WHO acknowledges corona is not Contagious

In a sudden and unexpected about-face, the World Health Organization (WHO) has announced that the evidence is scant to suggest that infected people without symptoms are capable of transmitting the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) to others. Your body is comprised of a virome containing more than 60 trillion viruses.  This is normal and omnipresent. You already have the virus present in you virome, so the idea of contagion is not applicable.

Speaking publicly, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO’s technical lead for COVID-19, recently explained that based on the data the organization has been collecting over the past several months, “it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.”

This is big, breaking news that the mainstream media has yet to touch amid all the criticism of President Trump, race riots, monument destruction, and of course, continued fear-mongering about the pandemic.

Asymptomatic Transmission – A Lie
Tedros Ghebreyesus, WHO Director General

Newsmax‘s Greg Kelly recently spoke with Dr. David Samadi, Director of Men’s Health at St. Francis Hospital, about this latest development, which completely upends everything the government and media have been saying about how healthy people need to wear masks, social distance and remain isolated.

They are taking a 360-degree turn,” Dr. Samadi stated about the WHO’s latest announcement concerning the pandemic.

This is big news that asymptomatic people out there are not contagious. Remember, because we didn’t know who would be able to spread this virus, we made everybody do something called ‘social distancing’ – this is a new word that you’ve heard and it came into our life a few months ago.”

Early on, Dr. Samadi noted, health officials had advised that only symptomatic people wear masks.

Later, however, that expanded to everyone being told to wear masks, despite of no evidence suggesting any benefits. More great scientific work here.

“We made everybody across the board wear masks,” Dr. Samadi stated. “At the beginning, we said, ‘if you have symptoms then you wear the mask to protect others.’ And then we gave in because the CDC and everybody kept changing back and forth.” Does this sound like good science?

Trump Is Right: The More People Tested, The More “Scary” Positives There Will Be

Testing for presence is a process for which no reliable testers exist…not that it matters, as everyone has the virus present in their body.

The government rolled out the fake tests and, as expected, people have tested positive, which the media has put forth as “evidence” of a new second-wave “spike.”, when it is really evidence that everyone is carrying any and all viruses all the time.  Once everyone in the world is tested, there will be 7.5 billion ‘cases’ of corona.  What will be the experts response to this?

“We also made everybody go for testing, we needed 300 million tests by the next day or else we could not reopen our country,” Dr. Samadi added.

The likelihood that these latest admissions by the WHO about asymptomatic transmission reach the mainstream airwaves is minimal, at best.  The truth would put this scamdemic out of business.

But Dr. Samadi and Newsmax are doing their part to get the news out that the world has been deceived into believing the worst-case scenario about this pandemic – and thus has already accepted the government’s worst-case response to it without a whimper.

“It is very important. It’s breaking news, that if you are not symptomatic and you don’t have any symptoms of fever, chills, shortness of breath, or any of those symptoms we’ve spoken about, the risk of passing it on to other people and being contagious do not exist,” Dr. Samadi emphasized during the interview.

“Studies like this come from a very accurate tracing in countries, like Singapore, and it’s too bad that these researcher’s reports are not making it to The Lancet, and the mainstream media is not covering it to any extent. This is probably one of the biggest news items we have had since the coronavirus outbreak was first announced”. The government-owned mainstream media are only engaged in government sponsored fear mongering. The ‘puppets’ of the US are in full support of the scam.

The Lockdowns are Lethal, COVID is Nothing but a Cold

Digging deeper into this incredible situation the world finds itself in, it is obvious that none of this is stemming from anything natural, spontaneous or organic.  It is contrived from top to bottom to set the stage for a world cataclysmic event that is of a grand scale and vast consequence to humanity.

On the surface, they would have us believe that a temporary medical disaster has unexpectedly developed all on its own that has the potential to wreak havoc on the world populations.  Then, to complicate this cataclysm, society has lost all meaning of the word…’social’.

The absurdly ridiculous response that has been imposed on humanity by brute force is in no way commensurate with the facts of the alleged threat.  They have been trying to create an active form of civil disturbance for several years without success.  Just like the medical threat is totally and obviously contrived, so it this BLM, Soros-funded civil rioting, accompanied by police overstepping their authority and foisting violence on their constituents.

Clinging to the hope that all is destined to return to normalcy is not going work any longer.  Too much irreparable damage has already been done while the threat response gets more intense by the day.  More permanent ruin is created while the masses are cringing in their lockdowns wearing their useless masks and wondering how much longer this will last.  They are desperately clinging to a false hope that this is not what it sure looks like.

It is obvious, suffice to say, that what is going on here has nothing to do with ‘killer viruses’ or ‘equality of human rights’.  These non-issues are intended to keep alive a ray of hope and the justification for nonsense ‘response measures’ that will keep humankind skulking in the dark, incommunicado, quavering in mindless fear while they tighten the screws more to see how much the slaves will meekly take.

I am wondering if you read my blog explaining what a virus is?  Since you are allowing a virus to destroy everything that was good about your life, you really should stop for a minute to learn why that is a bad idea.

A virus is nothing more than a small segment of molecular RNA or DNA that comes from a cell that has killed itself by means of apoptosis.  Viruses are dead. The dead strand of RNA is encapsulated inside of a proteinaceous vesicle and expelled as waste from the body…an exosome.  Virus populations, as tiny dead organic waste materials, are more prevalent than bacterium, fungi, mold, spores, etc. in the category called archaea. Compared to these other forms of archaea, viruses are the tiniest.

They are the most prevalent archaea comprising the human body, which normally contains more than 60 trillion viruses in its VIROME. The next most populous archaea are bacterium, amounting to 30 trillion in every human body, its microbiome. Viruses are also the most populous archaea in the world at large and have existed since the beginning of the life-form eukaryotes, cells with a central nucleus that perform mitosis.

Since viruses are dead, they are not pernicious little organisms that plan to invade and infect you to make you sick.  They have no intelligence or consciousness whatsoever. They have no capacity to plan anything. There’s just a lot of them around and most are doing good rather than harm.  Humans have been living in relative harmony with viruses for the entire 135,000 years of their existence.  Everything in the human body exists in relative good harmony until humans get the idea that they can use something like a bone as a lethal club or a virus as a bioweapon.

In the case in point, the COVID/SARS virus, here is another example of human action taken to try kill other humans.  If you have any hopes for surviving this, you had better get this point very clearly.  Viruses are pretty harmless until the killers, armed with labs and equipment you paid for, start to re-sequence viruses to give them an edge on finding their way to the interior of your eukaryote cells.  Once the eukaryote cells allow the virus into their interiors, the dead organic RNA molecules may be used as raw material in the process of mitosis, to either murder the eukaryote or make an imperfect replication of itself, adversely affecting a part of your body, like your lungs, for instance.

The viruses, themselves, never become a living entity.  They are just molecules that can get incorporated into a now living defective eukaryotic cell.  They never gain living status as an independent organism.  That is how it works.  They just make a mess out of some cells, not out of intent, but out of an accident.  A virus can accidently gain entry through the cell wall of a eukaryote on a vary limited basis and you get a cold.  Or, the problem of the present, killers have created viruses by re-sequencing of the order of the molecules so that they are able to gain entry into the interior of a larger number of eukaryote cells.

This has been the business of weaponizing viruses going back a long ways to HIV, ebola, SARS, MERS, Veterans, H1N1, bird flu, pig flu and all the other annual variations.  “Don’t Worry”, they say, “we have the shots ready for you”.  The other part of this scam is that there is no such thing as an immunization from any virus.  An immunization for COVID/SARS is not possible. Why don’t we have a shot to immunize from the common cold?  It’s not coming, this year or any other year.  They have trained you into the false belief that they can fix you by a vaccine.  They can’t.  But a healthy body can fix the flu pretty quickly.  But nothing can fix you once you have received this special-purpose vaccine.  You will soon be dead, or, at least when they decide you are of no further use. This will include 90% of the US empire world-wide.

How about a virus that could only be made in a laboratory, the false promise of a vaccine, a combination of a viral and bacterial infection better explains COVID-19, and the realization lockdown measures that will kill far more people than any virus.


  • COVID-19 coronavirus is man-made, that has been in circulation for some time now on the internet, has risen out of the “conspiracy theory” stage to bona fide scientific argument emanating from virologists in Norway who claim this novel mutated virus could only have originated from a laboratory rather than mutated in nature.
  • Furthermore, a noted pathologist in eastern Europe, based upon autopsies he has conducted, makes the bold statement that “no one has died from the coronavirus” and that “it is impossible to create a vaccine against the virus”. 18+ years have been spent in failed attempts to produce a coronavirus vaccine already.
  • In addition, researchers in Romania claim the data shows few if any patients die solely of the mutated COVID-19 coronavirus alone and theorize the synergistic combination of a virus + tuberculosis bacterium is the likely reason why some people die a horrid death, claimed to be from COVID-19 alone.
  • Finally, The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have proceeded with lockdown and quarantine measures with no regard for the collateral damage which is devastating countries worldwide, leaving no foreseeable economic future and the possibility of starvation for many millions of people around the world.  It is most likely that they are fully aware of the permanent destruction but care not.  They know this the all part of the RESET.

Story #1: Norwegian virologist Birger Sørensen, in an attempt to develop a vaccine, has broken down elements of the COVID-19 coronavirus and have determined the six mutations identified “could not evolve naturally.”

Sørenson’s group focused on parts of the virus that are changing.  Certain components of the virus are very well adapted to infect humans.  That finding raised suspicion over man-made origins of the virus.  This COVID-19 coronavirus exhibits two ways of attaching itself in the respiratory tract of humans.  One, the well-known entryway to the lower respiratory tract via ACE-2 receptors on living cells (viruses are not live and must enter a living cell and take over its genetic machinery to replicate), and two, an additional receptor that causes pneumonia. 

Says Sørenson:

“The structure of the virus cannot have evolved naturally. When we compare the novel (COVID-19) coronavirus with the one that caused (the previous) SARS, we see that there are altogether six inserts in this virus that stand out compared to other known SARS viruses.”  Four of those inserts increase human vulnerability to COVID-19 infection.

These changes do not exist in other coronaviruses and can only be produced in a laboratory, he says.  Sørensen: “We know that these properties make the virus very infectious, so if it came from nature, there should also be animals infected with this, but we have still not been able to trace the virus in nature… The only place we are aware of, where an equivalent virus to that which causes Covid-19 exists, is in a laboratory.”   He called this an “inconvenient truth.”

Story #2:  “No one has died from the coronavirus”

Calling the World Health Organization a “criminal medical organization” for creating fear and chaos without objective, verifiable proof of a pandemic, Dr. Stoian Alexov of the Bulgarian Pathology Association says “No one has died from the coronavirus.  I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

That eyebrow-raising statement was followed by a claim that pathologists have not been able to identify any antibodies that are specific for COVID-19. Dr. Alexov doubts the veracity of reports that antibodies can be used to treat patients.  Dr. Alexov’s comments were made at the European Society of Pathology webinar on May 18, 2020.

Dr. Alexov says COVID-19 related deaths in Italy were preceded by immunization with the H1N1 flu vaccine that suppresses the immune system, which could have increased lethality.

Dr. Alexov: “Therefore in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether the COVID-19 coronavirus is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by something else.”

Dr. Alexov says “COVID-19 is a predominantly harmless viral infection.”

Dr. Alexov’s statements were published in OFF-GUARDIAN online newspaper and included supportive backing from other health authorities.  The director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center in Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany also said there is a dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.


Accounts of COVID-19 alone having low to no lethality may be explained by the studies involving co-infections with COVID-19 and bacteria (Mycoacteria tuberculosis).  There is growing evidence that co-infection with COVID-19 coronavirus and tuberculosis (bacterial) spells trouble for those who are co-infected.  A more severe form of TB is postulated when both viral and bacterial infections like these are coincident.  The immune system is acutely hampered when individuals are infected by both of these pathogens, say researchers in Romania where TB is at epidemic levels.  However, the precise data needed to predict the impact of this co-infection is still in the process of being collected to confirm this association.

If it is a situation of co-existent corona virus and bacterial TB, it seems probable that the TB could be initially overlooked, with treatment limited to only the corona cold, while the TB is allowed to get a well-established infection underway. It is known that influenza infection may promote the progression of dormant (latent) TB into active infection by hindering the patient’s immune response.  T-cell counts (CD4 and CD8) can drop to undetectable levels when TB and coronavirus infections co-exist. 

Higher TB death rates are reported in winter when influenza outbreaks are common. The association of COVID-19 coronavirus infections with tuberculosis is gaining scientific traction.  Bacterial TB is potentially fatal and treatable with antibiotics.  But it is more common and less feared.  They have conditioned you to be terrified of the ‘virus’, which alone, is not fatal. Of course, they are telling you that it’s the virus that is the killer.

Claimed to be mortal outbreaks of COVID-19 coronavirus were geographically centered in areas that had been fighting TB epidemics: Wuhan, China; Modena, Italy; New York City, largely because of immigrant populations or aerosol contamination via wind storms of TB from pig farms.

Also, co-infection with HIV increases the danger of COVID-19 coronavirus.  There are an estimated 13 million Americans with dormant TB; 2 billion worldwide.  It appears the fear over COVID-19 coronavirus infection is highly exaggerated except for those who are unknowingly co-infected.


Collateral damage from draconian measures to control the spread of COVID-19 coronavirus is crushing economies and thrusting whole nations into the threat of extinction due to potential food shortages, shortages of currency and coins, commercial refusal to use legal tender over credit cards, and refusal to work due to fear of infection.

A data analyst in South Africa asserts the consequences of the country’s lockdown will lead to 29-times more deaths than from the coronavirus itself.  The report says attempts to save lives from the COVID-19 coronavirus over other causes of death “is a false dichotomy.” Choosing to exclusively treat the common cold while turning away those with high mortality ailments is idiocy. Giving every ‘bed’ to people with colds in an attempt to ‘flatten the curve’ only keeps hospitals underutilized, it doesn’t reduce body counts. 

The lockdown actually restricts accessibility to medical care leading to further needless deaths.  The poor will suffer severe consequences ahead of the rest of the population in South Africa.  Focus on saving the lives of at-risk individuals would be more effective, says the report.

In both New York City and Italy, over 95% of the deaths occurred among individuals with co-morbid conditions (obesity, diabetes, hypertension and autoimmunity) and old age.  By location and skin color, older infirm patients in nursing homes and dark-skinned individuals, both who have low vitamin D levels, are at greater risk for mortality.  The indiscriminate lockdown of entire populations leads to societal paralysis.  South Africa is trading a viral presence, which is universal but not mortal for well known mortal disease that is treatable.  The lockdown disaster dwarfs the number of deaths due to COVID-19.  Lockdown of the healthy can only lead to the death of those otherwise healthy.

I Guarantee You are not aware of the Dangers of Wearing Face Masks

Healthy People Should Not Wear Face Masks

Bio-engineered Furin Cleavage Sites make virus more invasive in a low oxygen environment caused by wearing Face Masks

During the COVID-19 pandemic, public health experts began telling us to follow a number of disease mitigation strategies that sounded reasonably scientific, but actually had little or no support in the scientific literature. Community-wearing of masks was one of the more dangerous recommendations from our heinous alleged public health experts.

The Pandemic of Bad Science and Public Health Misinformation on Community-Wearing of Masks

Renowned neurosurgeon, Russell Blaylock, MD had this to say about the science of masks: As for the scientific support for the use of face masks, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. The fact is, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficiency in controlling flu virus transmission. – Russell Blaylock, MD

Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks to the Healthy

Quarantining Healthy People – A Failed Experiment that should never have been attempted

This is back assward. You quarantine and mask the sick…not the healthy. We were told that everyone, even the healthy, should quarantine at home. All were told to “shelter-in-place,” isolate ourselves, hide alone, indoors, until the danger of the virus passed, despite the large body of scientific evidence that shows our immune systems thrive on diversity of exposures, sunlight, time in nature, and in loving company of others. Humans are social creatures who MUST have social contact with others to survive in any semblance normalcy.

Furthermore, it seemed that the alleged public health experts were ignoring the very real harms that result from shutting down the economy, putting hundreds of millions of workers out of work, and the shadow pandemic of suicides, drug abuse, overdoses, and other harms that follow massive economic downturns while the subject is in solitary confinement.

Historically and by definition, quarantines had always been about sequestering the sick. Never before has anyone beat a virus by quarantining the healthy. We were not told that quarantining healthy people has never been done before. And the experiment failed. Doing the exact opposite of what would be correct is beyond highly suspicious. It should make you wonder what is really going on here because there is zero justification or precedent. The ‘health experts’ seem to be very intent on getting more people sick to increase counts and puff out the statistical data.

Community-Wearing of Masks is a Bad Recommendation

We were frequently confused by the mixed messages coming from public health agencies. Early in the pandemic, Dr. Fauci, the U.S. Surgeon General, and the WHO all told the public, in no uncertain terms, not to wear masks. Then, over the course of the next several weeks and months, the CDC twice changed their recommendations, as did the WHO, and the recommendations always contradicted each other!

The CDC made the mistake of telling us cloth masks worked, and they even provided directions on their website for making homemade cloth masks.

To clear up the confusion, I will show that the scientific evidence not only does not support the community-wearing of face masks, but the evidence shows that healthy people wearing face masks pose serious health risks to wearers.

Hiding our faces behind masks and isolating in our homes is not the solution for people with healthy immune systems. Supporting the health of your immune system, confidently confronting all pathogens, and allowing immunity to develop and protect the vulnerable populations should be the goal. Or, how about teaching the people about ways to improve their own immune system’s constitution.

What’s happening in the world today, including the misinformation surrounding community mask wearing, is about political agendas, symbolism, fear, and dividing and isolating the people. It has nothing to do with science.

Medical Masks are Bad for Health

As a Doctor of Naturopathy and Chiropractic, I’ve carefully read the scientific literature regarding the use of face masks to mitigate viral transmission. I believe the self-proclaimed public health experts have community wearing of masks all wrong. What follows are the key issues that should inform the public against wearing medical face masks during the CoVID-19 pandemic, as well as during any future respiratory maladies.

Face masks decrease oxygen, increase carbon dioxide, and alter breathing in ways that increase susceptibility and severity of all colds and flus

Mask wearers frequently report symptoms of difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, headache, lightheadedness, dizziness, anxiety, brain fog, difficulty concentrating, and other subjective symptoms The longer a surgical mask is worn, the more saturated with moisture it becomes, and the more significantly it inhibits the inflow of oxygen and outflow of carbon dioxide.

In fact, clinical research shows that medical masks lower blood oxygen levels and raise carbon dioxide blood levels. The deviations in oxygen and carbon dioxide may not reach the clinical criteria for hypoxia (low blood oxygen), hypoxemia (low tissue oxygen), or hypercapnia (elevated blood carbon dioxide), but they can deviate enough to cause even healthy individuals to become symptomatic, as occurred with the surgeons studied and published in this report:

Preliminary Report on Surgical Mask Induced Deoxygenation During Major Surgery

At the same time masks inhibit oxygen intake, they trap the carbon dioxide rich breath in the mouth/mask inter-space. Thus, a fraction of carbon dioxide previously exhaled is inhaled at each respiratory cycle.

Masks force you to re-breathe a portion of your own breath, including all the toxins the lungs were trying to remove from the body (more on this later).

As medical masks lower oxygen and raise carbon dioxide in the blood, the brain senses the changes and the risk they pose to the maintenance of normal physiology. Thus, the brain goes to work to bring things back in order. To obtain more oxygen and remove more carbon dioxide, the brain tells the lungs to increase the rate (frequency) and depth of breaths. Unfortunately, struggle as they may, your brain and lungs can not fully compensate for the negative effects of the mask.

Some may even suffer the symptoms of carbon dioxide toxicity.

For people with diseases of the lungs, especially chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), face masks are intolerable to wear as they worsen breathlessness.

In the case of respiratory pathogens, the negative effects of masks and the respiratory changes they induce could increase susceptibility and transmission of CoVID-19, as well as other respiratory pathogens.

Viral particles move through face masks with relative ease. Studies show that about 44% of viral particles pass through surgical masks, 97% pass through cloth masks, and about 5% through N95 masks. Increasing tidal volume (depth of breaths) results in literally sucking more air, more forcefully through and around the mask. Any contaminates on, in, or around the mask are more forcefully suctioned into the mouth and lungs as a result of the compensatory increases in tidal volume.

The changes in respiratory rate and depth may also increase the severity of colds as the increased tidal volume delivers the viral particles deeper into the lungs.

These changes may worsen the community transmission of CoVID-19 when infected people wearing masks exhale air more heavily contaminated with viral particles from the lungs.

These effects are amplified if face masks are contaminated with viruses, bacteria, or fungi that find their way or opportunistically grow in the warm, moist environment that medical masks quickly become.

Despite the scientific evidence to the contrary, so-called public health experts claim that medical masks do not cause clinically significant hypoxia (low oxygen) and hypercapnia (high CO2). I would like to ask those experts to explain the growing number of cases in which medical masks worn during exercise have resulted in lung injuries and heart attacks:

Two Chinese boys drop dead during PE lessons while wearing face masks amid concerns over students’ fitness following three months of school closure .

Jogger’s lung collapses after he ran for 2.5 miles while wearing a face mask .

If medical masks were perfectly safe and effective, then why would healthy boys suffer heart attacks or a 26 year old man collapse his lung while wearing masks and running?! In my opinion, these are tragic examples of the risks of wearing medical masks. And we are only getting started.

SARS CoV-2 becomes more dangerous when blood oxygen levels decline

Low blood levels of oxygen is a critical issue in the pathogenicity of CoVID-19. The virus’ ability to infect cells is markedly enhanced by oxygen desaturation, which we know occurs when wearing a surgical mask.

One of the features that make SARS CoV-2 uniquely infectious is the “furin cleavage” sequence in the virus that activates increased ACE2 receptor attack and cellular invasion in low oxygen environments.

The furin cleavage site of SARS CoV-2 increases cellular invasion, especially during hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels).

The furin cleavage site found in SARS CoV-2 is the likely result of the bio-engineering “gain of function” (increasing the virulence of a pathogen) research conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the University of Maryland. This unethical, dangerous, and illegal-in-most-countries research is alleged to have been funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci (with $7.4 million taxpayer dollars) and cohort, Bill Gates.

Furin cleavage sites are found in some of the most pathogenic forms of influenza. The furin cleavage domain in SARS CoV-2 is cleaved by furin on the target cell.

Furin is a ubiquitous protease in humans. It is found in a wide variety of tissues in the human body: heart, brain, kidney, etc. It is expressed in significant concentrations in human lung cells, the common target of SARS CoV-2. When the virus encounters a lung cell expressing (both an ACE2 receptor and furin), the furin cleaves the furin cleavage site on SARS CoV-2, activates the virus’ surface S (spike) protein, and enables the virus to more effectively bind the ACE2 receptors and more efficiently invade the cell.

Remember how medical face masks decrease blood oxygen levels? Well, now you need to know that SARS CoV-2’s ability to invade and infect our cells is greatly enhanced under conditions of low oxygen.

Therefore, wearing a medical mask may increase the severity of CoVID-19. If that does not motivate you to ditch your mask, there are more reasons to come.

Some of the most pathogenic forms of influenza and HIV are armed with similar furin cleavage sites. However, furin cleavage sites are not present in other beta coronaviruses. The furin cleavage site is NOT present in SARS CoV-1, MERS, or the other “bat coronaviruses” postulated to be the progenitors of SARS CoV-2.

It is worth repeating: SARS-CoV, which is closely related to the newest SARS-CoV-2 strain, does not bear the furin cleavage site. So how did SARS CoV-2 gain the furin cleavage function?

Dr. Fauci built his career on HIV research, HIV vaccine failures, and unethical “gain of function” research. He undoubtedly knows a lot about furin cleavage sites and the suspicious origins of SARS CoV-2. Perhaps Congress should ask him…under oath…preferably with an indictment.

The question we should all be asking is how did the genetic sequence that codes for this serious gain of function that increases the potential for the virus to successfully infiltrate the host eukaryote, find its way into SARS-CoV-2? That’s the trillion dollar question; it demands a real answer. This is bio-weaponizing a virus that would otherwise never even be noticed.

Medical masks trap exhaled viral particles in the mouth/mask interspace, increase viral load, and increase the severity of disease.

Face masks trap exhaled particles in the mouth/mask inter-space. The trapped particles are prevented from removal from the airways. The mask wearer is thus forced to re-breathe the particles, increasing infectious viral particles in the airways and lungs. In this way, medical masks cause self-inoculation, increase viral load, and increase the severity of disease.

The possibility of cell wall penetration increases when an individual is masked, oxygen lessens, viral load increases, from particle re-breathing, and the disease taxes the weak innate immune system.

  1. The main purpose of the innate immune response is to immediately prevent the spread and movement of foreign pathogens throughout the body.
  2. The innate immune system plays a crucial role in destroying the virus, preventing infection, or decreasing the viral load to decrease the severity of infection.
  3. The innate immunity’s effectiveness is highly dependent on the viral load. If face masks increase viral particle re-breathing at the same time they create a humid habitat where bacteria cultures become actively infectious, the mask increases the viral load and can overwhelm a weak innate immune system.

This trapping, re-breathing, and increasing pathogen load delivered to the lungs becomes dramatically more dangerous when the medical mask becomes contaminated with the opportunistic viruses, bacteria, molds and fungi that can grow in the warm, moist environment of the mask.

“By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.” – Russell Blaylock, MD

Masks are less than worthless because asymptomatic spreading of SARS CoV-2 is impossible. Everyone already has plenty.

Much of the recommendation for community wearing of masks was based on the belief that asymptomatic carriers of SARS CoV-2 were responsible for the transmission and spread of CoVID-19. There was no real scientific evidence for this belief. However, antibody testing began demonstrating larger numbers of people with antibodies to the virus than anyone imagined. Therefore, the belief was that these people must represent asymptomatic carriers that were spreading the disease. This is utter nonsense. The virus is ever-present in all people all the time.  This is a simple fact that is well known by anyone with any knowledge of viruses.

The fact that alleged experts are touting this nonsense is very telling.  It translates to this:  they are sure you know little to nothing about viruses so they can bamboozle you into obeying them, no matter what the facts.  Why do they want to have this power over you?  Because the pandemic is not an issue, only a smokescreen.  It is making it possible for them to foist a much more serious threat without you even suspecting.  The latter threat is deadly, the corona is not.  This is mass depopulation on a scale never imagined.  This is RESET 2020, aka UN Agenda 2030.

Contact tracing has determined that asymptomatic cases are not causing secondary transmission:

Asymptomatic spread of coronavirus is “very rare,” even the WHO says in a moment of uncensored truth by an employee, that is impossible to ‘walk back’.

“We have a number of reports from countries who are doing very detailed contact tracing,” she [Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit], said. “They’re following asymptomatic cases. They’re following contacts. And they’re not finding secondary transmission onward. It’s very rare.”

More from the article:

Coronavirus presence without symptoms aren’t driving the spread of the virus, World Health Organization officials said Monday, crushing concerns by uninformed researchers beliefs that the disease could be difficult to contain due to asymptomatic infections, which are impossible.

Some people, particularly young and otherwise healthy individuals, who are infected by the coronavirus never develop symptoms or only develop mild common cold symptoms. Since everyone carries the virus, it can develop symptoms at any time a person’s immune system weakens.  Then you have a cold.  So What!! That why they are called ‘common’.

Preliminary evidence from the earliest outbreaks indicated that the virus could spread from person-to-person contact, even if the carrier didn’t have symptoms. This is coming from talking heads like Fauci, Gates and Birx. But WHO officials now say that it is not the way it’s being transmitted.

“From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.”…very rare like never?

The fact that asymptomatic carriers are not a major driver of the disease tells us that masks are unnecessary.

The Evidence for Aerosol Transmission does not exist

This is not a case where one minute you did not have the virus in your body, then you shook hands with someone and now you have it.  You have 60 trillion viruses in your body’s virome at all times.  You do not need someone to give them to you…you already have them. All of them.  How did you get all those viruses? You live in a virtual sea of viruses, bacterium, fungi, molds and archaea. They do not make you ill except for the case where you become susceptible due to your constitutional state of immune function.

Wearing a face mask makes the exhaled air go into the eyes.

This generates an uncomfortable feeling and an impulse to touch your eyes. If your hands are contaminated and you touch or rub your eyes, you are potentially infecting yourself.

Lack of Scientific Evidence for Community Wearing of Face Masks

There is no reasonable scientific evidence to support healthy people wearing masks. Russell Blaylock, MD had this to say about the science of masks:

“As for the scientific support for the use of face mask, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that,none of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.”

 Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. The fact is, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficacy in controlling flu virus transmission either.

Here’s what a group of physicians wrote regarding Universal Masking in Hospitals in the CoVID-19 Era in the New England Journal of Medicine:

“We know that wearing a mask outside healthcare facilities offers little, if any, protection. The chance of catching CoVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore insignificant. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic driven by TV propaganda.

The clinical research on this topic is clear: even when handled and worn properly, which is definitely NOT happening in the public spaces, wearing a mask in public offers little or no protection from infection in either direction. However, when masks are handled and worn improperly, they are a personal and public health disaster.

The “Hamster Study” is an example of weak science used to support bad recommendations

Here’s an example of one of the experimental studies used by some public health authorities to support wearing masks in the community:

Wearing a mask can significantly reduce coronavirus transmission, study on hamsters claims

Does this study of “masking” hamster cages sound like the kind of solid scientific evidence that supports recommendations or mandates for everyone to wear masks during the CoVID-19 pandemic? No. The hamsters were not forced to wear tiny hamster surgical masks, their cages were covered with a barrier made of mask-like material. The experiment was more about walls or barriers than it was masks.

The experiment did not create the same conditions experienced by masked humans. Placing a cloth barrier on hamster cages is nothing like masking the mouth and nose of humans. The way this experiment was set up, inhalations were unimpeded, therefore, arterial oxygen levels would not be expected to lower. Likewise, exhalations were not trapped in a way that would force the hamsters to suffer re-breathing their own carbon-dioxide or subject them to the dangers of re-inhaling the infectious viral particles released with each exhalation.

This study does not provide support for the recommendation for masking all members of the public to reduce transmission of SARS CoV-2. Those citing this study to support wearing masks in the community are inappropriately extrapolating and conflating the experiment’s findings to contrive a conclusion the experimental methodology does not allow.

Public Health Experts Are Confused and Contradictory on Masks

Since the first days of the pandemic, Fauci, Birx, the CDC, and the WHO have been confusing the public as they flipped, flopped, and contradicted each other on the community wearing of medical masks. We should expect more than confusing, contradictory, unevidenced advice from our public health experts. Their lack of evidence and clarity was subverted to the belief that any level of protection was better than none. However, no one seemed to be fully considering the downsides of masks.

The first advice – “masks are unnecessary”

In the early onset of the pandemic, nearly all organizations and specialists, including Dr. Anthony Fauci (March 8, 2020), advised against wearing a mask. The science simply did not support community wearing of masks:

“There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask,” infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci told 60 Minutes.

Fauci later walked back those comments and tried to explain his comments were taken out of context. Instead of saying he was wrong and pointing to scientific evidence that caused him to change his mind, he obfuscated.

Here’s an infographic made by the World Health Organization (WHO) in late 2019.

“For healthy people, wear a mask only if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCoV infection”

There is no better example of the lack of scientific clarity on community mask wearing than the CDC’s flip-flopping on the issue. Initially, the CDC recommended against community mask wear, then reversed that position a few weeks later. Now, they are doubling down on this mask wearing when it has been studied more deeply and found to be useless for  protection from virus and highly dangerous to those wearing masks for any extended period of time.

The CDC and WHO appear to be in disagreement on this recommendation. CDC (currently) recommends community mask wear, whereas the WHO does not…and they confirmed this fact again on March 31, 2020:

Canada Officially Recommends Against Community Wearing of Masks

On the official website of the Canadian government, a page lists many reasons why homemade masks are practically useless while also hindering oxygen intake.

Homemade masks are not medical devices and are not regulated like medical masks and respirators. Their use poses a number of limitations:

  • they have not been tested to recognized standards
  • the fabrics are not the same as used in surgical masks or respirators
  • the edges are not designed to form a seal around the nose and mouth
  • they do not provide protection against virus-sized particles
  • they can be difficult to breathe through and can prevent you from getting the required amount of oxygen needed by your body

These types of masks are not effective in blocking virus particles that may be transmitted by coughing, sneezing or certain medical procedures. They do not provide protection from virus particles because of a potential loose fit and the materials used allow virus sized particles to easily pass through..

CDC supports homemade cloth masks…but the science does not

Cloth masks have no place in disease mitigation. They have been shown to be ineffective and worse (see below).

The CDC currently recommends (and some states mandate that everyone wear some form of face cover anytime they leave their home and enter the public space.

(None of the studies referenced by the CDC represent clinical research on the public use of face masks.

The CDC even provides detailed instructions for how you can make your own face covers from common household items. The CDC and state public health advisors make up their science as they go along, but it is obviously not from any authentic studies.

Cloth masks: Dangerous to your health?

It should be well known that cloth masks, bandannas, or handkerchiefs will do nothing. The penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% compared to medical masks with 44%.  In fact, they may actually increase your risk of becoming ill from CoVID-19 and other influenza-like illnesses.

Medical masks must be properly fitted and sealed around the mouth and nose. Masks must not be touched. Medical masks are single use devices designed to be worn for a relatively short period of time, then discarded. Once the mask becomes saturated with moisture from breath, which, if properly fit, takes about an hour, they should be replaced. The more moisture-saturated the mask becomes, the more it blocks oxygen, increases re-breathing of carbon dioxide, re-breathing of viral particles, and becomes a breeding ground for other pathogens.

The longer masks are worn, the more they are touched, and the more contaminated they become.

In addition to capturing pathogens on their outer surface, masks also quickly become moist, warm breeding grounds for bacteria and fungi. Thus, these opportunistic pathogens increase the risk of disease as they are inhaled into the airways, transferred to the hands, and end up on anything touched.

Unless medical masks are worn and handled properly, with strict adherence to sterility practices, medical masks worn by the community are prescriptions for disease and disaster.

What the CDC and WHO should have said about when and how to wear medical masks

  • First, get healthy.  You could wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with a influenza, but, if you are healthy, you really have no need.
  • Wear a mask if you are coughing or sneezing. Better yet, STAY HOME.
  • If you wear a mask, then you must know how to use it and dispose of it properly.
  • Mask type matters. Virus are more than 1,000 times smaller than bacteria.
  • Medical grade surgical masks should be handled properly, never touched, and never reused
    • Medical grade N95 masks/respirators have some merit.
    • Cloth masks, bandannas, scarves, and homemade masks are useless.

Rigorous sterility maintenance techniques required

  • Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent washing with soap and water and strictly only for bacterium, not viruses.  Virus are dead unless they are inside of a eukaryote cell.  Masks, soap and water, antibacterial cleansers are only for bacterium, fungi and molds, not for viruses.
  • Before putting on a mask, clean hands with soap and water. Only use alcohol-based hand cleaners when soap and water are not available. Again, this is not going to work for viruses.
  • Cover your mouth and nose with the mask and make sure there are no gaps between your face and the mask. Proper wear, fit, handling, and disposal are critical to efficacy.
  • Avoid touching the mask while using it; if you do, clean your hands with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.
  • Replace the mask with a new one as soon as it is damp and do not reuse single-use masks.
  • To remove the mask: remove it from behind (do not touch the front of the mask); discard immediately in a closed bin; clean hands with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water. Again, this is for bacterium.
  • No mask should be worn and reused (unless it is properly sterilized, which is highly unlikely to occur in the general public) 

Experts Speak Out

If you don’t believe me, listen to what these experts have to say:

Dr. Brosseau, a national expert on respiratory protection and infectious diseases

In April, 2020, Dr. Brosseau, a national expert on respiratory protection and infectious diseases at the University of Illinois at Chicago published an article titled “Masks-for-all for COVID-19 not based on sound data”. She wrote: “Sweeping mask recommendations—as many have proposed—will not reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, as evidenced by the widespread practice of wearing such masks in Huwei province, China, before and during its mass COVID-19 transmission experience earlier this year. Our review of relevant studies indicates that masks will be ineffective at preventing SARS-CoV-2 transmission, whether worn as source control or as PPE.

If masks had been the solution in Asia, shouldn’t they have stopped the pandemic before it spread elsewhere?”

Ben Garrison: Ditch the Masks, Morons!

Beware the cult of the Mask zombies

Everything about COVID-19 stinks of lies:
Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci, and the Deep State have warned about such an event and indeed they have rehearsed such a scenario as recently as last year.

Dr. Fauci made sure the lab in Wuhan received millions of dollars in taxpayer money to expedite their plan.

It has occurred during an election year–and that’s always suspicious.

The virus serves as a distraction from the Deep State’s RESET 2020, UN Agenda 2030.

The virus helps advance the UN’s Agenda 21 (a part of Agenda 2030), Bill Gates’ ID 2020 and traceable ‘mark of the beast’ tattoos via vaccination, as well as a cashless society with a Chinese-style social credit system for the survivors.

Free speech continues to get trounced by social media. Only the ‘official medical authorities’ are allowed a say. Those authorities are corrupt and untrustworthy. They include the CDC, the NIA, AMA, WHO and everything the Gates Foundation pollutes with its dirty money. Only ‘official’ opinions about the virus are allowed to be expressed.’ We have been allowed to play the freedom and democracy game for a little while, but the real Masters of the Planet are going for their RESET, which takes the US and its empire out of contention and replaces it by China.

To keep the masses subdued during the RESET, they are playing both the corona and the BLM riot game.  No one seems to be looking for what is the real agenda.

We can resist by refusing to wear masks, which are far more harmful to our health than the negligible chance of dying from the virus.  If we do not practice civil disobedience somewhere along the way, they will only keep tightening the screws more and more.

-Ben Garr

Blaylock: Face Masks Pose Serious Risks To The Health of the Wearer

  • Dr. Russell Blaylock warns that not only do face masks fail to protect the healthy from getting sick, but they also create serious health risks to the wearer. The bottom line is that if you are not sick, you should not wear a face mask.
  • As businesses reopen, many are requiring shoppers and employees to wear a face mask. Costco, for instance, will not allow shoppers into the store without wearing a face mask. Many employers are requiring all employees to wear a face mask while at work. In some jurisdictions, all citizens must wear a face mask if they are outside of their own home. ⁃ TN Editor

With the advent of the so-called COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a number of medical practices that have little or no scientific support being promoted to reduce the spread of infection. One of these measures is the wearing of facial masks, either a surgical-type mask, bandanna or N95 respirator mask. When this pandemic began and we knew little about the virus itself or its epidemiologic behavior, it was assumed that it would behave, in terms of spread among communities, like other respiratory viruses. Little has presented itself after intense study of this virus and its behavior to change this perception.

This is somewhat of an unusual virus in that for the vast majority of people infected by the virus, one experiences either no illness (asymptomatic) or very little sickness. Only a very small number of people are at risk of a potentially serious outcome from the infection—mainly those with underlying serious medical conditions in conjunction with advanced age and frailty, those with immune compromising conditions and nursing home patients near the end of their lives. There is growing evidence that the treatment protocol issued to treating doctors by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), mainly intubation and use of a ventilator (respirator), may have contributed significantly to the high death rate in these select individuals. Ventilators have racked up a 97% mortality rate.

By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.

Russell Blaylock, MD

As for the scientific support for the use of face masks, a recent careful examination of the literature, in which 17 of the best studies were analyzed, concluded that, “None of the studies established a conclusive relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza infection.” Keep in mind, no studies have been done to demonstrate that either a cloth mask or the N95 mask has any effect on transmission of the COVID-19 virus. Any recommendations, therefore, have to be based on studies of influenza virus transmission. And, as you have seen, there is no conclusive evidence of their efficacy in controlling flu virus transmission.

It is also instructive to know that until recently, the CDC did not recommend wearing a face mask or covering of any kind, unless a person was known to be infected, that is, until recently. Non-infected people need not wear a mask. When a person has TB we have them wear a mask, not the entire community of non-infected. The recommendations by the CDC and the WHO are not based on any studies of this virus and have never been used to contain any other virus pandemic or epidemic in history.

Now that we have established that there is no scientific evidence necessitating the wearing of a face mask for prevention, are there dangers to wearing a face mask, especially for long periods? Several studies have indeed found significant problems with wearing such a mask. This can vary from headaches, to increased airway resistance, carbon dioxide accumulation, to hypoxia, all the way to serious life-threatening complications.

There is a difference between the N95 respirator mask and the surgical mask (cloth or paper mask) in terms of side effects. The N95 mask, which filters out 95% of particles with a median diameter >0.3 µm2, because it impairs respiratory exchange (breathing) to a greater degree than a soft mask, and is more often associated with headaches. In one such study, researchers surveyed 212 healthcare workers (47 males and 165 females) asking about presence of headaches with N95 mask use, duration of the headaches, type of headaches and if the person had preexisting headaches.2

They found that about a third of the workers developed headaches with use of the mask, most had preexisting headaches that were worsened by the mask wearing, and 60% required pain medications for relief. As to the cause of the headaches, while straps and pressure from the mask could be causative, the bulk of the evidence points toward hypoxia and/or hypercapnia as the cause. That is, a reduction in blood oxygenation (hypoxia) or an elevation in blood C02 (hypercapnia). It is known that the N95 mask, if worn for hours, can reduce blood oxygenation as much as 20%, which can lead to a loss of consciousness, as happened to the hapless fellow driving around alone in his car wearing an N95 mask, causing him to pass out, and to crash his car and sustain injuries. I am sure that we have several cases of elderly individuals or any person with poor lung function passing out, hitting their head. This, of course, can lead to death.

A more recent study involving 159 healthcare workers aged 21 to 35 years of age found that 81% developed headaches from wearing a face mask.3 Some had pre-existing headaches that were precipitated by the masks. All participants felt like the headaches affected their work performance.

Unfortunately, no one is telling the frail elderly and those with lung diseases, such as COPD, emphysema or pulmonary fibrosis, of these dangers when wearing a facial mask of any kind—which can cause a severe worsening of lung function. This also includes lung cancer patients and people having had lung surgery, especially with partial resection or even the removal of a whole lung.

While most agree that the N95 mask can cause significant hypoxia and hypercapnia, another study of surgical masks found significant reductions in blood oxygen as well. In this study, researchers examined the blood oxygen levels in 53 surgeons using an oximeter. They measured blood oxygenation before surgery as well as at the end of surgeries.4 The researchers found that the mask reduced the blood oxygen levels (pa02) significantly. The longer the duration of wearing the mask, the greater the fall in blood oxygen levels.

The importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19 and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence, your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so, having a much worse outcome.5,6,7

People with cancer, especially if the cancer has spread, will be at a further risk from prolonged hypoxia as the cancer grows best in a microenvironment that is low in oxygen. Low oxygen also promotes inflammation which can promote the growth, invasion and spread of cancers.8,9 Repeated episodes of hypoxia have been proposed as a significant factor in atherosclerosis and hence increases all cardiovascular (heart attacks) and cerebrovascular (strokes) diseases.10

There is another danger to wearing these masks on a daily basis, especially if worn for several hours. When a person is infected with a respiratory virus, they will expel some of the virus with each breath. If they are wearing a mask, especially an N95 mask or other tightly fitting mask, they will be constantly rebreathing the viruses, raising the concentration of the virus in the lungs and the nasal passages. We know that people who have the worst reactions to the coronavirus have the highest concentrations of the virus early on. And this leads to the deadly cytokine storm in a selected number.

It gets even more frightening. Newer evidence suggests that in some cases the virus can enter the brain.11,12 In most instances it enters the brain by way of the olfactory nerves (smell nerves), which connect directly with the area of the brain dealing with recent memory and memory consolidation. By wearing a mask, the exhaled viruses will not be able to escape and will concentrate in the nasal passages, enter the olfactory nerves and travel into the brain.13

It is evident from this review that there is insufficient evidence that wearing a mask of any kind can have a significant impact in preventing the spread of this virus. The fact that this virus is a relatively benign infection for the vast majority of the population and that most of the at-risk group also survive, from an infectious disease and epidemiological standpoint, by letting the virus spread through the healthier population we will reach a herd immunity level rather quickly that will end this pandemic quickly and prevent a return next winter. During this time, we need to protect the at-risk population by avoiding close contact, boosting their immunity with compounds that boost cellular immunity and in general, care for them.

One should not attack and insult those who have chosen not to wear a mask, as these studies suggest that is the wise choice to make.

Dr. Pamela Popper

Here’s what Dr. Pamela Popper said on her YouTube discussion of “What the Research Shows About Masks

Masking the public was never about science…

Community wearing of face masks was never about science, health, or disease mitigation; it was always about symbolism, fear, and psychological operations to control the population.

Instead of wearing a face mask, boost your immune system! Here are some of Dr. Meehan’s top supplement recommendations for supporting your immune system:

Support your immune system!


  1. bin-Reza F et al. The use of mask and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: A systematic review of the scientific evidence. Resp Viruses 2012;6(4):257-67.
  2. Zhu JH et al. Effects of long-duration wearing of N95 respirator and surgical facemask: a pilot study. J Lung Pulm Resp Res 2014:4:97-100.
  3. Ong JJY et al. Headaches associated with personal protective equipment- A cross-sectional study among frontline healthcare workers during COVID-19. Headache 2020;60(5):864-877.
  4. Bader A et al. Preliminary report on surgical mask induced deoxygenation during major surgery. Neurocirugia 2008;19:12-126.
  5. Shehade H et al. Cutting edge: Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 negatively regulates Th1 function. J Immunol 2015;195:1372-1376.
  6. Westendorf AM et al. Hypoxia enhances immunosuppression by inhibiting CD4+ effector T cell function and promoting Treg activity. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;41:1271-84.
  7. Sceneay J et al. Hypoxia-driven immunosuppression contributes to the pre-metastatic niche. Oncoimmunology 2013;2:1 e22355.
  8. Blaylock RL. Immunoexcitatory mechanisms in glioma proliferation, invasion and occasional metastasis. Surg Neurol Inter 2013;4:15.
  9. Aggarwal BB. Nuclear factor-kappaB: The enemy within. Cancer Cell 2004;6:203-208.
  10. Savransky V et al. Chronic intermittent hypoxia induces atherosclerosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2007;175:1290-1297.
  11. Baig AM et al. Evidence of the COVID-19 virus targeting the CNS: Tissue distribution, host-virus interaction, and proposed neurotropic mechanisms. ACS Chem Neurosci 2020;11:7:995-998.
  12. other coronaviruses. Brain Behavior, and Immunity, In press.
  13. Perlman S et al. Spread of a neurotropic murine coronavirus into the CNS via the trigeminal and olfactory nerves. Virology 1989;170:556-560.

Wu Y et al. Nervous system involvement after infection with COVID-19 and

Greenhalgh T, Schmid MB, Czypionka T, et al. Face masks for the public during the covid-19 crisis. BMJ 2020;:m1435. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1435

Vu YA, London WM, Vu YA, et al. Precautionary Principle. 2013;:9780199756797–0046. doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756797-0046

Advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in healthcare settings in the context of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19)

Desai AN, Aronoff DM. Masks and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Published Online First: 17 April 2020. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6437

Kyung SY, Kim Y, Hwang H, et al. Risks of N95 Face Mask Use in Subjects With COPD. Respir Care 2020;:respcare.06713. doi:10.4187/respcare.06713

Chen Y, Zhou Z, Min W. Mitochondria, Oxidative Stress and Innate Immunity. Front Physiol 2018;9:1487. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01487

Potts M, Prata N, Walsh J, et al. Parachute approach to evidence based medicine. BMJ 2006;333:701–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7570.701

No One has Died from the Coronavirus

I have said this in my blogs from day-one.  Coronavirus is not lethal, it is not treatable by vaccine, it is present in the Virome of virtually everyone living in the world, therefore is not contagious.

Therefore, everyone will always test positive for the presence of the virus, which they will call an ‘infection’ or a ‘case’. They will trot out a vaccine, claiming it is salvation when it is really death.  They will manufacture mortality by ‘genociding’ the elderly in elder-care facilities, fiddling the ‘cause-of-death’ of both new and old death-certificates, incentivizing hospitals financially to administer breathing apparatus that is 98% lethal, and so on.

The response measures of world governments are ridiculously absurd on the basic pretense that governments are trying to offer something of benefit to the masses.  They are not. They are revealing of what the real agenda is.  The measure do not, in any real world, equate in any way with the nonthreat of a virus that has been around for several billions of years and never been more than a passing nuisance that the body easily disposes of.

The response measures are intended for a different purpose, to make you fearful, to deprive you of your normal lifestyle, to make you wear filthy oxygen-depriving masks when everyone already has the virus in their body (ergo, no contagion), to social-distance and isolate you from human contact, to make necessities of life unavailable, to make all humans aliens to one another, to self-confine yourself to your pen, to encourage you to watch TV incessantly for the purpose of cementing your fears, to avoid sun exposure so you will become vitamin D deficient, to prevent you from discussing and analyzing your common dilemma with others so you unable to share opinions, analysis and ideas for potential counter-measures, to destroy the jobs and economic system of every city, county and state of every country, to make food supplies disappear by dumping crops and killing animals, while preventing any food replacement, and on and on.

You would have to be deaf, dumb and blind to fail to see that the corona scare is fake, the race riots are fake and that this is all a cover for a much more insidious destruction of a large part of the world population.  If you believe that compliance is going to save you, I have very bad news.

It was with relief that I read the following white-paper that confirms every word I have written. If you are too gutless to practice civil disobedience, at least refuse the whole idea of mandatory vaccines.  After all, if what the governments say is true, then you will be safe, and I will be the one to die from coronavirus, or will be ‘suicided’ for revealing the truth to you.  If you think this is going to blow over and return to some sort of ‘normal’, I have more bad news for you.  This has all gone too far now.  It will not be stopped unless enough people grow some balls to resist.

“No one has died from the coronavirus”

 Dr Stoian Alexov, President of the Bulgarian Pathology Association

A high-profile European pathologist is reporting that he and his colleagues across Europe have not found any evidence of any deaths caused by the novel coronavirus on that continent.

Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Another stunning revelation from Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president Dr. Alexov is that he believes it’s “impossible” to create a vaccine against the virus. After all, where are the cold or HIV vaccines?

He also revealed that European pathologists haven’t identified any antibodies that are specific for SARS-CoV-2.

These stunning statements raise major questions, including about officials’ and scientists’ claims regarding the many vaccines they’re rushing into clinical trials around the world.

They also raise doubt about the veracity of claims of discovery of anti-novel-coronavirus antibodies (which are beginning to be used to treat patients).

Novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies are supposedly the basis for the expensive serology test kits being used in many countries (some of which have been found to be unacceptably inaccurate).

And they’re purportedly key to the immunity certificates coveted by Bill Gates that are about to go into widespread use — in the form of the COVI-PASS — in 15 countries including the UK, US, and Canada.

Dr. Alexov made his jaw-dropping observations in a video interview summarizing the consensus of participants in a May 8, 2020, European Society of Pathology (ESP) webinar on COVID-19.

The May 13 video interview of Dr. Alexov was conducted by Dr. Stoycho Katsarov, chair of the Center for Protection of Citizens’ Rights in Sofia and a former Bulgarian deputy minister of health. The video is on the BPA’s website, which also highlights some of Dr. Alexov’s main points.

We asked a native Bulgarian speaker with a science background to orally translate the video interview into English. We then transcribed her translation. The video is here and our English transcript is here.

Among the major bombshells Dr. Alexov dropped is that the leaders of the May 8 ESP webinar said no novel-coronavirus-specific antibodies have been found.

The body forms antibodies specific to pathogens it encounters. These specific antibodies are known as monoclonal antibodies and are a key tool in pathology. This is done via immunohistochemistry, which involves tagging antibodies with colours and then coating the biopsy- or autopsy-tissue slides with them. After giving the antibodies time to bind to the pathogens they’re specific for, the pathologists can look at the slides under a microscope and see the specific places where the coloured antibodies — and therefore the pathogens they’re bound to – are located.

Therefore, in the absence of monoclonal antibodies to the novel coronavirus, pathologists cannot verify whether SARS-CoV-2 is present in the body, or whether the diseases and deaths attributed to it indeed were caused by the virus rather than by something else.

It would be easy to dismiss Dr. Alexov as just another crank ‘conspiracy theorist.’ After all many people believe they’re everywhere these days, spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and other issues.

In addition, little of what Dr. Alexov alleges was the consensus from the May 8 webinar is in the publicly viewable parts of the proceedings.

But keep in mind that whistleblowers often stand alone because the vast majority of people are afraid to speak out publicly.

Also, Dr. Alexov has an unimpugnable record and reputation. He’s been a physician for 30 years. He’s president of the BPA, a member of the ESP’s Advisory Board and head of the histopathology department at the Oncology Hospital in the Bulgarian capital of Sofia.

On top of that, there’s other support for what Dr. Alexov is saying.

For example, the director of the Institute of Forensic Medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf in Germany said in media interviews that there’s a striking dearth of solid evidence for COVID-19’s lethality.

“COVID-19 is a fatal disease only in exceptional cases, but in most cases it is a predominantly harmless viral infection,” Dr. Klaus Püschel told a German paper in April. Adding in another interview:

In quite a few cases, we have also found that the current corona infection has nothing whatsoever to do with the fatal outcome because other causes of death are present, for example, a brain hemorrhage or a heart attack […] [COVID-19 is] not particularly dangerous viral disease […] All speculation about individual deaths that have not been expertly examined only fuel anxiety.”

Also, one of us (Rosemary) and another journalist, Amory Devereux, documented in a June 9 Off-Guardian article that the novel coronavirus has not fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

These postulates are scientific steps used to prove whether a virus exists and has a one-to-one relationship with a specific disease. We showed that to date no one has proven SARS-CoV-2 causes a discrete illness matching the characteristics of all the people who ostensibly died from COVID-19. Nor has the virus has been isolated, reproduced and then shown to cause this discrete illness.

In addition, in a June 27 Off-Guardian article two more journalists, Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter, added to the evidence that “the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.”

The pair also confirmed “there is no scientific proof that those RNA sequences [deemed to match that of the novel coronavirus] are the causative agent of what is called COVID-19.”

Dr. Alexov stated in the May 13 interview that:

the main conclusion [of those of us who participated in the May 8 webinar] was that the autopsies that were conducted in Germany, Italy, Spain, France and Sweden do not show that the virus is deadly.”

He added that:

What all of the pathologists said is that there’s no one who has died from the coronavirus. I will repeat that: no one has died from the coronavirus.”

Dr. Alexov also observed there is no proof from autopsies that anyone deemed to have been infected with the novel coronavirus died only from an inflammatory reaction sparked by the virus (presenting as interstitial pneumonia) rather than from other potentially fatal diseases.

Another revelation of his is that:

“We need to see exactly how the law will deal with immunization and that vaccine that we’re all talking about, because I’m certain it’s [currently] not possible to create a vaccine against COVID. I’m not sure what exactly Bill Gates is doing with his laboratories – is it really a vaccine he’s producing, or something else?”

As pointed to above, the inability to identify monoclonal antibodies for the virus suggests there is no basis for the vaccines, serological testing and immunity certificates being rolled out around the globe at unprecedented speed and cost. In fact, there is no solid evidence the virus exists.

Dr. Alexov made still more important points. For example, he noted that, in contrast to the seasonal influenza, SARS-CoV-2 hasn’t been proven to kill youth:

[With the flu] we can find one virus which can cause a young person to die with no other illness present […] In other words, the coronavirus infection is an infection that does not lead to death. And the flu can lead to death.”

(There have been reports of severe maladies such as Kawasaki-like disease and stroke in young people who were deemed to have a novel-coronavirus infection. However, the majority of published papers on these cases are very short and include only one or only a small handful of patients. Moreover, commenters on the papers note it’s impossible to determine the role of the virus because the papers’ authors did not control sufficiently, if at all, for confounding factors. It’s most likely that children’s deaths attributed to COVID-19 in fact are from multiple organ failure resulting from the combination of the drug cocktail and ventilation that these children are subjected to.)

Dr. Alexov therefore asserted that:

the WHO is creating worldwide chaos, with no real facts behind what they’re saying.”

Among the myriad ways the WHO is creating that chaos is by prohibiting almost all autopsies of people deemed to have died from COVID-19. As a result, reported Dr. Alexov, by May 13 only three such autopsies had been conducted in Bulgaria.

Also, the WHO is dictating that everyone said to be infected with the novel coronavirus who subsequently dies must have their deaths attributed to COVID-19.

“That’s quite stressful for us, and for me in particular, because we have protocols and procedures which we need to use,” he told Dr. Katsarov. “…And another pathologist 100 years from now is going to say, ‘Hey, those pathologists didn’t know what they were doing [when they said the cause of death was COVID-19]!’ So we need to be really strict with our diagnoses, because they could be proven [or disproven], and they could be checked again later.”

He disclosed that pathologists in several countries in Europe, as well as in China, Australia and Canada are strongly resisting the pressure on them to attribute deaths to COVID-19 alone:

I’m really sad that we need to follow the [WHO’s] instructions without even thinking about them. But in Germany, France, Italy and England they’re starting to think that we shouldn’t follow the WHO so strictly, and [instead] when we’re writing the cause of death we should have some pathology [results to back that up] and we should follow the protocol. [That’s because] when we say something we need to be able to prove it.”

(He added that autopsies could have helped confirm or disprove the theory that many of the people deemed to have died of COVID-19 in Italy had previously received the H1N1 flu vaccine. Because, as he noted, the vaccine suppresses adults’ immune systems and therefore may have been a significant contributor to their deaths by making them much more susceptible to infection.)

Drs. Alexov and Katsarov agreed that yet another aspect of the WHO-caused chaos and its fatal consequences is many people are likely to die soon from diseases such as cancer because the lockdowns, combined with the emptying of hospitals (ostensibly to make room for COVID-19 patients), halted all but the most pressing procedures and treatments.

They also observed these diseases are being exacerbated by the fear and chaos surrounding COVID-19.

We know that stress significantly suppresses the immune system, so I can really claim 200% that all the chronic diseases will be more severe and more acute per se. Specifically in situ carcinoma – over 50% of these are going to become more invasive […] So I will say that this epidemic isn’t so much an epidemic of the virus, it’s an epidemic of giving people a lot of fear and stress.”

In addition, posited Dr. Alexov, as another direct and dire result of the pandemic panic many people are losing faith in physicians.

Because in my opinion the coronavirus isn’t that dangerous, and how are people going to have trust in me doing cancer pathology, much of which is related to viruses as well? But nobody is talking about that.”

We emailed Dr. Alexov several questions, including asking why he believes it’s impossible to create a vaccine against COVID-19.

He didn’t answer the questions directly. Dr. Alexov instead responded:

Fortunately, pathologists like Drs. Alexov and Püschel appear to be willing to step out and say that no one has died from a novel-coronavirus infection.

Perhaps that’s because pathologists’ records and reputations are based on hard physical evidence rather than on subjective interpretation of tests, signs and symptoms. And there is no hard physical evidence that COVID-19 is deadly.

Rosemary Frei and Patrick Corbett

Rosemary Frei has an MSc in molecular biology from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Calgary, was a freelance medical writer and journalist for 22 years and now is an independent investigative journalist. You can watch her June 15 interview on The Corbett Report, read her other Off-Guardian articles .

Patrick Corbett is a retired writer, producer, director and editor who’s worked for every major network in Canada and the US except for Fox. His journalistic credits include Dateline NBC, CTV’s W-5 and the CTV documentary unit where he wrote and directed ‘Children’s Hospital’, the first Canadian production to be nominated for an International Emmy.

Sweden – Covid Deaths Plummet as Cases Rise …WTF???

This seeming enigma is also happening in the United States and elsewhere! Number of deaths declining rapidly while cases increase.

In case you weren’t aware of this, Sweden refused to go into a lockdown mode. Restaurants remained open, bars remained open, the entire country remained open, all because Swedish authorities decided to let the virus run its course.

“Over the past ten weeks, the number of daily reported COVID-19 cases in Sweden has more than doubled, yet the number of deaths has plummeted,” writes Tony Heller. “The deaths in Sweden were in nursing homes receiving more elderly ‘COVID patients’.”

Can anyone see what is really going on?

If you have already read my other blogs on the Corona topic, you will know that about 100% of the people have the corona virus presence in their body’s virome 100% of the time.  Ergo: the more people tested over time, the more the case numbers will always necessarily increase.  Get it? There is no increase in ‘cases’, just the number of individuals that have been tested. You make the case count increase just by doing more testing.

Now, look at the mortality charts.  As they run out of old death certificates to relabel ‘cause-of-death: COV’, the fake mortality from COV must necessarily decrease.  And this, despite the massive genocide of the elderly.  There have been zero, as in no deaths from COV. People don’t die from the ‘common cold’.  They die from other mortal diseases.  Maybe, in their already weakened state, they also develop a cold, but that is never the cause of death. There are no deaths from the corona virus…the cold. You can white-out all the old death certificates you want….there is still zero deaths from corona.

Sweden Coronavirus: 67,667 Cases and 5,310 Deaths – Worldometer

“The same pattern is occurring in the US,” says Tony Heller. “The number of daily deaths is declining markedly”. The truth is, you can’t decline from zero.

United States Coronavirus: 2,681,811 Cases and 128,783 Deaths – Worldometer

The point here is that the number of new cases is meaningless propaganda. All of those new cases came as a result of more testing for a ‘positive’ result, every time, which is already basically a “known”, but they will never tell you this.

Sneaky little traitor

Forget the number of “new cases.” What we need to keep our eyes on are the sneaky little traitors who are manipulating the people by fiddling the data and ‘genociding’ the elderly. Once the elderly are gone, you are next.