Is there anything Real About Virology?

For the past two years, I’ve been making the case that the virus is a scientismic fiction, a con, and a cover story for tyranny that would make Hitler, Stalin, and Mao blush with envy.

Recently, the question has been attracting wider coverage: Does SARS-CoV-2 even exist ? We know that virus exist, but we also know that viruses are inert non-living molecules that are not capable of infecting, ‘contaging’, or harming living organisms.

Entrepreneur, inventor, and philanthropist, Steve Kirsch, says yes. He offers to set up a 5-hour live video debate. He’ll send his experts and the other side will send theirs. They’ll go at it. Will anyone be left standing?

What about the usual form of scientific debate, called the written word of logical argumentation, with available truths?

Buckle up.

Kirsch: “I don’t think the folks I’d ask to do this would want to spend time writing papers…They don’t even have the time to prepare their own papers. Why, they don’t even have time to use toilet paper to wipe their asses. Doing written documents is much more time consuming than talking because people spend the time to make it logical and bulletproof.”

Heaven forbid.

Kirsch: “None of the people on our team require that all discussions be in writing only.”

Of course not. Why would his team of scientists insist on the method by which science is accomplished?

Kirsch: “One of the commenters [to an article by Kirsch] wrote this: ‘But when someone really knows their shit, they would much rather handle it in a live conversation; it’s much more efficient (you don’t spend hours writing) and it reaches a wider audience of those who can’t read, and that audience has the benefit of tone and body language to affirm (or negate) the veracity and substance of what is being said.’”

Kirsch: “I agree with that.”

Truly awesome.

Tone and body language. Yes, of course. You know, that was Galileo’s problem when he was tried by the Inquisition for insisting the Earth rotated, and journeyed around the sun. If only he’d stood up straighter and spoken with unwavering clarity and body language (in the manner of, say, a Walter Cronkite). He might have won his case. Because tone and inflection equal science. We all realize that. Obviously, Galileo didn’t know his shit.

Spending hours writing arguments about the existence of the virus—who would have the audacity to insist on that? As Kirsch points out, his experts are busy. It’s rude to interrupt them and ask them to make their case bulletproof. Science on Video tends to be based on “we KNOW we’re sure” and “the truth is OBVIOUS” and “WE’RE the pros.” That’s good enough, and you can sell it. If you, again, display convincing tone and body language.

In medical school, they teach this. “One day you students will be called on to defend your actions and opinions with pure bullshit. I tell you that now, to prepare you for the moment. How do you shape and transmit the bullshit? Do you do it through tiresome written reports, which run the risk of exposing the truth, engraved on the page, or do you stand up before a panel and look those people in the eye and tell a story that wows them? Do you fumble to clarify a point, or do you gloss it over with a quick-hitting generality that covers a crack in your armor? Careers are won and lost on that basis.”

Kirsch believes an exchange of papers between debaters is futile. Who can, or is willing to, pore through them and analyze them? And do those written exchanges actually cover all essential points? But with video, we NEVER EVER see opponents talking past each other or quickly changing the subject to avoid unpleasant revelations. Certainly not. We never see opponents smirking like entitled monkeys and making ad hominem accusations. We never witness slippery logic sliding by before it can be isolated and corrected. We never witness grandstanding for the audience’s benefit. It’s never show biz on parade. No mainstream expert would dare intone, “Ahem, in my many years as professor of so-and-so at such-and-such, having engaged in intense research on this question, and having authored over 60 papers on this very subject…”

And then there is the suggestion, as the commenter states, that the audience can decide…on the winner in the debate. Yes. What else is a debate FOR? Science is a democracy, and the audience is the proof of the pudding. Once they vote up or down, the deed is done. This is why, in medical journals, at the bottom of every paper and study, you see the poll question: “DO YOU THINK THIS ANALYSIS IS ACCURATE? CAST YOUR BALLOT. Depending on the outcome, we will maintain the study in our archive or retract it with an apology. Everyone can vote. You do not need to be a subscriber. We work for our audience every day. If the majority of you believes one of our authors has convinced you that the moon is a slice of soft brie on a plate or an elephant’s ass, we concur. This is called consensus, and what else could science be?” If enough of the audience feels they have a winner, then we have what is known as “Settled Science”. The answer to this question can never hence be asked again. This is “Settled”

Not long ago, I crashed my Gulfstream in the Himalayas, and after a harrowing journey to the GeFunkte Hospital in Berlin, as I was lying on the operating table, two surgeons debated whether I needed one or two transplanted hearts. Later, I was told a live stream of this discussion had been piped into the hospital waiting room, and the patients expressed an overwhelming preference for two hearts, based on the charismatic presentation of Surgeon Number One, who had studied Voice and Drama at the Julliard School in New York. So…two hearts it was. You can read about the groundbreaking operation in the Medical Journal of Audience Participation.

Published blow-by-blow descriptions of “isolating viruses” are quite dense to begin with. Perhaps one person in two hundred thousand can plow through them and understand them. Therefore, the debate about the existence of a virus starts with something in writing that, for most people, is impenetrable.

It’s no surprise that these descriptions are viewed with suspicion.

“We’re the expert virologists. We are the only ones capable of understanding what we’re doing.”

“I see. So, understanding virus isolation is like understanding the properties of nano-graphene-hydroxide and insertion into lipid nanoparticles which are injected into about 7 billion people”, all for the sake of their own good.

“Yes, exactly. Only we can understand that whole process.”

“Got it. I have grave doubts about everything you’re claiming about the vaxxine, but I completely accept everything you’re saying about the existence of the virus.”

In this particular debate about the existence of the virus, the devil really is in the details.

The details concerning exactly how virologists believe they are isolating viruses and sequencing them. As I say, reading the studies, one sees immediately that the accounts of these procedures are laden with technical terms and technical steps that are not readily understandable by many.

Those elements have to be analyzed and taken apart, to see whether they make scientismic sense. In fact, a debate in writing is the sane way to proceed. But not all agree. Some feel that writing is a waste of paper and other assets.

Settling the question of virus-isolation via video would be quite a challenge. An exceptional amount of good will and patience, from the mainstream virologists, would be required. I’ve never seen medical “experts” show those qualities, when the basic assumptions of their professions are on the line. When they are “Settled Science”. I’ve seen them get up on their high horse, growl, bloviate, dismiss, generalize, tap dance, boil over, accuse, pretend to be oh so reasonable, with their pants on fire.

Someone will say, “But…but, let’s wrap all this up in one sitting. Video will accomplish that. I have things to do, places to go. We live in a fast-food world, face it.”

Yes, you have to go to the store with your mask on and maintain distancing; you have to look for a restaurant that won’t make you flash your vaccine passport; you have to show up at the school board meeting to tell the members what they can do with their mandate forcing your kid to take the shot; when they refuse to listen to you, you have to sell your house, pack up your belongings, and move with the kids from New York to Florida; and all the while, you have to keep deleting voice messages from your brother who’s telling you only the injection will save you and the family wants you institutionalized.

All these and so many more to-do’s begin with the assumption that a virus exists.

So, a debate on this point ought to be complete and rigorous and get a comprehensive sample of how everyone is feeling about it.

If the only possibility is a video, have a go. But the written word is far superior.

“Counsel, you have a video where the defendant discusses how he can steal a billion dollars from the pension fund?”

“Yes, Your Honor. But we also have a letter of agreement between the defendant and the head of the Montebello crime family. The letter reveals the defendant has already stolen the money, and will give it to the mob in exchange for certain favors.”

“A letter, you say? Words? Sentences? In writing, on a page? Signed? And it can be read?”

“Yes, sir. Writing is an older form of expression. It’s now being phased out. But it stands up quite well. It’s bulletproof.”

Vaxx Death Results from Nano Blood Clotting Throughout the Body

As I have been writing about incessantly, the VAXX serum is 99% nano-graphene oxide.  There is nothing scientific about it.  It is not a technical, scientific or biological achievement, like all the doctors and so-called experts are trying to take credit for.  It is just as scientific as Fauci taking a very sharp knife to the interior your blood vessels and vital organs, making countless lacerations.  The first failure, since this is a blood-borne system of trillions of nano-lacerating cutting-edged graphene particles, is the heart and the blood vessels themselves.  This is no disease, in the classical sense, any more than getting carved up by a fine extremely sharp knife is a disease. These clowns from both sides of the political spectrum, are making incessant, non-stop assertions about genetic alterations, spike-protein coated virus particles and myocarditis.  The lethal mechanism is simply a trillion sharp nano cutting edges that simply make trillions of nano-sized lacerations to the interior vital surfaces of the vital components of your body.

Graphene is a well-known industrial chemical that has a unique geometrical property.  Dimensionally, its thickness is only one atom, making it the sharpest cutting edge known to man. When nano-ized and suspended in slightly viscous liquid carrier, then injected into your blood stream, it is going to immediately begin the process of killing you.  It appears that the original intention was to place a sufficient amount such that the timing of death would be about two years.  But, as with any process of killing by a trillion lacerations, the time factor can be changed by the concentration, or titer, of the cutting edges in the cardio-system.  Thus, multiple injections will speed up the process of killing.  So will the constitutional state of the body’s health.  If you are weak, the trauma will take your life more rapidly. But logically, the perpetrators would desire that death not be a relatively instantaneous consequence, as it is the lethal aspect of the vaxx that potential victims are noticing and fearing, making them reluctant to willingly accept their own death by vaxx.

Doctors and researchers are now confirming that nearly all the negative side effects and deaths stemming from covid vaxxines are the result of blood clots. But all of those clots are submicroscopic and require scanning electron microscopy to detected. Standard medical imaging equipment of little value. These clots, called “nano blood clots,” can inflict countless lacerations, which occur in countless numbers that are accumulative.   Each new accumulative laceration expands the injuries to the entire system.  This is the reason that you see so many deaths following the second injection.  With even more injections, the concentration of nano graphene cutters increase and each nano particle will accelerate the process toward lethality.

The resulting die-off of local cells can be expressed in the body as a tingling sensation, numbness, loss of sensory acuity, organ failure, loss of cognitive function and even notable personality changes as people lose higher brain function.

“Nano blood clots are the cause of billions of health impacts and deaths, not from any COVID viral infection as they allege, but from the COVID vaxxines.

This coagulation causes the red blood cell platelets to stick together as in stroke and heart attacks. A small number of autopsies have been performed, revealing micro blood clots in the heart, lungs and other vital organs. Lung failure is not due to a virus but is due to the clotting. When people can’t breathe, the problem is nano-blood clotting in the lungs caused by the vaxx.

Dr. Charles Hoffe, went public with his findings on COVID vaxxinated patients. Using the d-dimer test of blood, he found that the majority of his vaxxinated patients had growing numbers of clots. He said that the use of graphene injections would “kill most people through heart failure.”

And another quote cites a published study from Loma Linda University:

Loma Linda University Health researchers found that severely ill vaxx victims are likely to die as the result of nano clots formed in the lungs that spread to cause deadly damage to other organs throughout the body. The current view being pushed by the suit-and-tie so-called doctors is that the COVID-19 virus travels to the body’s organs and damages blood vessel linings in those organs. This is more desperate nonsense to try to continue to involve virus in the vaxx-pandemic.  The doctors who like to sit in front of the TV cameras are all playing at being scientists, trying to develop fame and fortune for themselves.  They are not scientists, do not deserve any credit for doing anything except trying to maintain the lies, confusion and errors surrounding the false idea of virus being involved in this scam.

According to this research, once the VAXX process begins, the body now becomes overwhelmed in trying furtively and futilely to fight against the graphene lacerations occurring everywhere in the cardiovascular system, which services all of the body’s vital organs.

There is no protection from the countless lacerations produced by the graphene vaxx serum to the internal components of the victim’s body.  This is not a biological development.  It is simply death by a trillion knives.  These knives do not find their way out of the body, but continue to accumulate as more vaxx’s are administered by the heinous fiends who are perpetrating this scam on the public citizens of the world.  Don’t worry, the perpetrators have taken nothing more than placebos to trick you into thinking they are receiving the same death sentence as you.