Fauci’s Deceptive Data Manipulation Scheme Reveals Entire Scam

How the CDC is manipulating data to prop-up “vaccine effectiveness”.

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the defective PCR testing rules continue to inflate ‘false positive’ case numbers in the unvaccinated.

Can you figure out why they want to do this?

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change.

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway, having obvious. and undeniable symptoms, up to and including death.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely manufactured pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

  1. False-positive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value) which is set by the tester operator.
  2. Inflated Case-counts. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms, for the simple reason that the PCR test operator set the CT value for an amplification value already known to generate a ‘false positive’.

PCR tester operators are simply following the instructions given by the CDC in setting the number of Cycles of amplification.

Without these two intentionally erroneous policies, there would never have been a pandemic at all.  Now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which apply the same test with differing instructions for the ‘vaccinated’ and the ‘unvaccinated’.

Firstly, they are lowering the CT value when testing samples from “breakthrough infections” of ‘vaccinated’ subjects into a range of 28 or below, almost always yielding ‘negative’ test results.

Secondly, they are increasing the CT value when testing samples from ‘unvaccinated’ subjects to a range of 40 or above, for the purpose of always yielding ‘positive’ test results.

That’s just the way the PCR testers work. The PCR was never designed to be used as a “tester”. The inventor has stated all along that his instrument was designed only for laboratory use.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (CT) value, submit only specimens with CT value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher CT values.)

Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 39 have been the norm, with labs around the world typically using values into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, for the “vaccinated”, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of ‘breakthrough infections’ that don’t result in hospitalization or death.

From their website:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine ‘breakthrough cases’ to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been ‘vaccinated’. If you are ‘unvaccinated’, they will still be counted as cases.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will be much more likely to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.


Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case” and processed as such.

Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT recorded as a Covid case.

Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die, after weeks in a hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only if their ‘positive PCR test’ was based on a setting of 29 cycles, or less, are the considered a covid case. Otherwise, they’re not officially a Covid case either.

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how the test operator measures it. So, if they want an ‘unvaccinated’ person to be an official case ‘positive, they can set the test to yield this result. If they want a ‘vaccinated’ person that dies or has serious symptoms requiring hospitalization, after receiving the ‘vaccine’, the PCR test can be set to almost always yield a ‘negative’.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former. Thus, they can claim the ‘vaccine’ is effective.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate ‘cases’ in the ranks of the ‘unvaccinated’, and systematically minimize the ‘breakthrough’ cases among the ranks of the ‘vaccinated’

When we use the terms ‘vaccinated’ or ‘unvaccinated’, we mean those inoculated, or not, with the serum causing mRNA genetic dysfunction therapy. There is no procedure for ‘vaccination’ in the sense of the common usage of this term. 

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

Leave a Reply