The COVID-19 pandemic has brought us many harsh lessons. Importantly, it has shown us how easy it is to manufacture panic and control entire populations through deceptive scare tactics.
The very first point negating the whole idea of a viral epidemic is that viruses are dead matter derived and discarded from cell replication. Virus are submicroscopic. Before you can proceed in any meaningful way, you must find, isolate, and sequence the dead mRNA segment called a virus-something. This has never been done with the virus referred to as COVID19. Without actually having a real specimen of the virus, you can not conclude anything further about it. The PCR test, the sole means of allegedly detecting the virus is pitifully incapable of this task. So the government is demanding measures that destroy lives and means of survival of humans all over the world based on absolutely nothing.
Topping the list of deceptive strategies is the use of a test that falsely labels healthy individuals as sick and infectious. This allows mass testing to drive the narrative that we’re in a lethal pandemic when we are. in fact, not. Every person on the planet that has the capability to see this absurd deception needs to then attempt to understand what the sham is covering up. There is a real agenda underway that is being hidden by this sham. People need to become aware of what it is. It is much more heinous than a little virus that is harmless. Stop, think and discover as if your life depends on it, because it does.
Of course, I’m talking about the now infamous reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test.
The fact is, the PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between types of viruses but can yield false ‘positive’ for everyone tested while providing an opportunity to cause other serious infections and to rupture the cribriform plate brain barrier by using the long swab in the tissue collection process..
It can only detect polymerase presence under some conditions. A polymerase is an enzyme that synthesizes long chains of polymers or nucleic acids. DNA polymerase and RNA polymerase are used to assemble DNA and RNA molecules, respectively, by copying a DNA template strand using base-pairing interactions or RNA by half ladder replication. This is used for laboratory experiments…not for tests to reveal diseases or presence of viruses.
If you have a virus in your body, it will not cause any sickness and when it is expelled from your body, it cannot cause disease in others. Every body is busy making trillions of viruses of their own, as they replicate old cells that are in need of replacement. Nature never retains biological processes that are harmful.
Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive.” Positive test results are then labeled as ‘cases’, whatever that means. The fake medical experts allege this to mean infectious, contagious and potentially deadly when it means no such thing. It does, in fact, mean nothing at all. But they hope you do not know that.
The Crucial Detail That Nullifies All PCR Test Results
The PCR test results are not, and never were intended to be an indicator of viral infection. This is a gross misinterpretation and incorrect application of the test.
To obtain a sample of tissue for the PCR test, a long swab collects RNA from your nasal cavity. This RNA is then reverse transcribed into DNA.
Due to its tiny size, it must be amplified to become discernible. Each round of amplification is called a cycle, and the number of amplification cycles used by any given test or lab is called a cycle threshold (CT).
The higher the CT, the greater the risk that insignificant sequences of viral RNA end up being magnified to the point that the test reads positive, even if your viral load is extremely low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat to you or anyone else.
Many scientists have noted that anything over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible. A September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases revealed that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate.
Bombshell: Fauci States COVID Test Has Fatal Flaw
Yet, a test procedure described in the Corman-Drosten paper and tests recommended by the World Health Organization are set to 45 cycles, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend running PCR tests at a CT of 40.9
The question is why, considering the consensus is that CTs over 35 render the test useless. When labs use these excessive cycle thresholds, you clearly end up with a grossly overestimated number of positivess, so what we’re really dealing with is a “casedemic“— an epidemic of false positives, each called a ‘case’, a term completely lacking meaning.
Many are now questioning whether this was done on purpose to crash the global economy and provide cover for the implementation of what’s known as the Great Reset, which is nothing less than a global totalitarian takeover by unelected technocrats who seek to gain control over all the world’s assets.
Indeed, it seems quite clear we’re not dealing with a lethal pandemic at all. This contrived and fake pandemic is a ‘pretense’ for the absurd measures being imposed by a criminal authority that is the perpetrator of the whole scam.
Mortality statistics further prove this is the case, as overall mortality statistics have remained stable in 2020 and consistent with previous years.
In other words, people are dying but the illness is not killing an excess number of people. The same number of people would have died anyway, from something. Don’t lose sight of the simple fact that birth and death go hand in hand. No one gets out alive.
Indeed, CDC data released August 26, 2020, showed only 6% of so-called COVID-19 deaths had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause on the death certificate. And, since medical authorities have ordered subordinates to change every possible cause-of-death to be COVID, in spite of this being
“For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 2.6 additional conditions or causes per death,” the CDC stated, and any one of those comorbidities could have killed those people, no virus needed.
For Accuracy, Much Lower CTs Must Be Used
Now, if CTs above 35 are scientifically unjustified, just how low of a CT should be used? Quite a few studies have investigated this, so there’s no shortage of data at this point.
The fact that the WHO, FDA and CDC still have not changed their CTs downward in light of all this data tells us they’re not interested in getting an accurate picture of the infection rate, if any.
For example, an April 2020 study in the European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases showed that to get 100% confirmed real positives, the PCR test must be run at 17 cycles. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically.
By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives. Beyond 34 cycles, your chance of a positive PCR test being a true positive shrinks to zero.
More recently, a December 3, 2020, systematic review published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases assessed the findings of 29 different studies — all of which were published in 2020 — comparing evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection with the CTs used in testing.
As reported by the authors, “12 studies reported that CT values were significantly lower … in specimens producing live virus culture.”
In other words, the higher the CT, the lower the chance of a positive test actually being due to the presence of virus.
“Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in CT,” the authors noted.
Importantly, five of the studies included were unable to identify any live viruses in cases where a positive PCR test had used a CT above 30.
If you do not have symptoms, but test positive using a PCR test run at 35 CTs or higher, then it is likely a false positive and you pose no risk to self or others.
In fact, provided you’re asymptomatic, you’re unlikely to be infectious even if you test positive with a test run at 24 CTs or higher. If you have symptoms of flu or cold, the first thing to check is whether or not you are in a zone that is contaminated with aerosol spraying of nano-irritants. These are commonly sprayed by aircraft all over the planet. If you are sneezing and have mucous produced by your sinus glands, this is just your body’s reaction to breathing irritants. It is not indicative of any disease.
Fearmongering Success Hinges on Incorrect Use Of PCR Test
Medical experts are openly criticizing the use of PCR testing to diagnose infections of flu or cold. These include:
In 1993, Mullis spoke about the use of the PCR test to diagnose HIV. He explained that all the test does is amplify molecules into something detectable, but it cannot tell you whether those particles actually pose any risk to your health, nor to identify them.
He also points out that, using PCR, you can essentially find just about anything in anyone because all of us are walking around with pathogens of all sorts, but the immune system is doing its job or the particles are just dead debris that pose no risk.
Bustin points out that when you get a positive result using a CT of 35 or higher, you’re looking at the equivalent of a single copy of viral RNA. The likelihood of that causing a health problem is minuscule.
Even Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted that using a PCR test with a CT above 35 renders it useless because at that point, you’re just detecting dead nucelotides. No live virus can be detected at CTs that high. This means that literally all of the test run to date are totally meaningless and worthless.
Fatal Errors Found in Paper on Which PCR Testing Is Based
November 30, 2020, a team of 22 international scientists published a review challenging the scientific paper on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman.
The Corman-Drosten paper was quickly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was immediately adopted as the standard across the world. They desperately needed some way to amp up the fear factor without delay.
According to Reiner Fuellmich, founding member of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss, or ACU). Drosten is a key culprit in the COVID-19 pandemic hoax. He has profitted greatly for providing known false informationn, which the governments desperately needed and put into use immediately without any vetting or further analysis.
The scientists demand the Corman-Drosten paper be retracted due to “fatal errors,” one of which is the fact that it was written (and the test itself developed) with zero viral isolate available. All they used was the genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
The fact that the paper was published a mere 24 hours after it was submitted also suggests it didn’t even undergo peer review or any kind of review at all.
In an Undercover DC interview, Kevin Corbett, Ph.D., one of the 22 scientists who are now demanding the paper’s retraction, stated:
“Every scientific rationale for the development of that test has been totally destroyed by this paper. It’s like Hiroshima/Nagasaki to the COVID test.
When Drosten developed the test, China had no a viral isolate. They developed the test from a sequence published in a gene bank.
Do you see? China gave them a genetic sequence with no corresponding viral isolate. They had a code, but no body for the code. No viral morphology.
The Corman-Drosten paper, is nothing real. It’s all from gene banks. And the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.
They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So, its ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some, what you think is EEE, so you just put it in … This is basically a computer virus.
There are 10 fatal errors in this Drosten test paper … But here is the bottom line: There was no viral isolate to validate what they were doing or even to draw any conclusions from.
The PCR products of the amplification didn’t correspond to any viral isolate at that time or since. I call it ‘donut ring science.’ There is nothing at the center of it. It’s all about code, genetics, nothing to do with reality …
There have since been papers saying they’ve produced viral isolates. But there are no controls for them. The CDC produced a paper in July … where they said: ‘Here’s the viral isolate.’
Do you know what they did? They swabbed one person. One person, who’d been to China and had cold symptoms. One person. And they assumed he had [COVID-19] to begin with. So, it’s all full of holes, the whole thing.”
The conclusion of the review reads, in part:
“A decision to recognize the errors apparent in the Corman-Drosten paper has the benefit to greatly minimize human cost and suffering going forward. Is it not in the best interest of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is clear.” This is a decision to accept vital information that is known to be invalid and based on nothing real.
“In the face of all the tremendous PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described here, we conclude: There is not much of a choice left in the framework of scientific integrity and responsibility.”
The critique against PCR testing is further strengthened by a November 20, 2020, study in Nature Communications, which found no viable virus in PCR-positive cases at all.
The study evaluated data from 9,865,404 residents of Wuhan, China, who had undergone PCR testing between May 14 and June 1, 2020.
Of this 10 million, a total of 300 tested positive but had no symptoms. Of the 34,424 people with a previous record of COVID-19 positive test results, only 107 tested positive a second time.
Yet, when they did virus cultures on these 107 individuals who had tested positive (either for the first or second time), no live virus was found in any of them!
Antibody Tests Are Equally Unreliable
Antibody tests are also turning out to have their share of quality problems. If you have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, that would be evidence that your immune system successfully overcame the virus at some point in the past.
However, the COVID-19 antibody test may also turn out positive if you have antibodies against common cold pathogens.
June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior exposure to coronaviruses responsible for the common cold can result in a positive COVID-19 antibody test, even if you’ve never been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 specifically.
The saving grace is that studies suggest antibodies produced following exposure to the common cold also appear to provide some general and long-lasting resistance against other cold causing pathogens. This is very unspecific because most people have no resistance to the common cold except for those with healthy immune systems. Most people have unhealthy immune systems because of the low quality Western diet and lifestyle.
According to the authors, this suggests there’s “cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating ‘common cold’ coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.”
In other words, if you’ve recovered from a common cold caused by a particular pathogen, your humoral immune system may be functional.
Another study discovered SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies are only found in the most severe cases
Since everyone has hundreds of trillions of viruses of all types, those who didn’t get sick have functional immune systems. This is the only conclusion that can be taken. Table 1 summarizes the false-positive rates at various population prevalence for the Cellex test and for a hypothetical test that is supposedly 90% sensitive and 99% specific.
Since there is no basis to conclude that the prevalence is abnormal, we would argue that false-positive rates are unacceptably high with the Cellex test.”
Ebell and Barry pointed out that many of the antibody tests that have provisional approval from the FDA still have not even been evaluated for accuracy.
They also recommended that labs report test results “in a way that reflects the local population prevalence based on widespread testing and include the false-positive rate,” as this information “is needed to help family physicians better inform shared decision-making regarding previous infection and return to work or school.”
At present, you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone including that data in their reporting, and the way things are going, I wouldn’t hold my breath in anticipation of such helpful numbers being included in the future either. The fake medical establishment is much more interested in inflated data that induces a greater fear in the population at large.
High Time to End the Mass Testing Scam
If the vast majority of people who test positive for COVID-19 infection have no symptoms, don’t feel sick and don’t look sick, is COVID-19 really a “deadly” disease? Obviously not. That is why people who have ordinary flu or cold are always diagnosed as having COVID, with no viable way to make such a claim, lacking any testing ability.
Or, is it more like fabricated bullshit such as HPV — an alleged viral infection that most people have without knowing it, and which over 90% are able to eliminate without treatment?
The primary justification for the tyrannical governmental interventions of COVID-19 was alleged to slow the spread of the infection so that hospital resources would not be overwhelmed, causing people to die due to lack of medical care. This is more than a little lame when direct investigations of hospitals all over the world have shown that the beds are empty and the staff are playing parlor games.
These interventions were not about stopping alleged infections, of which there were none. All we have seen in 2020 was an unusually mild flu season with no excess mortality.
They certainly were never meant to prevent alleged deaths. Any rational analysis would rapidly conclude that this simply isn’t possible, under any circumstance.
Short-term stay-at-home orders and business closings were only intended to cause destruction of all small businesses and to ‘play out’ the people, like playing a fish on the hook.
Yet the goal posts keep shifting as we go along.
Two-week lockdowns turned into months in all areas. Eventually, we were told everything would go back to normal as soon as a vaccine became available.
But once the vaccines started rolling out, the narrative changed again, and we were told we’d still need masks, social distancing and lockdowns indefinitely, even with a vaccine. They say we even need more vaccinations, even with the vaccine. It’s a wonder how much bullshit people can be immersed in and still not smell the stench.
What, exactly, is going on?
The only rational reason for why government interventions continue is because they’re meant to erode our personal freedoms and civil liberties and transfer wealth to unelected technocrats who are controlling the fake pandemic narrative.
It’s all fearmongering based on a combination of wildly manipulated data and flawed tests.
Aside from PCR testing data, there’s no evidence of a lethal pandemic at all. As mentioned, while there may be such a thing as COVID-19 virus, and all people have the presence of viruses in their bodies, there are no excess deaths due to it. The total mortality for 2020 is normal. An epidemic requires excess mortality for its existence, by definition.
So, unless we think we should shut down the world and stop living because people die from heart disease, diabetes, cancer, the flu or anything else, then there’s no reason to shut down the world because some people happen to allegedly die from a fabricated virus called COVID-19.
What You Can Do
The good news is the hoax is starting to be exposed. In November 2020, a Portuguese appeals court ruled that the PCR test is “not a reliable test for SARS-CoV-2” and that “a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.”
Therefore, “any enforced quarantine based on the results is unlawful.” The court also noted that forcing healthy people to self-isolate could be a violation of their fundamental right to liberty.
As detailed in “Coronavirus Fraud Scandal — The Biggest Fight Has Just Begun” and “German Lawyers Initiate Class-Action Coronavirus Litigation,” additional legal cases are also to be expected, all of which will help expose the fraud perpetrated.
As for what you can do in the meantime, consider:
- Turning off mainstream media news and turning to independent experts — do the research. Read through the science from unbiased reliable sources.
- The lack of substance in the fake narrative proves that the epidemic is a fake cover story for a larger crisis that is being implemented. This would seem to be the 200 year RESET that has been expected for some time. The global power structure is changing from the US camp to the China camp. The Matrix is changing to the Technate. This is under control of the UN and has been 50 years or more in the planning and implementation. You can read all about it in recent blog posts.
- Continue to counter the censorship by asking questions — arm yourself with mortality statistics and the facts on PCR testing, so you can explain how and why this pandemic simply isn’t a pandemic anymore.
- If you are a medical professional, especially if you’re a member of a professional society, write an open letter to your government, urging them to speak to and heed recommendations from independent experts.
- Sign The Great Barrington Declaration, which calls for an end to lockdowns.
- Join a group so that you can have support — Examples of groups formed to fight against government overreach include Us for Them, a group campaigning for reopening schools and protecting children’s rights in the U.K., and the Freedom to Breathe Agency, a U.S. team of attorneys, doctors, business owners and parents who are fighting to protect freedom and liberty.
Sources and references:
- 1 CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel July 13, 2020 (PDF)
- 2 The Vaccine Reaction September 29, 2020
- 3 Jon Rappaport’s Blog November 6, 2020
- 4 YouTube TWiV 641 July 16, 2020
- 5 Clinical Infectious Diseases September 28, 2020; ciaa1491
- 6 WHO.int Diagnostic detection of Wuhan Coronavirus 2019 by real-time RT-PCR, January 13, 2020 (PDF)
- 7 WHO.int Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCOV by real-time RT-PCR, January 17, 2020 (PDF)
- 8 Eurosurveillance 2020 Jan 23; 25(3): 2000045
- 9 FDA.gov CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Instructions, July 13, 2020 (PDF) Page 35
- 10 PJ Media October 27, 2020
- 11 AAPS October 7, 2020
- 12, 36 YouTube, SARS-CoV-2 and the rise of medical technocracy, Lee Merritt, MD, aprox 8 minutes in (Lie No. 1: Death Risk)
- 13, 37 Technical Report June 2020 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.24350.77125
- 14, 38 Johns Hopkins Newsletter November 26, 2020 (Archived)
- 15 CDC.gov August 26, 2020
- 16 European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases April 27, 2020; 39: 1059-1061
- 17 Clinical Infectious Diseases December 3, 2020; ciaa1764
- 18, 26 Corman Drosten Review Report
- 19 Eurosurveillance, Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus by real-time RT-PCR
- 20 Fuellmich.com, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Bio (German)
- 21 Acu2020.org Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss
- 22 Acu2020.org Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, English
- 23 Algora October 4, 2020
- 24, 25 Undercover DC December 3, 2020
- 27 Nature Communications November 20, 2020; 11 Article number 5917
- 28 CDC Test for Past Infection
- 29 Biorxiv preprint DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.26.115832 (PDF)
- 30 Daily Mail June 12, 2020
- 31 Science Times June 12, 2020
- 32 Cell May 14, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.015
- 33 Wall Street Journal June 12, 2020 (Archived)
- 34 Off-Guardian June 12, 2020
- 35 American Family Physician July 1, 2020