COVID-19 Theory built on killing old people

   The basic deception
The New York Times (June 27, 2020) is reporting that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths are occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly.  In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths are occurring in these facilities. The situation is far worse than the Times makes it out to be.   

The medical establishment is facing the embarrassing and devastating fact that a huge percentage of so-called COVID deaths are occurring in nursing homes.  The elderly are dying prematurely. And not only in nursing homes.  In hospitals, and alone in their apartments.

All told, huge numbers of old people are dying premature deaths.

It’s obvious these patients have many serious and long-standing health conditions that have NOTHING to do with a corona virus.  They’ve been treated for decades with toxic medical drugs.  Their immune systems are severely compromised.

THEN they’re terrified when they’re handed a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on fraudulent tests, or no tests at all.  They’re shut off completely from the outside world.  No family or friends are permitted to see them.  So the elderly just die.

New York City is the claimed epicenter of corona deaths.

From for data, the latest figures available:
As of May 13, take these two age groups—65 to 74, and 75 and older—and together they account for a staggering 73.6 percent of all COVID deaths in the city, with the 75 and older group accounting, all on its own, for 48.7 percent of all alleged COVID deaths in the city.

For this, New York is on lockdown, boarded up, Imprisoned.  Economically torpedoed and devastated, with two ignoramus-vampire trolls—Governor Cuomo and Mayor De Blasio—administering their ‘wisdom’ over the situation.

If you subtracted the premature and forced deaths of the elderly, the fiction of New York as “the epicenter of COVID” would blow away in the wind in minutes.

The Hill, dated April 2020, reporting on data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)…for the oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical [breathing] ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”

Just in case all the other obvious factors failed to produce premature death in the elderly, ventilators provided the method. There is added government insurance money to be made from it too.

New York—the “epicenter of the pandemic”—is an epicenter of killing old people.

Public health agencies think: “How can we falsely explain all these old people dying, in terms that will operate as a diversion and a cover story?”
And they come up with: “Well, of course these elderly people already had medical problems before the COVID virus came along, and yes, these problems contributed to their demise.  But in the end, the cause of death was surely the VIRUS…”

A convenient and false statement.

So let’s look at this Wuhan VIRUS again. Instead of blithely accepting the claim that the virus was “sequenced” and its genetic makeup was laid out, do the study you never did.  Do something coherent.  Since you announced a global pandemic affecting billions of lives, do a real study.

Select a thousand people you claim are suffering from the “epidemic disease,” and take tissue samples from them.  In the real world.  Now, under proper supervision, with independent observers recording on video every single step of the process, CORRECTLY put these samples through a purifying procedure that involves centrifuging them, and extracting the relevant material—and place small bits of this material under an electron microscope.  Take photos (EMs) of what you see.

Now place these thousand photos side by side.  In each photo, do you see many, many particles of what is unmistakably a virus?  Is it a virus you’ve never seen before?  From photo to photo, are the many particles of this new virus all the same?

When you’ve done that, let another set of technicians follow the same procedure, and see what results a duplicate study shows compared to the first one. Do they confirm each other?

There is no procedure that can climb inside a person’s body and record what is happening in real time at the level of a virus—but the closest you can come is the electron microscope procedure… that you didn’t do.  Don’t show us a few random anecdotal cases from here and there, of which you found some electron microscope photos.  Don’t tap dance.

The planet went on lockdown as a result of what you claim you discovered—so do the coherent study.  Go the whole distance.  That’s what science is supposed to do.  And then other teams of researchers can weigh in with their own large electron microscope studies and confirm or deny your findings.

Meanwhile, what you have is an unproven virus theory.  A fake.  A story about a virus that is conveniently shadowing what you really have going on…mass murder.

All your diagnostic tests “for the new virus” are a sham.  They’re based on something you never even demonstrated to exist in the first place.

All those elderly people dying for obvious reasons in nursing homes, and in their lonely apartments, and in hospitals all over the world?  You have no proof they’re dying from a virus.  How could you?  You never properly discovered the new virus.  You have dust in your hands.  Saying these elderly people died as a result of the COVID virus is meaningless and total bullshit.

Actually you have murder.  You have blood on your hands.  Your death-dealing COVID diagnosis of these old people is the final straw that drives them into terror and over the edge into death.  You have that to answer for.

The medical “experts” keep falling back on ‘THE VIRUS’ to explain away all objections.  The truth is right in front of their eyes—it’s obvious why all these old people are dying, and why fake scientists and medical fraudsters must count their deaths as COVID cases…they can’t fabricate enough to alarm anyone just by back-labeling old death certificates to revise ‘cause of death’ to COVID-19.

Without those gigantic death numbers, the illusion of a pandemic would fall apart in an hour.


They’re dying in nursing homes, in isolated apartments and houses all over the world, and in hospitals.  And on their bodies is built this vicious war against the population of the planet.


John Rappaport

Child Mortality

Vaccination Rates fell During Lockdowns, Deaths Followed Suit

Vaccines are praised, mostly by the vaccine serum manufacturers, as the gold-standard for saving millions of lives worldwide. That’s the promise that we are led to believe as parents ritualistically submit their infant sons and daughters to a cornucopia of state-sanctioned injections.’ Well-baby’ visits are designed to introduce up to 26 liability-free vaccinations in the baby’s first year of life, during six or more visits to a pediatrician. Why is it so critical that the government has a law shielding vaccine serum makers from any responsibility or liability from their products?

During the covid-19 lockdowns, ‘well-baby’ visits were cancelled and vaccination rates plummeted as a result. More parents stayed home, nursed their babies, watched them closely, and kept them away from pediatricians.

When the national emergency order was declared, provider orders for routine pediatric vaccines dropped significantly. The Vaccines for Children Program and the Vaccine Safety Data link reported a drop-off in vaccination rates starting in the third week of March, 2020, as hundreds of thousands of parents stayed home and skipped ‘well-baby’ visits. The downward trend was observed from March 23rd to the end of April for all non-influenza vaccines, especially measles-containing vaccines.

Clear correlation between rate of infant vaccination and infant mortality

So why did infant mortality rates drop to historic lows as vaccination rates fell?

If vaccines are so important for an infant to survive, then why didn’t the infant death rate dramatically increase as the vaccination rate fell? The data shows that the opposite effect occurred; infant deaths actually plummeted to historic lows! In the U.S., to roughly 700 babies per week. This trend of infant death and sacrifice remained steady from 2014 to 2019. In 2020, this all changed. From early March to mid-April, infant deaths fell by 30 percent on average each week! Throughout April and into mid-May, the infant mortality rate had declined to 500 on average per week.

Child Mortality during the 2020 Lockdowns improved due to less vaccination

Deaths among children under 18 are relatively rare when compared to deaths from other age groups. For the average death rate to change by 30 percent in the youngest age group (infants) – that is unprecedented!

The main causes of death for infants is congenital malformation (birth defects), representing 32 percent of all infant deaths. On average, accidents account for 31 percent of infant deaths. Circulatory complications (9 percent) and homicide (7 percent) are also contributing causes. The biggest grey area for infant death is “sudden infant death syndrome” which accounts for roughly 32 percent of infant deaths. This is when an otherwise healthy infant suddenly dies in sleep, through suffocation, poisoning, or from an undiagnosed condition or adverse reaction.

Infant mortality rates fall when less vaccine doses are administered

The study finds correlation between the number of vaccine doses given and the death rate. The study asks: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? After all, the cumulative safety of the entire U.S. vaccine schedule has never been studied.  Aren’t we onto something important here? The logical extrapolation of this evidence is that there are more infant lives to save here, just by eliminating all infant vaccines.  And the next question that logically follows is…how about eliminating all vaccines for all people and observe where this takes us.  My money is on the total elimination of all vaccines to yield the optimum number of lives saved…the lowest mortality rate..

Infant mortality rate is defined as the number of infant deaths per 1000 live births. The infant mortality rate for the US is an abysmal 6.22. Singapore, Sweden, and Japan have an infant mortality rate that is less than half that of the US (2.80). There were major differences in infant mortality for nations that gave 12-14 doses in the first year of a baby’s life compared to those that gave 21-23 and 24-26 doses. As of 2009, the five nations with the lowest infant mortality rate only require 12 vaccine doses in the infant’s first year, compared to 24-26 doses required by the US. The US pathetically has the highest infant mortality rate out of the 33 developed nations in the study.

The covid-19 lockdowns of 2020 provided more insight into how a nation can lower the infant mortality rate. As a nation that alleges to care for the lives of its citizens, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) must rethink the purpose of ‘well-baby’ visits and the necessity of pumping infants full of numerous vaccinations. If the US can save 200 or more babies on average each week by simply foregoing ‘well-baby’ visits and vaccinations, then how many more babies can be saved if pediatric care was reformed entirely, and vaccine doses were eliminated? How many babies can be saved if pediatric care adopted a more comprehensive and integrative approach to infant health and neurodevelopment? Finally, what if vaccine manufacturers were held liable in a court of law?

Sources include:


Exosomes Confabulated with Viruses

COVID-19 is an Exosome

Following the current events involving the COVID-19 issue is causing global confusion and restlessness for many people. It is quite bewildering for most.

This hysterical but vaguely identified health problem is supplying a pretense to the governments of the world to shut down almost every infrastructure that is vital to the economy and the lives of the people in the 99%, the middle social bracket. They are all functioning in lock-step, meaning there is a higher authority directing this orchestra. Under influence of the wealthiest institutions such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), governing bodies that are stealthily influenced and controlled by the biggest pharmaceutical companies (Rockefellers), to buy government decisions that seem to be leading the citizens of the world in uncertain directions. Certainly not in the direction they tell us we are going. It is obvious that we are being lead to our own demise while the royals tell us they have it covered.

Trump is nothing more than a puppet, like the rest of his fellow presidents.

On the other side, day by day, many people are finding conclusive evidence that show there is something much bigger going on, beyond just what the mainstream media and health institutions are claiming. Clearly, the mainstream media are lying about this crisis and the CDC’s guidelines for determining the COVID-19 diagnosis and death-rate, itself, are causing many experts to raise questions. The government’s response measures are monstrous compared to the tiny, insignificant threat from the obviously fabricated threat.

Questioning the official narrative, many experts and professionals are popping up on every public platform, every day, to raise valid questions and provide compelling insights that are making more sense than what we are hearing from the “official sources”. Thankfully, some real doctors are addressing the inconsistencies of the issues surrounding this alleged pandemic, while also providing answers to vital questions that sound-thinking people are asking.

One of the many important experts being referrenced is Dr. Andrew Kaufman. Dr. Kaufman is a board-certified MD licensed in psychiatry and forensic psychiatry. He is also a former medical instructor of hematology and oncology at the Medical University of South Carolina and a graduate  Bachelors of Science in Biology from MIT.

Exosomes and Multi-vescular bodies (MVBs)

According to Dr. Kaufman, what the fake experts call COVID-19 is not really a deadly “virus” per se, but an “exosome”. Kaufman argues that exosomes are the agents that are being found with the test instruments using RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription – Polymerase Chain Reaction).  But this is the test the governments use for detecting COVID-19 virus, which has a similar physical appearance compared to the exosome.

Exosomes leaving cell with a load of toxins to be eliminated from the body.

In his presentation, he explains that exosomes are excreted by the eukaryotic cells when fighting various insults caused by environmental and biological toxins, such as stress (including fear), infection, harmful radiations, and other kinds of injuries. These exosomes, Kaufman emphasized, do not harm the body but instead are natural defenses of the immune system, ridding the body of toxins and damaged elements.

To understand more about what Dr. Kaufman has discovered about this subject, please read his statements:

“What I think is happening is that, first of all, there is really no pandemic levels of sickness from whatever is going on. The numbers are far less than the typical flu season. However, there are clearly some people who are getting sick. People getting sick and dying is not unusual or abnormal.  About 1.3% of the total population die each year from normal attrition, called a ‘lifespan’. If the average lifespan is 75 years, as they publish in their health statistics, then 1.3% annual mortality is occurring normally, by all causes. Corona is accounting for 0.14% of these deaths, an almost totally insignificant number.

 What I believe is causing any abnormal rate of illness is that there is some kind of insult that occurs that’s causing the damage and then there’s a reaction to it which is the production, by eukaryotic cells, of exosomes. These are the cellular defenders that you do no hear any hype about in the mainstream media or the ‘talking heads’.  They want to lead you to believe that the corona virus threat is one that you have no defense against and that can just pop up and kill you without warning out of no where.  This is nonsense, of course.  There is always a cause and, in this case, it is neither real or natural.  It is also not dangerous.  Only on the news.

virus approaching to attach to the cell wall

And when the allopaths are testing for this alleged abnormal threat, (the virus), their testers are actually testing for exosomes, not viruses, If there are a lot of exosomes, this would confirm that there is some kind of unhealthy process occurring in nature.  If the insult to the cells is real, it is being resolved by natural defences, the exosomes.

 But first, it must be determined if there even is any massively abnormal threat in the world. It appears that the allopaths are revising death certificates, both old and new, such that almost all certificates are claiming the cause of death to be covid-19.  You can mislabel death certificates all you want, but that is not going to change reality.  You can mislabel all day long, but only the stupid and/or ignorant are going to believe the lies.

 Now, I described the things that can trigger production of the exosomes, and,  I believe that those represent the cause of the alleged pandemic. I think that there is a multiplicity of poisoning. If there is even any real pandemic level of deaths occurring, it seems to be well hidden. Normal attrition will total 96 million deaths in the world. I do not see the additional mortality. Certainly, there’s a lot of precedent for pneumonia-type illness coming from inhalation of toxic, polluted substances. There could also be stress and fear factors adversely affecting the immune system. It could represent a regular or normal flu or pneumonia, or a cold, and whatever the causes, those would represent the same common cause.

Exosomes left – viruses right

Lastly, electromagnetic radiation could certainly be a cause as well. There has been a major proliferation and installation of new 5G infrastructure, both on the surface and upper atmosphere (satellites), and there’s certainly incidences where 5G can have adverse effects on an individual’s health, including damage to DNA, and that evidence actually comes from Los Alamos National Laboratories’ studies on microwave radiation as used in airport body scanners and elsewhere.

And I think it’s quite possible that there is not a single toxic exposure but many different causes of illness in different areas for different people. There may not be a uniform cause of the illness. There are factors that cause a similar constellation of upper respiratory symptoms. And these symptoms are not extremely specific, I could list twenty different illnesses that would cause a cough, possible shortness of breath, or fever but I could not see conclusive evidence of any virus. Appearance-wise , the exosome and the virus are essentially indistinguishable from each other when taken at a glance and out of context.”

Characteristics are Identical

Exosome Definition

Exosomes are membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EV) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic cells. The multivesicular body (MVB) is an endosome defined by intraluminal vesicles (ILV) that bud inward into the endosomal lumen. If the MVB fuses with the cell surface, these ILVs are released as exosomes. In multicellular organisms, exosomes and other EVs are present in tissues and can also be found in biological fluids including blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid. They are also released in vitro by cultured cells into their growth medium. Since the size of exosomes is limited by that of the parent MVB, exosomes are generally thought to be smaller than most other EVs, from about 30 to 150 nanometers in diameter, around the same size as many lipoproteins but much smaller than cells. Compared with EVs in general, it is unclear whether exosomes have unique characteristics or functions or can be separated or distinguished effectively from other EVs. EVs including exosomes carry markers of cells of origin and have specialized functions in physiological processes, from coagulation and intercellular signaling to waste management. – Wikipedia

Intra-luminal Vesicle formation

This description is a little technical, but put into simple terms, the exosome is a vehicle (vesicle) developed to receive, encapsulate and remove corrupt poisonous cellular material. A virus, already containing corrupt material, attempts to deliver its’ contents into the cell’s interior to cause disease by integrating its RNA and becoming living cellular material. The exosome may actually be removing and disposing of this same viral material.

Exosome Uptake

In any case, the body does not require any help from the allopathic meddlers to be healthy.  It most certainly does not require any vaccine, which is capable only of doing harm.

For better or for worse, we are at a time of great change from which the world will likely never return. We are heading into what is probably the most significant period in human history, and it would be wise to pay attention to the evidence, not the TV, media and alleged government health “experts” who are engaged in a larger scheme called the great RESET.

There is a blog on this site, written at an earlier time that provides insights into this RESET. You would benefit from reading it.


Greater Threats are Looming

Corona Virus is a Global False Alarm

Germany’s federal government and mainstream media are engaged in damage control following a report that challenges the established Corona narrative, leaked from their interior ministry of health.

The German report included the following statements:

  • The danger of Covid-19 was over-reported: at no point did the danger posed by the alleged new virus go beyond the ‘normal’ level.
  • The danger is obviously no greater than that of other viruses, pathogens and aging cells. There is no evidence that this was more than a false alarm.
  • A reproach could go along these lines: During the Corona crisis, the State has proved itself as the biggest producer of Fake News in the world.

Another example, from a June 9, 2020 report by covering new disclosures from the World Health Organization (WHO), states:

        “From the latest data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual.” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s Emerging Diseases and Zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations headquarters in Geneva today.

Asymptomatic spread (mysterious contagion) was the entire reason used by governments to demand lockdowns, social distancing, face masks, driving restrictions, etc.  It is also the justification for demanding universal mandatory vaccination and ‘contact tracing’.

This is an admission that only symptomatic victims displaying the known visible symptoms, easily identified and avoided, are capable of transmitting the corona virus onward to others. These people can easily be identified by everyone, and they are the ones who must self-isolate themselves for a short time until their symptoms abate.

Journal of the American Medical Association, April 17, 2020, “Masks and Coronavirus Disease”: “Unless you are sick, a health care worker, or caring for someone who has cold symptoms, medical masks (including surgical face masks and N95s) are not recommended.” The filthy masks are the single greatest existing health danger.

Therefore, there is no logical need for the lockdown measures or the mandatory vaccines, and to continue these arbitrary deprivations of human freedom would only indicate some undisclosed alternate reason for doing so.  What could that ‘alternate reason’ be?

All at once, the WHO has just demolished its own, and the narratives of other agencies like the CDC, politicized health experts and governments, who try to justify new or continued lockdowns and vaccines.  

Meanwhile, officials have followed the orders of their benefactors in the US and continue to strip their citizens of their immutable human rights to freedom.  This lockdown is purported to be necessary to avoid ‘contagion’ from hidden sources. 

No government has the right to take away immutable freedoms from its citizens without solid justification.  The measures must be commensurate with the level of danger based on reality and facts.

But the facts, even from day-one, never existed.  The measures were based on lies.  Now, that the lies are known to everyone, these restrictions of freedom must be lifted immediately.  The original facts justifying the taking away of freedom were only based on claims by officials of the US government. That is not justification for any of the of the totally corrupt measures levied by the ministers of the world’s governments.

And, now that everyone knows this, the push for lockdowns, isolation, masks, etc. is back with an increased vengeance when, if it was based on any real medical cause, would, instead, dictate a easing off and total dismissal of all the worthless fake measures. ‘THEY’ are going forward with their agenda, which can now be seen as an alternate agenda to the stated one, the claimed ‘reason why’. This means that the stated ‘reason why’ is not true at all. The reason is much more contrived and vile than people can even imagine, so the go along with the widening chasm between reality and lies. They are terrified, the more they realize the fakeness of the government’s narrative. But the government’s plan was conceived long ago and is going to be driven, unchanged by facts, to its end. This is the depopulation of a huge percentage of the population. It is part of the “200-year reset”. The old and then the middle aged adults are going to be murdered, by the government. That is their intention for the entire scam.

Today, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), who predicted total widespread massive death and suffering, have published world mortality rates from corona of 0.14%.  Covid-19 is nothing more than the seasonal ‘cold’.

The human lifespan averages 75 years, so about 1.3% of the total world population will die and pass-on each year from simple attrition.  In a world of 7.4 billion people, this means that more than 96 million people will die each year, from normal attrition.  In the USA, with 330 million people, 4.3 million people will die each year.  In Costa Rica, with 5 million population, 65 thousand people will die each year through attrition.  In spite of attempts by governments to attribute all attrition to corona by mis-identifying ‘causes-of-death’, corona mortality is basically on par with the common cold…it is negligible.

Only six months ago, no one would have believed that we would find ourselves in a face mask-wearing society today. Initially US agencies like the CDC said wearing face masks would not protect from CV -19. The surgeon general said the same. Other medical experts have cited serious health problems that can result from extended face mask use. Now the CDC says wearing a mask is essential. What changed? Is protecting public health really the goal? Or are other agendas in play? While populations are understandably burdened with the increasing day to day difficulties that covid-19 measures have brought on, what wider-horizon challenges are looming? Could these background challenges very soon make all other concerns moot?

This should be the focus of your attention.  The pandemic is totally fake.  It is only a smoke-screen to divert your attention.  This is also true for the race-rioting that is now instigated by the fake killing of Floyd George.  The rioters are being well paid by George Soros and his numerous front groups of mercenary thugs.  Now we have the ‘second-wave’ of the pandemic, which is even more fake as the first wave.  Next you are going to see martial law being imposed on some cities, then more and more cities.  The Kilgali agreement, signed by Obama and Kerry with the UN, will automatically trigger, making the UN military forces, already prepared and present on-the-ground in the US, the sole government and enforcers in those martial law venues.  This will be immediately followed be heavy restriction of freedom and door-to-door confiscation of all arms.  Once disarmed, the ‘RESET’ will go public. 


COVID Antibody Tests

Here Comes More Trickery and Fakery

By Makia Freeman

COVID antibody tests are an important element in the game to control the public.  However, a closer look reveals they are unreliable and their results can be interpreted in literally any way they like.


Antibodies are not a measure of immunity. Now is time to educate yourself about antibodies. The controllers will undoubtedly try to exploit people’s ignorance in this area to trick them into voluntarily submitting to deadly vaccines..

Cheap Chinese junk COVID tester

COVID Antibody Tests

COVID antibody tests are subject to false positives and all manner of interpretation, opening the door for them to be used as tools of control.

They are going to become a focus, now that many states and nations have partially or fully lifted their lockdown restrictions. As we enter another chapter in the long book of ‘Operation Coronavirus’, authorities are trying to implement widespread testing based on detection of antibodies (along with contact tracing or surveillance). Now is the time to inform yourself about what the COVID antibody tests are and how they work, since there is a lot at stake here. Authorities are planning on upholding or violating your rights and freedoms based on the results (and more importantly the interpretation of the results) of these tests. In truth, we all possess the right to personal bodily autonomy and medical sovereignty, and being forced to undergo such a test is itself a violation of our inherent sovereign rights. However, regardless of what choice you personally make in that regard, it is crucial to understand how these tests work and what the results mean, because – rest assured – the results will be used against you if past history is any indicator of the intent of the NWO (New World Order) conspirators.

Antibody Theory

Before we jump into the COVID antibody test, let’s begin with some definitions. An antibody is a blood protein which your body produces to counteract a specific antigen. An antigen is a toxin or other foreign substance which the body recognizes as an invader. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien as part of a healthy immune response. In typical fashion, the Medical Industry (remember that Western Medicine is Rockefeller allopathic medicine) has conflated antibodies with immunity, by claiming that high titers (or levels) of antibodies show strong immunity. However, this is a fallacy coming from a materialistic viewpoint (everything must be measured) combined with a profit-driven motive (vaccines contain antibodies, so if the Medical Establishment can convince you that antibodies = immunity, then vaccines confer immunity, no questions asked). Do you have immunity from the common cold? The truth is, immunity is far more elusive than just a simple measurement of certain substances in the blood. Immunity has a strong bio-energetic component which cannot be measured! Here are some quotes from the website:

“A titer test does not and cannot measure immunity, because immunity to specific viruses is reliant not on antibodies, but on memory cells, which we have no way to measure. Memory cells are what prompt the immune system to create antibodies and dispatch them to an infection site caused by the virus it “remembers.” Memory cells don’t need “reminders” in the form of re-vaccination to keep producing antibodies.” (Science, 1999; “Immune system’s memory does not need reminders.”) ACCESS to JUSTICE. MMR10 – IN EUROPE

“The fallacy of this (antibody theory) was exposed nearly 50 years ago, which is hardly recent. A report published by the Medical Research Council entitled ‘A study of diphtheria in two areas of Gt. Britain, Special report series 272, HMSO 1950 demonstrated that many of the diphtheria patients had high levels of circulating antibodies, whereas many of the contacts who remained perfectly well had low antibody.” – Magda Taylor, Informed Parent

“Just because you give somebody a vaccine, and perhaps get an antibody reaction, doesn’t mean a thing. The only true antibodies, of course, are those you get naturally. What we’re doing [when we inject vaccines] is interfering with a very delicate mechanism that does its own thing. If nutrition is correct, it does it in the right way. Now if you insult a person in this way and try to trigger off something that nature looks after, you’re asking for all sorts of trouble, and we don’t believe it works.”— Glen Dettman Ph.D, interviewed by Jay Patrick, and quoted in “The Great American Deception,” Let’s Live, December 1976, p. 57

“Many measles vaccine efficacy studies relate to their ability to stimulate an antibody response (sero-conversion or sero-response). An antibody response does not necessarily equate to immunity … the level of antibody needed for effective immunity is different in each individual … immunity can be demonstrated in individuals with a low or no detectable levels of antibody. Similarly in other individuals with higher levels of antibody there may be no immunity.” – Trevor Gunn BSc

Then we have a quote from Dr. Stefan Lanka, whose viewpoints I highlighted in Deep Down the Virus Rabbit Hole – Question Everything:

“I’m absolutely sure that no antibody test in medicine has any absolute meaning. Especially in HIV antibody testing, it is clear that the antibodies that are detected in the test are present in everybody. Some people have them in higher concentrations, and some in lower concentrations, but only when you reach a very high level of antibodies — much higher than in any other antibody testing — are you considered to be “positive.” This is a contradiction in terms because in other antibody tests, the lower your level of antibodies, the higher your risk for a symptomatic infection. But with HIV they say you are “positive” only when you have reached a very high level of antibodies. Below this level, you are said to be negative.” – [1995] INTERVIEW STEFAN LANKA

Old Blood Samples Contain COVID Antibodies

Knowing that background to antibody theory, let’s take a look now at how they are applying it to COVID. I will be quoting David Crowe’s recent paper Antibody Testing for COVID-19 throughout this article. Crowe points out many major assumptions with the COVID antibody tests. One place to start is with tests which show antibody positive results. The question is: how do we know if they just acquired those antibodies recently, or if they had them for years? There is no way to know. If they had them for years, what is the antibody test proving? Nothing. Crowe writes:

“Almost 14% of saved blood from old donations tested positive in a Dutch study, and in the validation of the Cellex and Chembio tests, 4.4% and 3.6% of old samples were positive. The idealized antibody model is based on the date of infection as the starting point, but this date is never known with certainty. Even when someone came into contact with a COVID-19 RNA positive person on a certain date that is not a guarantee that this was the date of infection, given that, prior to the lockdown, people could apparently be infected while playing in the park, eating at a restaurant, walking down the street, attending a concert, or participating in any other now banned activity. When antibody surveys are performed, the vast majority of people who test positive had no idea that they had previously been infected, and cannot possibly be sure about the date.”

“But a far bigger problem is that the number produced is impossible to validate. When 1.5% of Santa Clara volunteers tested positive, it was assumed that was truth. This ‘truth’ asserts that all of these people were RNA-positive at some point in the recent past. But there is absolutely no evidence for this. The ‘truth’ assumes that all the people were negative for COVID-19 antibodies prior to the assumed period of RNA-positivity. But there is absolutely no evidence for this.”

COVID Antibody False Positives

A second problem with COVID antibody test is false positives. Just like the PCR test was found to lead to as much as an 80% false positive rate in the actual diagnosis of COVID, so too can COVID antibody tests lead to false positives, meaning the test finds that you have COVID antibodies in your system when you are COVID negative. Something is clearly very wrong with a test that is supposedly designed to only detect antibodies to a particular disease, and then detects such antibodies in people without that disease! Crowe writes:

“Other problems with antibody tests include a significant number of samples testing antibody positive from people who were COVID-19 RNA negative (although some had ‘COVID-like’ symptoms), with no evidence that the person was ever infected. In one Chinese study the positive rate on presumably never infected people was 25%.”

Antibodies are Not Specific

Yet another problem with COVID antibody tests is that they test for antibodies which may not even be specific for COVID! Crowe writes:

” … different manufacturers found a significant percentage of samples positive for COVID-19 antibodies, that were known not to have COVID-19, but instead contained other viruses, bacteria or mycoplasma, or were from people with auto-immune conditions, indicating that the antibodies are not specific. For example, 10% of Hepatitis B samples were positive, 33% of Respiratory Synctitia Virus, 10% of auto-antibodies and 17% of Streptococcus.

I encourage readers to read Crowe’s paper in whole since it is an excellent synopsis of the problems of COVID antibody tests. Meanwhile, let’s return to the subject of antibodies, the innate immune system, the adaptive immune system and more.

Antibodies are Only Developed by your Immune System if its First Line of Defense Fails

Remember: innate (non-specific) immunity comes first. Humoral, adaptive, antibody-mediated immunity (specific) comes second, and is also referred to as “acquired immunity.” Jon Rappoport did an article (COVID: David Crowe’s brilliant new paper takes apart antibody testing) on Crowe’s paper. I was impressed by many of the comments below the article, and have reproduced several here. This comment is by Tim Lundeen (spelling errors and typos are left as written for all comments):

“One of the major issues (mentioned peripherally in this paper) is that you only develop antibodies when your innate immune system can’t clear an infection. So, 60% to 85% of people are able to clear coronavirus using their innate immune system, and will NEVER develop antibodies. The innate immune system is your “generic”, it works against any infection. It’s the first line of defense. If it can’t totally clear an infection, then the adaptive immune system comes into play, makes antibodies, and then the antibodies clear the infection. There are a number of places where large numbers of people have been exposed to coronavirus in a contained space: cruise ships, military ships, and homeless centers. In all of these places, 60 to 85% of the people massively exposed showed NO coronavirus RNA, e.g. their innate immune system cleared the coronavirus, they were immune to it. So, they did not, and never will, develop antibodies.”

This comment is by PFT:

“One thing people don’t understand. Not everyone needs or produces antibodies when infected. Antibodies are produced by the adaptive immune system, which is basically your army of last resort against pathogens and which takes 1-2 weeks to mobilize. The primary immune defense is the innate system made up of many cells that inhibit viral replication by killing the defective eukaryotes. They also coordinate with the adaptive immune system sending signals to mobilize and providing information on the location and nature of the pathogen. If the innate system clears the infection quickly, danger signals are no longer issued and the adaptive immune system is deactivated and stands down, so no antibodies or very few (below detection limits) are produced. So,

 while antibody rates may be in the order of 20-40% of the herd, an unknown number of the herd are also immune by nature of having a more effective innate immune system.”

“The adaptive immune system has 2 components. Humoral and cellular responses. The former produces antibodies produced by B cells. The latter uses T cells. Helper T cells actually are important to activate the B cells to produce antibodies and cytotoxic T cells. Tregs prevent an excessive immune response, and activated cytoxic T cells are killing machines. Cellular immunity is important to actually kill infected cells. Antibodies don’t kill but only mark an infected call for destruction or block it from infecting an uninfected cell. Although both are important when the innate immune system needs their help, many believe cellular immunity is the more important and that it also has memory that’s not as well understood.”

COVID antibody immunity passport
Antibody Passport

How the NWO Controllers will Use COVID Antibody Testing for Nefarious Purposes

Antibody tests are clearly flawed in numerous ways – and this opens the door for them to be used (like so many other things) in the ‘name of science’ to achieve highly destructive agendas. It’s all about interpretation, which is a form of perception. I have stated emphatically many times that we are in the midst of a perception war. Operation Coronavirus is all about perception management, starting with controlling people’s perception of the true nature of viruses and disease. Perception is all important in the interpretation of the results. For example, authorities could claim that people who are antibody positive must be isolated, quarantined and subjected to absurd unscientific rules (social distancing, mask wearing, etc.) because the antibodies are evidence that they are currently infected or sick. On the other hand, authorities could claim that people who are antibody positive are now immune and well, since the antibodies show they already had COVID and successfully defeated it, and that people who are antibody negative must be monitored and feared, because without the antibodies they are not immune and could become infected and spread it to others (and thus ‘a threat to everyone’ or other such nonsense). A third example is that authorities could claim that if the number of people who are antibody positive remains below the level of ‘herd immunity’ (90% or so), then we must have mandatory vaccination (a long cherished NWO agenda) to ‘protect public health’ (or other such nonsense). The capacity to manipulate the meaning of the results is endless.

Rappaport himself has written for decades about the lack of logic when it comes to the interpretation of antibody tests. This quote is in reference to HIV antibody tests:

“Until AIDS testing took off in earnest in the mid-1980s, it was generally assumed that the presence of antibodies in a patient signified good health. The patient had contacted a germ, mounted an immune response, and the germ was neutralized. There was certainly no consensus that antibodies meant present or future disease across the board. In other words, if millions of people in China had encountered H5N1 (bird flu) viruses and showed antibodies to these viruses, it would be expected that they would remain healthy. Except that with the onset of AIDS research, everything was stood on its head. People who were tested and called HIV-positive – meaning they had antibodies to the virus – were said to be sick or on a sure road to becoming sick.

So now we have another level of the AIDS testing hoax. Why were people being tested for antibodies to HIV? Why was that method presumed to be significant at all? Why wasn’t the presence of antibodies to HIV taken as a sign of health? Millions of people all over the world have been subjected to the Elisa and Western Blot HIV tests – both of which have the sole objective of finding antibodies to HIV. Why have these tests been elevated to the status of present or future disease detectives? While writing AIDS INC. in 1988, I had a very interesting conversation with a doctor at the US National Institutes of Health. He told me that when an HIV vaccine eventually went into testing (and when it was later released for use on the public), every person who got the vaccine would be given a special letter. The letter would say that the person had received the vaccine. The letter would say that if, at any time, the person was subsequently tested for HIV and came up positive – meaning he had antibodies to HIV – this should NOT be taken as a sign of present or future illness. In this case, the person was actually immune to HIV, because he had “received” his antibodies from the vaccine.

I almost fell off my chair. I said, “Let me get this straight. If a person develops antibodies naturally to HIV, he is told he is either sick now or will get sick. But if he gets his antibodies – the same antibodies – to HIV from a vaccine, he is told he is immune to the virus.” The doctor gave me no clear response. This explosive contradiction has been studiously ignored by the mainstream press and by the entire AIDS establishment network. By conventional standards (not mine), the whole point of a vaccine is to confer immunity to a germ by producing antibodies to that germ in the body. That would be the essence and the standard of a “good vaccine.”, if there even is such a thing. And yet, in the case of AIDS research, all this was turned upside down. Suddenly, HIV positive meant: the patient has antibodies to HIV and this is a sign that he will become very ill and most likely die. To sum up: not only are both HIV antibody tests (Elisa and Western Blot) unreliable in finding true positives, as opposed to false positives, the WHOLE IDEA of using the presence of antibodies as an unmistakable sign of present or future illness is without merit.” – [1988/2006] The Massive Fraud Behind HIV Tests by Jon Rappaport

He also writes in a more recent article about COVID antibody tests:

“Chicago Tribune, April 3: “A new, different type of coronavirus test is coming that will help significantly in the fight to quell the COVID-19 pandemic, doctors and scientists say.” “The first so-called serology test, which detects antibodies to the virus rather than the virus itself, was given emergency approval Thursday by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.” “The serology test involves taking a blood sample and determining if it contains the antibodies that fight the virus. A positive result indicates the person had the virus in the past and is currently immune.”

Got that? A positive test means the patient is now immune to the virus and can walk outside and go back to work. NBC News, April 4, has a somewhat different take: “David Kroll, a professor of pharmacology at the University of Colorado who has worked on antibody testing, explained that the antibodies [a positive test] mean ‘your immune system [has] remembered the virus to the point that it makes these antibodies that could inactivate any future viral infections’.” “What the test can’t do is tell you whether you’re currently sick with coronavirus, whether you’re contagious, whether you’re fully immune — and whether you’re safe to go back out in public.” “Because the test can’t be used as a diagnostic test, it would need to be combined with other information to determine if a person is sick with COVID-19.”  Oops, No, this really isn’t a diagnostic test, it doesn’t tell whether the patient is immune and can go back to work. Excuse me, what??

And all this for an alleged virus that has never even been isolated and proven to exist.

And there you have it. The official word on the COVID antibody test from official sources. It’s yes, no, and maybe. Public health officials can SAY whatever they want to about antibody tests: a positive result means you’re immune, it means you have an infection, it means you’re walking on the moon eating a hot dog.

Generally speaking, before 1984 a positive antibody test was taken to mean the patient had achieved immunity from a germ. After 1984, the science was turned upside down; a positive result meant the patient “had the germ” and was not immune. Now, with COVID-19, if you just read news headlines, a positive test means the patient is immune; but if you read down a few paragraphs, a positive test means the patient is maybe…maybe not…immune. Maybe infected, maybe not infected. Maybe sick, maybe not sick. And, on top of all that, antibody tests are known to read falsely positive, owing to factors that have nothing to do with the virus being tested for.”


So, as the world rushes into COVID antibody testing and contact tracing, it is always worth examining the basis of the official narrative, because without fail it turns out to be built on lies and propaganda. High antibody levels don’t equate to immunity, and they can mean anything under the sun depending on how they are interpreted. We know the plan is for digital certificates and immunity passports. Will these immunity passports be based on (unreliable) antibody tests before the they roll out a COVID vaccine? And that begs the question as to whether there is any such thing as a COVID vaccine. There is absolutely no evidence that there is even a COVID virus, let alone a COVID antibody, let alone a COVID vaccine. Stay aware and question every aspect of this agenda.




















Makia Freeman, Guest Author