US COVID Deaths In 2021 Have Surpassed 2020’s Total… Despite Vaccines and other meaningless countermeasures

The scamdemic has killed more people in 2021 than 2020.  The vaxx’s were claimed to be capable of mitigating this situation. Why are the vaxx’s killing instead of immunizing, when Fauci and the CDC claim they are so efficacious?

The virus was reported as the underlying cause of death (or a contributing cause of death) for an estimated 377,883 people in 2020, accounting for 11.3% of deaths, according to the CDC. As of Monday, more than 770,000 people have died from the coronavirus, according to Johns Hopkins University data. That means over 15,000 more people have died in 2021 than 2020 from COVID-19 – and there’s still more than a month left.

This has happened despite the fact that last year no Americans were vaccinated (now 59% of all eligible Americans have had the “miracle” jab) and some 17% have received booster shots.  And deaths are rapidly increasing, not decreasing.

The 2021 U.S. death toll caught some doctors by surprise. They had expected vaxxinations and precautionary measures like social distancing and scaled-down public events to curb the spread of infections and minimize severe cases, or so they claim.  But, The Wall Street Journal has its own explanation, suggesting lower-than-expected immunization rates as well as fatigue with precautionary measures like masks allowed the highly contagious Delta variant to spread, largely among the unvaccinated, epidemiologists say. It is safe to say that the WSJ is totally ignorant on the subject, yet anxious to publish its false speculations.  Variants can only exist if there is something from which to vary.  In this case, no covid19 virus has been shown to even exist.  Therefore, no variant can exist.

Among missteps, Dr.Abraar Karan, an infectious-diseases doctor at Stanford University, said, public-health officials failed to effectively communicate that the purpose of vaccines is to protect against severe cases of Covid-19 rather than to prevent the spread of infection entirely, which may have led some to doubt the effectiveness of the shots.  This statement, as I recall, is the exact opposite of the claims made by CDC and vaxx makers at the time.  They all claimed that the vaxx was only going to work for mild cases. No attempt was even being made, at that time, to address the more severe cases.  I think it is safe to say that, with the fake PCR tester, there were, in fact, close to zero cases, and any that existed were just common cold and flu.  Recall the survival rate, even in the face of the manufactured crisis, was officially 99.7% across the spectrum.

CDC has an excuse too, claiming that there was a larger undercount of Covid-19 deaths in 2020, when the disease was newer and a scarcity of tests made confirming some infections difficult.  This is patently ridiculous, as the PCR was yielding 97% false positive cases for hundreds of millions of humans…no symptoms even being necessary.

Deaths remain concentrated in older people (81% of 2020 deaths were among people aged 65 and above, and 69% of the same cohort in 2021).  This, of course, is due to the massive campaign that was mounted against the elderly, who were ‘sitting ducks’, locked away in their elder-care facilities, defenseless and unable to escape or recruit any help.

The disaster here is that the mounting death rates are just the tip of the iceberg.  These deaths stem from the vaxxine itself.  Those receiving the vaxxine are being poisoned outright by squirting large doses of graphene oxide into the blood streams of the victims.  Often, these injections cause relatively immediate adverse reactions and deaths.  Because of arbitrary senseless rules instituted by the CDC, “vaxxination” does not take place until 14 days after the final jab in the multi-jab protocols. Those frequent deaths and adverse reactions are recorded as being among the “unvaxx’d”.  Obviously, this makes the vaxx appear much safer and heaps unwarranted negative statistics on the unvaxx’d.

Cases confirmed by Defective PCR

“The vaxxine is not a panacea,” said Ana Bento, an epidemiologist at Indiana University-Bloomington. More appropriately, the vaxxine is the nightmare.

Well, that’s pretty clear now, The vaxxine itself is the pandemic.  It is the only active pathogen that is killing people in ever increasing numbers.  This trend will become clearer and more undeniable as the time passes, and the deaths exponentially increase.

This is exactly how it was supposed to happen all along.

CDC Study: Double Jabbed Dying at 6x Higher Rate Than the Unvaxxed

Technocrats have apparently taken control of the death rate, exposing their agenda of population reduction. The number of vax-related deaths is soaring to genocidal proportions and not even a whole year has passed since the massive shot campaign started. And yet, there is no talk about halting these FDA unapproved shots.

> Recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics reveals people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are dying from all causes at a rate six times higher than the unvaxxinated

> In the U.S., meanwhile, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is propping up the official narrative with two manipulated studies — one suggesting the jab reduces all-cause mortality, and another claiming the shot is five times more protective than natural immunity

> Both studies are of questionable quality and have several problems, including selection of time and date ranges that allow them to pretend that the COVID shots are safer and more effective than they really are

> According to all-cause mortality statistics, the number of Americans who died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018 (the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality) and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaxxination, or are people dying at increased rates because of the COVID jabs?

> CDC data reveal that while the number of hospitalized patients with natural immunity fell sharply over the summer, when the delta variant took over, the number of vaxxinated people being hospitalized soared, from three per month on average during the spring to more than 100 a month in late summer. Since these vaxxinated patients were less than six months from their second dose, they should have been at or near maximum immunity

While recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics (ONS) reveal people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are dying from all causes at a rate six times higher than the unvaxxinated, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is propping up the official narrative with a “study” that came to the remarkable conclusion that the COVID shot unbelievably reduces your risk of dying from all causes, which includes accidents (but excluding COVID-19-related deaths). As reported by CNN Health, October 22, 2021.

“The research team was trying to demonstrate that the three authorized Covid-19 vaxxines are safe and they say their findings clearly demonstrate that. ‘Recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Janssen vaxxines had lower non-COVID-19 mortality risk than did the unvaxxinated comparison groups,’ the researchers wrote in the weekly report of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The team studied 6.4 million people who had been vaxxinated against Covid-19 and compared them to 4.6 million people who had received flu shots in recent years but who had not been vaxxinated against coronavirus.

They filtered out anyone who had died from Covid-19 or after a recent positive coronavirus test … People who got two doses of Pfizer vaxxines were 34% as likely to die of non-coronavirus causes in the following months as unvaxxinated people, the study found.

People who got two doses of Moderna vaxxine were 31% as likely to die as unvaxxinated people, and those who got Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaxxine were 54% as likely to die …”

Two key takeaways from those paragraphs are:

 1) the researchers admit they intended to demonstrate that the shots are safe and effective, and stats can be manipulated to find what you want to find.

 2) people who got the Janssen shot did in fact have a higher death rate than the unvaxxinated (54% likelihood, compared to the unvaxxed).

Are the Shots Reducing All-Cause Mortality?

The researchers hypothesize that people who get the COVID jab may be healthier overall than those who abstain, and have healthier lifestyles. In my view, this is classic Orwellian doublespeak, as most of the brainwashed don’t understand the fundamentals of healthy behavior.

I suspect their new propaganda has more to do with the fact that they only looked at data through May 31, 2021. By mid-April, an estimated 31% of American adults had received one or more shots.5 As of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaxxinated.” So, we can assume that by the end of May, somewhere in the neighborhood of 45% of eligible Americans were double jabbed, give or take a couple of percentage points.

The reason I suspect statistical tomfoolery is because this is precisely how the CDC invented the “pandemic of the unvaxxinated” myth, where they claimed 99% of COVID-19 deaths and 95% of COVID-related hospitalizations were occurring among the unvaxxinated.

To achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021, a timeframe during which the vaxxinated were still in a minority.

Here, we again see them use a seven-month span of time when vaxxination rates were low. More importantly, however, is that the chosen cutoff date also obscures a rapid rise in vaccine-related deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

Look at the graph below, obtained from OpenVAERS. Mortality reports page, as you can see, reports of deaths following the COVID jab peaked right at the beginning of April 2021, then dropped down again during the month of April. Interestingly enough, the study notes that the daily vaxxination rate has declined by 78% since April 13, 2021.

However, while the daily vaxxination rate has plummeted since April, reported deaths have remained high and relatively steady. Could this be a hint that people are dying from shots they received earlier in the year?

Yes, it could.  The deadly nature of the vaxx is that the graphene oxide that causes the blood clotting works very slowly.  The worst is not over in the time following the jab, the worst is still in development and coming in the future approximately two years.

As of January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot, so comparing death rates of the vaxxed and unvaxxed in December 2020 and January 2021 may not be all that meaningful. Why not include July, August and September in the analysis instead?

As you can see, reported deaths were significantly elevated during these months, compared to December and January. And, while not shown in that graph, between September 3, 2021, and October 22, 2021, the total cumulative reported death toll shot up from 7,662 to 17,619. In other words, it more than doubled in about seven weeks — a timeframe that was suspiciously ommitted in the CDC’s analysis.

What’s more, while the study was large and socio-demographically diverse, the authors admit that “the findings might not be applicable to the general population.”

Also, recall they changed the definition of “vaxxinated” to include someone who is two weeks past their second dose (for two dose regimens). This would obfuscate the truth as there were tens of millions that received one jab or more but were not considered “vaxxinated.”

Why Is All-Cause Mortality Higher in 2021?

According to all-cause mortality statistics, the number of Americans who died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018, the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality, and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted for population growth of about 0.6% annually, the mortality rate in 2021 is 16% above the average and 14% above the 2018 rate.

The obvious question is, why did more people die in 2021 (January through August) despite the rollout of COVID shots in December 2020? Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaxxination, or are people dying at increased rates because of the COVID jabs?  The incidence of deaths from these jabs have mostly not occurred yet, due to the way the graphene oxide blood clotting works slowly, at first, but keeps evolving until death at a later date.  It’s not over, it’s just getting started.

In a two-part series, Matthew Crawford of the Rounding the Earth Newsletter examined mortality statistics before and after the rollout of the COVID shots. In Part 1, he revealed the shots killed an estimated 1,018 people per million doses administered (note, this is doses, not the number of individuals vaxxinated) during the first 30 days of the European vaxxination campaign.

Between 800,000 and 2 million so-called ‘COVID-19 deaths’ are, in fact, COVID vaxxine-induced deaths.

After adjusting for deaths categorized as COVID-19 deaths, he came up with an estimate of 200 to 500 deaths per million doses administered. With 4 billion doses having been administered around the world, that means 800,000 to 2 million so-called “COVID-19 deaths” may in fact be vaxxine-induced deaths.

As explained by Crawford:

“This does not even include vaxxine-induced deaths that have not been recorded as COVID cases, though I suspect that latter number is smaller since the only good way to hide the vaccine mortality signal is to smuggle deaths through the already-established COVID death toll.”

Corroborating Crawford’s calculations are data from Norway, where 23 deaths were reported following the COVID jab at a time when only 40,000 Norwegians had received the shot. That gives us a mortality rate of 575 deaths per million doses administered. What’s more, after conducting autopsies on 13 of those deaths, all 13 were determined to be linked to the COVID jab and all are at early incubation, meaning the deaths are coming in the future.

Is the COVID Jab Responsible for Excess Deaths?

Crawford goes on to look at data from countries that have substantial vaxxine uptake while simultaneously having very low rates of COVID-19. This way, you can get a better idea as to whether the COVID jabs might be responsible for the excess deaths, as opposed to the covid itself.  Keep in mind that covid has never yet, to this day, been shown to even exist.

He identified 23 countries that fit these criteria, accounting for 1.88 billion individuals, roughly one-quarter of the global population. Before the COVID jabs rolled out, these nations reported a total of 103.2 COVID-related deaths per million residents. Five nations had more than 200 COVID deaths per million while seven had fewer than 10 deaths per million.

As of August 1, 2021, 25.35% of inhabitants in these 23 nations had received a COVID jab and 10.36% were considered fully vaxxinated. In all, 673 million doses had been administered. Based on these data, Crawford estimates the excess death rate per million vaccine doses is 411, well within the window of the 200 to 500 range he calculated in Part 1.

Another interesting data dive was performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. In the video “Vaxxine Secrets: COVID Crisis,” he argues that VAERS can be used to determine causality, and shows how the VAERS data indicate more than 300,000 Americans have likely been killed by the COVID shots. Anywhere from 2 million to 5 million have also been injured by them in some way and will die at a future date.

What Do the VAERS Data Tell Us?

In a September 18, 2021, interview with The Covexit podcast, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., who holds degrees in applied mathematics, immunology, computational biology, molecular biology and biochemistry, also discussed what the VAERS data tell us about the safety of the COVID shots.

Rose covers issues such as the magnitude of the side effects compared to other vaxxination programs, the problem of under-reporting, and how causality can be assessed using the Bradford Hill Criteria. Here’s a summary of some of the key points made in this interview:

  • Between 2011 and 2020, the number of VAERS reports ranged between 25,408 and 49,412 for all vaxxines. In 2021, with the rollout of the COVID shots, the number of VAERS reports shot up to 521,667, as of September 3, 2021, for the COVID shots alone. (Fast-forward to October 22, 2021, and the report tally for COVID-related adverse events has ballooned to 837,593.20)
  • Between 2011 and 2020, the total number of deaths reported to VAERS ranged between 120 and 183. In 2021, as of September 3, the reported death toll had shot up to 7,662. As of October 22, 2021, the death toll was 17,619.
  • Cardiovascular, neurological and immunological adverse events are all being reported at rates never even remotely seen before.
  • The estimated under-reporting factor (URF) is 31. Using this URF, the death toll from COVID shots is calculated to be 205,809 as of August 27, 2021; Bell’s palsy 81,747; herpes zoster infection 149,017; paresthesia 305,660; covid-vaxx disease (breakthrough COVID) 365,955; myalgia 528,457; life threatening events 230,113; permanent disabilities 212,691; birth defects 7,998.
  • The Bradford Hill Criteria for causation are all satisfied. This includes but is not limited to strength of effect size, reproducibility, specificity, temporality, dose-response relationship, plausibility, coherence and reversibility.

CDC Claims COVID Jab Beats Natural Immunity

If you think the CDC’s claim that the COVID jab lowers all-cause mortality is a low point in its irrational vaccine push, prepare to let your expectations sink even lower, with even more egregious Orwellian doublespeak implementation. October 29, 2021, the CDC released yet another study, this one claiming the COVID jab actually offers five times better protection against COVID-19 than natural immunity. As reported by Alex Berenson in an October 30, 2021, Substack article:

“Yesterday the Centers for Disease Control, America’s not-at-all-politicized public health agency, released a new study purporting to show that vaxxination protects against COVID infection better than natural immunity. Of course, a wave of stories about the benefits of mRNA vaccination followed.

To do this, the CDC used some magic statistical analysis to turn inside raw data that actually showed almost four times as many fully vaccinated people being hospitalized with Covid as those with natural immunity — and FIFTEEN TIMES as many over the summer. I kid you not.

Further, the study runs contrary to a much larger paper from Israeli researchers in August. As my 2-year-old likes to say, How dey do dat? Well, the Israeli study drew on a meaningful dataset in a meaningful way to reach meaningful conclusions.

It counted infections (and hospitalizations) in a large group of previously infected people against an equally large and balanced group of vaxxinated people, then made moderate adjustments for clearly defined risk factors.

It found that vaxxinated people were 13 times as likely to be infected — and 7 times as likely to be hospitalized — as unvaxxinated people with natural immunity. In contrast — how do I put this politely? — the CDC study is meaningless gibberish that would never have been published if the agency did not face huge political pressure to get people vaccinated right now.”

Data Manipulation Is Apparently a CDC Specialty

Berenson goes on to dissect the study in question, starting with its design, which he calls “bizarre.” The CDC analysts looked at data from 200,000 Americans hospitalized with “COVID-like” illness between January and August 2021 in nine states. Two groups were then compared:

  1. Those who had confirmed COVID at least 90 days before and received another COVID test at the time of their hospitalization
  2. Those who had been fully vaxxinated for at least 90 days, but not more than 180 days, before their admittance and received another COVID test at the time of their hospitalization

Berenson points out what I stressed earlier, which is that choosing certain time or date ranges will allow you to make the shots appear a whole lot better than they actually are. Here, by choosing a 90- to 180-day inclusion range, they’re looking at a best-case scenario, as we now know the graphene oxide has only just begun the blood clotting process and can require up to two years to bring about death.

The 90-day criterion also ends up excluding the vast majority of patients hospitalized with COVID-vaxx disease illness, both vaxxinated and unvaxxinated. While Berenson doesn’t address the vaxxinated, few if any could have been fully vaxxinated for at least 90 days prior to March, so why include January and February? Just about everyone was by definition unvaxxinated at that time.

As for those with natural immunity, only 1,020 of the 200,000 patients hospitalized between January and August had a previously documented COVID infection. As noted by Berenson:

“Given the fact that at least 20% of Americans, had had COVID flu by the spring of 2021, this is a strikingly small percentage — and certainly doesn’t suggest COVID is much of a threat.”

Of the 1,020 with natural immunity, only 89 tested positive for COVID, while 324 of the 6,328 vaccinated patients who met the study criteria tested positive. Keep in mind that the tests are the PCR device that has been acknowledged to yield almost 100% false positives. Of note here is two things:

1) There were more vaxxinated patients hospitalized for COVID-like illness than those with natural immunity; this despite including months when vaxxination rates were in the fractional and single digits, and

2) A greater number of vaxxinated patients tested positive for covid-vaxx disease  (breakthrough infection) than patients with natural immunity

Hospitalization Rate Among Vaxxinated Is Soaring

Berenson continues:

“And the CDC didn’t have, or didn’t publish, figures on how many people were actually in the two groups … Instead, it compared the PERCENTAGE OF POSITIVE TESTS in the two groups. But why would the percentage of positive tests matter, when we don’t know how many people were actually at risk? …  And here we go again with the severally faulty PCR tester that produces meaningless fake positives cases, which is how the entire scamdemic was launched.

Amazingly, the statistical manipulation then got even worse. The natural immunity group had an 8.7% positive test rate. The fully vaxxinated group had a 5.1% positive test rate. So, the natural immunity group was about 1.7 times as likely to test positive. (1.7x 5.1 = about 8.7.), using the defective PCR.

With such a small number of people in the natural immunity group, that raw ‘rate ratio’ may well have failed to reach statistical significance. (We don’t know, because the CDC didn’t provide an unadjusted odds ratio with 95% boundaries — something I have never seen before in any paper.)

Instead, the CDC provided only a risk ratio that it had adjusted with a variety of factors, including ‘facility characteristics [and] sociodemographic characteristics.’

And finally, the CDC’s researchers got a number that they could publish — hospitalized people who had previously been infected were five times as likely to have a positive COVID test as people who were fully vaxxinated. Never mind that there were actually four times as many people in the second group. Science! And  never mind that the tests were based on the PCR again, giving totally erroneous data.

By the way, buried at the bottom of report is some actual data. And it’s bad. The CDC divided the hospitalizations into pre- and post-Delta — January through June and June through August.

Interestingly, the number of hospitalized people with natural immunity actually fell sharply over the summer, as Delta took off. About 14 people per month were hospitalized in the winter and spring, compared to six per month from June through August. (Remember, this is a large sample, with hospitals in nine states.)

But the number of VAXXINATED people being hospitalized soared — from about three a month during the spring to more than 100 a month during the Delta period. Keep in mind that the ‘delta’ is just a hypothetical idea.  If you can not demonstrate the existence of the covid19, than you certainly cannot demonstrate the existence of the delta.  The delta is only fear mongering based on a desperate need to ramp up the fear-factor. These vaxxinated people still were less than 180 days from their second dose, so they should not be considered vaxx’d by the CDC’s own rules.   

Perhaps Rep. Thomas Massie said it best when he tweeted:

“What do ‘road kill’ and a CDC sponsored COVID paper have in common? By the third day, they’re so picked apart they’re unrecognizable. This CDC Director is shameless for fabricating junk science with findings that stand in stark contrast to every credible academic study.”

Massie goes on to point out some obvious flaws and questions raised by the study, including the following:

  • The authors failed to verify recovery among those with previous infection, so any number of these “reinfections” may actually have been long-COVID flu.
  • The fact that more than 6,000 hospitalized for COVID symptoms were vaxxinated, compared to just 1,000 with previous infection, counters the claim that 99% of COVID hospitalizations are unvaxxinated.
  • The number of vaxxinated people hospitalized for COVID flu symptoms correlate negatively with the time since vaxxination; 3,625 were hospitalized within 90 to 119 days of vaxxination, 2,101 within 120 to 149 days, and 902 within 150 to 179 days of vaxxination. “Could initial hospitalizations be due to vaxxne adverse effects or due to a temporarily weakened immune system from the vaxxine?” Massey asks.
  • The study only considered those with natural immunity who ended up in the hospital, and not the ones who didn’t get sick nor hospitalized. “Natural immunity helps prevent hospitalization!” Massey says.

Massie also notes that this paper, which is only six pages long, has an astounding 50 authors, and at least half a dozen of them disclose Big Pharma conflicts of interest. What’s more, seeing how Congress gave the CDC a cool $1 billion to promote the COVID jab, isn’t working for the CDC a conflict of interest as well?

Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician and epidemiologist in the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, also critiqued the study in a tweet, saying:

“This CDC study has a major statistical flaw, and the 5x conclusion is wrong, it implicitly assumes that hospitalized respiratory patients are representative of the population, which they are not. Trying to connect with authors.”

Natural Immunity Is the Best Answer

Try as the CDC might to twist the data, there’s really no question that natural immunity is superior and more permanent than vaxxine-induced immunity, which is far, far from being demonstrated. This is also a long-held medical fact that has been tossed aside as too inconvenient to matter in COVID-19.

For some undisclosed reason, the government is desperate for everyone to get the COVID injection, whether medically warranted or not. The sheer lunacy of that is cause enough to be leery and hold off on getting the risky jab. I can tell you one thing, this policy has nothing to do with safeguarding public health, because it’s driving public health in the wrong direction.

It’s quite clear that the way out of this pandemic is through natural immunity, and at this point, we know there’s no reason to fear COVID-19. Overall, its lethality is on par with the common flu. Provided you’re not in a nursing home or have multiple comorbidities, your chances of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.74%, on average.

The reported rate of death from COVID-19 shots in VAERS, on the other hand, exceeds the reported death rate of more than 70 vaxxines combined over the past 30 years, and if you are injured by a COVID shot and live in the U.S., your only recourse is to apply for compensation from the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Act (CICP).

Compensation from CICP is very limited and hard to get. You only qualify if your injury requires hospitalization and results in significant disability and/or death, and even if you meet the eligibility criteria, it requires you to use up your private health insurance before it kicks in to pay the difference.

There’s no reimbursement for pain and suffering, only lost wages and unpaid medical bills. Salary compensation is of limited duration, and capped at $50,000 a year, and the CICP’s decision cannot be appealed.

For a taste of what life is like for those injured by these shots, review some of the cases reported to nomoresilence.world. You can also learn more about the potential mechanisms of harm in Stephanie Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of Vaxxines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh.

Technocrats have apparently taken control of the death rate, exposing their agenda of population reduction. The number of vax-related deaths is soaring to genocidal proportions and not even a whole year has passed since the massive shot campaign started. And yet, there is no talk about halting these FDA unapproved shots.

> Recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics reveals people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are dying from all causes at a rate six times higher than the unvaxxinated

> In the U.S., meanwhile, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is propping up the official narrative with two manipulated studies — one suggesting the jab reduces all-cause mortality, and another claiming the shot is five times more protective than natural immunity

> Both studies are of questionable quality and have several problems, including selection of time and date ranges that allow them to pretend that the COVID shots are safer and more effective than they really are

> According to all-cause mortality statistics, the number of Americans who died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018 (the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality) and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaxxination, or are people dying at increased rates because of the COVID jabs?

> CDC data reveal that while the number of hospitalized patients with natural immunity fell sharply over the summer, when the delta variant took over, the number of vaxxinated people being hospitalized soared, from three per month on average during the spring to more than 100 a month in late summer. Since these vaxxinated patients were less than six months from their second dose, they should have been at or near maximum immunity

While recent data from the U.K. Office of National Statistics (ONS) reveal people who have been double jabbed against COVID-19 are dying from all causes at a rate six times higher than the unvaxxinated, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is propping up the official narrative with a “study” that came to the remarkable conclusion that the COVID shot unbelievably reduces your risk of dying from all causes, which includes accidents (but excluding COVID-19-related deaths). As reported by CNN Health, October 22, 2021.

“The research team was trying to demonstrate that the three authorized Covid-19 vaxxines are safe and they say their findings clearly demonstrate that. ‘Recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, or Janssen vaxxines had lower non-COVID-19 mortality risk than did the unvaxxinated comparison groups,’ the researchers wrote in the weekly report of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The team studied 6.4 million people who had been vaxxinated against Covid-19 and compared them to 4.6 million people who had received flu shots in recent years but who had not been vaxxinated against coronavirus.

They filtered out anyone who had died from Covid-19 or after a recent positive coronavirus test … People who got two doses of Pfizer vaxxines were 34% as likely to die of non-coronavirus causes in the following months as unvaxxinated people, the study found.

People who got two doses of Moderna vaxxine were 31% as likely to die as unvaxxinated people, and those who got Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen vaxxine were 54% as likely to die …”

Two key takeaways from those paragraphs are:

 1) the researchers admit they intended to demonstrate that the shots are safe and effective, and stats can be manipulated to find what you want to find.

 2) people who got the Janssen shot did in fact have a higher death rate than the unvaxxinated (54% likelihood, compared to the unvaxxed).

Are the Shots Reducing All-Cause Mortality?

The researchers hypothesize that people who get the COVID jab may be healthier overall than those who abstain, and have healthier lifestyles. In my view, this is classic Orwellian doublespeak, as most of the brainwashed don’t understand the fundamentals of healthy behavior.

I suspect their new propaganda has more to do with the fact that they only looked at data through May 31, 2021. By mid-April, an estimated 31% of American adults had received one or more shots.5 As of June 15, 48.7% were fully “vaxxinated.” So, we can assume that by the end of May, somewhere in the neighborhood of 45% of eligible Americans were double jabbed, give or take a couple of percentage points.

The reason I suspect statistical tomfoolery is because this is precisely how the CDC invented the “pandemic of the unvaxxinated” myth, where they claimed 99% of COVID-19 deaths and 95% of COVID-related hospitalizations were occurring among the unvaxxinated.

To achieve those statistics, the CDC included hospitalization and mortality data from January through June 2021, a timeframe during which the vaxxinated were still in a minority.

Here, we again see them use a seven-month span of time when vaxxination rates were low. More importantly, however, is that the chosen cutoff date also obscures a rapid rise in vaccine-related deaths reported to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

Look at the graph below, obtained from OpenVAERS. Mortality reports page, as you can see, reports of deaths following the COVID jab peaked right at the beginning of April 2021, then dropped down again during the month of April. Interestingly enough, the study notes that the daily vaxxination rate has declined by 78% since April 13, 2021.

However, while the daily vaxxination rate has plummeted since April, reported deaths have remained high and relatively steady. Could this be a hint that people are dying from shots they received earlier in the year?

Yes, it could.  The deadly nature of the vaxx is that the graphene oxide that causes the blood clotting works very slowly.  The worst is not over in the time following the jab, the worst is still in development and coming in the future approximately two years.

As of January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a COVID shot, so comparing death rates of the vaxxed and unvaxxed in December 2020 and January 2021 may not be all that meaningful. Why not include July, August and September in the analysis instead?

As you can see, reported deaths were significantly elevated during these months, compared to December and January. And, while not shown in that graph, between September 3, 2021, and October 22, 2021, the total cumulative reported death toll shot up from 7,662 to 17,619. In other words, it more than doubled in about seven weeks — a timeframe that was suspiciously ommitted in the CDC’s analysis.

What’s more, while the study was large and socio-demographically diverse, the authors admit that “the findings might not be applicable to the general population.”

Also, recall they changed the definition of “vaxxinated” to include someone who is two weeks past their second dose (for two dose regimens). This would obfuscate the truth as there were tens of millions that received one jab or more but were not considered “vaxxinated.”

Why Is All-Cause Mortality Higher in 2021?

According to all-cause mortality statistics, the number of Americans who died between January 2021 and August 2021 is 16% higher than 2018, the pre-COVID year with the highest all-cause mortality, and 18% higher than the average death rate between 2015 and 2019. Adjusted for population growth of about 0.6% annually, the mortality rate in 2021 is 16% above the average and 14% above the 2018 rate.

The obvious question is, why did more people die in 2021 (January through August) despite the rollout of COVID shots in December 2020? Did COVID-19 raise the death toll despite mass vaxxination, or are people dying at increased rates because of the COVID jabs?  The incidence of deaths from these jabs have mostly not occurred yet, due to the way the graphene oxide blood clotting works slowly, at first, but keeps evolving until death at a later date.  It’s not over, it’s just getting started.

In a two-part series, Matthew Crawford of the Rounding the Earth Newsletter examined mortality statistics before and after the rollout of the COVID shots. In Part 1, he revealed the shots killed an estimated 1,018 people per million doses administered (note, this is doses, not the number of individuals vaxxinated) during the first 30 days of the European vaxxination campaign.

Between 800,000 and 2 million so-called ‘COVID-19 deaths’ are, in fact, COVID vaxxine-induced deaths.

After adjusting for deaths categorized as COVID-19 deaths, he came up with an estimate of 200 to 500 deaths per million doses administered. With 4 billion doses having been administered around the world, that means 800,000 to 2 million so-called “COVID-19 deaths” may in fact be vaxxine-induced deaths.

As explained by Crawford:

“This does not even include vaxxine-induced deaths that have not been recorded as COVID cases, though I suspect that latter number is smaller since the only good way to hide the vaccine mortality signal is to smuggle deaths through the already-established COVID death toll.”

Corroborating Crawford’s calculations are data from Norway, where 23 deaths were reported following the COVID jab at a time when only 40,000 Norwegians had received the shot. That gives us a mortality rate of 575 deaths per million doses administered. What’s more, after conducting autopsies on 13 of those deaths, all 13 were determined to be linked to the COVID jab and all are at early incubation, meaning the deaths are coming in the future.

Is the COVID Jab Responsible for Excess Deaths?

Most definitely.

Crawford goes on to look at data from countries that have substantial vaxxine uptake while simultaneously having very low rates of COVID-19. This way, you can get a better idea as to whether the COVID jabs might be responsible for the excess deaths, as opposed to the covid itself.  Keep in mind that covid has never yet, to this day, been shown to even exist.

He identified 23 countries that fit these criteria, accounting for 1.88 billion individuals, roughly one-quarter of the global population. Before the COVID jabs rolled out, these nations reported a total of 103.2 COVID-related deaths per million residents. Five nations had more than 200 COVID deaths per million while seven had fewer than 10 deaths per million.

As of August 1, 2021, 25.35% of inhabitants in these 23 nations had received a COVID jab and 10.36% were considered fully vaxxinated. In all, 673 million doses had been administered. Based on these data, Crawford estimates the excess death rate per million vaccine doses is 411, well within the window of the 200 to 500 range he calculated in Part 1.

Another interesting data dive was performed by Steve Kirsch, executive director of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund. In the video “Vaxxine Secrets: COVID Crisis,” he argues that VAERS can be used to determine causality, and shows how the VAERS data indicate more than 300,000 Americans have likely been killed by the COVID shots. Anywhere from 2 million to 5 million have also been injured by them in some way and will die at a future date.

What Do the VAERS Data Tell Us?

In a September 18, 2021, interview with The Covexit podcast, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., who holds degrees in applied mathematics, immunology, computational biology, molecular biology and biochemistry, also discussed what the VAERS data tell us about the safety of the COVID shots.

Rose covers issues such as the magnitude of the side effects compared to other vaxxination programs, the problem of under-reporting, and how causality can be assessed using the Bradford Hill Criteria. Here’s a summary of some of the key points made in this interview:

  • Between 2011 and 2020, the number of VAERS reports ranged between 25,408 and 49,412 for all vaxxines. In 2021, with the rollout of the COVID shots, the number of VAERS reports shot up to 521,667, as of September 3, 2021, for the COVID shots alone. (Fast-forward to October 22, 2021, and the report tally for COVID-related adverse events has ballooned to 837,593.20)
  • Between 2011 and 2020, the total number of deaths reported to VAERS ranged between 120 and 183. In 2021, as of September 3, the reported death toll had shot up to 7,662. As of October 22, 2021, the death toll was 17,619.
  • Cardiovascular, neurological and immunological adverse events are all being reported at rates never even remotely seen before.
  • The estimated under-reporting factor (URF) is 31. Using this URF, the death toll from COVID shots is calculated to be 205,809 as of August 27, 2021; Bell’s palsy 81,747; herpes zoster infection 149,017; paresthesia 305,660; covid-vaxx disease (breakthrough COVID) 365,955; myalgia 528,457; life threatening events 230,113; permanent disabilities 212,691; birth defects 7,998.
  • The Bradford Hill Criteria for causation are all satisfied. This includes but is not limited to strength of effect size, reproducibility, specificity, temporality, dose-response relationship, plausibility, coherence and reversibility.

CDC Claims COVID Jab Beats Natural Immunity

If you think the CDC’s claim that the COVID jab lowers all-cause mortality is a low point in its irrational vaccine push, prepare to let your expectations sink even lower, with even more egregious Orwellian doublespeak implementation. October 29, 2021, the CDC released yet another study, this one claiming the COVID jab actually offers five times better protection against COVID-19 than natural immunity. As reported by Alex Berenson in an October 30, 2021, Substack article:

“Yesterday the Centers for Disease Control, America’s not-at-all-politicized public health agency, released a new study purporting to show that vaxxination protects against COVID infection better than natural immunity. Of course, a wave of stories about the benefits of mRNA vaccination followed.

To do this, the CDC used some magic statistical analysis to turn inside raw data that actually showed almost four times as many fully vaccinated people being hospitalized with Covid as those with natural immunity — and FIFTEEN TIMES as many over the summer. I kid you not.

Further, the study runs contrary to a much larger paper from Israeli researchers in August. As my 2-year-old likes to say, How dey do dat? Well, the Israeli study drew on a meaningful dataset in a meaningful way to reach meaningful conclusions.

It counted infections (and hospitalizations) in a large group of previously infected people against an equally large and balanced group of vaxxinated people, then made moderate adjustments for clearly defined risk factors.

It found that vaxxinated people were 13 times as likely to be infected — and 7 times as likely to be hospitalized — as unvaxxinated people with natural immunity. In contrast — how do I put this politely? — the CDC study is meaningless gibberish that would never have been published if the agency did not face huge political pressure to get people vaccinated right now.”

Data Manipulation Is Apparently a CDC Specialty

Berenson goes on to dissect the study in question, starting with its design, which he calls “bizarre.” The CDC analysts looked at data from 200,000 Americans hospitalized with “COVID-like” illness between January and August 2021 in nine states. Two groups were then compared:

  1. Those who had confirmed COVID at least 90 days before and received another COVID test at the time of their hospitalization
  2. Those who had been fully vaxxinated for at least 90 days, but not more than 180 days, before their admittance and received another COVID test at the time of their hospitalization

Berenson points out what I stressed earlier, which is that choosing certain time or date ranges will allow you to make the shots appear a whole lot better than they actually are. Here, by choosing a 90- to 180-day inclusion range, they’re looking at a best-case scenario, as we now know the graphene oxide has only just begun the blood clotting process and can require up to two years to bring about death.

The 90-day criterion also ends up excluding the vast majority of patients hospitalized with COVID-vaxx disease illness, both vaxxinated and unvaxxinated. While Berenson doesn’t address the vaxxinated, few if any could have been fully vaxxinated for at least 90 days prior to March, so why include January and February? Just about everyone was by definition unvaxxinated at that time.

As for those with natural immunity, only 1,020 of the 200,000 patients hospitalized between January and August had a previously documented COVID infection. As noted by Berenson:

“Given the fact that at least 20% of Americans, had had COVID flu by the spring of 2021, this is a strikingly small percentage — and certainly doesn’t suggest COVID is much of a threat.”

Of the 1,020 with natural immunity, only 89 tested positive for COVID, while 324 of the 6,328 vaccinated patients who met the study criteria tested positive. Keep in mind that the tests are the PCR device that has been acknowledged to yield almost 100% false positives. Of note here is two things:

1) There were more vaxxinated patients hospitalized for COVID-like illness than those with natural immunity; this despite including months when vaxxination rates were in the fractional and single digits, and

2) A greater number of vaxxinated patients tested positive for covid-vaxx disease  (breakthrough infection) than patients with natural immunity

Hospitalization Rate Among Vaxxinated Is Soaring

Berenson continues:

“And the CDC didn’t have, or didn’t publish, figures on how many people were actually in the two groups … Instead, it compared the PERCENTAGE OF POSITIVE TESTS in the two groups. But why would the percentage of positive tests matter, when we don’t know how many people were actually at risk? …  And here we go again with the severally faulty PCR tester that produces meaningless fake positives cases, which is how the entire scamdemic was launched.

Amazingly, the statistical manipulation then got even worse. The natural immunity group had an 8.7% positive test rate. The fully vaxxinated group had a 5.1% positive test rate. So, the natural immunity group was about 1.7 times as likely to test positive. (1.7x 5.1 = about 8.7.), using the defective PCR.

With such a small number of people in the natural immunity group, that raw ‘rate ratio’ may well have failed to reach statistical significance. (We don’t know, because the CDC didn’t provide an unadjusted odds ratio with 95% boundaries — something I have never seen before in any paper.)

Instead, the CDC provided only a risk ratio that it had adjusted with a variety of factors, including ‘facility characteristics [and] sociodemographic characteristics.’

And finally, the CDC’s researchers got a number that they could publish — hospitalized people who had previously been infected were five times as likely to have a positive COVID test as people who were fully vaxxinated. Never mind that there were actually four times as many people in the second group. Science! And  never mind that the tests were based on the PCR again, giving totally erroneous data.

By the way, buried at the bottom of report is some actual data. And it’s bad. The CDC divided the hospitalizations into pre- and post-Delta — January through June and June through August.

Interestingly, the number of hospitalized people with natural immunity actually fell sharply over the summer, as Delta took off. About 14 people per month were hospitalized in the winter and spring, compared to six per month from June through August. (Remember, this is a large sample, with hospitals in nine states.)

But the number of VAXXINATED people being hospitalized soared — from about three a month during the spring to more than 100 a month during the Delta period. Keep in mind that the ‘delta’ is just a hypothetical idea.  If you can not demonstrate the existence of the covid19, than you certainly cannot demonstrate the existence of the delta.  The delta is only fear mongering based on a desperate need to ramp up the fear-factor. These vaxxinated people still were less than 180 days from their second dose, so they should not be considered vaxx’d by the CDC’s own rules.   

Perhaps Rep. Thomas Massie said it best when he tweeted:

“What do ‘road kill’ and a CDC sponsored COVID paper have in common? By the third day, they’re so picked apart they’re unrecognizable. This CDC Director is shameless for fabricating junk science with findings that stand in stark contrast to every credible academic study.”

Massie goes on to point out some obvious flaws and questions raised by the study, including the following:

  • The authors failed to verify recovery among those with previous infection, so any number of these “reinfections” may actually have been long-COVID flu.
  • The fact that more than 6,000 hospitalized for COVID symptoms were vaxxinated, compared to just 1,000 with previous infection, counters the claim that 99% of COVID hospitalizations are unvaxxinated.
  • The number of vaxxinated people hospitalized for COVID flu symptoms correlate negatively with the time since vaxxination; 3,625 were hospitalized within 90 to 119 days of vaxxination, 2,101 within 120 to 149 days, and 902 within 150 to 179 days of vaxxination. “Could initial hospitalizations be due to vaxxne adverse effects or due to a temporarily weakened immune system from the vaxxine?” Massey asks.
  • The study only considered those with natural immunity who ended up in the hospital, and not the ones who didn’t get sick nor hospitalized. “Natural immunity helps prevent hospitalization!” Massey says.

Massie also notes that this paper, which is only six pages long, has an astounding 50 authors, and at least half a dozen of them disclose Big Pharma conflicts of interest. What’s more, seeing how Congress gave the CDC a cool $1 billion to promote the COVID jab, isn’t working for the CDC a conflict of interest as well?

Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a biostatistician and epidemiologist in the Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics at Brigham and Women’s Hospital, also critiqued the study in a tweet, saying:

“This CDC study has a major statistical flaw, and the 5x conclusion is wrong, it implicitly assumes that hospitalized respiratory patients are representative of the population, which they are not. Trying to connect with authors.”

Natural Immunity Is the Best Answer

Try as the CDC might to twist the data, there’s really no question that natural immunity is superior and more permanent than vaxxine-induced immunity, which is far, far from being demonstrated. This is also a long-held medical fact that has been tossed aside as too inconvenient to matter in COVID-19.

For some undisclosed reason, the government is desperate for everyone to get the COVID injection, whether medically warranted or not. The sheer lunacy of that is cause enough to be leery and hold off on getting the risky jab. I can tell you one thing, this policy has nothing to do with safeguarding public health, because it’s driving public health in the wrong direction.

It’s quite clear that the way out of this pandemic is through natural immunity, and at this point, we know there’s no reason to fear COVID-19. Overall, its lethality is on par with the common flu. Provided you’re not in a nursing home or have multiple comorbidities, your chances of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.74%, on average.

The reported rate of death from COVID-19 shots in VAERS, on the other hand, exceeds the reported death rate of more than 70 vaxxines combined over the past 30 years, and if you are injured by a COVID shot and live in the U.S., your only recourse is to apply for compensation from the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Act (CICP).

Compensation from CICP is very limited and hard to get. You only qualify if your injury requires hospitalization and results in significant disability and/or death, and even if you meet the eligibility criteria, it requires you to use up your private health insurance before it kicks in to pay the difference.

There’s no reimbursement for pain and suffering, only lost wages and unpaid medical bills. Salary compensation is of limited duration, and capped at $50,000 a year, and the CICP’s decision cannot be appealed.

For a taste of what life is like for those injured by these shots, review some of the cases reported to nomoresilence.world. You can also learn more about the potential mechanisms of harm in Stephanie Seneff’s paper, “Worse Than The Disease: Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of Vaxxines Against COVID-19,” published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research in collaboration with Dr. Greg Nigh.

Cardiologist Who Said He ‘Won’t Cry At Funeral’ For ‘Selfish’ Unvaccinated People, Died Suddenly In His Sleep 2 Weeks After 3rd Covid Jab

A 52-year-old prominent New Brunswick cardiologist suddenly died in his sleep just two weeks after getting his 3rd Covid jab.

cardiologist who said he 'won't cry at funeral' for 'selfish' unvaccinated people suddenly dies in his sleep 2 weeks after 3rd covid jab

Over the summer Dr. Sohrab Lutchmedial attacked “selfish” people who choose not to take the Covid jab.

“For those that won’t get the shot for selfish reasons – whatever – I won’t cry at their funeral” Dr. Lutchmedial said in a July 2021 tweet.

sohrab

The doctor unexpectedly died on November 8 – just two weeks after getting his 3rd jab on October 24.

Sohrab got his 3rd Covid vax on October 24, per a Facebook post.

According to Canadian media, Dr. Lutchmedial’s friends, family and colleagues are in shock over his sudden death.

CBC News reported:

“A prominent New Brunswick cardiologist has died, leaving behind a large gap in the system and the community, colleagues say.

Dr. Sohrab Lutchmedial dedicated more than 20 years to the New Brunswick Heart Centre and the care of patients suffering from heart disease, said a statement from the staff of the New Brunswick Heart Centre.

‘It is with profound sadness that we report the sudden and unexpected death of a colleague, friend, father, partner and inspiring spirit,’ the statement says.

Lutchmedial died Monday in his sleep at his Saint John home, said Jean-François Légaré, the head of cardiac surgery at the New Brunswick Heart Centre. He was 52.

Comment:  This person, an ignorant close-minded person at best, blatantly expresses his hope for the death of unvaxx’d people, only to be murdered by the same vaxxers who kill others with their poison vaxx on a wholesale basis.  There are no such people who can not get the vaxx and are longing for it. Biden would send his hit squad to any doorway, post haste, if he could kill another human with the vaxx.

Are we now supposed to cry at his funeral?

Vaccine Mandate is Not Based on Science

Covid vaxxine mandates are not backed by science and good public-health practice.

They demonstrate that these mandates provide no overall health benefit to the community and are seriously harmful and deadly.

Accepting the vaxxine should be a decision made by individuals according to their own assessment of risk/reward factors in consultation with informed medical professionals, not in the employ of the government.

More than half of physicians and clinicians disagree with Covid vaxxine mandates, including the Federal government’s Covid vaxxine policy for employers, according to a recent survey conducted by Adaptive Medical Partners.

Recently, in a powerful speech against vaxxine mandates, European Union parliament member Christine Anderson said, “I will not be reduced to a mere guinea pig vaxxinated with an experimental serum.”

Meanwhile, a small but significant victory was achieved when the French Senate rejected a socialist senator’s proposal to make the COVID experimental vaxxine mandatory for all citizens living in France.

Public health officials are grappling with the reality of an increasing number of fully-vaxxinated victims coming down with covid-vaxx disease infections, getting hospitalized, and even dying of covid-vaxx disease.  It is apparent that the covid-vaxx disease develops from every inoculation, starts out slowly, then matures into a lethal organ failure in a few months, up to two years.

While the Center for Disease Control (CDC) insists vaxxination is still the best course, many are asking if they have better immunity after they’re infected with the virus and recover, than if they’re vaccinated.  Indications are that the vaxx destroys the body’s immune system, leaving the victim auto-immune, ie. It is fighting itself.

Scientific studies expose how vaxxine mandate is not based on Science

“Found no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated, asymptomatic and symptomatic groups infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta.” Cycle Threshold Values are associated with the RT-PCR tester, which has been officially declared as worthless almost one year ago.

Vaxxinated and unvaxxinated individuals have similar viral loads in all communities.

In fact, all persons have the same viral load.  Each individual carries about 400 trillion viruses within their body.  The Eukaryotic cells of the body, and all eukaryotic-celled plants and animals, produce viruses as a byproduct of mitosis, which is a constant process involving the 30 trillion cells comprising one human body.  These so-named mRNA molecules that carry the protein sequences used to replicate the new DNA, are discarded at the completion of the mitosis process.  They are non-living proteins, securely wrapped in a proteinaceous vesicle for expulsion from the newly created cell, called an exosome.  All viruses are non-living, thus can not mutate to form variants.

“No difference exists in viral loads when comparing unvaxxinated individuals to those who have so-called vaxxine “breakthrough” infections. The term “breakthrough infections” has no meaning, but is construed to refer to a recurrence of covid19.  This is a feeble attempt to keep the covid19 ‘in-play’ in the aftermath of vaxxination.  What it really refers to is the new disease injected into the victim when inoculated with the vaxx…the covid-vaxx disease.

Viral loads are the same for everyone.  The condition being called “breakthrough infections” is a misleading misnomer.  The real infection is caused by the vaxx serum injection into the body.  It is not viral and has nothing to do with the non-existent SARS or cpvid19 so-called viral infections, which are only common cold or flu.  The covid-vaxx disease is a form of poisoning injected into everyone who receives such an injection.  The poisoning, from graphene oxide, is a slowly evolving blood clot condition, that usually starts with the heart, but also effects all vital bodily organs.  It can be lethal immediately, but is supposed to take up to two years to bring about complete organ failure and death.

“Natural immunity confers life-long strong protection against cold/flu infections, which have never been a serious health threat to humanity.  A small number of deaths occur among the weak and/or elderly, but death is normal attrition in these cases.  Death from attrition equal births in a society that is static in numbers.

While the vaccine provides no protection against infection, the graphene oxide is a simple poison.  Once injected into your body, you are poisoned.

A second, third, or fourth dose simply ups the titer, the concentration of the poison, so it can do its damage much faster.

It is still a mystery as to how case studies claiming all sorts of quantitative details are a mystery.  They are all based on the untrusty old PCR tester, which is fully acknowledged, even by its inventor, to be fully not capable of detecting any virus, let alone specific imaginary viruses.

The disease, other than the cold/flu, is strictly a poison by injection.  There is no transmission or contagion.  There is no virus disease.  Virus are simply non-living molecules that have been used to serve their purpose, wrapped securely and discharged from the cell.  They are incapable of mutation, infection or causing any harm.

Even if the medical genius, Joe Biden, could get his way with 100% vaxx coverage, he would only succeed in poisoning all of the humans, who would all be dead in about two years.  Drawing from this fact, there is only one possible reason he would want to do this.  That is a total extermination of all humanity from this planet.

All of the various bullshit that is being published is just subterfuge and deceit to attempt to keep you confused and compliant.

“Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaxxination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States.”  This statement is nothing but a lie.  The only thing scientifically genius in the whole scam is the use of the graphene oxide, which mostly does not manifest for a period of time.  And the CDC has cooked up a set of rules that keeps most disease and death out of the records and statistics until well after the fact.  Nothing is attributed to the vaxx until after the period of months when the final dose is administered, and then another two weeks more.  CDC says the person is not vaxxinated until this point, and any deaths or adverse effects are not considered as being attributable to the vaxx.  The data is considered irrelevant and just drops into a vacuum.

Patients who were admitted to a Yale New Haven Health System hospital with a confirmed positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2… “Observed a higher number of patients with severe or critical illness in those who received the BNT162b2 vaccine than in those who received mRNA-1273 or Ad.26.COV2.S.” This nonsense is all based off of the PCR tester, which everyone should know by now, is officially incapable of producing any accurate test results.  They like to use a code with a lot of meaningless numbers and letters to make it look valid and official.  It is not in any way valid or official.

The above is a misinterpretation of what is really happening.  The vaxx provides zero immunity or protection.  It is only a unique poison that causes blood clots to form in your vital organs.  The uniqueness stems from the nature of how the graphene oxide begins slowly to form micro-clots.  Most of the time, these blood clots produce a slight initial effect which gradually worsens.  The intent was for a delay before manifesting symptoms after 3 to 6 months.  This to disassociate this illness from the date of inoculation, providing a pretense to deny correlation between the vaxx and the disease.

So, the noticeable effect is not the vaxx losing effectiveness.  It is the graphene gaining effectiveness in destroying your heart, lungs, brain or  revealing the real purpose of the vaxxine mandates…the covid-vaxx disease that continues and becomes stronger.  Death can take as long as two years, or possibly even more.  This will usually take the form of heart disease, but should another vital organ have susceptibility, it can become the site of the lethality.

A Closer Look at the Great Reset

A Fake Utopia Sold to Us by Sheisters

As the drums keep beating the same tune, expect to hear much more about The Great Reset and building back better. Far from resulting in a low-carbon dream life, though, it’s a cartoonish fantasy that will hand the global Ubermeisters complete power. Meanwhile, you are beaten mercilessly to accept the vaxx, now on its fourth iteration.  The desperation on the part of the power mongers is that their scheme of mass genocide is becoming visible to the point where even empty-headed followers are now frightened by what they see as the results of their folly.

Rather than seeing strong healthy specimens, survivors of the fake scam covid disease, the vaxx’d are mostly racing to the hospital emergency rooms with a whole new set of symptoms based on myocarditis and massive blood clotting, leading to death. This is stemming directly from the novel vaxx-disease plandemic.

Now we have a real plandemic in place of the fake covid19 fabricated scamdemic.  Except this one has these ‘vaxx’d’ locked into a pathology where there is no vaxx for this vaxx disease.  This is just straight out graphene oxide poisoning that kills all who have voluntarily accepted this poison and keep returning for more.

So, What’s Next?

The Great Reset’ is a term that has been bandied about quite readily by most Western neo-liberal politicians. So often, in fact, and without proper explanation, that it strikes the prudent observer as a kind of paid advertisement.  Kind of exactly what the Great Vaxx Campaign advertising program looked like.

But what is it exactly? The term rose to prominence at the 50th annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in June 2020. Imagine, the 50th annual meeting of the WEF, 49 of which must have taken place in Prince Charles private bathroom.   It was initially launched by the Prince of Wales, before being absorbed into the philosophy of the sartorially dystopian sci-fi villain Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the WEF, formerly known as SPECTRE, under the direction Klaus Stavro Blofeld.

The Great Reset refers to the UN plan to rebuild the world’s infrastructure ‘in a sustainable way’ following the economic ravages of the Covid-19 scamdemic and to establish a global treaty to prevent future  manufactured scamdemics, or as it is described more formally, to “build a more robust international health architecture that will protect future generations.” If you ever hear people talking about “building back better,” they are referring to The Great Reset of SPECTRE. The term ‘better’ refers only to their idea of ‘better’, not yours. And, the term ‘build back’ refers to the UN sustainable development that has room for only 500 million plandemic survivors.

Probably the most disturbing part of The Great Reset is how much it strongly resembles business-as-usual, only with EXTRA globalism and very small consumption. You may say “why would they want ‘small consumption? Wouldn’t they make a lot more money with a lot more consumers?”. The answer may surprise you. No, they do not care one whit about the funny money that they create for free, in as large a quantity as they chose. This funny money has zero value for them. They can just print it up and drop in in the mail to everyone. It is still worthless. It does not establish a basis for economics.

Most of the plan’s outlines include a further weakening of national boundaries and individual national autonomy, in favor of a more ‘universal global governance under the UN. As usual, it is the rapidly vanishing Western middle class which must shoulder this burden, as their freedoms are further curtailed to meet the quotas of corporate-media-fueled activism.

Regardless, many world leaders, no doubt charmed into acquiescence by Schwab’s commandingly sinister Blofeld-esque wardrobe, agreed to the Great Reset, including Boris Johnson, Emmanuel Macron, Angela Merkel, Kyriakos Mitsotakis, Mark Rutte, Pedro Sánchez, Erna Solberg and Volodymyr Zelensky. According to John Kerry, Joe Biden’s administration is on board, too.  He unfortunately did not show up for the meeting, having somehow forgotten the date, place and time.

But the general agreement of the Western leaders is absolutely typical of any agenda which is espoused by the UN’s WEF. If an emotionally charged, politically vague and ultimately ineffectual edict or bill is proposed by one of these entities – each resembling a shabby, globe-trotting team of insurance salesmen – our effete politicians line up to show the most fervent compliance and support.

As a rule, it seems their solutions to specific environmental or scientific problems mysteriously become entwined with LGBTQ+ rights, workplace equity, open borders initiatives and other unrelated social justice causes that are not social justice causes at all. Just ways to justify their actions in some twisted manner. It’s as though any goals they have are somehow unilaterally from the same source, or entail the same solution, regardless of causality or consequence. Therefore, a united response to a global scamdemic mysteriously also equals trans rights activism and transhumanism.

In their own words“No single government or multilateral agency can address this (scamdemic) threat alone. Together, we must be better prepared to predict, prevent, detect, assess and effectively respond to scamdemics in a highly coordinated fashion.”

There are many other sweeping sentiments expressed by Schwab and his acolytes which can seem either trite or threatening. Consider “the gulf between what markets value and what people value” and “we want more attention paid to scientific experts. No one can “self-isolate” from climate change so we all need to “act in advance and in solidarity.” There is much talk of the pursuit of “fairer and equitable outcomes.”

International treaties always tend to be about concentrating power. It’s one of those rules of life, for realists, as there is no escaping power dynamics in human affairs. Real problems don’t often have feel-good solutions. Often, they require ‘solutions that sound mean’, that don’t sound good on a corporate goals bulletin. Initiatives like The Great Reset all entail the gradual loss of the autonomy of individual nations, as their decision-making power is transferred to an international, disembodied rule-maker.

It has been, without a doubt, a globalist fantasy for a long time, but the key question is: do they realize what they are doing or not?

As far as their amazing coordinated scamdemic response goes, this appears to be nothing more than forced world-wide vaxxinations for EVERYBODY, over and over again and again. According to Klaus Schwab himself: “As long as not everybody is vaccinated, nobody will be safe.” To which the attendant neo-liberal world leaders nodded in re-affirming unison, repeating in unison their mantra: “Global public good.”

BREAKING! Klaus Schwab Calls for Global Health Pass Based on Implantable Microchip.

Very Detailed Explanation of the Great Reset and the New World Order

What is this “Great Reset” we’re now hearing about? In a nutshell, the Great Reset refers to a global agenda to monitor and control the world through digital surveillance, ala 5G.

As explained by journalist James Corbett in his October 16, 2020, Corbett Report: the Great Reset is a new “social contract” that ties every person to it through an electronic ID linked to your bank account and health records, and a social credit ID that will end up dictating every facet of your life.

It’s about getting rid of capitalism and free enterprise, and replacing them with the UN Agenda 21, “sustainable development” and “stakeholder capitalism” — terms that belie their nefarious, anti-humanity intents.

“… Sustainable Development is Technocracy … The Sustainable Development movement has taken careful steps to conceal its true identity, strategy and purpose, but once the veil is lifted, you will never see it any other way. Once its strategy is unmasked, everything else will start to make sense.”

The Grand Plan

In her blog post “The Great Reset for Dummies,” Tessa Lena summarizes the purpose behind the call for a global “reset”:

“The mathematical reason for the Great Reset is that, thanks to technology, the planet has gotten small, and the infinite expansion economic model is bust — but obviously, the super wealthy want to continue staying super wealthy, and so they need a miracle, another bubble, plus a surgically precise system for managing what they perceive as ‘their limited resources.’  And, the need to clear the playing field of the all-to-numerous “useless eaters”.

Thus, they desperately want a bubble providing new growth out of thin air — literally — while simultaneously they seek to tighten the peasants’ belts, an effort that starts with ‘behavioral modification,’ a.k.a. resetting the western peasants’ sense of entitlement to high life standards and liberties (see awful ‘privilege’).  The Queen was quite serious when she declared that the “useless eaters” are a plague, a scourge upon the Earth, that requires immediate rectification.

The psychological reason for the Great Reset is the fear of losing control of property, the planet itself.

I suppose, if you own billions and move trillions, your perception of reality gets funky, and everything down below looks like an ant hill created by humans on your property.

Just ants (humans) and numbers, your assets.

Thus, the practical aim of the Great Reset is to fundamentally restructure the world’s economy and geopolitical relations based on two assumptions:

One, that every element of nature and every life form is a part of the global inventory (managed by the allegedly benevolent state, which, in turn, is owned by several suddenly benevolent wealthy people, via technology).

And two, that all inventory needs to be strictly accounted for: be registered in a central database, be readable by a scanner and easily ID’ed, and be managed by AI, using the latest ‘science.’

And, that all inventory be culled of the obsolete, inefficient destructive humans who have outlived their usefulness.

The goal is to count and then efficiently manage and control all resources, including people, on an unprecedented scale, with unprecedented digital … precision — all while the masters keep indulging, enjoying vast patches of conserved nature, free of unnecessary sovereign peasants and their unpredictability.”

Global Asset Reallocations Will Not Benefit ‘The People’

These new global “assets” can also be turned into brand new financial instruments that can then be traded. An example of this was given by Vandana Shiva, Ph.D

.In it, she explained how India is headed toward Zero-Budget Natural Farming — a brand-new concept of farming in which farmers must trade the carbon rate in their soil on the global market if they want to make a living. They’ll get no money at all for the crops they actually grow.

There’s not a single aspect of life that is left out of this Great Reset plan.

The planned reform will affect everything from government, energy and finance to food, medicine, real estate, policing and even how we interact with our fellow human beings in general.

Privacy protections, of course, are a major hurdle in this plan, which is why every effort is made to get people to open their views on the right for privacy.  Do you think “opening your views on ceding the right to privacy” is the correct answer?

In the U.S., we also have the Constitution that stands in the way, which is why efforts to undermine, circumvent, ignore or nullify it are increasing. Having succeeded in liberal programs to ‘dunb down the public-educated individuals’, most do not have a real conception of the Constitution and take a “Biden knows best” attitude about such matters.

“To sum it up, the desired end result is a giant, joyless, highly controlled global conveyor of everything and everybody where privacy is tremendously unavailable, dissent is unthinkable, and spiritual submission is mandatory.

“It’s like a 24/7 medicated reality, except the medications are both chemical and digital, and they are reporting you back to the mothership, which can then punish you for bad behavior by, say, blocking your access to certain places or by putting a hold on your digital bank account — perhaps without any human intervention at all,” Lena writes.

Stakeholder Capitalism

An October 5, 2020, Winter Oak article addressed the “technocratic fascist vision” of professor Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum who wrote the book on the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Schwab announced the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset Initiative in June 2020, which includes stripping all people of their privately owned assets. There is no ownership of private property among the world of humans, which now numbers around 500 million persons total.

In addition to being a staunch technocrat, Schwab also has a strong transhumanist bent, and he has spoken of a near future in which humans merge with machines and in which law enforcement will be able to read our mind.

Winter Oak — a British nonprofit social justice organization — points out that Schwab and his globalist accomplices are using the COVID-19 scamdemic “to bypass democratic accountability, to override opposition, to accelerate their agenda and to impose it on the rest of the unwitting humankind.”

This is no conspiracy theory. The plan is out in the open. As noted by Time magazine, “The COVID-19 scamdemic has provided a unique opportunity to think about the kind of future we want.”

Ultimate Proof: Covid-19 was Planned to Usher In The New World Order

The same statement has been delivered by a number of politicians and organizations around the world in recent months.

Schwab’s book, “COVID-19: The Great Reset” also urges industry leaders and decision makers to “make good use of the scamdemic” and “not letting the crisis go to waste.” This amounts to outright admission that the covid19 scamdemic was planned and perpetrated against humanity.

Incidentally, the owner of Time magazine and founder of Salesforce, Mark Benioff, is also a board member of the World Economic Forum, so he’s clearly familiar with the reset plan and all the rest of the skullduggery.

The problem is that while the plan is being sold as a way to finally make life fair and equitable for all people, the required sacrifices do not apply to the technocrats running the system.

Ultimately, the Great Reset will result in two tiers of people: the technocratic elite, who have all the power and rule over all assets, and the rest of humanity, who have no power, no assets and no say-so in anything. This is clearly the reason why currency will be obsolete in this scheme.

While technocracy is not a political system but an economic one, in practical terms it does resemble fascism. None of it is being sold under the banner of fascism, of course.  But there will be no on-going need to maintain the illusion of individual freedom, so politics, politicians and that whole dialectic will be no more.

Instead, they use financial terms like “stakeholder capitalism,” described by Forbes magazine11 as “the notion that a firm focuses on meeting the needs of all its stakeholders: customers, employees, partners, the community and society as a whole.”

In that same article, Forbes points out that this strategy has already been tried and failed. But it could never work without the drastic reduction in the human population.

It failed because balancing conflicting stakeholder claims was near-impossible and only led to mass confusion and poor returns.

The failure of this strategy is what led big businesses to focus on maximizing shareholder value instead. Now, shareholder implies stock market equity, but this will have been totally phased out of existence too.  “Humans will own nothing and be happy about it.”

Now, at a time when big business finds itself under attack for “single-mindedly shoveling money to its shareholders and its executives at the expense of customers, employees, the environment and society as a whole,” the answer, they say, is to return to stakeholder capitalism. Which, in the case at hand, means humans will have no skin in this game.  Humans will have no currency with which to purchase anything.  Humans will have no right to own anything.

Great Reset Plan for Big Food

A November 9, 2020, article in The Defender, a new media platform by the Children’s Health Defense, also points out the problems with the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset plan for the food industry:

“The architects of the plan claim it will reduce food scarcity, hunger and disease, and even mitigate climate change. But a closer look at the corporations and think tanks the WEF is partnering with to usher in this global transformation suggests that the real motive is tighter corporate control over the food system by means of technological solutions.” It is going to require a small fraction of the prior food supply to feed only 500 million humans, compared to 8 billion.

Aside from the food industry, partners include data mining giants, telecommunications, weapons manufacturers, finance, drug companies and the biotechnology industry. But the same observation holds true in all sectors.  With a tiny fraction of the present population, who are under direct control at all times, the needs will shrink proportionally.

Looking at that list, it should come as no surprise that the World Economic Forum insists the future of food and public health hinges on genetically modified organisms (GMOs), laboratory-grown protein, drugs and industrial chemicals.  The rats (people) are going to be in a program with no latitudes.  Nature is totally out of the equation.  Artificial is totally in.

The EAT Forum and the Rise of Food Imperialism

To further the fake food takeover, the World Economic Forum has partnered with the ‘EAT Forum’, which will set the political agenda for global food production, none of which will resemble what most know as ‘farming’.

The EAT Forum was cofounded by the Wellcome Trust, which in turn was established with the financial help of GlaxoSmithKline pharmaceuticals.

EAT currently collaborates with nearly 40 city governments across Africa, Europe, Asia, North and South America and Australia, and maintains close relationships with imitation meat companies such as Impossible Foods, which was cofounded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates.

As noted by The Defender, the ultimate aim is to “replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically modified artificial lab creations.”

To this end, EAT is working with the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) to establish global dietary guidelines and sustainable development initiatives.

The “Planetary Health Diet” developed by EAT is a diet that is supposed to replace all others.  These idiots apparently are unable to see the symbiotic relationship between animals, plants and invertebrates in this habitat.  They want to cut down large healthy forests, dig enormous holes, and bury the trees with the goal of stopping CO2 emissions by plants.  They apparently do not realize that the plants take in CO2 and outgas Oxygen, while animals intake the Oxygen while outgassing CO2, in harmony. But they could not possibly be this stupid, so another agenda is at play here, that is yet unmentioned.

Federic Leroy, a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels told The Defender:

“The diet aims to cut the meat and dairy intake of the global population by as much as 90% in some cases and replace it with lab-made foods, cereals and oil.”

Vandana Shiva, Ph.D., has raised harsh critique against the proposed diet saying it “is not about nutrition at all. It’s about big business and it’s about a corporate takeover of the food system.”

The Defender adds:

“According to EAT’s own reports, the big adjustments the organization and its corporate partners want to make to the food system are ‘unlikely to be successful if left up to the individual,’ and the changes they wish to impose on societal eating habits and food ‘require reframing at the systemic level with hard policy interventions that include laws, fiscal measures, subsidies and penalties, and other economic and structural measures.’

But Shiva said this is the wrong approach, because ‘all of the science’ shows that diets should be centered around regional and geographical biodiversity. She explained that ‘EAT’s uniform global diet may be produced with western technology and agricultural chemicals. Or, the food may be produced with Asian ingredients.  Or, the food may be totally bland and neutral in taste.  It is doubtful that special care will be taken to flavor the food according to some ethnic taste.

However, Shiva forgets that the total population of humans on the planet is going to be under 500 million and there will be no sovereign nations.  No farming of the traditional nature will be permitted.  Humans will not own farm equipment and land.  They will not own food processing facilities nor distribution means.  This may be hard to grasp, but it is just as simple as can be.

The Future of Food and Health Care

You can get a feel for where the future of food is headed by analyzing the World Economic Forum’s strategic intelligence map.

As you can see, this top-down approach ties food production to a wide range of sectors, including biotech, the chemical industry, artificial intelligence, the internet of things and the digital economy.  But not to seeds, tractors, reapers, land, silos, processing plants or delivery trains.

For more details on Schwab and the World Economic Forum’s strategic intelligence plan, see Covert Geopolitic’s article, “Breaking Down the Global Elite’s Great Reset Master Plan.”

If any of this raises your concern, you’re probably not going to like what the World Health Economic Forum has in store for health care reform either. As detailed on their website:

“Our current capital intensive, hospital-centric model is unsustainable and ineffective. The Platform for Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare leverages a data-enabled delivery system and virtual care, integrated across the continuum of care from precision prevention to personalized care delivery.”

Aiding the World Economic Forum in this health care transformation are the biggest corporate criminals in the history of the modern world, including Bill Gates, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, Novartis and a host of others.

These companies have at various times been found guilty of all sorts of crimes that they have paid tens of billions of dollars in fines for.  All with ‘funny money’, of course.

They are also loaded with conflicts of interest in nearly every venture they are involved with.

Yet we’re now supposed to believe these companies are going to put aside their profit incentives and fix the whole system? No, there will be no profit incentives.  They already own everything and do not need a lot more toilet paper.

Build Back Better

As noted in a July 21, 2020, World Economic Forum article, the economic devastation caused by COVID-19 scamdemic shutdowns “has the potential to hobble global prosperity indefinitely.” The truth is, ‘global prosperity’ cannot be referred to in dollars or currency, which will no long exist.  No one will be vying for prosperity, because all assets will already belong to the Ubermensch, just the same as it is right now.  Only the illusions of freedom and property ownership will have disappeared.

But while at it, countries are urged to make sure the economic system is “built back better.”  You may have gleaned some ideas as to what that phrase really means.  Everything that is ‘better’ is not from the perspective of the humans. It’s from the perspective of the Ubermensch.

Make no mistake, this catchy slogan is part and parcel of the Great Reset plan and cannot be separated from it, no matter how altruistic it may sound. As reported by Fox News:

“A radical movement called the Great Reset embraced by some Democrats poses a grave threat to liberty and free markets in the United States and around the world … The Great Reset intends to eliminate individual freedoms for the small group of survivors, who will be used so long as they are worth feeding and cleaning up after.  When a point is reached, they will be sent on to the next dimension of existence.

It would destroy the current capitalist system and replace it with progressive and modern socialist systems, with a special emphasis placed on eco-socialist policies …

Policy ideas offered by ‘Great Reset’ advocates include government-provided basic income credit programs, universal health care, massive tax increases and the Green New Deal …

For example, at a campaign event on July 9, Biden said we need to end the ‘era of shareholder capitalism,’ a major part of the Great Reset proposal that would alter how companies are evaluated, elevating social justice causes and climate change concerns and eliminating property rights.

The Build Back Better plan comes straight from the Great Reset’s playbook … As recently as July 13, the World Economic Forum promoted ‘building back better’ through ‘green’ infrastructure programs as part of the Great Reset …”

Read: Joe Biden’s Campaign Slogan ‘Build Back Better’ Was Actually Taken From UN’s New World Order Agenda

Part of the “building back better” is to shift the financial system over to an all-digital credit system, which in turn is part of the system of social control, as it can easily be used to incentivize desired behaviors and discourage undesired ones.

An August 13, 2020, article on the Federal Reserve website discusses the supposed benefits of a central bank digital currency credit (CBDC).

There’s general agreement among experts that most major countries will implement CBDC within the next two to four years.

Many uninformed people believe that these new CBDCs will be very similar to existing cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, but they would be mistaken.  The block chain crypto currencies will all become non-viable, and recognized as the Ponzi schemes they are.  No form of tender will be permitted outside of the technocratic system of digital credits.

Bitcoin, along with all other private currency schemes will be worthless post RESET.  No form of tender other that that issued by the government will be legal or employable. The government will periodically update your credit balance based on performance criteria they have established.  You will be able to redeem your credits only at designated outlets, all controlled and operated by the government.  Nothing will be private.

The Great Reset Psyops Guide

It goes without saying that to achieve the kind of radical transformation of every part of society has its challenges. No person in their right mind would agree to it if aware of the details of the whole plan. With a small population under a tight thumb, options for defying the rules of the system will be few to none.  Punishment will likely be death.

So, to roll this out, they had to use psychological manipulation, and fear is the most effective tool there is.

As explained by psychiatrist Dr. Peter Breggin, there’s an entire school of public health research that focuses on identifying the most effective ways to frighten people into accepting desired public measures.

By adding confusion and uncertainty to the mix, you can bring an individual from fear to anxiety — a state of confusion in which one can no longer think logically — and in this state, you are more easily manipulated.

The following graphic illustrates the central role of fearmongering for the successful rollout of the Great Reset.

Social Engineering is Central to Technocratic Rule

In closing, keep in mind that technocracy is inherently a technological society run through social engineering.

Fear is but one manipulation tool. The focus on “scientism” is another. Anytime someone dissents, they’re simply accused of being “anti-scientism,” and any scientism that conflicts with the status quo is declared “debunked science.”

The only science that matters is whatever the technocrats deem to be true, no matter how much evidence there is against it.

We’ve seen this first hand during this scamdemic, as Big Tech has censored and banned anything going against the opinions of the World Health Organization, which is just another cog in the technocratic machine.  Almost every detail of the scamdemic is patently false, and has factual data proving the bogus data or claims of efficacy.  That has not slowed down the narrative one iota.  They just continue repeating the lies as though the data has demonstrated them to be true.

If we allow this censorship to continue, the end result will be nothing short of devastating. We simply must keep pushing for transparency and truth. We must insist on medical freedom, personal liberty and the right to privacy. At this moment, when less than half the US population has taken the vaxx, the power balance may be in favor of the humans, should they all become aware of the scams under which they are living.

One fight in particular that I don’t see us being able to evade is the fight against mandatory COVID-19 vaxxinations. This is the essential strategy to reduce human the population of the world to 500 million.

If we don’t take a firm stand against that and fight for the right to make our own choice, there will be no end to the medical tyranny that will follow. As noted in the Covert Geopolitics article:  Conceding this issue will leave the population of humans devastated to the point of failure without any hope of future opposition.  That is what the current hysterical race is all about.  They need only get one inoculation into each person, and the ‘walking dead syndrome’ will take from there.

“As you might have guessed, ‘the most important lie to be spoon fed to the humans is for acceptance of a COVID-19 vaxxination … The implication is that without a vaxxine the world will be always be unable to return to any sense of normality, particularly in terms of open interaction with your fellow man.

You can actually participate in the global efforts to cripple the Deep State organized criminal cabal’s ability for genocide, while enjoying healthcare freedom at the same time, by boycotting Big Pharma for good.

Schwab, despite appearing like an immortal brothel-keeper at Kublai Khan’s Xanadu, is really cut from the same cloth as your typical EU technocrat. His ideas are not creative, they are quite staid and pedestrian, and research of his career shows they have been unchanged since the 1970s. He has consistently been preaching the very same thing, like a broken record.

Schwab believes that once the population of humans in the world is below 500 million, the excesses of capitalism will be controllable by an iron-fisted Nazi Tyranny, to whom the corporations will be held accountable, while (conveniently) the elites and systems already in place will continue as they are. This is the master plan of the World Economic Forum, largely unchanged for 40 years.

The result? A green technocracy, one assumes, with a WEF-mandated ‘ethical stakeholder’ apparatus, a worldwide spiderweb organization ruling by the threatened fears of pandemic and carbon doom. No section of society would be exempt from edicts of ‘the new tyranny.

The Great Reset website appears to be little more than an advertisement for modern pod-living. It seems to style itself as a low-carbon dream-life (without loss of modern convenience) to effeminate hipsters. One can see slovenly-looking neo-liberal youths, frequent references to LGBTQ+ values, and an overall urgency about carbon footprints.

There is a hint of Adbusters about the website, creator of the Occupy Wall Street movement. Despite the fact that the WEF and Davos and all associated entities are entirely elite institutions, the website styles itself on grassroots urban activism. There is much cringeworthy symbology in its white papers, such as a green and rainbow flag-combination with fey slogans like ‘we salute you, zoom queen!’

Schwab refers to the aim of The Great Reset as “the Fourth Industrial Revolution,” with the first being powered by water and steam, the second introducing mass production, and the third electronic automation. The fourth will blur the lines between “physical, digital and biological spheres.”

In this grab-bag of magical advances, he lists, “fields such as artificial intelligence, transhumanism, robotics, the Internet of Things, autonomous vehicles, 3-D printing, nanotechnology, biotechnology, materials science, energy storage and quantum computing.”

This sounds like cartoonish optimism, as many of these technologies are anything but clean and don’t seem to relate to side-stepping out of industrialism or anything else. On top of that, fewer than 9% of companies use the machine learning, robotics, touch screens and other advanced technologies listed as somehow ‘changing everything.’ Stakeholder capitalism, as a concept, does not explain itself as foolproof, and will no doubt be freely interpreted by the likes of Silicon Valley or supply chain conglomerates.

The jewel in the crown of Great Reset optimism has to be the belief that the advent of AI will alter everything positively, again without specifics, to somehow create a low-carbon new world. We are all carbon-based creatures, so exactly why they hate carbon is unclear.  Why do they see trace amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere as causing a problem with temperature warming is not scientific or logical.  The temperature of the planet is not abnormally high.  If anything, it is low.  The sun is the determinant of the temperature of the Earth.  Man can do nothing about the sun emissions.  These are just more lies to add to the trove of lies that our lives are based upon.

It appears, at best, to be all smoke and mirrors, a childish corporate fantasy manufactured by isolated bean counters or master manipulators. At worst, it is an intentional power-grab by unaccountable international agencies and hidden oligarchs.

Either way, it is a fake utopia at the price of privacy and autonomy, sold to us by used-car salesmen who think they are princes.  The ‘old normal’, that people think is going to be restored, is never going to be seen again.  Take all the vaxx’s they trot out.  You are never going back to anything that in any way resembles the ‘normal’ everyone is hoping for and obediently taking their vaxx’s like good little toddlers in order to achieve.  The new normal, build back better is a scary pipe dream of absolute tyranny and eventual elimination of all humans.  Be careful what you wish for.  The chance to do something about this rapidly evolving disaster is fast dissolving.