Alleged Inventor Of mRNA Technology Warned FDA That Shots Could Be Dangerous

Robert Malone

Dr. Robert Malone alleges to have invented the mRNA gene therapy technology and warned the FDA that the vaccines are dangerous. Did the FDA listen to him? No. Instead, he was censored by Big Pharma and the FDA went ahead with the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that has resulted in millions of injuries and deaths.

DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., interviews Dr. Robert Malone, the alleged inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology, and Steve Kirsch, an entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaxxines.

Malone is the scientist that claims to have actually invented the technology that makes the COVID jab possible and he spills the beans on just how this introduction has been ethically compromised to make informed consent absolutely impossible for the average person.  Now this is no longer something to brag about, if it ever was.

Why?  Because the contents of the vaxxine serum has recently been determined and made public.  The vaxxine serum is 99.1% graphene oxide, the exact same ingredient found in all the various producers’ products.  There is no technology involved in this serum.  It is simply an industrial nano chemical, that is extremely toxic and that works slowly within the body to destroy various critical organs and systems.  Its toxicity is a function of the accumulated titer within a given person’s body.

This toxic nano-chemical is being administered to the public in many ways under cover of the covid plandemic.  The so-called covid 19 disease is nothing more than graphene oxide poisoning, which has flu-like respiratory symptoms, in part.  When a person gets the flu or a cold these days, they have been propagandized to believe it is covid disease and therefore they go to the doctor or hospital, even when they would not have bothered to do so in the past.

 Once in the hands of the allopathic doctors and the medical system, they are administered the test for covid requiring the use of the extremely long nasal swab, which is full of graphene oxide nano-particles.  They may often rupture the cribriform plate, the brain barrier, introducing graphene oxide into the cranium. That is the purpose for the super long swab.

This swab test, known as the PCR, uses a little plastic toy that its inventor insists is not capable of detecting the presence of any virus. Oh well, no matter.  It is not of any importance because there are no viruses involved in this whole covid scam.

Kirsch recently published an article, “Should You Get Vaccinated?” in which he reviews how and why he has changed his mind about the COVID-19 “vaccines.” This after he got both doses of the Moderna shot, as have his three daughters.

If you or someone you know is equivocal about the COVID jab, then please, look at Kirsh’s article, as it a first hand account written on the topic and provides the other side of the story that is NEVER given in the mainstream media. Remember, without full disclosure of the vaccine’s risk, it is impossible to have informed consent. If you read Kirsch’s article, you will get, in great detail, the other side that the conventional media refuses to share. He writes:

“I recently learned that these vaccines have likely killed over 25,800 Americans (which I confirmed 3 different ways) and disabled at least 1,000,000 more. And we’re only 1% to the finish line. We need to PAUSE these vaccines NOW before more people are killed.

Based on what I now know about the miniscule vaccine benefits (approximately a 0.3% reduction in absolute risk), side effects (including death), current COVID rates, and the success rate of early treatment protocols, the answer I would give today to anyone asking me for advice as to whether to take any of the current vaccines would be, ‘Just say NO.’

The current vaccines are particularly contraindicated if you have already been infected with COVID or are under age 20. For these people, I would say ‘NO! NO! NO!’

In this article, I will explain what I have learned since I was vaccinated that totally changed my mind. You will learn how these vaccines work and the shortcuts that led to the mistakes that were made.

You will understand why there are so many side effects and why these are so varied and why they usually happen within 30 days of vaccination. You will understand why kids are having heart issues (for which there is no treatment), and temporarily losing their sight, and ability to talk. You will understand why as many as 99% may be severely disabled by the vaccine.”

Now, understand this:  Kirsch has had a bad experience with the vaxx but he still is under the mistaken idea that there is some efficacy to this vaxxine.  There is none.  This is straight industrial nano-chemical poisoning.  Graphene oxide is not something needing inventing.  It is readily available in large quantities for cheap.

His article is of little value other than to alert you to the disaster he has experienced at the hands of these murderers-aforethought.  Beyond that, he is totally mistaken about the causes and effects of this murder scheme.

As explained by Malone, many months ago he warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that the spike protein — which the COVID-19 “vaccines” instruct your cells to make — could be dangerous. The FDA dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active. Besides, the vaccine makers specifically designed the injections so that the spike protein would stick and not float about freely.  Now this is not even plausible to a kindergarten student, but you can simply forget about it.  It is not relevant.  There is no mRNA genetics-based serum in any of the vaxx injections.

Spike Protein Does Not Exist, so Far as this VAXX Goes. Forget about it.

Dangerous Corners Were Cut

Graphene poisoning has reproductive toxicity as it accumulates in women’s ovaries. Kirsch cites data suggesting the miscarriage rate among women who get the COVID “vaccine” within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is 82%.5 The normal rate is 10%, so this is no minor uptick. Kirsch writes:6

“It is baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not the case. For example, one our family friends is a victim of this. She miscarried at 25 weeks … She had her first shot 7 weeks ago, and her second shot 4 weeks ago.

The baby had severe bleeding of the brain and other organ damage. Her gynecologist had never seen anything like that before in her life. They called in a specialist who said it was probably a genetic defect, because everyone buys into the narrative that vaccines are safe, it is always ruled out as a possible cause.

No VAERS report. No CDC report. Yet the doctors I’ve talked to say that it is  100% certain it was the vaccine. The family doesn’t want an autopsy for fear that their daughter will find out it was the vaccine. This is a perfect example of how these horrible side effects just never get reported anywhere.”

Disturbingly, the Pfizer biodistribution data package reveals that corners were cut in the interest of speed. A rapidly growing number of reports of miscarriages (which is likely to be a significant undercount), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is still urging pregnant women to get vaccinated. Why is that?

This is, of course, a very simple matter.  They know the vaxx content is nothing more than industrial nano poison.  Why would they run tests, and generate data when it would beg more questions?

Is There Purposeful Suppression of VAERS Data?

What’s more, as discussed in the interview, there’s evidence that data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is being manipulated as reports that were filed are now missing. Why were they removed? And without the filers’ consent?

Even with that manipulative fraud, the number of deaths reported post-vaccination against COVID-19 is beyond anything  ever seen. The rate of death from COVID-19 shots exceeds that of more than 70 vaccines combined over the past 30 years, and it’s about 500 times deadlier than the seasonal flu vaccine, which historically has been the most hazardous.

Israeli data show boys and men between the ages of 16 and 24 who have been vaxxinated have 25 times the rate of myocarditis (heart inflammation) than normal. Additionally, many young people are actually dying as a result of this myocarditis. What is not told, and few know, is that this is just the start of the dying process from graphene oxide poisoning.  Especially as people get second or more subsequent mega-doses of graphene oxide, they will have expedited adverse consequences, especially deaths.

Malone points out that, in re-reading the most current version of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that governs these COVID shots, he discovered that the FDA opted not to require stringent post-vaccination data collection and evaluation, even though they had the latitude to do so.  How very convenient!  Now, no autopsies are conducted, so the cause of death is never revealed. 

As noted by Weinstein, this is yet another anomaly that needs an answer. Why did they opt for such lax data capture, because without it, there’s no way of evaluating the safety of these products. You cannot identify the danger signals if you don’t have a process for capturing effects data and evaluating all of it.

“The whole logic of EUA is you’re basically substituting real-time capture of key information for prospective capture of key information,” Malone explains. “But to do that, you’ve got to get the information and it has to be rigorous.”

Other Anomalies

Furthermore, as noted by Weinstein, if you release a vaccine under emergency use — because you say there’s an unprecedented health emergency and there are no other options, therefore it’s worth taking a larger than normal risk — then you still would not give it to people who are at no or low risk of the disease in question.  This is an obvious common-sense question that even a grade-school student would ask.  So, you can see the scope of this fraudulent cover up that no one seems to have any questions or concerns about.

This would include children, teens and healthy individuals of any age, at bare minimum. Children appear naturally immune against COVID-19, and have been shown to not be disease vectors, and people under 40 have an infection fatality ratio of just 0.01%.  That means their chances of survival is 99.99%, which is about as good as it gets.  It really means that no threat exists at all

Pregnant women would also be excluded as they are a high-risk category for any experimentation, and anyone who has recovered from COVID would be excluded as they now have natural immunity and have no need for a vaccine whatsoever. In fact, a recent Cleveland Clinic study found people who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least 42 days prior to vaccination reaped no additional benefit from the jabs.  Quite the contrary as it is now being reported that vaxx’d people are dying at a rate of 8 times the unvaxxed.

Yet all of these incredibly low-risk groups are urged and even inappropriately incentivized to get vaccinated, and this too is anomalous behavior. Part of the risk-benefit analysis is not only the risk of serious outcomes and death from the disease, but also the availability of alternative treatments, and here we have the third massive anomaly.

Now we see Biden out with his fully armed ‘strike forces’, going door-to-door all over the US to force inoculate citizens, whose alternate choice is arrest or death in the case of any resistance. Obviously, he has a quota, levied from ranks above him, to achieve a level of vaxx coverage, like 70% by July 4, 2021. He has passed this quota down to the state governors.  There are consequences for failure, as you see a very common revelation of agendas towards this same goal and deadline.

I feel like a fool even writing this…but the motivation of the government to inject is so irrational, that I would think everyone who can ‘fog a mirror’ would plainly see and recognize the undeniable sheer insanity of what is going on here.  What is the real agenda here?  If something makes no sense, then you don’t just go along with it.  You figure out what they are trying to do to you.  In the present case, when all this that is going on is taken in context, it is not too difficult to see that we are in a depopulation agenda in which all those who take the vaxxine are the ones that are going to be dead. 

Their ‘precautionary principle’ they have brain washed you to believe is,  as long as a drug or treatment strategy doesn’t do harm, even if the positive effect may be insignificant, it should be used. This is the logic they used with masks (even though the data overwhelmingly showed no statistical benefit and there are a number of potential harms).  This logic, again, is non-logic.  It is only because people do not think that they would wear masks, wrongly thinking that masks can’t hurt them.  The commercial masks are contaminated with graphene oxide, and this is another way for them to administer it to you surrepticiously.

Doctors are also being muzzled and their warnings suppressed and censored. Dr. Charles Hoffe has administered Moderna’s COVID-19 “vaccine” to 900 of his patients. Three are now permanently disabled and one has died. After writing an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry, the provincial health officer for British Columbia, in which he stated that he’s “been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment,” his hospital privileges were yanked.

Bioethics Laws Are Clearly Being Broken

In a May 30, 2021, essay, Malone reviewed the importance of informed consent, rightly concluding that censorship makes it so that informed consent simply cannot be given. Informed consent isn’t just a nice idea or an ideal. It is the law, both nationally and internationally. The current vaccine push also violates bioethical principles in general. This, not even to mention, is a breach of bioethics laws to knowingly inject people with industrial poisons.  So where does ‘informed consent’ figure in here?

The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID poisonous injections, which are not based on gene therapy technologies, cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. In this case, informed consent would be an absurdity.  If you informed victims that the syringe is full of graphene oxide, and you fully informed the recipients of the consequences of getting shot full of this nano-poison, you could surely conclude that you would have zero takers.

In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial.

At this point, with the information of adverse effects of the injection that is disclosed, this injection will not qualify for emergency-use-only.  Not even remotely close to qualifying. Then, inform them of the actual ‘truth’ of the matter and you have pure plain and simple MURDER.  What does this imply?

And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research — written or otherwise.

The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects.”

Experimentation without proper informed consent also violates the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles were developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.

Lines Have Been Crossed That Must Never Be Crossed

In the U.S., we also have the Belmont report, cited in Malone’s essay, which spells out the ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, covered under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46 (subpart A). The Belmont report describes informed consent as follows:

“Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for informed consent are satisfied.

While the importance of informed consent is unquestioned, controversy prevails over the nature and possibility of an informed consent. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that the consent process can be analyzed as containing three elements: information, comprehension and voluntariness.”

Americans, indeed the people of the whole earth, are being prevented from freely accessing and sharing information about these poisonous injections. Worse, we are misled by fact checkers and Big Tech platforms that ban or put misinformation labels on anyone and anything discussing them in a critical or questioning way. The same censorship also prevents comprehension of risk.

Lastly, government and any number of vaccine stakeholders are encouraging companies and schools to make these deadly injections mandatory, which violates the rule of voluntariness. Government and private businesses are also creating massive incentives to participate in this experiment, including million-dollar lotteries and full college scholarships. None of this is ethical or even legal.

“… as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies which meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.

For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream, this would clearly violate every law in existence because is pure and plain murder by coercion.

If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any US IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study is allowed.

In human subject clinical research, in most countries of the world this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to waive that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed? In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me.

1)  An unlicensed medical product deployed under deceptive emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development.   It certainly cannot be hustled door-to-door, like Biden is trying to pull off, as though this was an honest and legitimate enterprise.

2)EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent in cases of clear life-and-death emergencies.  It does not authorize it for clear and simple cases of execution..

3)The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion.” They must be given the truth.  They are being given a pile of lies by the current administration.

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) recently posted more than 50 video presentations from the pay-for-view Fifth International Public Conference on Vaccination held online October 16 to 18, 2020, and made them available to everyone for free.

The conference’s theme was “Protecting Health and Autonomy in the 21st century.

Malone Concerned That Anti-Vaxxer’s Concerns Will Be Validated

“What would happen to the entire vaccine enterprise—I’m talking about pediatric vaccines, the fundamental bedrocks of public health—if we basically validate the criticisms of those that have been labeled anti-vaxxers?”  The answer is, of course, that we would save a lot of peoples lives and expose a lot of medical homicide.

The ‘vaccine industry’, a part of the Big-Pharma Industrial Complex, originated with Rockefeller allopathic medicine.  Allopathic medicine means pills, shots, chemotherapy, radiation therapy and unnecessary elective surgeries.  The underlying theories of Rockefeller medicine are all knowingly false and totally fraudulent.

 Baron von Rothschild, the financier of John D. Rockefeller, the Robber Baron, paid Louis Pasteur to publish a document on the subject of germ theory.  This document plagiarized the research of another contemporary and altered the conclusion to claim that all disease stems from something he called a ‘germ’.

There is no such thing as a “germ”.  You do not become ill by touching a toilet seat and catching a germ.  That is totally opposite of how human health works.

You can read a lot of information about how health works in my blogs offered in the running archives of this site. 

Leave a Reply