Deaths are All from the Elderly Segment of the Population

There are several reasons to reject and ignore ALL COVID statistics. Chief among the reasons—no one has proved that the virus, SARS-CoV-2, even exists.

But for purposes of this discussion, and to show, once again, that the medical cartel is deeply mired in fraud and killing, let’s have a look at official COVID death numbers in the US.

Death numbers are a significant metric, because, obviously, all other so-called “cases” recover and live.

The government murderers are having a hard time keeping their pandemic balloon inflated.  95 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. have occurred among people who were 50 or older. This, even though the majority of coronavirus ‘cases’ have been reported in people under age 50. Cases, it is now commonly known, are totally erroneous and add up to zero due to the PCR test misapplication of use.  About 80% of deaths have been among people 65 and older, according to the latest demographic data available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”

Reported January 23, 2021:

“Between the beginning of February 2020 and January 23, 2021, of 359,352 deaths caused by COVID-19 in the United States, almost 115,700 had occurred among those aged 85 years and older.”

Statista.com goes on to report the COVID death numbers among other age groups. Age 75-84: 99,342 deaths. Age 65-74: 76,404 deaths. Age 55-64: 42,031 deaths.

Adding up all the COVID deaths in the 55-and-older age groups, we get 333,477—out of 359,352 total COVID deaths registered at the time of the Statista report.

93% of all COVID deaths in the US have occurred in people 55 years old and older.

Of course, the real question is…did any of these deaths result from something called COVID, or any virus, for that matter?  We live in a world where humans get born, lead a short life-span, and then die. 

Most of these people who died had multiple long-term health conditions. They had been treated, for years, perhaps decades, with toxic medical drugs.

Most of these elderly people believed the government that there actually is a terrible new disease called COVID-19 and feared they might catch it.  Sure enough, the fake PCR test that yields 99% fake ‘positives’, says “you have caught the disease”.  Just the terror of having been told they had caught the disease may be enough to induce death in some.

THEN they were put into isolation, cut off from contact with family and loved ones—and they shut-down and died.

NO VIRUS REQUIRED.

Some of these elderly and frail people were heavily sedated and put on breathing ventilators. In a large New York study of hospitalized COVID patients, 97.2% of all patients 65 and older who were put on ventilators died.      97.2 PERCENT!    Do you think this would cause alarm?

Whether ventilated or not, in these 55-and-older patients, we are talking about FORCED PREMATURE DEATHS—through terror induced by the COVID diagnosis, plus isolation from friends and family, on top of their prior serious health conditions and long-term toxic medical treatments.  Old age leads to death from many causes.  This is normal, not epidemic.

NO VIRUS NECESSARY.

Viruses as pathogens is Rockefeller allopathic medicine nonsense from the dawn of its invention, 100 years ago.

Therefore, using official death numbers, roughly 93% of all US COVID deaths are explained with no reference to a virus.

“Well, we killed as many old people as we could. That gives us the needed COVID numbers…”

Perhaps you think the 55-64 age group is “too young.”  If we just consider 65 and older, the deaths in that group are 81% of all claimed US COVID deaths. And, by the way, where did all the cold, flu, bronchitis, pneumonia, etc. deaths disappear to?  Couldn’t be that they are counting everything as COVID?  Every country in the world has almost completely no deaths from anything but COVID.  How convenient for the hoaxers and how absurd for everyone else.

There is no pandemic. The official definition of a “COVID-19 case” is so broad, it allows most anything through the door.

A COUGH, or CHILLS AND FEVER, for example. Either of these is sufficient for a diagnosis of COVID.

The requirement of a positive PCR test for the virus— isn’t really necessary, although it is a dependable way to get a false ‘positive’.

So, there is a perfect recipe for a false pandemic.

A person who, in 2018, would be diagnosed with the flu turns into a person who, in 2020, is diagnosed with COVID-19.

Ordinary pneumonia suddenly turns into COVID pneumonia.

All sorts of other lung infections are now COVID.

“I have a cold, Doctor.”

“No, it’s COVID.”

“It’s a sniffle.”

“A COVID sniffle.”

The disease labeling and relabeling game has been going on since the dawn of priest classes. Modern medicine has refined it somewhat, but it’s still an obvious con on humans, to keep them coming back for more, until the time comes to depopulate them.  Depopulation on a massive scale has occurred many times in the past. ‘Slow Death Syndrome’ is a non-stop proposition for all humans.  How many realize their biological life-expectancy is 150 years?

Today, COVID-19 is a label that conceals a stark truth: the real “social-disease” is an assault on national economies and every human who works for a living, by means of lockdowns.  The real underlying issue is the global RESET, including the depopulation of the “Western Nations” by means of what are called mRNA Vaccines.  These, of course, are not vaccines, but genetics-altering experiments on live people.  If you do not die outright, like the elderly, you are going to end up an ‘android’, that is programmable to perform some useful services for your masters.

ABASEMENT Just How Far Will People Go?

       Anal Swabbing

       Face Diapers in Triplicate

China says, with the recent testing of sewer systems for the presence of COVID-19, scientists in China decided to go to the source for test samples, namely, your asshole. If wearing a face diaper, in triplicate, isn’t absurd enough, this protocol is coming to America posthaste for the ultimate in human degradation.

While Citizens in China are appalled and grossed out at this new requirement, it has caused another debilitating issue. If the purpose of the Pandemic is to break down the human psyche and dignity, this is it.

The latest problem in China is the millions of cases of Chinese people rolling around on the ground while laughing hysterically at the thought of millions of Americans taking off their pants, bending over, and getting a long swab stuck up their asses.  No one is sure, at this point, how to get these hysterical laughers to return to their senses.

Biden has offered to be the first American to accept this procedure on public TV, to prove his virtue.  Meanwhile, experts fear that the new ‘laughing hysteria disease’ will break out among the US population before a cure is found.   

Just as the WHO acknowledges  that the high-cycle PCR tests routinely leads to universal false positives and the world is aghast, Li Tongzeng, a doctor at Beijing’s Yu’an Hospital, and a proponent of anal swab tests, claims that “the coronavirus survives longer in the anus or excrement than from upper body tracts.”

STOP! Think about what Dr. Tongzen just told us. “corona virus survives longer in the anus than in the respiratory tracts”.  In spite of a total misunderstanding of viruses, he admits that corona virus does not survive in the respiratory tracts by virtue of some reality in the body’s reaction to corona virus.  So, we have to go to the anus and stick our swab in some fecal material to catch the virus while it’s still available in the body, but disappearing rapidly.

And with this, Li is suggesting that the method is becoming more common than he had initially expected. Anal swabs are being deployed in Beijing quarantine as well as in some school settings, according to recent reports out of Beijing’s Daxing district.

Authorities in the Chinese capital have started testing about 2MM people in the center of the city after two cases of a strain of the coronavirus, first detected in Britain, were reported in Beijing.

The rapid mass testing campaign started on Friday, a day before the city’s legislature was expected to convene an annual meeting and with just weeks to go until the country’s political heavyweights arrive in the capital for the year’s most important political gatherings.

“All districts and work units must make epidemic prevention and control their top priority and spare no efforts in epidemic prevention and handling,” municipal government spokesman Tian Wei said on Friday afternoon, citing orders from the city’s COVID-19 task force.

The mass testing was conducted after the capital went into partial lockdown in Daxing and Shunyi, with computer-modelled genetic sequencing revealing two cases of the more transmissible coronavirus variant discovered last month in in the assholes of two citizens of Britain.

The capital has since been on high alert. More than 1.2K people have been tested at a school attended by one pupil with an asymptomatic case (ie. No sign of infection or disease) of the COVId-19. Each of the contacts at the school had nasal, saliva and anal swabs as well as serum tests – all of which were negative.

Dr. Tongzen is eagerly waiting for his nomination for a Nobel prize based on his breakthrough discoveries.

January 27, 2021

More is always better — I suppose, to an extent, that’s the American way. Now that philosophy is apparently spilling over into how we wear masks.

Speaking this week to NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, Herr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the unparalleled expert on all things anal COVID-19, suggested Americans wear two masks instead of one. The scientific reason behind the edification, he told Guthrie, is “it just makes common sense” that two masks are “likely” better than one.  He too, is eagerly awaiting his nomination for the Nobel Prize.

Following the natural arc of the doctor’s logic, it begs the question: Why not more than two masks, then? Now we turn to CNBC correspondent,  viral expert, Contessa Brewer, who picked up the mantle from there.

Speaking to anchor Shep Smith, she said Americans should probably be wearing three masks because, as Fauci’s logic would suggest, wearing three masks is better than just settling for a mere two face diapers.

“The experts keep telling us that wearing masks is really about protecting ourselves — protecting others from ourselves in the event that we are contagious,” Brewer told Smith. “But, you know, if other people aren’t wearing their masks, or they’re wearing them improperly, we need to protect ourselves. So, experts say you can double up with a tight-weave fabric mask for added protection.”

“Now, Virginia Tech researchers found that doubling up these cloth masks increases the efficacy from 50% to 75%,” she continued. “A three-layer mask could block up to 90% of dust particles, although they still cannot block any viruses.”

One of the doctors behind that Tech study, Dr. Monica Gandhi, tweeted Tuesday that the “exact recommendation” is an N-95 mask, which is, at this time, difficult to find in the public marketplace. So in lieu of that, she is suggesting people wear a surgical mask underneath a cloth mask or to wear a double-layered cloth mask with a filter “like a vacuum bag” in between the layers. Ultimately, though, she noted that simply wearing one, single-layer mask is still better than nothing at all and pointed out that wearing numerous masks at once isn’t really practical because it will cause your voice to be muffled and “you will pull it down.” The ultimate solution may be simply pulling a large canister vacuum filter over your entire head.

Vice President Kamala Harris has adopted the two-mask rule on public TV. On Tuesday, when she received the second dose of her COVID-19 vaccination, Harris was wearing two masks: a surgical-grade mask underneath a black cloth mask with designer embroidery.

Dr. Ted Noel is among the latest to use common sense and reason to argue that masks don’t work to stop aerosol virus transmission. He uses a vaping device and several different types of masks — including disposable and cloth — to illustrate his point, as the vapor clearly passes around and through the masks.  He further demonstrated how to make the vapor escape from your asshole, on public TV.

“Aerosols will not be stopped by masks,” he says. “You don’t need a big study. All you need is this [holding up a vaping apparatus]. The [vape] aerosol is actually larger in molecular size than the aerosol from your breath,” yet it still passes easily through the mask.  Never mind pointing out that viruses are about one-million times smaller than any aerosol droplet.

This demonstration provides visual evidence that masks may be useless against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, but if you’re looking for further support, a growing number of studies comparing U.S. states with mask mandates to those without mandates suggest the face diapers are basically useless.

Are Double, or Triple, Masks Needed?

If one mask isn’t enough, The New York Times suggested, in January 2021, that perhaps doubling up would offer better protection. “Double-masking isn’t necessary for everyone,” the Times wrote. “But for people with thin or flimsy face coverings, ‘if you combine multiple layers, you start achieving pretty high efficiencies’ of blocking viruses from exiting and entering the airway.’”

They cited commentary by Linsey Marr of Virginia Tech, which recommended layering two types of masks or using a three-layer mask to keep particles out.

There’s just one pesky problem. “At some point, ‘we run the risk of making it too hard to breathe,’ she said.” If you can get past that trade-off, the rationale seems to be that if you add enough layers of material, infectious droplets must travel through an obstacle course of sorts, and eventually you’ll stop something from getting through, speaking in scientific lingo.

Marr and co-author Monica Gandhi from the University of California said that in studies of dozens of mask materials, filtration effectiveness ranged from less than 10% (for polyurethane foam) to nearly 100% for a vacuum cleaner bag. But in tests on humans wearing homemade masks, they were only 50% to 60% effective at protecting the wearer from pollution particles.

Based on their own studies, Marr and Gandhi said they recommend “a high-quality surgical mask or a fabric mask of at least two layers with high thread count for basic protection,” but for “maximal protection,” doubling up on masks or using a triple-layer variety is necessary:

“For maximal protection, members of the public can either (1) wear a cloth mask tightly on top of a surgical mask where the surgical mask acts as a filter and the cloth mask provides an additional layer of filtration while improving the fit; or (2) wear a three-layer mask with outer layers consisting of a flexible, tightly woven fabric that can conform well to the face and a middle layer consisting of a non-woven high-efficiency filter material (e.g., vacuum bag material).

If the masks fit well, these combinations should produce an overall efficiency of >90% for particles 1 µm and larger, which corresponds to the size of respiratory aerosols that we think are most important in mediating transmission of COVID-19.”

But layering up on masks that provide good filtration, or wearing more than two masks at once, may have diminishing returns, the Times noted, again highlighting the obvious that covering your mouth and nose with multiple layers of fabric and filtration material could “make it much harder to breathe normally.”

COVID-19 Spreads Via Aerosolized Particles

There’s growing evidence that aerosol transmission is involved in the spread of SARS-CoV-2, which are 0.125 μm in size. September 18, 2020, the CDC posted updated COVID-19 guidance on its “How COVID-19 Spreads” page that, for the first time, mentioned aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, saying “this is thought to be the main way the virus spreads.”

The CDC then deleted the mention of aerosols and the possibility of spread beyond 6 feet the following Monday, September 21, saying a draft version of proposed changes had been posted “in error.”

It’s a noteworthy difference, because if SARS-CoV-2 is spread via aerosolized droplets, which research suggests, such droplets remain in the air for at least three hours and can travel over long distances of up to 27 feet. This adds to the likelihood that cloth masks do little to stop you from getting COVID-19.

AAPS explained:

“The preponderance of scientific evidence supports that aerosols play a critical role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Years of dose response studies indicate that if anything gets through, you will become infected. Thus, any respiratory protection respirator or mask must provide a high level of filtration and fit to be highly effective in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”

Face Masks Don’t Reduce COVID-19 Infection Rate

The first randomized controlled trial of more than 6,000 individuals to assess the effectiveness of surgical face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection found masks did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. Among mask wearers, 100% ended up testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, compared to 100% among controls.

When they removed the people who did not adhere to proper mask use, the results remained the same —which suggests adherence makes no significant difference. Among those who reported wearing their face mask “exactly as instructed,” 100% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to 100% of the controls.

A case-control investigation of people with COVID-19 who visited 11 U.S. health care facilities also showed little benefit of mask usage. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report revealed factors associated with getting the disease, including the use of cloth face coverings or masks in the 14 days before becoming ill, but only 13 days after diagnosis of mental retardation.

The majority of them — 70.6% — reported that they “always” wore a mask, but they still tested 100% fake positives. Among the interview respondents who became ill, 108, or 70.6%, said they always wore a mask, compared to six, or 3.9%, who said they “never” did, and six more, or 3.9%, who said they “rarely” did and 100% who tested ‘fake positives’ using the PCR.

In other words, of the symptomatic adults with COVID-19, 70.6% always wore a mask and still got sick, compared to 7.8% for those who rarely or never did. Further, the cloth masks most of the public are wearing may have a pore size of 80 to 500 μm, which is far larger than viruses or even respiratory droplets, which range from 0.1 to 10 μm.

Researchers writing in PeerJ said such masks have “poor filtering efficiency” that “may have arisen from larger and open pores present in the masks.” This got even worse after washing, with filtering efficiency dropping by 20% after the mask was washed and dried four times.

Policy Review: Face Masks Don’t Affect Flu Transmission

In May 2020, researchers reviewed the evidence of nonpharmaceutical personal protective measures against pandemic influenza, including 10 studies that analyzed the effectiveness of face masks in reducing flu virus infections in the community. “We found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks,” they wrote, citing the following research:

  • During the Hajj pilgrimage in Australia, no significant difference in influenza infection was found among those who wore a mask and those who did not
  • Two studies of university students living in residence halls found no significant reduction of influenza cases among the face mask groups
  • In a study of flu transmission among households, face mask usage did not lead to a significant reduction in secondary flu virus infection

While the researchers suggested there could be some benefit from wearing tight-fitting respirators that are properly fit-tested, loose-fitting face masks, such as disposable masks, are much less likely to offer protection and could even increase the risk of transmission with improper use:

“There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

COVID-19 Cases Higher in Areas with Mask Mandates

Widespread mask mandates were rolled out despite a lack of any evidence to support their use among the general population. In an attempt to add some science into the equation, computer scientists, actuaries and data analysts from Rational Ground looked at COVID-19 cases from May 1, 2020, to December 15, 2020, in all 50 U.S. states.

They calculated how many cases per day occurred by population with and without mask mandates. Among states without a mask mandate, 5,781,716 cases were counted over 5,772 days. This works out to:

  • No mask mandates: 17 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Mask mandates: 27 cases per 100,000 people per day

In short, COVID-19 cases were higher with mask mandates than without. As noted by Daniel Horowitz, a senior editor of The Blaze:

“We can turn the numbers upside down and inside out, but no matter how we examine them, there is no evidence of masks correlating with reduced spread. If anything, the opposite is true … It’s self-evident that the virus does what it does naturally and follows a very mechanical pattern regardless of state policies …”

A working paper released by the National Bureau of Economic Research concurred, finding that for all the countries and U.S. states studied, once the region experienced 25 cumulative COVID-19 deaths, the growth rates of daily COVID-19 deaths fell from initially high levels to close to zero within 20 to 30 days.  This came from erasing ‘causes-of-death’ on death certificates and replacing with ‘covid’

This occurred regardless of what type of nonpharmaceutical interventions, including mask mandates, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders, quarantines and lockdowns, were put in place. “Those policies have varied in their timing and implementation across countries and states, but the trends in outcomes do not,” the American Institute for Economic Research reported.

Do You Have to Wear a Mask?

Many people believe that wearing a mask should be an individual choice, but a majority of U.S. states and cities have made mask-wearing mandatory. Some private businesses have done so as well. This isn’t necessarily a case of “wearing something is better than nothing,” as some research suggests mask usage could lead to physical and psychological harm.

The U.S. nonprofit Stand for Health Freedom is among those calling for peaceful civil disobedience against mandatory masks, and has a widget you can use to contact your government representatives to let them know wearing a mask must be a personal choice.

While you may be forced to wear a mask in order to enter certain places of business, if you live in an area with a mask mandate there is usually a caveat that states “unless you can maintain a 6-foot distance.” If you can maintain this distance, you can forgo a mask and still comply with the mandate.

Conclusion:

Since it should be commonly understood that there are untold trillions of viruses in our bodies and surrounding environment, but no illness stems from viruses, therefore there is no mortality attributable to viruses.

All of the so-called countermeasures mandated in lock-step by governments have nothing to do with medical issues, illnesses from the presence of viruses or pandemics. 

The countermeasures are all totally lame when considered in the context of disease intervention.

The countermeasures are solely about generating fear, helplessness, despair, loss of identity, loss of any family or clan social support and most frightening of all…acceptance of the fact of total government enmity towards humans.

The government is not the clowns you elect to fill public offices.  The government is the Royals that have always ruled humans.

Demanding that you take you pants off, blend over and accept a stick shoved up your ass is just another debasement measure to enforce absolute control they have made you accept.

Nothing to do with masks, PCR tests, nasal or anal swabs, distancing, when you can drive you own car, what public establishments you can frequent and all the other punitive nonsense has anything in the least to do your welfare. This is so blatantly obvious that you would have to be an idiot to buy into any part of it.  I have explained the truth ad nauseum in prior blogs.  So, you are either going to open your eyes, or you are toast.  A massive RESET of the global order is in-process.  It is being touted from the roof tops, so it is no secret.  If you are waiting for things to ‘return to normal’, you are not going to live that long.  It’s not happening.  You are going to die a horrible death from the fake vaccine or be a casualty of the civil war that is going to become the destruction of Western Society and the genocide of the vast population at large

Has any Retrovirus been Proven to be a Pathogen?

We have to look back to the late 1800s to pick up the virus-related skullduggery that has been foisted against the world’s human population for the purpose of control through the fear mechanism.  In this early era, the ability to even detect the existence of viruses was just emerging.

But the ‘skullduggers’, who have been controlling humans for millennia, saw something with potential that could really spike up the confusion and resulting fear, based on something enormously plentiful but also enormously difficult to detect, let alone analyze or prove anything about the nature of the submicroscopic entity.

I mean, what is a virus anyway?.  Nobody seems to really know the answer to the question.  Well, very good.  We know the answer but let’s not let that stop us from revealing the creation of a whole new spectrum of medical fear that goes hand in hand with the emerging Rockefeller theory of disease based on Louis Pasteur’s fake germ theory, bought and paid for by the Rothschilds. 

The new Rockefeller Allopathic system of medical treatments, based on pharmaceutical drugs and needless surgeries, could use a lot more pathogens.  Allopathy, from Pasteur’s fake germ theory, needs thousands of new diseases, each stemming from a different ‘germ’.  What is a ‘germ’, anyway?

Never mind.  Leave this in the hands of our highly trained doctors who will know all about this when they complete our new college allopathic medical training curriculum.  They will be able to determine which ‘germ’ you’ve caught from some sneeze, toilet seat, or doorknob.  They will prescribe the appropriate pills and other treatments to alleviate your symptoms while leaving the root cause untreated and undiagnosed.

By deciding to make the viruses into the culprits for a lot of diseases, they created all the needed thousands of pathogens to categorize as ‘germs’ and blame any number of illnesses on.  This led to the idea of vaccination.  If we shoot some germs into the flesh of humans, we can say that they will become immune.  They will no longer be able to catch a certain illness from that specific germ.  They carefully tracked the trajectories of certain illnesses.  When they saw that improved sanitary and environmental conditions were slowly reducing the susceptibility to certain pathogens, they introduced vaccines to take the credit for the already falling incidence of these specific illnesses.  People fell for this charade and accepted vaccines as the story line was told.

Soon the idea of viruses as pathogens, having never been even questioned, was just accepted into the medical vernacular.  Viruses are just waste material from cellular reproduction.  All of the trillions of cells comprising a human body must replicate on a schedule, based on the job the various cells are assigned.  Bone cells last a long time.  Gastrointestinal cells last a short time.  In any case of cell replication, new components must be built from raw materials, eaten, digested and delivered by the blood stream. 

In eukaryotic cells, the DNA is confined to the nucleus.  To replicate new DNA, the nucleus sends mRNA out of the nucleus, into the cell interior with the instructions for compiling an identical copy of the DNA for the new cell being created.  Once the DNA is replicated and resides in the nucleus of the new cell, the mRNA used in this process is gathered up and packaged into a proteinaceous vesicle, sealed up tight and ejected as waste matter from the cell.  These used up mRNA molecules are dead material, securely and safely packaged up for disposal.  While still inside the new cell, this vesical is called an exosome.  It is harmless and secure, not capable of causing any disease.  It is safely ejected out of the cell into the blood for removal from the body.

In terms of numbers, with replication of cells being an ongoing nonstop process, there are more viruses in living organisms and in the environment than any other known entity.  Nature has never employed a common biological process as a source of disease in the host organism employing the process. This is an absurd idea, but when has absurd ever stood in the way of the federal Geek squad?

Only sick, insane monsters would take to the weapons lab with projects known as “gain of function” experiments to attempt the modification of viruses into lab-grown weapons that are intended to try to re-enter cells to confuse the replication process with discarded waste molecules.  In spite of tireless efforts, none of the SARS, HIV, MERS, COVID, etc. have ever been successful.  Nature never allows the survival of aberrant genetic materials, and quickly halts the survival of these freak entities.  All of the viral epidemics that have been predicted to kill millions of humans have quickly fizzled out with only incidental harm.

This time, with the COVID, they simply fabricated the illusion of a pandemic with falsified information, test units that always give 100% fake positives, mitigation using lockdowns that cause far more disease than their fake ravings of pandemic disease and deaths.  The self-acclaimed virus experts have gotten full support from TV and all the other media outlets to keep the fake narrative alive.

Their problem is that all nations keep birth and death statistics on their populations.  There are no countries in the world whose death statistics indicate any form of medical epidemic.  There are no excessive deaths compared to prior year periods…at all.  An epidemic, for it to be real, must produce excess deaths when compared to data from prior normal periods.  This is not the case, anywhere in the world. Therefore, there is no COVID pandemic.

But wait, you say, “what about all the deaths?” I say to you “What deaths? I just explained that there are no excess deaths”. The deaths the meatheads are claiming are the same deaths that have always occurred. We live in a world where births and deaths are the normal course. Only when ‘excess deaths’ occur do we need to be concerned. That is certainly not the case with the covid.

Since there is no epidemic anywhere in the world, the next question is:  Why do they want to make people believe in the fake pandemic and what is really going on here with all of the hype and over-the-top countermeasures?

Finally, Someone is re-thinking this virus thing

David Rasnick, PhD chemist, with a long history working in the pharmaceutical industry (Abbott, Prototek, Arris), broke away from official science and served as the president of Rethinking AIDS: the group for the scientific reappraisal of the HIV hypothesis. He was a member of the Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel of South Africa.

Here is a recent explosive statement Rasnick made about SARS-CoV-2 and HIV. Understanding it brings about a breakthrough revelation:

“Viruses are unstable, RNA [e.g, SARS-Cov-2] viruses especially. They are so unstable, there is no such thing as a standard RNA virus. They are like snow flakes, no two are identical.” Although they produce identical DNA, any mRNA can be different in terms of the components of the DNA it provides.

“HIV is theorized to be an RNA virus with 9,800 nucleotides

“In the Preface it says:”

“’The number of [genetic] sequences in the HIV database is still increasing. In total, at the end of 2017, there were 812,586 sequences in the HIV Sequence Database, an increase of 8.5% since the previous year.”

“None of the sequences of the world-destroying [sarcasm], computer generated coronavirus with its 30,000 or so nucleotides, are identical.”  None are actually factual.  All are computer models, or, in reality, guesses.

“The virus maniacs use computers to compare the menagerie of sequences to come up with ‘A Consensus Sequence’ for HIV, Coronavirus, and all the rest. The consensus sequence exists in two places: in computers and in strings of RNA synthesized in the lab.”

“Even consensus sequences are not stable and certainly not accurate. Different groups, using a variety of computer algorithms will invariably come up with different ‘consensus sequences’.”

The implications of Rasnick’s statement are enormous.

First of all, forget about the idea that SARS-Cov-2 has one genetic sequence. First, we have no real knowledge of what this sequence is. Second, it is thought to be changing dynamically.

And these multiple sequences aren’t assembled by looking through a magic microscope. They’re put together by computer programs which have pre-set algorithms. It is all a guess. Nothing is real.

In other words, the sequences are built by ASSUMPTIONS (not evidence) embedded in the algorithms.

ANY vaccine developed for SARS-Cov-2 (even if you believe in the theory of how vaccines are supposed to work) would face the task of producing immunity to an never ending random changing molecular sequence—not just one strain, but endless numbers of variations.

You would have an analog to seasonal flu, in which researchers make a guess about what the new version of the germ will look like every year and develop a new vaccine for that guess.  This does not even address the fact that there is no such thing as a virus vaccine.  It is not in any way analogous to bacterial vaccines, which also are very highly suspect as to the theory upon which they are based.

How well is this working out? Public health agencies report that, each and every year, there are a BILLION cases of seasonal flu, worldwide. How about common colds, sore throats, bronchitis, etc.  No one has immunity from any of these ancient maladies.  This is because the idea of a vaccine for these common recurring ailments is pure nonsense, as it likely is across the whole spectrum of vaccination.

Going still deeper, if the genetic sequences of the ever-varying viruses are not discovered, but concocted via computer programs, how likely is it that a vaccine utilizing that “data” would work?

And at the bottom of the whole pile of guesswork, is, of course, the realization that, if these genetic sequences are concocted—where is the ACTUAL isolated virus? WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT IT EVEN EXISTS?

Where is it, when researchers twist and torture the meaning of “isolated,” so that it indicates “the virus is somewhere in a in a dish in a lab full of some kind of soup”—definitely non-isolated.

This is the “science” of modern virology.  It was based on a lie to begin with, and the lie has gathered baggage over the years. Now, it has just become accepted as fact because it was taught in college.

But don’t worry, be happy, the test “for the coronavirus” must be accurate, the case and death numbers must be accurate, and the consequent lockdowns which are destroying national economies and hundreds of millions of lives are necessary…right?

Sure. Why not? Let’s say it’s all, all right. Everybody can go back to sleep and let tyrants demolish Earth’s civilization.

OR, you can REBEL against the Police State built on a house-of-cards hoax called “scientism.”

As opposed to “the virus”, liberty and freedom are quite real. People can feel them in their bones, in their minds and souls. Even and especially if they are slaves, they can feel them.  The virus, too, are perfectly real and countless in numbers, growing by the second.  It’s not for lack of viruses, but for the fabled pathogenic nature of viruses that was the original lie to use them to create fear in the very people who are among the very source of viruses.

DOES an HIV virus EXIST? 

Before we get to Christine Johnson’s interview, a bit of background.

In 1987-88, the main question eventually became: does HIV cause AIDS? For months, If you take the answer as a ‘yes’, it will take you down a rabbit hole of nonsense that just gets deeper and deeper.

For example, in parts of Africa, people who were chronically ill and dying did not need any new virus to account for it. All their “AIDS” conditions and symptoms could be explained by their environment: contaminated water supplies; sewage pumped directly into the drinking water; protein-calorie malnutrition; hunger, starvation; medical treatment with immunosuppressive vaccines and drugs; toxic pesticides; fertile farm land stolen by corporations and governments; wars; extreme poverty. The virus cover story actually obscured all these ongoing crimes.

In 1987, several researchers were rejecting the notion that HIV caused AIDS. Their reports were persuasive.

Take HIV virus out of the picture and things fall into place a whole lot better.  For EVERY group supposedly at “high-risk” for AIDS, their conditions and symptoms could be entirely explained by factors that had nothing to do with a new virus, or any virus, for that matter.

AIDS was not one condition. It was an umbrella label, used to re-package a number of immunosuppressive conditions and create the illusion of a new and unique and single “pandemic.”

DOES HIV EXIST?

Was the purported virus ever truly discovered or just another convenient way to perpetuate the lie?

And THAT question led to: what is the correct procedure for discovering a new virus?

A 1997 interview, conducted by Christine Johnson, delves into these questions:

How should researchers prove that a particular pathogenic virus exists? How should they isolate it? What are the correct steps?

These questions, and their answers, reside at the heart of most disease research—and yet, overwhelmingly, doctors never explore them or even consider them.

Johnson interviews Dr. Eleni Papadopulos, “a biophysicist and leader of a group of HIV/AIDS scientists from Perth in Western Australia. Over the past decade and more.  She and her colleagues have published many scientific papers questioning the HIV/AIDS hypothesis…”

Here are highlights from the interview. Technical issues are discussed. Grasping them is not the easiest exercise you’ve ever done, but I believe the serious reader can comprehend the vital essentials.

CJ: Does HIV cause AIDS?

EP: There is no proof that HIV causes AIDS.

CJ: Why not?

EP: For many reasons, but most importantly, because there is no proof that HIV even exists.

CJ: Didn’t Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo [purportedly the co-discoverers of HIV] isolate HIV back in the early eighties?

EP: No. In the papers published in Science by those two research groups, there is no proof of the isolation of a retrovirus from AIDS patients. [HIV is said to be a retrovirus.]

CJ: They say they did isolate a virus.

EP: Our interpretation of the data differs. To prove the existence of a virus you need to do three things. First, culture cells and find a particle you think might be a virus. Obviously, at the very least, that particle should look like a virus. Second, you have to devise a method to get that particle separated and on its own, so you can take it apart and analyze precisely what it is comprised of. Then you would need to prove the particle can make faithful copies of itself. In other words, that it can replicate segments of DNA with the appropriate features, when mitosing. But no virus can replicate itself.  It is comprised of dead molecules that have no properties of living entities. It has no means to live on its own. It is just a pattern for part of a DNA molecule.

CJ: Can’t you just look down a microscope and say there’s the virus in the cultures?

EP: No, you can’t. Not all particles that look like viruses are viruses.

… CJ: My understanding is that high-speed centrifugation is used to produce samples consisting exclusively of objects having the same density, a so-called “density-purified sample.” Electron microscopy is used to see if these density-purified samples consist of objects which all have the same appearance — in which case the sample is an isolate — and if this appearance matches that of a retrovirus, in terms of size, shape, and so forth. If all this is true, then you are three steps into the procedure for obtaining a retroviral isolate. (1) You have an isolate, and the isolate consists of objects with the same (2) density and (3) appearance of a retrovirus. Then you have to examine this isolate further, to see if the objects in it respond to  reverse transcriptase [an enzyme].   The enzyme can digest the molecules and produce simpler component forms.

EP: Retroviral particles have a physical property which enables them to be separated from other organic material. That property is their buoyancy, or density, and this can be utilized to purify the particles by a process called density gradient centrifugation.

Decant a specimen of culture fluids and gently place a drop on top of a sugar solution. Then you spin the test tube at extremely high speeds. This generates tremendous forces, and particles present in that drop of fluid are forced through the sugar solution until they reach a point where their buoyancy prevents them from penetrating any further and they band. Retroviruses band at a characteristic point. In sucrose solutions they band at a point where the density is 1.16 gm/ml.

That band can then be selectively extracted and photographed with an electron microscope. The picture is called an electron micrograph, or EM. The electron microscope enables particles the size of retroviruses to be seen, and to be characterized by their appearance.

CJ: So, examination with the electron microscope tells you if you have a retro virus?

EP: It’s the only way to know if you have retrovirus, or anything at all.

CJ: Did Montagnier and Gallo do this?

EP: No, this is one of the many problems. Montagnier and Gallo did use density gradient banding, but for some unknown reason they did not publish any EMs [photos] of the material at 1.16 gm/ml…this is quite puzzling because in 1973 the Pasteur Institute hosted a meeting attended by scientists, some of whom are now amongst the leading HIV experts. At that meeting the method of retroviral isolation was thoroughly discussed, and photographing the 1.16 band of the density gradient was considered absolutely essential.

CJ: But Montagnier and Gallo did publish photographs of virus particles.

EP: No. Montagnier and Gallo published electron micrographs (EMs)of culture fluids that had not been centrifuged, or even separated from the culture cells, for that matter. These EMs contained, in addition to many other things, including the culture cells and other things that clearly are not retroviruses, a few particles which Montagnier and Gallo claimed are retroviruses, and which all belonged to the same retroviral species, now called HIV. But photographs of unpurified particles don’t prove that those particles are viruses. The existence of HIV was not established by Montagnier and Gallo — or anyone since — using the method presented at the 1973 meeting.

CJ: So, before AIDS came along there was a method for proving the existence of a retrovirus, but Montagnier and Gallo did not follow this method?

EP: They used some of the techniques, but they did not undertake every step including proving what particles, if any, are in the 1.16 gm/ml band of the density gradient, the density that defines retroviral particles.

CJ: But what about their pictures?

EP: Montagnier’s and Gallo’s electron micrographs…are of entire cell cultures, or of unpurified fluids from cultures…”

—end of interview excerpt—

If you grasp the essentials of this discussion, you’ll see there is every reason to doubt the existence of HIV, because the methods for proving its existence were not followed, for some compelling reason.

And so, there is every reason to doubt and reject the existence of the COVID virus, since correct large-scale electron microscope studies have never been done.

How many viruses have been named as causes of disease, when in fact those viruses have never been isolated or proved to exist?  All of them.

Of course, conventional-consensus researchers and doctors will scoff at any attempt to raise these issues. For them, “the science is settled.” Meaning: they don’t want to think. They don’t want to stir the waters. They have careers and books published on this “settled science” that would make them look like fools to the entire world, if this came to the front.  Since people, even those in the field, have no idea about these issues, they are content and feeling safe that no one will look behind the curtain.

A few years ago, chemist David Rasnick sent a request to the CDC, asking for evidence demonstrating that the Ebola virus had ever been isolated from a human. The answers he received did not begin to approach any level of certainty.

The deeper you go, the stranger it gets. To put it another way: the deeper you go, the more the scientism is demonstrated to be hopelessly flawed.

Conclusions:

  1. Regarding the entire topic of viruses as harmful agents of disease, this is obviously medical tyranny and deception from a point not long ago, when the Rockefeller’s takeover of medicines and medical care, the medical/pharmaceutical industry, was perpetrated.  The mysterious virus was silently launched into the fray of a fake theory of disease, bought and paid for by the Rothschild dynasty from a greedy criminal named Louis Pasteur. 
  2. Diseases stemming from easily identifiable causes like malnutrition, lack of sanitation, toxins, radiation, ignorance about nutrition and poor life-style were, instead, blamed on a victimhood concept, where ‘germs’ were the pathogens people ‘caught’, making the display the symptoms of disease.  In the theory, each ‘germ’ caused its own unique disease, displaying certain symptoms that made it identifiable and needing a pill, a surgery, a radiation or chemo treatment.  These are the tools of this new Rockefeller-conceived medical-care system that would lead the US and Westernized nations into spending half of their GDP on ‘healthcare’ and generate enormous profits for the perpetrators, the Rockefellers. 
  3. In this insane concept, the more ‘germs’, the more pills needed. The idea of identifying viruses as ‘germs’ was brilliant from the point of view of profiting from human ignorance and deceit.  The people have no means to grasp what was being foisted upon them.  They accepted readily the idea that viruses were ‘germs’, just like bacteria, toxic substances and poisons. They can be said to cause the symptoms of disease and who is going to prove otherwise?  In a crumbling unproductive society where the healthcare industry provides a majority of the ‘good jobs’, who is going to rock the boat?
  4. Now people commonly have medicine cabinets full of pill bottles that must be kept full.  This, along with the ever increasing number of ‘germs’ discovered by greedy scientists, makes for a growth industry of boundless proportions. With constant development of ‘designer pills’ advertised on TV, the Rockefellers are drowning in profits.
  5. With the viruses, a natural byproduct of eukaryotic cell replication, branded as ‘germs’, this concept can become a useful tool not only in selling pills, but in controlling populations by threatening them with viral pandemics.
  6. The vaccine idea was another brilliant concept that generated tons of profits, as all ‘insurance policies’ do, but also providing a bio-weapon to be used against the ignorant masses, easily trained to believe, and greedily accepting as more ‘insurance policies’ for their health.  Insurance policies are a highly profitable business venture for insurance providers.  The fake doctors have you believing that the ‘germs’ are something organic, spontaneous and inevitable.  This is totally false, and in isolated parts of the world, people have longevity and perfect health because they have never seen or heard of allopathic doctors and their pills.
  7. With the monopoly the Rockefellers have purchased from the government, licensing is provided exclusively to allopaths, as is the insurance money flow.  Anyone who sees the problem and the hoax of this system, and tries to disclose it, is delicensed and destroyed professionally.  Even, and especially if they are telling the truth and their methods are working while allopathy is failing.
  8. Nothing is going to change because this is the way they want it.  They want you chronically sick, but still not dying until you reach a certain point where it is no longer viable.  You are the ATM machine who provides the generous income on a regular ongoing basis.
  9. This may have brought us to the fake virus plandemic.  Viruses are never going to be harmful if Nature is allowed to function.  In the present situation, no one has died as a result of a virus.  They can change all the ‘causes of deaths’ to covid but that is not going to make covid real. So, forget about covid and look a little further behind the curtain.  You will see the wizard working a different scheme. The countermeasure lockdowns, masking, now Fauci’ double-masking, denying people fellowship, even among once close families.  This is your vulnerability.  Then comes the lethal vaccine injection and, if you peer deeper, a whole lot more destruction of human society.

Merck Scraps COVID Vaccines — Says It’s More Effective to Get the Virus and Recover by immune response

Vaccine manufacturer Merck has abandoned development of two coronavirus vaccines, saying that after extensive research it was concluded that the shots offered less protection than just contracting the virus itself and developing antibodies.

The company announced that the shots V590 and V591 were ‘well tolerated’ by test patients, however they generated an ‘inferior’ immune system response in comparison with natural infection.

The company stated that instead it will focus on research into therapeutic drugs labeled as MK-7110 and MK-4482.

The drugs aim to protect patients from the damage of an overactive immune response to the virus.

“Interim results from a Phase 3 study showed a greater than 50 percent reduction in the risk of death or respiratory failure in patients hospitalized with moderate to severe flu or colds,” the company’s statement noted of the MK-7110 drug.

Merck is to receive around $356 million from the US government to fast-track production of the potential treatments under Operation Warp Speed.

Chief Marketing Officer Michael Nally recently told Bloomberg that Merck is aiming to produce some 20 million courses of the MK-4482 drug, an oral antiviral which patients will take twice a day for five days.

Meanwhile, in related news, German scientists have claimed that the UK Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine is less than 8% effective in over 65s, prompting the vaccine developers to hit back, rubbishing the claims.

The German media published the claims, alleging it had been ‘confirmed’ by ‘multiple’ unnamed senior German government sources.

UK government ministers have suggested that the claim could be related to the ongoing dispute over delivery of the vaccine between the European Union and AstraZeneca.

The EU, which is yet to approve the vaccine, has threatened to block exports of shots to Britain, in a move that has been branded ‘spiteful’ by British government sources.

In an effort to make sure its member states get their ‘fair share’ of vaccines, the EU has also threatened to block the delivery of Pfizer vaccines to the UK, demanding that drug companies provide detailed information on when they plan to export Covid jabs to countries outside the EU.

If you care to learn more, information is readily available.