ABASEMENT Just How Far Will People Go?

       Anal Swabbing

       Face Diapers in Triplicate

China says, with the recent testing of sewer systems for the presence of COVID-19, scientists in China decided to go to the source for test samples, namely, your asshole. If wearing a face diaper, in triplicate, isn’t absurd enough, this protocol is coming to America posthaste for the ultimate in human degradation.

While Citizens in China are appalled and grossed out at this new requirement, it has caused another debilitating issue. If the purpose of the Pandemic is to break down the human psyche and dignity, this is it.

The latest problem in China is the millions of cases of Chinese people rolling around on the ground while laughing hysterically at the thought of millions of Americans taking off their pants, bending over, and getting a long swab stuck up their asses.  No one is sure, at this point, how to get these hysterical laughers to return to their senses.

Biden has offered to be the first American to accept this procedure on public TV, to prove his virtue.  Meanwhile, experts fear that the new ‘laughing hysteria disease’ will break out among the US population before a cure is found.   

Just as the WHO acknowledges  that the high-cycle PCR tests routinely leads to universal false positives and the world is aghast, Li Tongzeng, a doctor at Beijing’s Yu’an Hospital, and a proponent of anal swab tests, claims that “the coronavirus survives longer in the anus or excrement than from upper body tracts.”

STOP! Think about what Dr. Tongzen just told us. “corona virus survives longer in the anus than in the respiratory tracts”.  In spite of a total misunderstanding of viruses, he admits that corona virus does not survive in the respiratory tracts by virtue of some reality in the body’s reaction to corona virus.  So, we have to go to the anus and stick our swab in some fecal material to catch the virus while it’s still available in the body, but disappearing rapidly.

And with this, Li is suggesting that the method is becoming more common than he had initially expected. Anal swabs are being deployed in Beijing quarantine as well as in some school settings, according to recent reports out of Beijing’s Daxing district.

Authorities in the Chinese capital have started testing about 2MM people in the center of the city after two cases of a strain of the coronavirus, first detected in Britain, were reported in Beijing.

The rapid mass testing campaign started on Friday, a day before the city’s legislature was expected to convene an annual meeting and with just weeks to go until the country’s political heavyweights arrive in the capital for the year’s most important political gatherings.

“All districts and work units must make epidemic prevention and control their top priority and spare no efforts in epidemic prevention and handling,” municipal government spokesman Tian Wei said on Friday afternoon, citing orders from the city’s COVID-19 task force.

The mass testing was conducted after the capital went into partial lockdown in Daxing and Shunyi, with computer-modelled genetic sequencing revealing two cases of the more transmissible coronavirus variant discovered last month in in the assholes of two citizens of Britain.

The capital has since been on high alert. More than 1.2K people have been tested at a school attended by one pupil with an asymptomatic case (ie. No sign of infection or disease) of the COVId-19. Each of the contacts at the school had nasal, saliva and anal swabs as well as serum tests – all of which were negative.

Dr. Tongzen is eagerly waiting for his nomination for a Nobel prize based on his breakthrough discoveries.

January 27, 2021

More is always better — I suppose, to an extent, that’s the American way. Now that philosophy is apparently spilling over into how we wear masks.

Speaking this week to NBC’s Savannah Guthrie, Herr Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the unparalleled expert on all things anal COVID-19, suggested Americans wear two masks instead of one. The scientific reason behind the edification, he told Guthrie, is “it just makes common sense” that two masks are “likely” better than one.  He too, is eagerly awaiting his nomination for the Nobel Prize.

Following the natural arc of the doctor’s logic, it begs the question: Why not more than two masks, then? Now we turn to CNBC correspondent,  viral expert, Contessa Brewer, who picked up the mantle from there.

Speaking to anchor Shep Smith, she said Americans should probably be wearing three masks because, as Fauci’s logic would suggest, wearing three masks is better than just settling for a mere two face diapers.

“The experts keep telling us that wearing masks is really about protecting ourselves — protecting others from ourselves in the event that we are contagious,” Brewer told Smith. “But, you know, if other people aren’t wearing their masks, or they’re wearing them improperly, we need to protect ourselves. So, experts say you can double up with a tight-weave fabric mask for added protection.”

“Now, Virginia Tech researchers found that doubling up these cloth masks increases the efficacy from 50% to 75%,” she continued. “A three-layer mask could block up to 90% of dust particles, although they still cannot block any viruses.”

One of the doctors behind that Tech study, Dr. Monica Gandhi, tweeted Tuesday that the “exact recommendation” is an N-95 mask, which is, at this time, difficult to find in the public marketplace. So in lieu of that, she is suggesting people wear a surgical mask underneath a cloth mask or to wear a double-layered cloth mask with a filter “like a vacuum bag” in between the layers. Ultimately, though, she noted that simply wearing one, single-layer mask is still better than nothing at all and pointed out that wearing numerous masks at once isn’t really practical because it will cause your voice to be muffled and “you will pull it down.” The ultimate solution may be simply pulling a large canister vacuum filter over your entire head.

Vice President Kamala Harris has adopted the two-mask rule on public TV. On Tuesday, when she received the second dose of her COVID-19 vaccination, Harris was wearing two masks: a surgical-grade mask underneath a black cloth mask with designer embroidery.

Dr. Ted Noel is among the latest to use common sense and reason to argue that masks don’t work to stop aerosol virus transmission. He uses a vaping device and several different types of masks — including disposable and cloth — to illustrate his point, as the vapor clearly passes around and through the masks.  He further demonstrated how to make the vapor escape from your asshole, on public TV.

“Aerosols will not be stopped by masks,” he says. “You don’t need a big study. All you need is this [holding up a vaping apparatus]. The [vape] aerosol is actually larger in molecular size than the aerosol from your breath,” yet it still passes easily through the mask.  Never mind pointing out that viruses are about one-million times smaller than any aerosol droplet.

This demonstration provides visual evidence that masks may be useless against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, but if you’re looking for further support, a growing number of studies comparing U.S. states with mask mandates to those without mandates suggest the face diapers are basically useless.

Are Double, or Triple, Masks Needed?

If one mask isn’t enough, The New York Times suggested, in January 2021, that perhaps doubling up would offer better protection. “Double-masking isn’t necessary for everyone,” the Times wrote. “But for people with thin or flimsy face coverings, ‘if you combine multiple layers, you start achieving pretty high efficiencies’ of blocking viruses from exiting and entering the airway.’”

They cited commentary by Linsey Marr of Virginia Tech, which recommended layering two types of masks or using a three-layer mask to keep particles out.

There’s just one pesky problem. “At some point, ‘we run the risk of making it too hard to breathe,’ she said.” If you can get past that trade-off, the rationale seems to be that if you add enough layers of material, infectious droplets must travel through an obstacle course of sorts, and eventually you’ll stop something from getting through, speaking in scientific lingo.

Marr and co-author Monica Gandhi from the University of California said that in studies of dozens of mask materials, filtration effectiveness ranged from less than 10% (for polyurethane foam) to nearly 100% for a vacuum cleaner bag. But in tests on humans wearing homemade masks, they were only 50% to 60% effective at protecting the wearer from pollution particles.

Based on their own studies, Marr and Gandhi said they recommend “a high-quality surgical mask or a fabric mask of at least two layers with high thread count for basic protection,” but for “maximal protection,” doubling up on masks or using a triple-layer variety is necessary:

“For maximal protection, members of the public can either (1) wear a cloth mask tightly on top of a surgical mask where the surgical mask acts as a filter and the cloth mask provides an additional layer of filtration while improving the fit; or (2) wear a three-layer mask with outer layers consisting of a flexible, tightly woven fabric that can conform well to the face and a middle layer consisting of a non-woven high-efficiency filter material (e.g., vacuum bag material).

If the masks fit well, these combinations should produce an overall efficiency of >90% for particles 1 µm and larger, which corresponds to the size of respiratory aerosols that we think are most important in mediating transmission of COVID-19.”

But layering up on masks that provide good filtration, or wearing more than two masks at once, may have diminishing returns, the Times noted, again highlighting the obvious that covering your mouth and nose with multiple layers of fabric and filtration material could “make it much harder to breathe normally.”

COVID-19 Spreads Via Aerosolized Particles

There’s growing evidence that aerosol transmission is involved in the spread of SARS-CoV-2, which are 0.125 μm in size. September 18, 2020, the CDC posted updated COVID-19 guidance on its “How COVID-19 Spreads” page that, for the first time, mentioned aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2, saying “this is thought to be the main way the virus spreads.”

The CDC then deleted the mention of aerosols and the possibility of spread beyond 6 feet the following Monday, September 21, saying a draft version of proposed changes had been posted “in error.”

It’s a noteworthy difference, because if SARS-CoV-2 is spread via aerosolized droplets, which research suggests, such droplets remain in the air for at least three hours and can travel over long distances of up to 27 feet. This adds to the likelihood that cloth masks do little to stop you from getting COVID-19.

AAPS explained:

“The preponderance of scientific evidence supports that aerosols play a critical role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Years of dose response studies indicate that if anything gets through, you will become infected. Thus, any respiratory protection respirator or mask must provide a high level of filtration and fit to be highly effective in preventing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”

Face Masks Don’t Reduce COVID-19 Infection Rate

The first randomized controlled trial of more than 6,000 individuals to assess the effectiveness of surgical face masks against SARS-CoV-2 infection found masks did not statistically significantly reduce the incidence of infection. Among mask wearers, 100% ended up testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, compared to 100% among controls.

When they removed the people who did not adhere to proper mask use, the results remained the same —which suggests adherence makes no significant difference. Among those who reported wearing their face mask “exactly as instructed,” 100% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 compared to 100% of the controls.

A case-control investigation of people with COVID-19 who visited 11 U.S. health care facilities also showed little benefit of mask usage. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report revealed factors associated with getting the disease, including the use of cloth face coverings or masks in the 14 days before becoming ill, but only 13 days after diagnosis of mental retardation.

The majority of them — 70.6% — reported that they “always” wore a mask, but they still tested 100% fake positives. Among the interview respondents who became ill, 108, or 70.6%, said they always wore a mask, compared to six, or 3.9%, who said they “never” did, and six more, or 3.9%, who said they “rarely” did and 100% who tested ‘fake positives’ using the PCR.

In other words, of the symptomatic adults with COVID-19, 70.6% always wore a mask and still got sick, compared to 7.8% for those who rarely or never did. Further, the cloth masks most of the public are wearing may have a pore size of 80 to 500 μm, which is far larger than viruses or even respiratory droplets, which range from 0.1 to 10 μm.

Researchers writing in PeerJ said such masks have “poor filtering efficiency” that “may have arisen from larger and open pores present in the masks.” This got even worse after washing, with filtering efficiency dropping by 20% after the mask was washed and dried four times.

Policy Review: Face Masks Don’t Affect Flu Transmission

In May 2020, researchers reviewed the evidence of nonpharmaceutical personal protective measures against pandemic influenza, including 10 studies that analyzed the effectiveness of face masks in reducing flu virus infections in the community. “We found no significant reduction in influenza transmission with the use of face masks,” they wrote, citing the following research:

  • During the Hajj pilgrimage in Australia, no significant difference in influenza infection was found among those who wore a mask and those who did not
  • Two studies of university students living in residence halls found no significant reduction of influenza cases among the face mask groups
  • In a study of flu transmission among households, face mask usage did not lead to a significant reduction in secondary flu virus infection

While the researchers suggested there could be some benefit from wearing tight-fitting respirators that are properly fit-tested, loose-fitting face masks, such as disposable masks, are much less likely to offer protection and could even increase the risk of transmission with improper use:

“There is limited evidence for their effectiveness in preventing influenza virus transmission either when worn by the infected person for source control or when worn by uninfected persons to reduce exposure. Our systematic review found no significant effect of face masks on transmission of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

COVID-19 Cases Higher in Areas with Mask Mandates

Widespread mask mandates were rolled out despite a lack of any evidence to support their use among the general population. In an attempt to add some science into the equation, computer scientists, actuaries and data analysts from Rational Ground looked at COVID-19 cases from May 1, 2020, to December 15, 2020, in all 50 U.S. states.

They calculated how many cases per day occurred by population with and without mask mandates. Among states without a mask mandate, 5,781,716 cases were counted over 5,772 days. This works out to:

  • No mask mandates: 17 cases per 100,000 people per day
  • Mask mandates: 27 cases per 100,000 people per day

In short, COVID-19 cases were higher with mask mandates than without. As noted by Daniel Horowitz, a senior editor of The Blaze:

“We can turn the numbers upside down and inside out, but no matter how we examine them, there is no evidence of masks correlating with reduced spread. If anything, the opposite is true … It’s self-evident that the virus does what it does naturally and follows a very mechanical pattern regardless of state policies …”

A working paper released by the National Bureau of Economic Research concurred, finding that for all the countries and U.S. states studied, once the region experienced 25 cumulative COVID-19 deaths, the growth rates of daily COVID-19 deaths fell from initially high levels to close to zero within 20 to 30 days.  This came from erasing ‘causes-of-death’ on death certificates and replacing with ‘covid’

This occurred regardless of what type of nonpharmaceutical interventions, including mask mandates, travel restrictions, stay-at-home orders, quarantines and lockdowns, were put in place. “Those policies have varied in their timing and implementation across countries and states, but the trends in outcomes do not,” the American Institute for Economic Research reported.

Do You Have to Wear a Mask?

Many people believe that wearing a mask should be an individual choice, but a majority of U.S. states and cities have made mask-wearing mandatory. Some private businesses have done so as well. This isn’t necessarily a case of “wearing something is better than nothing,” as some research suggests mask usage could lead to physical and psychological harm.

The U.S. nonprofit Stand for Health Freedom is among those calling for peaceful civil disobedience against mandatory masks, and has a widget you can use to contact your government representatives to let them know wearing a mask must be a personal choice.

While you may be forced to wear a mask in order to enter certain places of business, if you live in an area with a mask mandate there is usually a caveat that states “unless you can maintain a 6-foot distance.” If you can maintain this distance, you can forgo a mask and still comply with the mandate.


Since it should be commonly understood that there are untold trillions of viruses in our bodies and surrounding environment, but no illness stems from viruses, therefore there is no mortality attributable to viruses.

All of the so-called countermeasures mandated in lock-step by governments have nothing to do with medical issues, illnesses from the presence of viruses or pandemics. 

The countermeasures are all totally lame when considered in the context of disease intervention.

The countermeasures are solely about generating fear, helplessness, despair, loss of identity, loss of any family or clan social support and most frightening of all…acceptance of the fact of total government enmity towards humans.

The government is not the clowns you elect to fill public offices.  The government is the Royals that have always ruled humans.

Demanding that you take you pants off, blend over and accept a stick shoved up your ass is just another debasement measure to enforce absolute control they have made you accept.

Nothing to do with masks, PCR tests, nasal or anal swabs, distancing, when you can drive you own car, what public establishments you can frequent and all the other punitive nonsense has anything in the least to do your welfare. This is so blatantly obvious that you would have to be an idiot to buy into any part of it.  I have explained the truth ad nauseum in prior blogs.  So, you are either going to open your eyes, or you are toast.  A massive RESET of the global order is in-process.  It is being touted from the roof tops, so it is no secret.  If you are waiting for things to ‘return to normal’, you are not going to live that long.  It’s not happening.  You are going to die a horrible death from the fake vaccine or be a casualty of the civil war that is going to become the destruction of Western Society and the genocide of the vast population at large