And a few words about Trump, who does not happen to be the messiah
We should begin by acknowledging that Time Magazine, once respected for purveying a left-wing version of politicized events, has deteriorated over the years into a smelly old rag of lies and amateurish, biased, fabricated horse-shit. Knowing this, their Great Reset: Slimeball Edition is available to influence voters on this timely occasion.
On the eve of the election, burning pots of snake powder and chanting spells, hoping for a Biden victory, Time magazine published a monster feature, called The Great Reset. The fabrication features bloviations from “leading thinkers,” all pointing to the need for a complete revamping of our world, because…pandemic has been foisted upon the world by lying governments and their talking-head medical non-experts.
Well, actually, it’s because of the the economic devastation and consequent ruination of untold numbers of lives. In other words, “We crashed the world economy and stilled the engine of the planet’s production, using the pretext of a fake pandemic; so now we must remake all economies and governments.” That’s Time’s insinuated version of logic.
Their number-one go-to reset thinker is Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, part of the UN. His chunk of hot air is titled, “A Better Economy is Possible. But We Need to Reimagine Capitalism to Do It”:
Sustainable future; more inclusive corporate hiring practices; reduce greenhouse gases. It could have been written in 1999, and, in fact, probably was. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is, the whole world must be changed. This is the mantra. The world must be changed by UN Globalists. This Great Reset has been 200 years in the planning and making. That includes this totally fake pandemic distraction cover story.
The enticement is ” free-everything for everybody”, UBI and other cocaine-candy incentives. As opposed to cosmic cheese glob collectivism, in which the independent thoughts and desires of the individual are measured against the ruling force of every other empty and dependent thought of every individual who has surrendered to the Glob.
The Time magazine version of reality is, we need a plan, we need a plan, we need a plan. Surprise for Time magazine…the UN has been planning and implementing on this for close to 100 years. They have been organizing the planet down to the last dotted i and crossed t. It’s the wet dream of technocrats. Oh look, we have a plan of more than 100 years in the making by our friends at the UN. Let’s take up this magnificent plan, with a complete structured organization waiting in the wings, and run with it to resolve this dire pandemic that Nature has foisted upon us at this convenient time. Nature has foisted nothing of the kind.
Once depopulation of the “West” is completed, a defined slot for every remaining person, a person for every defined slot. Humanity as a machine. So, you get cosmic cheese glob plus machine. That’s the future we’re supposed to enlist in. After months of research, consultations, and preliminary reports, I believe the appropriate, measured, and technical response is: “SCREW YOU”. This response can be printed in various fonts, in caps, italics, or bold. It can be voiced. It can be announced through a bullhorn. It can be printed on masks, shirts, shower curtains, bedsheets, blouses, dresses, windbreakers, trench coats. It can be stamped in day-glo on the backs of pet cats and dogs. Persons in technical fields, who believe language more agile than instructions for building computer chips, can have their tailor stitch the response in tiny letters just below their shirt pockets. More ambitious folk could secure the use of an eighteen-wheeler. A poster would cover one side of the rig. Two lines of text: THE GREAT RESET, and below it, the response. SCREW YOU. Each letter would be three feet high. Roman bold caps. Going along with the current trend, white letters against a black background. Or maybe just the traditional red, white, and blue.
I’ve watched, for 50 years, “dissent on the Left” undergoes transformations, until it became “centrist Marxism.” Karl Marx can’t be too bad. After all, didn’t he write a book, a manifesto? Well, actually Marx did not write anything. The British government wrote it for him and even let him put has name down as the author. That dissent has been swallowed up and is now the unthinking status quo for millions of people, including politicians and the mainstream press. It’s an instrument of attack against all basic freedoms, one of which is the freedom to express dissent. That’s the way tyranny always operates. A call for freedom turns into a call for lockdowns.
Many have tried to make excuses for these fascists. “They don’t know what they’re doing.” It doesn’t matter whether they know or don’t know. They’re doing it. They’re out to destroy what’s left of the country. Inalienable rights mean nothing to them. There are no rights. They only want what they want, and most of time they don’t even know what that is, beyond tearing down whatever lies in their path. They’re the foot soldiers of the Elite, who are the unknowing proponents of The’ Great Reset’.
The ‘Elite’ means the ‘hidden power structure that actually runs the governments of the world. Marxism IS a dictatorship of the Elite, in case you haven’t noticed. It’s another name for a very old con. On the other side of the coin, we have people who have drunk the Kool-Aid and are very sure Trump is the Second Coming of the Messiah. He is the instrument of surrender of the nations to the fabrications of the medical experts and supporting the unconstitutional lockdowns and the economic devastation. His ardent supporters gloss all that over, as if the nation is now well on its way to recovery. No harm, no foul. If only wishing would make it so.
At one time, in March, 2020, recovery was said to be only two weeks away. It seems, no one is going to back up Trump’s campaign rhetoric and make the opened US economy a FACT, not merely a proposition calculated to win a second term. His claim of having the military take charge of deploying the COVID vaccine remains very disturbing. To strangely assume this is part of his brilliant plan to guard our freedom to refuse the vaccine is based on zero evidence. Add to that the secrecy surrounding the federal collaboration with the Pentagon to develop a COVID vaccine, and you have a prescription for a medical nightmare and genocide.
Trump never spoke directly to the American people and admitted the extent of the economic destruction which has occurred since the fake pandemic was declared. He has never taken any responsibility whatsoever for permitting this horror show and tragedy in the first place. It is revealing of the extent of his real power, which is virtually zero. His supporters say, “Well, he couldn’t have gone up against the medical people and rejected the lockdowns…” Oh really? Why not?
The job of the leader involves doing exactly that when the heat is turned up to its highest pitch. He stands firm. He takes the blows. He strikes back. He shows some courage. The truth is, when Fauci came into the White House with the absurd and insane projections of Neil Ferguson, claiming two million people could die this past summer in the US, Trump folded up like a nickel comic book and never questioned the source or the numbers. Ferguson, of the Imperial College in London, bankrolled by Bill Gates, was and is a failed computer modeler, with a track record of failed ridiculous predictions, none of which have ever come to pass. For example, in 2005, he stated that 200 million people, worldwide, could die from the bird flu. The final official figure was a few hundred, these all fabricated lies, yielding a big fat zero.
But Trump never made inquiries into Ferguson. He never stopped the Fauci train in its tracks, then and there, and exposed him as the predatory criminal he is. Fauci is nothing more than a relic of WW2 Nazi medical experimental horrors. Trump climbed on board the train and rode it. NOW he says there is too much nonsense about COVID and we are coming out of the darkness. He says this is great and that is great and everything is great. Sorry, pal, that’s not the true story.
The forces of the plot are jacking up and rigging new case numbers to extreme heights to justify the plan to implement more senseless lockdowns. Every living thing, human, animal, plant, fungus, mold and spoor is a “case” for these idiots. Viruses are created in infinite numbers and are present in all eukaryotic entities by the normal process of cellular mitosis. They are harmless, dead, not capable of killing anyone or anything. The sooner you grasp this truth, the sooner you could become effective in saving your own ass, and that of your family and friends. Slogging along in ignorance is not your answer unless you are suicidal.
With the Biden now the likely shoe-in for the Haitian-born Harris, things can go no where but further down the toilet…big time. Forget pipe dreams and fantasies about Trump. This war is far from over and Trump’s role may be nothing but a cameo. The US, along with its nanny-allies, have been invaded. The enemy is within the gates, moving like locusts through a field. They’ve destroyed millions of businesses, companies and people. This is the “Real Great Reset of 2020”, making its 200-year cycle on a timely basis. The UN has been created to take the ball from here. It has a massive organization with all the bureaucracy required to hit the ground running.
If Biden wins the presidency, then the Haitian, Harris, will be the apparent ruling mouthpiece. Her controllers are hoping to override state governments and stamp a host of new repressive measures on all our heads at once. The “medical experts” will play their roles until the coup/genocide is completed. After which, the Technate will come into its full bloom. If it were even possible to stop this development, resistance would have to be active already. All that is currently visible is stooped, hanging heads with the masks of the ‘walking dead’, lining up for their lethal injections of corona vaccines. This is not going to cut it folks. We have the advantage of sheer numbers, but once the genocide program is in full swing, it will probably all be moot.
It would be smart to get serious sooner than later. The window is closing fast.
Typically, the course of empire goes from trade surplus to trade deficit during the 200 period of hegemony that is a ‘Reset Period’. Even in ruin and deep fiscal deficit, the dying hegemon persists until the period ends and the newly inaugurated power is recognized. This is brought about by the true ruling power structure of the world. It surely must be obvious, after the most rigged and fake election of recent history, that the voters are not in control of anything. Nothing is linear. Everything is cyclical.
America Cannot Just Make Everything It Needs Anymore.
At the peak of empire, 100 years ago, America was able to not only make everything it needed, but was also able to make most everything that the ‘rest of the world’ needed to boot, while having the surplus resources to donate or open credit lines for all nations who wished to trade.
The U.S. trade deficit in goods and services was $616.8 billion in 2019. Imports were $3.1 trillion and exports were only $2.5 trillion.
In 2019, the U.S. trade deficit in goods alone was $866 billion. The United States exported $1.65 trillion in goods. The biggest categories were commercial aircraft, automobiles, and food. It imported $2.51 trillion. The largest categories were passenger cars, cell phones, and pharmaceutical preparations.
Key Takeaways
The United States runs a trade deficit with all its five major trading partners: China, Mexico, Japan, Germany, and Canada
America’s largest trade deficit is with China
The United States imports more goods than it exports because its trading partners can produce these at much better prices or quality
Why America Can’t Just Make Everything It Needs
The United States could make almost everything it needs. But some countries can make products just as well for a lower price. It makes more sense to pay less for these goods.
In some products, America has a comparative advantage. These are agricultural products and industrial supplies like organic chemicals. They also include capital goods like transistors, aircraft, motor vehicle parts, computers, and telecommunications equipment.
The United States runs a deficit with countries which fit at least one of the following categories:
They can produce things more cheaply than the United States can, such as consumer products or oil. That is changing with increased U.S. production of shale oil, but at a very high cost..
They don’t need what America is good at making
They trade a lot of everything with the United States, but America imports more than it exports
Top Five Trade Partners
Most U.S. trade partners have deficits that fall into the first two categories. The two largest are China and Japan. Some of the largest deficits are with countries in the third category. They are Canada, Mexico, and Germany.
The countries with which the United States has the largest trade deficits in goods are not always its most important trading partners. Some nations export a lot without importing much. But the top five trading partners also have the largest deficits.
Mexico – $615 billion traded with a $102 billion deficit
Canada – $612 billion traded with a $27 billion deficit
China – $559 billion traded with a $346 billion deficit
Japan – $218 billion traded with a $69 billion deficit
Germany – $188 billion traded with a $67 billion deficit
The chart below shows the trade for the top five U.S. trading partners as of 2019. The first tab shows the volume of goods traded by each country. The second tab shows the deficits. Please note that the Census provides trade data by country for goods only, not services.
The Largest U.S. Deficit Is with China
More than 42.1% of the U.S. trade deficit in goods is with China. The $346 billion deficit with China was created by $452 billion in imports. The main U.S. imports from China in 2018 were electrical machinery, machinery, and furniture and bedding.
Many of these imports are actually made by American companies. They ship raw materials to be assembled in China for a lower cost. They are counted as imports even though they create income and profit for these U.S. companies. This practice results in many outsourced manufacturing jobs.
America only exported $107 billion in goods to China. The top three exports in 2018 were aircraft, machinery, and electrical machinery.
The United States Has a Deficit with Its NAFTA Partners
The second-largest U.S. trade deficit is with Mexico at $102 billion. Exports are $256 billion, mostly auto parts and petroleum products. Imports amount to $358 billion, with cars, trucks, and auto parts being the largest components.
The trade deficit with Canada was $27 billion in 2019. The United States exported $293 billion to Canada, more than it does to any other country. It imported $320 billion. The largest export by far is automobiles and parts. Other large categories include petroleum products and industrial machinery and equipment. The largest import is crude oil and gas from Canada’s abundant shale oil fields.
Japan and Germany Are Third and Fourth
The third-largest trade deficit in 2019 was $69 billion with Japan.
The world’s fifth-largest economy needs the agricultural products, industrial supplies, aircraft, and pharmaceutical products that the United States makes.
Exports totaled $75 billion in 2019 Imports were higher, at $144 billion. Automobiles comprised much of the imports. Industrial supplies and equipment made up another large portion. Trade has improved since the 2011 earthquake, which slowed the economy and made auto parts difficult to manufacture for several months.
The fourth-largest U.S. trade deficit in 2019 was with Germany at $67 billion. The United States exported $60 billion. A large portion of this was comprised of automobiles, aircraft, and pharmaceuticals. It imported $127 billion in similar goods: automotive vehicles and parts, industrial machinery, and medicine.
So-called experts have assured us the trade deficits are not important. This is only true if you have the deck stacked in your favor, a non-sustainable situation. The Petro-dollar scheme is rapidly coming to an end.
The UN was birthed for the purpose of designing, implementing and managing Reset 2020. The UN will survive as the New World Order, The World Bank, The WEF, The World Religion, The Technate, The Peacekeeper, The Trilateralist Commission, The WHO and numerous other authorities I will address later. Most Americans know surprisingly little about the UN and its mission. Most think it is an auxillary world entity that only steps in when there is something awry somewhere that requires ‘peace keeping’. Even though the US pays a heavy portion of UN expenses and provides ‘home turf’ benefits, the UN is no friend. Consider this” ‘As President Trump prepares to address the U.N. General Assembly this week, a new State Department report shows that the world body is out of sync with U.S. interests in more than two-thirds of votes — likely raising further concerns within the Trump administration about the organization and America’s financial commitment to it.’
“The United States continues to be diplomatically isolated on development and Israel-related resolutions,” the report on voting practices at the U.N. in 2018 said.
UN votes anti-US most of the time
People living in the ‘western world’ are the primary target, the outgoing power bloc. The time frame here is deadline 2025, at which point less than 20% will have survived, and of these, most will be young orphaned children who will be redistributed in the new world order. The future of republican forms of governance is zip. That form of government has been an illusion from the Reset 1812. As then, the Technate will be built up from a world catastrophe. Not a nuclear war, but a culling to form a new social order that will have no possibility of future violent wars. The coronavirus pandemic is being used, on the political end, as a massive coup against ‘free’ society. We are being confronted with this ‘great reset’, alluding to post-catastrophe reconstruction…”Build Back Better”. But for a whole generation, people have already been living under a technocracy in China. This is a regime that can only be explained as some toxic combination of the systemic inevitabilities of a consumer-driven society on the foundation of planned obsolescence, and the never-ending greed and lust for power which defines whole sections of the societies, the US included.
Some agencies of the UN
Recently we saw UK PM, Boris Johnson, stand in front of a ‘Build Back Better’ sign, speaking to the need for a ‘great reset’. ‘Build Back Better’ happens to be Joe Biden’s campaign slogan. But, to what extent are the handlers who manage ‘Joe Biden’, and those managing ‘Boris Johnson’ working the same script?
The more pertinent question is to ask: in whose interest is this ‘great reset’ being carried out? The answer depends, as always, on how you view it. It will be good for some and bad for others. Like a cattle farmer culling his herd. The homo capensis need and want the best producing labor. They definitely do not want ‘useless eaters’ who contribute less than they consume, or, worse yet, labor that consumes a lot while creating wastes, but contributes nothing to production. For example, the service sector economies of the US and others.
The UN is the most extensive organization in the world.
What Johnson calls the ‘Great Reset’, Biden calls the ‘Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution & Environmental Justice’. The coming economy is neither one of austerity or overabundance. During the 21st Century, the era of Agenda 21, a depopulation will take place that will end with a world comprising no sovereign states, no competing ‘isms’, no politicians or political bureaucrats, no wars, no private ownership of property, no superstitious religions, no possibility of over consumption and no competing philosophies.
How is it that now Boris Johnson speaks publicly of a ‘great reset’, whereas just months ago, when those outside the ruling media paradigm used this phrase, it was censured by corporate Atlanticist media as being conspiratorial in nature?
In terms of public discourse, ‘reset’ is a no-no word. The public is supposed to believe that this all a coming result of the fake covid pandemic and ‘grass roots’ civil unrest.
And so, we have by now all read numerous articles in the official press talking about how economic life after coronavirus will never be the same as it was before. Atlanticist press has even run numerous opinion articles talking about how this may cut against globalization.
Yet they have avoided any substantive discussion about what, if anything, exists in lieu of globalization, and what the economy looks like in various parts of the world if it is not globalized. This is all stalling and avoidance of hard questions. They do not intend to talk about any of this until such time as the die is cast. Global implementation is going to take a long time and they want to keep the resistance and opposition quiet and hopeful, until it is a done deal.
Multipolarity is a term that, in decades past, was utilized frequently in western vectors, in the sphere of geopolitics and international relations. Now there is some strange ban on the term, and so we are now bereft of a language with which to have an honest discussion about the post-globalization paradigm. Globalization intends to make these terms essentially meaningless. The UN has this mapped out to the nth detail, but no one is going to like what they hear, thus ‘keep the lid on as long as possible and blame it all on covid’, with the implication something better may be in the cards post covid like the elusive ‘return to normal’.
Technocracy or Pluralism? A Fight Against the Newspeak
Until now, we have only been given a steady diet of distancing, of lockdown provisions, quarantining, masking, track and trace, and we have forgotten entirely about the fact that all of this was only supposed to be a two or three-week long exercise to flatten the curve. And now the truth is emerging that what is being planned is a new proposal being disguised as a ‘great reset’. There is no discussion to be had in the question of Technocracy versus Pluralism. All ‘isms’ are going to be gone and forgotten. Letting people hang on to false hopes is the game to keep the bumps in the road smoothed out to the extent possible along the extended journey.
One of the large problems in discussing the ‘great reset’ is that a false dichotomy has arisen around it. Either one wants things to be how they were before and without changes to the status quo, or they promote this ‘great reset’, “build back better” slogan. Unfortunately, Clark in his RT article falls into this false dichotomy, and perhaps only for expedience sake in discussing some other point, he does not challenge the inherent problems in ‘how things were before’.
What we propose is that we must oppose their ‘new normal’ ‘great reset’, while also understanding the inherent problems of what had been ‘normal’ up until Covid. The way things were before was also a tremendous problem, and yet now it only seems better in comparison to the police state-like provisions we’ve encountered throughout the course of politicizing the specter of this ‘pandemic’. There is absolutely no possibility that the old ‘normal’ was viable or sustainable. It definitely is not. This is the reason they have a Reset every 200 years or so. The old paradigm is no longer viable and there are too many holes in the curtain for the wizard to remain hidden.
Strangely, we are told to ‘listen to the consensus science’ even as these very institutions consist of political appointees who are driven by excessive funding and unwarranted power and respect. Certainly, science is not about consensus, but about challenging assumptions, repeatability and a lively debate between disagreeing scientists with relatively equal qualifications. As Kuhn explains in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, science is always evolving, and by definition potentially overturns consensus paradigms. Now, we all know that science has not operated this way since government has taken over all funding. This is a debate we have not seen, and this fact by itself represents an illiberal cancer growing on an already defective pluralist society – ironically, all flying under the banner of liberalism.
In a real viable society, decisions should be driven by reason, prudence, and justice. What is or isn’t scientific plays a role, but cannot be the deciding factor. Science clearly says that we may eliminate cross-walk injuries by banning street-crossing or by banning driving, but what policy makers must do is account for the need to have both cars and crossing the street, in deciding how – if it’s even possible – to reduce or eliminate such injuries. Science is only one part of this equation. Unfortunately, it is no longer pure fact seeking, but rather whatever the government is buying with its grant moneys.
But isn’t economics also a science? Is sociology not a science? What about psychology and psychiatry? The facts are, none of these qualify as science, as they do not deal in ‘facts’. They claim to adopt and apply the scientific method in their work. Universities have been awarding doctoral degrees in these sciences for a century or more. Do these expert opinions not count when managing a public catastrophe?
It is, and always has been, a political and politicized position to listen to some scientists, and not others. But when the output is predetermined by government funding mandates, it is all worthless. Problems cannot be solved with this scientism. It is only a gimmick to contrive some basis for political decisions that are then claimed to be based on “settled science”. In other words, there is no scientific basis at all.
And so, what of the term ‘reset’? Indeed, it is itself misleading, and we would propose it is intentionally so if we understand Orwell’s critique of the use of language – newspeak – in technocratic oligarchies. At this time, it is certain that most people have no clue as to what ‘Reset’ means nor what are the consequences for their future.
A ‘reset’ textually refers to going back to something once known, erasing defects or contradictions which arose along the way, which carries with it the ‘familiar’, and something we thought was previously agreed to. A ‘reset’ by definition means going back to how things were before – not just recently, but before at some point farther back. And, this is exactly what the 200-years Resets are. They go all the way back to the point of departure of the Anunnaki, creators of homo sapiens and homo capensis. These regularly occurring ‘Resets’ take things back to square one in terms of the assigned mission of the homo capensis as the divine rulers over homo sapiens in the absence of the Anunnaki, who were the kings ruling men for the prior 135,000 years. It is only the homo sapiens that do not understand these facts nor the pertinent history.
The term ‘reset’ was therefore arrived with extraordinary planning and thoughtfulness, with the intent to persuade [manipulate] the public. It simultaneously straddles two unique concepts, and bundles them together at once into a single term in a manner that reduces nuance and complexity and therefore also reduces thinking. It does so while appealing to the implicit notion of the term that it relates to a past consensus agreement between the Anunnaki and the homo capensis.
It specifically does not refer to any form of agreement with homo sapiens, who are on a lower level and are not privileged with such decision making authority.
We are incongruously told that this ‘reset’ must effectively restore society to how it was at a point in the past but most humans do not have knowledge of the true past, so they cannot understand what they do not know. Suffice to say that humans are not anything more than the pawns in this game, who have no role in decision-making. Humans will be ‘Reset’ by their rulers and perform their new part in the global world order. And, according to Klaus Schwab, they will learn to love their new order, eventually.
What are Our Real Options, if any?
Those few who understand that this ‘reset’ is being done by oligarchical methods and objectives, without any sort of mandate governed by laws or men, are reluctant to admit that a great change is indeed necessary.
Rather, we must understand that the underlying catastrophic mechanisms which drive this great change, exist totally independently of the coronavirus, and exist independently of any of the Matrix constructs implemented at the beginning of the ‘reset 1812’. Since no one alive at this time was a party to the prior ‘reset 1812’, no one has much of any idea of the general concept. Except, the evidence is abundant to those who would like to discover its history, which they have never been taught. During the ‘reset 1812’, photography had already been invented, as had the printing press. It is possible to spend some time to verify all this for oneself, if one should be so inclined.
The oligarchs have planned this solution hundreds of years ago. They are always seeking the system that will allow exploitation of the planet’s resources with the greatest efficiency and safety for them. The UN was formed more than 100 years ago, expressly for the implementation of this ‘reset 2020’. All of the planning, preparation, and means of implementation are in-place and have been moving ahead on this reset without alerting humans. Since this ‘reset’ is going to take out the US and its allies, few among this segment of the population even have knowledge and understanding of the world-role of the UN. No one from this bloc of peoples has even been appointed to any major leadership position during the more than 100 years of operation of the UN. The UN Security Council has voted down the US and its toady, Israel, more than 90% of the time. There is no respect or regard for the US and allies as it has been well known that the mission is to take-out this power-bloc in the ‘reset’.
The ‘Matrix’, the ‘world order’ introduced by the ‘reset of 1812, was designed to experiment with capitalism as a means to exploit the resources of the planet. By establishing the construct that humans are free-men, working for themselves, they would increase production simply through greed. Overt slavery is a weak incentive. Working to enrich oneself is a more incentivizing construct. However, capitalism has been found to have fatal flaws that facilitate gross unsustainable waste and over-consumption. The general idea goes like this: on Monday morning, you come to my gold mine. I give you a pick and a bag. You labor to fill the bag. When you come out of the mine, you give me the bag of gold in exchange for a piece of paper that I make at no cost to myself, or anyone else. You can extrapolate everything from this analogy.
Over consumption and greed have exploded as the empire created wealth. Now, the laborers wanted to simply consume for their own amusement, as much as possible, spending the family jewels, then turning to borrowing. As China and allies become the productive labor force, and especially a producer willing to extend credit, the ‘west’ became unproductive, wasteful, over consumers that did not ever intend to become productive again and repay the vast debt that had accrued. Now, the vast majority of human beings of the ‘west’ must be considered redundant. To use the vernacular of Queen Elizabeth II, they have become “Useless Eaters”. You may be inclined to consider her opinion of little matter. That would be a mistake. The US and its allies are all crown colonies owned, in reality, by the Crown.
The Queen, of course, is homo capensis, divine ruler over homo sapiens, with the responsibility to mine the resources of the planet using human labor. They have been using the 200-year resets since around 1,000 BCE. The recent ‘Matrix” order has allowed the homo sapiens to become way too over populated. From a population of under one billion, to 7.7 billion in the course of under 200 years. This has led to the drastic change that Technocracy represents. After the depopulation of the ‘west’, more will come to follow the same path to a total planetary load of at most two billion humans.
The anti-lockdown protests are contributing to the plan for rapid depopulation. There is a deep rift in the political scene. The right and left are ready to take to violence as the differences will not be solved by fake electoral politics. They have been trying to instigate sufficient rancor to light the fires of violent conflict between the two parties for numerous prior years. This is how they can establish Martial Law, blaming it on the people. The UN military forces are ready in waiting to take over the US, according to the agreement made by Obama. This includes the small arms treaty that Obama also signed to make gun confiscation mandatory.
After disarmament, the pandemic will come back into play. The major kill-off will come through the fake covid vaccine, that is already killing everyone in the testing programs. It appears likely that at least 50% of the population will voluntarily accept this vaccine. That will murder half the population very clean and simple. The other half, already disarmed, will be rounded up and sent to the FEMA camps and most will likely be beheaded using guillotines.
Do not be deceived over rhetoric claiming the oligarchs are just greedy and reckless socialists. If only it were that simple. Recently we saw UK PM Boris Johnson stand in front of a ‘Build Back Better’ sign, speaking to the need for a ‘great reset’. ‘Build Back Better’ happens to be Joe Biden’s campaign slogan. It is highly likely that Biden, Trump, Merkel and Johnson are all homo capensis. If so, they are also likely on the fringe of the blue-blood genetic lines who could be either on the inside or the outside, depending on how they play out their respective roles in bringing off the ‘reset’. They are certainly not champions of the humans, in any case. Looking around the circles of power, there may not be any ‘Champions’ of humans, excepting Trump in his ‘Good Cop’ role. Just doing his part to keep his place at the ‘hog trough’.
The blue-blood oligarchs do not act out of morality or even emotion. Humans, to them, are a cut below their level. The scenario is more akin to humans managing herds of cattle. It is business, not a matter of morals. You think nothing of cattle farmers who take their unsuspecting cows to the abbatoir for slaughter. The farmer thinks nothing of it. Now, for the cows it’s another matter. They are not pre-informed. They are trusting and willing to cooperate until they reach a point in-line where they realize their fate. Their fate, at that point is already sealed.
This regularly occurring ‘reset’ is similar to taking the cows to market. Its business. There is no issue about who will benefit. A farmer who allows his herd to become too large for his pasture will have ill-fed and unhealthy cows, as well sparse grasses. Feed lots are an example. Farmers do whatever it takes to optimize their return on investment. The ‘reset’ is for the purpose of managing the herd of humans. Obviously, in the case of insufficient pasture, the surviving members of the herd will benefit. If the oligarchs cull the humans to achieve a more efficient labor force, they too will benefit.
What Johnson calls the ‘Great Reset’, Biden calls the ‘Biden Plan for a Clean Energy Revolution & Environmental Justice’. Certainly, the coming new Technocratic Order is not the product of the minds of the Boris Johnson’s or Joe Biden’s.
Keep an eye on the second and third wave lockdown measures that will sweep down on the US, just as is happening now in the nations of the historical allies of the US… Britain, Canada, Germany, Italy, France, Australia and NZ. They are hoping the election violence is going to burn down the barn, doing a whole lot of their work for them, human upon human. In any case, read the ‘Bye Bye Canada’ essay for a peek at what is in store for election night survivors.
PUBLISHED: 22:24 GMT, 24 October 2020 | UPDATED: 10:57 GMT, 25 October 2020
Go to Reality:
When I came across this amateurish propaganda piece with the cheesy ‘stock’ photos, I had a good laugh, then wondered how they thought anyone would buy a single word of it.
Read the above headline again. Did you sense any alarms going off in your mind? Is there any possibility that the COVID killed off the INFLUENZA? Explaining the reason we see no influenza this year, but oddly, we do see an exactly equal amount of COVID with the exact symptoms of influenza? Maybe this is not adding up for you either?
I certainly hope not. Obvious to any fruit fly, this is utter and total nonsense. What is being witnessed is the same old influenza we have seen every past year. What is missing here is any COVID, the non-existent fabricated unseen deadly viral threat, as hyped by the media, government medical morons and totally biased talking heads like Gates, Fauci, Birx, etc.This is pure unmitigated propaganda for the unthinking public.
Back to Propaganda Jo McFarlane:
It was feared by many to be the perfect winter storm, a nightmare situation that would push our health service over the edge: the ‘twin-demic’ of flu, which kills about 10,000 Britons every year, and a second deadly wave of Covid-19.
Such was the concern that the Government rolled out the biggest flu vaccination program in British history.
Back to reality:
No flu vaccines have ever worked, no flu vaccines can ever work. That is just a scientific fact. There is absolutely no efficacy in flu vaccinations. That is why we all have colds and flus from time to time. They start with irritants that turn up the sinus fluid production, which makes for a good culture environment for breeding bacteria. There simply is no such thing as a vaccine for a cold or flu, so get this fact clear in your mind, and start opening your mind as to what these lying assholes are really up to. It’s really very simple.
Back to Propaganda:
Thirty million people – 20 per cent more than normal, and now including all over-50s – are eligible for this year’s jab.
Take up of the vaccine is already the highest it has ever been in the over-65s and young children, according to the latest reports.
There’s just one curious problem: flu, it seems, has all but vanished.
Cheesy stock photo 1
It was feared by many to be the perfect winter storm, a nightmare situation that would push our health service over the edge: the ‘twin-demic’ of flu, which kills about 10,000 Britons every year, and a second deadly wave of Covid-19. Pictured: Stock image
The disappearing act began as Covid-19 rolled in towards the end of our flu season in March. And just how swiftly rates have plummeted can be observed in ‘surveillance’ data collected by the World Health Organization (WHO).
Patients aren’t routinely tested for flu, even if it’s suspected, but a number of ‘sentinel’ GP surgeries and hospitals do carry out diagnostic screening on those who have symptoms, and this data gives us the most accurate picture of how much flu is in circulation.
And the figures provide a startling insight into what has become a creeping trend across the world.
In the Southern Hemisphere, where the flu season happens during our summer months, the WHO data suggests it never took off at all.
In Australia, just 14 positive flu cases were recorded in April, compared with 367 during the same month in 2019 – a 96 per cent drop.
By June, usually the peak of its flu season, there were none. In fact, Australia has not reported a positive case to the WHO since July.
In Chile, just 12 cases of flu were detected between April and October. There were nearly 7,000 during the same period in 2019.
Has this puzzling mystery got you shaking your head in profound amazement? The flu just evaporated before our eyes, only to be replaced by COVID, in the exact same prevalence rate and the exact same symptoms.
It couldn’t be that the governments are pulling off magic tricks on us? That they want us to believe that something new has appeared in infectious medicine that is exactly like the same thing with a different name. It couldn’t be that you are being played out like a fish on a hook, for some totally different agenda that is being foisted on you under false illusions? The governments wouldn’t do such a thing, would they?
Cheesy stock photo 2
Thirty million people – 20 per cent more than normal, and now including all over-50s – are eligible for this year’s flu jab. Pictured: Stock image
Cheesy stock photo 3
In the UK, our flu season is only just beginning. But since Covid-19 began spreading in March, just 767 cases have been reported to the WHO compared with nearly 7,000 from March to October last year. Pictured: Stock image
Cheesy stock photo 4
And in South Africa, surveillance tests picked up just two cases at the beginning of the season, which quickly dropped to zero over the following month – overall, a 99 per cent drop compared with the previous year.
In the UK, our flu season is only just beginning. But since Covid-19 began spreading in March, just 767 cases have been reported to the WHO compared with nearly 7,000 from March to October last year.
And while lab-confirmed flu cases last year jumped by ten per cent between September and October, as a new season gets under way this year, they’ve risen by just 0.7 per cent so far.
Cheesy stock photo 5
Of course, this isn’t the total number of flu cases.
We know from Office for National Statistics data that hundreds of people have been dying from suspected flu-related pneumonia every week throughout the year – that, and the predicted tough winter ahead, is why experts agree that vaccination is still vital to those eligible. Some flu seasons begin earlier than others.
But our low flu surveillance figure does indicate the spread of flu in the UK, right now, has yet to pick up pace.
Other research by Public Health England has confirmed this. Globally, it is estimated that rates of flu may have plunged by 98 per cent compared with the same time last year.
‘This is real,’ says Dr David Strain, senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter Medical School. ‘There’s no doubt that we’re seeing far fewer incidences of flu.’
So where has flu gone? And what does it mean for our winter?
There are intriguing theories – some more outlandish than others.
There are those who claim flu cases haven’t vanished at all, but are instead being recorded as Covid-19. Sceptics say Covid tests are unable to distinguish between coronavirus and flu, but this is simply untrue. Scientists overwhelmingly agree the decline in flu cases is likely to be linked to interventions – social distancing, hand-washing, lockdowns and school and shop closures. Pictured: Stock image
“Oh yes, this is simply untrue”. Says scientism. They obviously think we are so ignorant that we could never deduce the obvious from this misinformation.
Dr Elisabetta Groppelli, virologist and lecturer in global health at St George’s, University of London, explains: ‘Flu and Covid-19 are caused by very distinct viruses, and this is clear to see under a microscope.
There’s no chance of mistaking one for the other – the fragment of viral genetic material from the coronavirus looks like a bit of spaghetti, while the flu genetic material we test for looks like eight pieces of penne pasta.’
Another compelling explanation suggests the presence of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19 and has run rampant throughout the world, has somehow ‘crowded out’ the flu virus.
The theory has gained traction on Twitter, and there is some scientific backing for the phenomenon.
When an individual is infected with one virus, they are less likely to be infected by another during that time due to something called ‘viral interference’.
Covid Q&A: Will Christmas be normal, and are NHS intensive care beds full?
Q: Is it possible to reduce coronavirus infection rates before Christmas?
A: We’re all hoping for a proper Christmas, when we can spend time with family and friends.
It’s an aim shared by Ministers, it seems.
Stephen Barclay, Chief Secretary to the Treasury, implied that stricter rules in the Greater Manchester region were necessary for the ‘common purpose’ of getting the virus under control by the festive period.
Welsh Health Minister Vaughan Gething used Christmas as justification for a 17-day national lockdown, or so-called ‘fire-break’, in Wales.
But will it work? Nearly all areas in the UK under the strictest Tier 3 lockdown measures recorded a drop in the infection rate last week.
Rates in Manchester, for instance, have been steadily falling for the past two weeks – even before it entered the Tier 3 restrictions.
However, many scientists say the worst is yet to come, with the Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, admitting that we may be forced to endure a ‘digital Christmas’.
Q: Are NHS hospitals running out of intensive care beds?
A: Government statistics released last week showed 82 per cent of intensive care beds in Manchester were occupied, mostly with Covid-19 patients.
The Department of Health warned that NHS services would soon become ‘overwhelmed’ by cases.
In Liverpool, councillors have warned that NHS intensive care units had reached 95 per cent of their bed capacity.
It’s difficult to clarify these statements, as the Government does not release this data.
The 82 per cent figure in Manchester may sound alarming, but at the same point in 2019, 83 per cent of intensive care beds in the area were occupied.
Nationally, there are currently less than half the number of people in UK hospitals with Covid-19, than there were at the peak of the pandemic in April, and hospitals were not overwhelmed then.
Q: Are people obeying the current restrictions?
A: Mostly, yes. Young people were previously thought to be most likely to flout the rules.
But over the past few weeks, infection rates in teenagers and twentysomethings have dropped dramatically, according to Public Health England.
Officials believe this is a sign that youngsters are finally adhering to the rules.
But clearly, this does not account for the behaviour of older adults. And when it comes to whether people are self-isolating when told to by NHS tracers, it’s almost impossible to know if Britons are complying.
The Government does not publish data on how many ‘traced’ contacts of someone who has tested positive actually isolate for ten days.
Public health officials say one thing is for certain: the majority of transmissions are still occurring within people’s homes.
Virus expert Professor James Stewart, at the University of Liverpool, says: ‘Immune system cells come in and help destroy the first infection, and if another virus comes along that same response will fight it off.’
Dr Groppelli adds: ‘Viruses are parasites. Once they enter a cell, they don’t want other viruses to compete with. So the virus already in the body will effectively kick the other parasite out.’
On a population level, it means if enough people have one virus, others will have nowhere to go and cannot spread.
A study by researchers at the US Centre for Disease Control concludes it is at least possible that this has happened in some regions, and that coronavirus could effectively ‘muscle out’ influenza in the body’s respiratory system.
Viral interference may well have been the reason 2009’s swine flu pandemic never took hold in the way many feared it would.
Yale University academics recently suggested the high presence of rhinovirus – the common cold – in the autumn of that year may have ‘blocked infection’ of the deadly H1N1 virus. At the time, the UK Government planned for a worst-case scenario of 65,000 deaths. In the end, 392 died.
The Yale study found human cells already infected with the cold virus were significantly less likely to become infected with H1N1. So could that happen again this year?
Public Health England studied samples taken from about 20,000 people during the first four months of this year, as coronavirus took hold, and found those who had flu were 58 per cent less likely to also have coronavirus.
This may be more to do with behaviour when you have a virus – staying in bed, or not going out – which means you’re less likely to come into contact with another virus, Prof James Stewart explains.
Yet the study also theorised ‘possible pathogenic competition’ between the two, because co-infection – people with flu and Covid-19 at the same time – was strikingly rare.
A Chinese study on two previous coronavirus outbreaks, SARS and MERS, has also shown the same effect. Infection with another virus, such as flu, protects to some degree against a coronavirus infection.
But what isn’t clear, and hasn’t been tested, is what happens the other way around. Can a coronavirus infection, with or without symptoms, elbow-out flu? Dr Groppelli says: ‘The only thing we can say is that, right now, before winter hits, is it’s a bit too early to tell.’
Most scientists agree there was not enough Covid-19 in circulation in March to explain the dramatic drop in flu cases. And the same holds true as we approach winter.
Random testing suggests that, in May, between five and six per cent of people in the UK had corona antibodies, rising to 17.5 per cent in worst-hit London, according to Public Health England.
Now cases are rising again, by 90,000 a day, according to the Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance.
But Dr Ellen Foxman, who authored the Yale viral interference study, says: ‘One virus can only disrupt the spread of another if enough people have them.
‘When we’re talking about common colds, the rates are astronomically high, and many people are asymptomatic.
‘But for Covid, at present we think only 15 to 20 per cent of people in hard-hit places like New York have been exposed. Most places will be a lot lower than that.
‘That’s not enough for Covid to prevent flu by interference and certainly not enough to account for the huge drops in flu we’ve seen in the statistics.’
Viral interference, typically, would also not have caused such a sudden drop in flu cases, adds Dr Strain.
Instead, scientists overwhelmingly agree the decline is far more likely to be linked to interventions – social distancing, hand-washing, lockdowns and school and shop closures.
‘If coronavirus interfered with anything, it was our behaviour,’ says Dr Foxman.
Both viruses spread in the same way: through infected droplets. But people with Covid are thought to be more contagious, and for longer, that those with flu.
One measure of this is the much talked about reproduction, or R number – the number of people that one infected person will pass on a virus to, on average.
Covid-19 has a reproduction number of about three, if no action is taken to stop it spreading. It means one person would be expected to give it to three others.
Some viruses are more contagious, for instance measles, which has an R number of roughly 15. Flu, on the other hand, has an R number of just over one.
The incubation period for flu is also lower. After being infected with flu, it typically causes illness within two days, compared with five days on average for Covid-19.
That means it’s far more likely that individuals will be going about their business while unknowingly infecting others with Covid-19 than they will if they come down with flu.
It means, Dr Strain says, that even small mitigation measures will have a far greater, and speedier, effect on flu transmission.
‘All of the studies on face masks and social distancing are based on preventing flu transmission and have shown huge reductions,’ he adds. ‘So it’s no surprise it worked.’
Australian officials claim their low flu numbers can be partly attributed to their vaccination programme, which the Government boosted by 50 per cent, ordering 18 million vaccines rather than its usual 12 million.
Australia’s huge geography – 32 times the size of the UK with people more dispersed – combined with strict Covid lockdown measures also played a role.
Random testing suggests that, in May, between five and six per cent of people in the UK had corona antibodies, rising to 17.5 per cent in worst-hit London, according to Public Health England. Pictured: Stock image
‘The total number of coronavirus cases in Australia was around 27,500 in a population of nearly 25 million,’ says Dr Strain. ‘So the idea Covid is crowding out flu – when rates are low and there’s a high degree of compliance to lockdown measures – becomes nonsensical.’
However, there are potentially unintended consequences. As other, milder viruses, such as the flu or common cold, stop circulating as freely, some believe we could have less protection against the more dangerous coronavirus
Dr Foxman says: ‘Common colds probably shore up our defences against other viruses. If we completely shut down transmission of these with lockdown measures, and then open things up again, will we see bigger peaks of coronavirus and other viruses?
‘I’m strongly in favour of mitigation measures, but it’s a big experiment. I’ll be watching closely.’
The other question is whether we can actually trust the flu data at all – most officials say global figures are not robust this year as coronavirus surveillance took priority in laboratories.
Fewer people have also been having appointments for flu-like symptoms during the pandemic, so fewer suspected cases are recorded.
Public Health England confirmed that flu testing has been lower this year. However the body also say that available data does show that overall flu activity is ‘low’.
There is also the danger that, in the absence of testing flu cases in this country and elsewhere, flu cases could be mistaken for Covid-19.
The picture for flu is therefore ‘muddied’, Prof Stewart says.
What happens as we move into flu season is still unknown. Some point out flu deaths might be reduced because many of the vulnerable and elderly have already succumbed to coronavirus. But flu remains a very real risk.
Prof Stewart says: ‘We need to maintain or increase flu vaccination as there will be flu circulating, and if the vulnerable are co-infected then the consequences could be much worse.’
Back to Reality:
Ever since the alleged pandemic erupted this past March the mainstream media has spewed a non-stop stream of misinformation that appears to be laser focused on generating maximum fear among the citizenry.
But the facts and the science simply don’t support the grave picture painted of a deadly virus sweeping the land.
Yes, we do have a pandemic, but it’s a pandemic of ginned up pseudo-science masquerading as unbiased fact. Yes, there are almost infinite quantities of viruses in this world. Every plant and animal is shedding trillions of viruses as a normal metabolic function.
Here are nine facts backed up with data, in many cases from the CDC itself that paints a very different picture from the fear and dread being relentlessly drummed into the brains of unsuspecting unthinking citizens.
According to an article in the New York Times August 29th 2020 testing for the Covid-19 virus using the popular PCR method results in up to 100% of those tested showing positive results that are grossly misleading. Everyone carries trillions of viruses, all the time, because your body produces them. They are not infectious nor are they harmful.
All persons tested are asymptomatic and pose no threat to others. It is possible that a person can manifest symptoms of cold or flu, and officials will jump all over this opportunity to log another false COVID case.
For some reason every positive Covid-19 test is immediately designated a CASE. As we saw in #1 above up to 100% of positive Covid-19 tests result in miniscule amounts of virus that do not sicken the subject or anyone else.
Historically only patients who demonstrated actual symptoms of an illness were considered a case. Mere ‘presence’ of something that everyone has is not an ‘infection’ of any kind. ‘Infection’ means causing illness of some kind. The officials are contriving in every dishonest way they can conceive of to come up with some statistics for their cause. It’s just that none exist, so fabricate in every way possible.
Publishing positive test results as “CASES” is obviously grossly misleading and falsely alarming.
The entire population has had exposure to Covid-19. But this is unrelated to preexisting illnesses like heart disease, obesity, hypertension, cancer and various respiratory illnesses.
While every death was accompanied by Covid-19 they did none died from Covid-19.
The CDC updated their “Current Best Estimate” for Covid-19 survival on September 10th showing that over 99.6% of people exposed to the virus survived. The fact is, every death was from some other condition than COVID.
Another way to say this is that less than 0.4% of the exposures are potentially life threatening. According to the CDC the vast majority of deaths attributed to Covid-19 were concentrated in the population over age 70, close to normal life expectancy. All of these would be from normal causes of attrition. None would be from covid.
The only rational conclusion from this study is that cloth face masks offer little if any protection from Covid-19 infection. In fact, one could conclude that face masks are contributing to whatever is making people sick and is zero percent effective for anything to do with covid.
Harvey Risch, MD, PhD heads the Yale University School of Epidemiology. He authored “The Key to Defeating Covid-19 Already Exists. We Need to Start Using It” which was published in Newsweek Magazine July 23rd, 2020.
Dr. Risch documents the proven effectiveness of treating patients diagnosed with Covid-19 using a combination of Hydroxychloroquine, an antibiotic like azithromycin and the nutritional supplement zinc.
If Covid-19 was the lethal killer it’s made out to be, one would reasonably expect to see a significant spike in the number of deaths reported. But that hasn’t happened.
According to the CDC as of early May 2020 the total number of deaths in the US was 944,251 from January 1 – April 30th.
This is actually slightly lower than the number of deaths during the same period in 2017 when 946,067 total deaths were reported. No need for covid.
[Actually, the same thing is happening in Europe as well. Though the number of cases keeps rising due to an increase in testing, the mortality rate remained the same as last year and prior years. ‘Cases’ is a meaningless term when its use is perverted, as is being done by medicine land.
According to the CDC as of 2017 US males can expect a normal lifespan of 76.1 years and females 81.1 years.
A little over 80% of the suspected Covid-19 deaths have occurred in people over age 65.
According to a June 28th New York Post article almost half of all Covid suspected deaths have occurred in Nursing Homes which predominately house people with preexisting health conditions and close to or past their normal life expectancy.
For 20-49 year-olds the survival rate was almost as good at 99.98%.
Even those 70 years-old and older had a survival rate of 94.6%. In this category, all had other lethal conditions.
To put this in perspective the CDC data suggest that a child or young adult up to age 19 has a greater chance of death from some type of accident than they do from Covid-19.
Everyone is able to successfully fight off the virus with their body’s natural immune system.
Common sense precautions should be taken, particularly by those over age 65 that suffer from preexisting medical conditions.
The gross over reaction by government leaders to this illness is causing much more distress, physical, emotional and financial, than the virus ever could dream of on its own.
The bottom line is there is NO pandemic, just a typical flu season that has been wildly blown out of proportion by 24/7 media propaganda and enabled by the masses paralyzed by irrational fear from the government-mandated measures.
State and local governments in particular have ignored the rights of the people and have instituted outrageous attacks on freedom and liberty that was bought and paid for by the blood and sacrifice of our forefathers.
Slowly the people are recognizing the great fraud perpetrated on them by bureaucrats and elected officials alike, who have sworn to uphold rights and freedoms as spelled out in the US Constitution.
Now, the citizens must start putting 2 and 2 together to grasp the obvious alter-intentions being hidden by the covid hype. Whatever you do, do not take any vaccines associated with this fraud. The vaccines are likely the end game of all this nonsense. In any case, the end-game has nothing to do with epidemics, viruses, or public health. The end game is the Reset 2020, which means the implementation of UN Agenda 21 and massive depopulation in the ‘western’ empire.
