Huge COVID case-counting deception at the CDC

Let’s enter the official world (of the insane)—where everyone is operating on the theory that a new coronavirus was discovered in China and the worthless diagnostic tests mean something and the case numbers are real and meaningful. 
We execute all those absurd maneuvers and we land square in the middle of yet another scandal—this time at our favorite US agency for scandals, the CDC.

The Atlantic, May 21, has the story, headlined, “How could the CDC make that mistake?”

The stark inference The Atlantic somehow failed to grasp is hugely inflating the data regarding the number of corona cases.

“We’ve learned that the CDC is making, at best, a debilitating mistake: combining test results that diagnose current coronavirus presence with test results that measure whether someone has ever had presence of the virus, which pretty much includes everyone, dead or alive. The agency confirmed to The Atlantic on Wednesday that it is mixing the results of PCR tests with antibody tests, even though the two tests reveal different information and are used for different reasons.” Mixing the apples with the oranges.

“Several states—including Pennsylvania, the site of one of the country’s largest outbreaks, as well as Texas, Georgia, and Vermont—are blending the data in the same way. Virginia likewise mixed the PCR viral-presence tests with antibody test results until last week, but it reversed course and the governor apologized for the practice after it was covered by the Richmond Times-Dispatch and The Atlantic. Maine similarly separated its data on Wednesday; Vermont authorities claimed they didn’t even know they were doing this.”

“‘You’ve got to be kidding me,’ Ashish Jha, the K.T.Li Professor of Global Health at Harvard and the director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, told us, when we described what the CDC was doing. ‘How could the CDC make that mistake? This is a mess’.”

“The CDC stopped publishing anything resembling a complete database of daily COVID test results on February 29, 2020…”

First of all, the CDC’s basic mission is publishing disease statistics on an ongoing basis.  Reporting partial data, mixed apples and oranges data is totally wrong and misleading. The big deal, of course, is combining results from two different tests—the PCR and the antibody—and placing them in one lump, as though this is factual and indicative of something when knowing full well it is not.

It appears the experts believe only PCR viral presence tests should be used to count the number of COVID cases.  This test is meaningless because presence of virus is universal.  People are all equally exposed.  The only difference is whether their immune-response is able to prevent any illness, or whether their immune response is ineffective due to existing poor health.

The Atlantic article fails to mention the real problem : COMBINING THE TWO TESTS WILL VASTLY INFLATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF CASES.

We’re not talking about categories like “rate of infection” or “percentage.”  We’re talking about plain numbers of cases of corona virus presence.

PCR tests will indicate corona presence and some antibody tests will indicate past corona immune response activity.  Adding them together will pump up the number of cases.  You know, that big number they flash on TV screens a hundred times a day.

“Coronavirus cases jumped up again yesterday, and the grand total in the US is now…blah blah blah”

THAT number.

THAT number is used by media and government and related con artists to scare the people and justify lockdowns and to prevent reopening the economy.

Therefore, what the CDC is doing is not a mistake.  They’ve managed to create the illusion that absolute case numbers are higher than they are, and even though they are meaningless because it would be difficult to find someone who does not have corona virus in their VIROME.

Somehow, these “mistakes” always seem to result in worse news, not better news.  The “errors” are always to bolster the ‘experts’ side rather than the reality side.

Case in point: the computer prediction of COVID deaths in the UK and US made by that ‘abject failure, Neil Ferguson’, whose track record, going back to 2001, has been one horrendous lunatic exaggeration after another.  His 2020 projections of 500,000 COVID deaths in the UK and two million in the US were directly used to justify lockdowns in many countries.  For the right price, Ferguson will produce figures on-demand that say anything fake experts want.

The CDC, back in 2009, stopped reporting the number of Swine Flu cases in the US—while still claiming that number was in the tens of thousands.  This was exposed by then-CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson.  The CDC stopped counting cases, because the overwhelming percentage of tissue samples from patients was coming back from labs with no sign of Swine Flu or any other kind of flu.  And yet, in a later retrospective “analysis,” the CDC claimed that, at the height of the “epidemic,” there were 22 MILLION cases of Swine Flu in the US…complete and utter fake nonsense.

Going all the way back to 2003 and SARS, the CDC and other public health agencies around the world hyped the dangers to the sky; the final official death count, globally, when the dust cleared?  800 counted, with probably none being real.

There is a tradition of lying on the high side, blowing up figures in order to create the illusion of destruction.  This has all been done to create the stage setting for this current virus which, if it really exists, is pretty much totally harmless.

CDC?  Mistake?  The agency is certainly incompetent.  But that’s just the beginning of the story.

The only time they say there is no danger is when they’re lying through their teeth about the effects of vaccines.  The WARP vaccine is lurking in the background, waiting and hoping the public will be sufficiently duped into a stampede to be the first to get vaccinated with this untested bio-weapon.


“Probably, whatever the TOTAL is.   Just when a few governors are trying to reopen their economies, a gigantic case-counting deception at the CDC is taking the wind out of their sails.  The millions of Americans suffering financial devastation could be pushed back into a hole.  Who is screaming to high heaven about THAT on the nightly news?  No one.  Why not?

John Rappaport

Conditioning the Children

Children Have 0.00% chance of dying from COVID but are harmed for life by ‘Social Distancing’, which has Its roots In CIA torture techniques such as Solitary Confinement.

California Civil Rights Attorney Leigh Dundas explains the devastating consequences of isolating children and forcing them to practice “social distancing” at school and in public.

Here are some lesser known facts about social distancing and isolation:

• It was developed 70 years ago by the CIA to break down enemies of state.

• Its damage is the equivalent of smoking 15 cigarettes a day AND being an alcoholic.

• It doubles the risk of death, and destroys the part of the brain responsible for learning.

She pointed out that according to the statistics and the CDC:

• A child’s risk of dying from COVID is 0.0%, per the CDC.

• No child has passed on COVID to a family member or third party (Virus are ever-present, therefore not individually transmittable).

She goes on to explain the historical origins of practicing Social Distancing, and how the technique was developed by the CIA to torture “enemies of the state.”

Math on COVID Was Wrong

The study that precipitated the lockdown of more than 95% of America’s population (and indeed, the planet’s population) was authored by a well-known nutcase in the UK, Neil Ferguson. It erroneously predicted deaths in the millions.

This alarming conclusion was taken into account by leaders of most nations, and acted on opportunistically.

America acted by quarantining – not the sick – but the approximately 311 million Americans who were not sick, and putting them under the functional equivalent of house arrest, for an indefinite period of time. Note that this is the opposite of the idea of ‘quarantine’, to isolate the sick.

After one day of lockdown, Ferguson, the study’s author, walked back his math ninety-six percent (96%), revising the predicted deaths in his own country from 500,000 down to 20,000, well within the normal course of annual attrition from all causes.

“At this juncture, allow me to point out the obvious, using an analogy involving my daughter: if my daughter Katya routinely said the answer to a math problem this year was 100, when it was indeed only 4 – and Katya continued to get her math problems wrong by 96% – she would receive a failing grade in math from Foothill High”.

And rightly so: with such incompetence in basic arithmetic reflected on her transcript, I would hope that she not be hired by anyone, anywhere, in any serious job that required basic math, as such degree of error – in engineering, statistics, or any job – would have fatal consequences (imagine if the degree of slope in a freeway overpass were 96% wrong).

Why Neil Ferguson’s model was adopted in the first place is curious, as this was not his first such major error: witness Ferguson’s 2001 model of mad cow disease – which predicted horrible fatalities including up to 150,000 deaths in England – which was subsequently deemed “not fit for purpose” when in fact only 177 people died through 2020 (normal attrition).

Indeed, what current actual data evinces is that the mortality rate is nowhere near the initial projections, as concluded by a study out of Stanford on Sunday, followed by one out of USC yesterday.

The Stanford study, led by Professor Eran Bendavid, “concluded that the mortality rate in Santa Clara County is between 0.12% and 0.2%.” Less than 1% fatal.

ZERO Children Dying

The overall mortality rate for all ages is officially 0.14%, with children at 0.00%, essentially immune.  The mortality is almost exclusively among people over 70 who have existing potentially mortal health conditions, most whom were transported to nursing homes for the elderly.

You read that right: worldwide, ZERO children under 10 have died. And in the US? Zero individuals under age 20 have died. [3]

Yet further, the number of deaths for all people in the US to date is proving this virus to be no more deadly than the common cold.[4]

And that is even with the number of deaths being radically over-inflated due to the CDC’s order that all deaths be counted as COVID deaths – including e.g., a man who dies by crashing his motorcycle or from a heart attack, if he tests positive for COVID (even though he was not SICK from COVID at the time of his death, and the actual proximal cause of his fatal injury was vehicular fatality or heart attack and that all humans test positive to the virus with the fake testers, like all of the testers in-use today, everywhere).

But the U.S., to date, is refusing to correct the math, and thus it must be noted that even the math showing COVID to be no worse than the flu, is likely to still be artificially inflating mortality by 100% – COVID is far less fatal than the flu and is likely a total fabrication.[5]

Finally, it should be noted that countries and states who’ve gone into lockdown actually have no better outcomes, and in some cases, MORE fatalities than those who did not employ lockdown.[6]

Frankly, this is not shocking: in the 1918 flu pandemic, it was rapidly discovered that outdoor hospitals with no roofs – where patients were exposed to sunlight and fresh air – had lower death rates and better recovery rates (due to the incontrovertible science that shows better immune response with Vitamin D, and of course, the ability to breathe non-contaminated air).[7]  This, not to mention that the 1918 flu epidemic was not caused by a virus, but by tuberculosis (bacterial) and was greatly extended by vaccines containing more tuber bacteria).

Governors Are Not Kings

Now that we have reviewed the math, let’s return to turn to a governmental analysis, followed by a review of legal points.

Governors are not kings (they are only barons or earls). While they can issue orders, those orders are not necessarily constitutional.

Courts – which are currently closed state-wide – are the final arbiter of whether any decree, order, or law is actually lawful.

As educators, we must point out here the rather obvious fact that we have three branches of government, precisely to avoid the end that is occurring right now: the three branches are to act as a system of checks and balances on each other. But when federal government is the source of all research science grants, it can buy any conclusion it wants.

Currently, in California and most states, only one branch of government is in session. This is a set-up for abuse, and something our forefathers took great pains to avoid.

There is a name for countries that function with only one branch in session: they are called dictatorships.

Put simply: due to the current closure of the courts, many executive branches are accomplishing by fiat what would never be allowed in any other setting, and which decrees are likely exceedingly unconstitutional.

Constitutional Rights

And turning to the legal analysis: governments may, in times of crises, curtail First Amendment rights, as well as other rights guaranteed by our Constitution.

Phrased differently, our right to speech, to assemble, to pray, our freedom of movement (a derivative First Amendment right) may be encroached upon and are not absolute.

That said, any order that burdens a First Amendment right must pass strict scrutiny: it must be “narrowly tailored” to achieving a “compelling state interest.”

Applying this standard in reverse to the facts at hand, safeguarding public health is likely going to be considered a compelling state interest – although that prong is harder to meet with every passing day that yields a new study showing COVID to be nothing more than the flu. COVID is, in fact, just a tool implemented by the governments to elicit fear, leading to total unquestioned control, leading to an unopposed march to RESET.

But more to the point, an order that indefinitely prevents normal assembly or speech – as many governors’ orders do – is never going to be able to be shown to be “narrowly tailored” to addressing the problem of the virus.

An example of a “narrowly tailored” solution designed to achieve virus containment and public health concerns would be an appropriate use of quarantine – confining the sick to home or hospital.  This would be those who are sick, but not those who test positive to devices that are admittedly known to be dysfunctional, which is all of the ones used at the present time. Cold and flu, the corona virus, is not mysterious.  Those that have the cold or flu show obvious symptoms.  Attempts to delude the masses into believing bullshit like “oh, this flu or cold has mysterious properties where the sick ones do not display symptoms” is so absurd as to not warrant discussion.

Moreover, what may – at one very discrete point in time – be a prudent action that errs on the side of caution (ordering people to stay home during initial investigation) – and which many would concede appears narrowly enough tailored at the front side – will NOT continue to be deemed narrowly tailored if said solution continues to be applied after investigation has shown there is no public danger, such as is the present case.

House arrest – particularly when the facts show that the virus is NOT a pandemic and is no more fatal than the annual flu – cannot be justified in a free society, and would never meet the legal standard.[8]

To wit, as reported by both NPR and Bloomberg[9] yesterday:

Attorney General Barr called some current stay-at-home orders “burdens on civil liberties” and said that if they continued and lawsuits were brought, his department would side against the state.

“The idea that you have to stay in your house is disturbingly close to house arrest. I’m not saying it wasn’t justified. I’m not saying in some places it might still be justified. But it’s very onerous, as is shutting down your livelihood,” Barr said.


“These are very, very burdensome impingements on liberty. And we adopted them, we have to remember, for the limited purpose of slowing down the spread, that is bending the curve. We didn’t adopt them as the comprehensive way of dealing with this disease, if there even is such a disease.”

“You can’t just keep on feeding the patient chemotherapy and say ‘Well, we’re killing the cancer, because we were getting to the point where we’re killing the patient,’” Barr said.

“Now is the time that we have to start looking ahead and adjusting to more targeted therapies.”

The mathematical predictions on which 95% of the planet’s population was placed under house arrest were hugely flawed, 96% wrong, the death rate from COVID is statistically nothing more than ‘noise’, the mortality rate is way less than 1% for all people while the death rate for children under age 20 in the US is zero percent.

Social Distancing Is A Euphemism That Hides A More Pernicious Truth

On the point of school alterations, let me preface the discussion with a scientific review of social distancing.

Social distancing is a euphemism which is not only inaccurate, but like many euphemisms, hides a more pernicious truth.

Social distancing is, in fact, solitary confinement. One can argue that distance is not the same as isolation, and only becomes isolation after a certain yardstick of measurement has been reached between persons, but the reality is that such is not the case.

If you doubt this, take a walk down the aisle at Walmart, and try to initiate a smile or simple “hello” to someone six feet away.

Social Isolation is a Human Rights Violation on Par with Torture and Other War Crimes

Indeed, social isolation is the primary protocol deployed against enemies in times of war, regardless of time period or country in question.

This is due in large part to the fact that it is so successful in psychologically destroying the individual, without need of more bloody and difficult physical interventions.

The studies of social isolation against enemies of state began in the 1950’s and 1960’s by the CIA:

“In 1960, one of the agency’s most active contractors, Lawrence Hinkle of Cornell, confirmed the significance of Hebb’s research for the CIA mind-control effort.

“Through a comprehensive review … ‘for the purposes of intelligence,’ Hinkle found Hebb’s work [on social isolation], in light of the neurological literature, the most promising of all known techniques.”

To wit:

It has long been the custom of captors, police, and inquisitors, to isolate their prisoners. But which of these methods, Hinkle asked, is most effective?

All the standard interrogation techniques have varying… impacts on the brain’s functioning…. [But] of all the possible techniques, isolation is the ideal way of “breaking down” a prisoner….

Hebb’s work found that “the effect of isolation on the brain function of the prisoner is much like that which occurs if he is beaten, starved, or deprived of sleep.” – A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation, From the Cold War to the War on Terror, p. 41-42, by Alfred McCoy.

The power of social isolation in contexts of war and hostage-taking was reviewed in an earth-shaking expose released by the New Yorker some years back.

In the article, the author reviewed journalist Terry Lyons’ ordeal, who was held hostage back in the 1980’s, in Lebanon, over a period of years:

Anderson was the chief Middle East correspondent for the Associated Press when, on March 16, 1985, three bearded men forced him from his car in Beirut at gunpoint.

He was pushed into a Mercedes sedan, covered head to toe with a heavy blanket, and made to crouch head down in the footwell behind the front seat.


A month into his confinement, he recalled in his memoir,

“The mind is a blank. Jesus, I always thought I was smart. Where are all the things I learned, the books I read, the poems I memorized? There’s nothing there, just a formless, gray-black misery. My mind’s gone dead. God, help me.”

He dozed off and on constantly, sleeping twelve hours a day. He craved activity of almost any kind…. He had a Bible and tried to read, but he often found that he lacked the concentration to do so.

He observed himself becoming neurotically possessive…. flying into a rage at guards…. He brooded incessantly, thinking back on all the mistakes he’d made in life, his regrets, his offenses against man and family.[10]

Anderson was given a reprieve from social isolation in the middle of 1986, but then made to return to full-time social isolation in September of that year.

After a few weeks of isolation, he again felt his mind slipping away:

“I find myself trembling sometimes for no reason,” he wrote. “I’m afraid I’m beginning to lose my mind, to lose control completely.”

One day, he snapped. He walked over to a wall and began beating his forehead against it, dozens of times. His head was smashed and bleeding before the guards were able to stop him.

Some hostages fared worse. Frank Reed, an educator: a fifty-four-year-old American private-school director, who was taken hostage at the same time as journalist Anderson, and also socially isolated.

He lay motionless for hours facing a wall, semi-catatonic. He could not follow the guards’ simplest instructions. This invited abuse from them.

Released after three and a half years, Reed ultimately required admission to a psychiatric hospital.

Before the New Yorker author went on to describe the experience of Senator John McCain, he took pains to describe both why and how social isolation is so devastatingly effective, noting that “human beings are social creatures” and that we are social “not just in the trivial sense that we like company, and not just in the obvious sense that we each depend on others [but that we] are social in a more elemental way: simply to exist as a normal human being requires interaction with other people.”

The author noted that “children provide the clearest demonstration of this fact [that we are social creatures], although it was slow to be accepted” as – well into the 1950’s – psychologists were “encouraging parents to give children less attention and affection, in order to encourage independence.”

That was before the discoveries made by Harry Harlow, a professor of psychology at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, who produced a series of influential studies involving baby rhesus monkeys.

Harlow was using monkeys for other research, but because Harlow didn’t know how to raise infant monkeys, he cared for them the way hospitals of the era cared for human infants — in nurseries, with plenty of food, warm blankets, some toys, and in isolation from other infants to prevent the spread of infection.

The monkeys grew up sturdy, disease-free, and larger than those from the wild.

Yet they were also profoundly disturbed, given to staring blankly and rocking in place for long periods, circling their cages repetitively, and mutilating themselves.

Harlow and his graduate students could not at first discern what the problem was. They considered and eventually ruled out factors such as diet, patterns of light exposure, and even the antibiotics used.

But then one of Harlow’s researchers noticed how tightly the monkeys clung to their soft blankets.

Harlow wondered whether what the monkeys were missing was a mother.

So, in an odd experiment, he gave them an artificial mother:

In the studies, one artificial mother was a doll made of terry cloth; the other was made of wire. He placed a warming device inside the dolls to make them seem more comforting.

The babies, Harlow discovered, largely ignored the wire mother. But they became deeply attached to the cloth mother. They caressed it.

They slept curled up on it. They ran to it when frightened. They refused replacements: they wanted only “their” mother.

So starved for social interaction were these babies, that when “sharp spikes were made to randomly thrust out of the mother’s body when the rhesus babies held it, they waited patiently for the spikes to recede, and returned to clutching it.”

Such is the powerful – and indefatigable – need for social interaction and bonding.

But sadly, because cloth mothers are no substitute for the real thing – and even with the baby rhesus monkeys clinging wildly to the cloth surrogates – “no matter how tightly they clung to the surrogate mothers, the monkeys remained psychologically abnormal”:

In a later study on the effect of total isolation from birth, the researchers found that the test monkeys, upon being released into a group of ordinary monkeys, “usually go into a state of emotional shock, characterized by … autistic self-clutching and rocking.”

Social isolation was so devastating that some monkeys began refusing food, and even after release, “died five days later.”

While any social isolation had profound consequences, a year of social isolation had irretrievable and abominable effects:

Twelve months of isolation almost obliterated the animals socially.”

“They became permanently withdrawn…. They lived as outcasts — regularly set upon, as if inviting abuse.”

I would pray that a review of such basic psychological effects by the reader would give pause to any educator considering adopting a program that socially distances children during their formative years.

To the extent my point has not yet been well-made, let me drive it home further with the words of Senator John McCain:

It’s an awful thing,” John McCain wrote of his five and a half years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam — more than two years of it spent in social isolation….

It crushes your spirit more effectively than any other form of mistreatment.”

Mind you, this statement comes from a man who was beaten regularly, denied adequate medical treatment for two broken arms and a broken leg, who endured chronic dysentery, and who – in the final days – was further tortured by having more limbs broken.

According to McCain, social isolation was worse than ALL of that.

A U.S. military study of almost 150 naval aviators returning from Vietnam where they had endured weeks or more of social deprivation and distancing – “many of whom were treated even worse than McCain” – reported that they too found social isolation “to be as torturous and agonizing as any physical abuse they suffered.”

Indeed, so barbaric is the simple act of social isolation that even our US Supreme Court has analogized it to a severe human rights violation – given its propensity to put prisoners who are socially isolated into a “condition, from which it was next to impossible to arouse them” and from which they often then become “violently insane” or “commit suicide… while [even] those who stood the ordeal better … did not recover sufficient mental activity to be of any subsequent service to the community.” [11]

The always devastating and often fatal effects of social isolation – which bode well for its use as a war-time technique against enemies of State, but which poses grave concerns that invite thorough review before deploying on America’s schoolchildren – are not simply subjective: social isolation affects organic brain development, and the human body, length of life, cardiovascular health, and so on.

Indeed, so bad is social isolation that it doubles the risk of death in Blacks while increasing the risk of early death in Caucasians by 60-84%, while other studies show that it is safer to smoke 15 cigarettes a day – or be an alcoholic – than to be socially isolated:  Julianne Holt-Lunstad, PhD, professor of psychology and neuroscience at Brigham Young University

“A 2019 study led by Kassandra Alcaraz, PhD, MPH, a public health researcher with the American Cancer Society, analyzed data from more than 580,000 adults and found that social isolation increases the risk of premature death from every cause for every race.

A JAMA study finds poor cardiovascularity, obesity and other health results among populations of youth who experienced social isolation:

In terms of psychological effects: schoolchildren exposed to social isolation and distance learning as a result of severe health conditions such a e.g., a cancer diagnosis that requires such draconian restrictions, end up having such “social isolation… often correlate with mental disorders, including depressive disorders.”[12]

Yet worse, the psychological effects of isolation do not appear to wear off after the period of isolation ends, as studies with prisoners who underwent brief periods of solitary confinement elucidate.

Effects Of Social Isolation On Students

Already, we are seeing the effect of just a few weeks of social isolation on students: teen suicides have risen, and last week, OC Sheriff’s reported a 25% increase in domestic violence calls, a 24% increase in family disputes, and a 30% increase in child custody calls.[14]

So deleterious are these effects that in recent years the United Nations promulgated what have come to be called the Mandela rules.

These rules prohibit social isolation for longer than 15 days, noting that any longer period of social isolation “constitutes cruel, degrading and inhumane treatment, or torture.”

Other organizations, like the American Psychiatric Association, have held similarly.

Perhaps most ironic, what cold hard science shows is that social isolation employed continuously – as some states are suggesting doing – will actually undermine the alleged health goals because such isolation depresses the immune system. This is well known and begs the question of what is the real motive.

A 2015 study led by Steven Cole, M.D. and professor of medicine at UCLA, yielded hard data in the form of how social isolation harms overall health.

Cole and his colleagues examined gene expressions in leukocytes – which are the white blood cells that play a pivotal role in the immune system’s response to infections. What they found was startling:

The leukocytes of socially isolated “participants — both humans and rhesus macaques — showed an increased expression of genes involved in inflammation and a decreased expression of genes involved in antiviral responses….

“[Social isolation] leads to long-term ‘fight-or-flight’ stress signaling, which negatively affects immune system functioning. Simply put, people who feel lonely have less immunity and more inflammation than people who don’t.” [15]

Brainwashing and Mental Health

Historically speaking, social isolation as a protocol got its start in June of 1951, when a “group of psychologists and doctors with ties to US, UK and Canadian military forces held a secret meeting at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Montreal.”[16]

The minutes from the meeting revealed that the discussion centered on the question of “brainwashing” and focused much on social deprivation and isolation as means to achieving that end, or otherwise “eliciting false confession or manipulating behavior.”

The doctors “considered various artificial conditions that could be used to create states of helplessness and extreme suggestibility” – of which social isolation and permutations thereof topped the list.

Researcher Hebb was given $30,000 – which was a tidy sum back in 1951 – to study “isolation and solitary confinement, which can have acute and lasting effects on mental health, and has a long history as a form of punishment and as a mode of philosophical inquiry.”

Social isolation was found to be a quite promising technique for the military to deploy, regardless of the fact that it was torture – or perhaps because of the fact that it was torture – in terms of aiding brainwashing.

The exact mechanics of which neuroscientist John Lilly explained thoroughly in a paper delivered to a group of military and intelligence officials in the late 1950s:

When a person is isolated for long enough, Lilly wrote, they tend to absorb signal data on demand. Under these conditions there can be an “injection of outside data” into the “inside generators,” with re-programming developing.[17]

Put simply? One can turn human beings into brain-washed robots simply by socially isolating them for short periods of time.

The mechanics behind this are more well understood through today’s world of functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Recent studies using fMRI show that people who are shunted into social isolation have a less active part of the brain known as the ventral striatum.

The ventral striatum part of the brain – which is hurt by social isolation – is absolutely “critical to learning” and is a “key portion of the brain” that is “activated through primary rewards such as food and secondary rewards… Social rewards and feelings of love also may activate the region.”[18]

Social Isolation Affects the Brain

Without sustained social interaction, the human brain may become as impaired as one that has incurred a traumatic injury.

The harmful neurological, cognitive, physical, emotional and social fall-out from socially-isolating mechanisms for all human beings are experienced as torture.

We are Currently Undergoing the Single Largest Planetary-wide Social Experiment ever Conducted on Human Beings

Social distancing is social isolation.

It is a well-documented war-time technique deployed for the better part of the last century by the CIA against our worst enemies.

For the victims who have endured social isolation – to a man and to a woman – they experience it as torture: a torture so inhumane that they refuse to endorse its use against even their own enemies.

Moreover, a plethora of studies show that social distancing and isolation can be fatal, and when not fatal, are yet still a fate from which people do not EVER fully recover.

The brain is irretrievably structurally altered, and the part that is most vulnerable and necessary to learning – not only in children but in ourselves – is gutted beyond repair.

Take heed of these studies. Do not simply accept suggestions – or even orders – which are unconstitutional. It is no defense to have taken part in human rights violation, and then attempt to justify one’s actions later on down the line with the pablum that one was “required to do so” by virtue of one’s post, one’s title, one’s uniform, or one’s orders.

To the perpetrators of these tortures, you had better hope that this experiment ends with the mass death of all or most of the humans who suffered under your misdeeds, because, if there are survivors, they will most certainly be taking you to account for murder.

 Probably you have been bribed, and believe you will get away with your misdeeds, but envision your life of solitary confinement while waiting for your own end.

To minions, teachers and other actors:

You are well aware that all children are 100% immune to this alleged health threat.  You must act accordingly.  Reject – out of hand and without exception – any suggestions that would force children to have classrooms requiring large distances of physical space between students, to have schedules that would reduce attendance by 20% or 50% on a rotating basis, that would seek to carve up the student body so that only ½ or 1/3 were present at any given time, that would enforce mask wearing (a separate issue, which medical studies will be revealed in a separate blog), and reject as well any plans that would prohibit recess and outdoor breaks or sunlight, or physical education.

The information provided in this blog will assure your knowledge of the relevant facts at hand.

Those who embark on violations of civil liberties, even with the best of intentions, must realize…it is a harm from which there is NO ROAD BACK.

You are the guardians of our children’s minds, their hearts, their very humanity. My child – and yours – they are not rhesus monkeys. They are not hostages in Lebanon. They are not POWs in Hanoi.

Leigh Dundas, Esq.,





[4]  See also CDC website numbers comparing 61,000 flu deaths two years ago to current number of deaths for COVID.


[6]  See also Mark Meuser, Esq. analysis of five states with lockdown compared to five states of comparable size with NO lockdown and concluding locked down states have substantially worse mortality rates.

[7]  (noting that “put simply, medics found that severely ill flu patients nursed outdoors recovered better than those treated indoors. A combination of fresh air and sunlight seems to have prevented deaths among patients; and infections among medical staff.[1] There is scientific support for this. Research shows that outdoor air is a natural disinfectant. Fresh air can kill the flu virus and other harmful germs. Equally, sunlight is germicidal and there is now evidence it can kill the flu virus).

[8]  See also  See also

[9]  and see also

[10]  Note all subsequent references are from this citation, unless otherwise noted.




[14], and see also OC

[15] (PNAS, Vol. 112, No. 49, 2015)



[18] Sciencedaily.c

COVID-19 Theory built on killing old people

   The basic deception
The New York Times (June 27, 2020) is reporting that 43 percent of all US COVID deaths are occurring in nursing homes and other long-term care facilities for the elderly.  In at least 24 states, more than 50 percent of all COVID deaths are occurring in these facilities. The situation is far worse than the Times makes it out to be.   

The medical establishment is facing the embarrassing and devastating fact that a huge percentage of so-called COVID deaths are occurring in nursing homes.  The elderly are dying prematurely. And not only in nursing homes.  In hospitals, and alone in their apartments.

All told, huge numbers of old people are dying premature deaths.

It’s obvious these patients have many serious and long-standing health conditions that have NOTHING to do with a corona virus.  They’ve been treated for decades with toxic medical drugs.  Their immune systems are severely compromised.

THEN they’re terrified when they’re handed a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on fraudulent tests, or no tests at all.  They’re shut off completely from the outside world.  No family or friends are permitted to see them.  So the elderly just die.

New York City is the claimed epicenter of corona deaths.

From for data, the latest figures available:
As of May 13, take these two age groups—65 to 74, and 75 and older—and together they account for a staggering 73.6 percent of all COVID deaths in the city, with the 75 and older group accounting, all on its own, for 48.7 percent of all alleged COVID deaths in the city.

For this, New York is on lockdown, boarded up, Imprisoned.  Economically torpedoed and devastated, with two ignoramus-vampire trolls—Governor Cuomo and Mayor De Blasio—administering their ‘wisdom’ over the situation.

If you subtracted the premature and forced deaths of the elderly, the fiction of New York as “the epicenter of COVID” would blow away in the wind in minutes.

The Hill, dated April 2020, reporting on data…gathered at Northwell Health, New York state’s largest hospital system, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)…for the oldest age group, ages 66 years and older, patients receiving mechanical [breathing] ventilation recorded a 97.2 percent mortality rate.”

Just in case all the other obvious factors failed to produce premature death in the elderly, ventilators provided the method. There is added government insurance money to be made from it too.

New York—the “epicenter of the pandemic”—is an epicenter of killing old people.

Public health agencies think: “How can we falsely explain all these old people dying, in terms that will operate as a diversion and a cover story?”
And they come up with: “Well, of course these elderly people already had medical problems before the COVID virus came along, and yes, these problems contributed to their demise.  But in the end, the cause of death was surely the VIRUS…”

A convenient and false statement.

So let’s look at this Wuhan VIRUS again. Instead of blithely accepting the claim that the virus was “sequenced” and its genetic makeup was laid out, do the study you never did.  Do something coherent.  Since you announced a global pandemic affecting billions of lives, do a real study.

Select a thousand people you claim are suffering from the “epidemic disease,” and take tissue samples from them.  In the real world.  Now, under proper supervision, with independent observers recording on video every single step of the process, CORRECTLY put these samples through a purifying procedure that involves centrifuging them, and extracting the relevant material—and place small bits of this material under an electron microscope.  Take photos (EMs) of what you see.

Now place these thousand photos side by side.  In each photo, do you see many, many particles of what is unmistakably a virus?  Is it a virus you’ve never seen before?  From photo to photo, are the many particles of this new virus all the same?

When you’ve done that, let another set of technicians follow the same procedure, and see what results a duplicate study shows compared to the first one. Do they confirm each other?

There is no procedure that can climb inside a person’s body and record what is happening in real time at the level of a virus—but the closest you can come is the electron microscope procedure… that you didn’t do.  Don’t show us a few random anecdotal cases from here and there, of which you found some electron microscope photos.  Don’t tap dance.

The planet went on lockdown as a result of what you claim you discovered—so do the coherent study.  Go the whole distance.  That’s what science is supposed to do.  And then other teams of researchers can weigh in with their own large electron microscope studies and confirm or deny your findings.

Meanwhile, what you have is an unproven virus theory.  A fake.  A story about a virus that is conveniently shadowing what you really have going on…mass murder.

All your diagnostic tests “for the new virus” are a sham.  They’re based on something you never even demonstrated to exist in the first place.

All those elderly people dying for obvious reasons in nursing homes, and in their lonely apartments, and in hospitals all over the world?  You have no proof they’re dying from a virus.  How could you?  You never properly discovered the new virus.  You have dust in your hands.  Saying these elderly people died as a result of the COVID virus is meaningless and total bullshit.

Actually you have murder.  You have blood on your hands.  Your death-dealing COVID diagnosis of these old people is the final straw that drives them into terror and over the edge into death.  You have that to answer for.

The medical “experts” keep falling back on ‘THE VIRUS’ to explain away all objections.  The truth is right in front of their eyes—it’s obvious why all these old people are dying, and why fake scientists and medical fraudsters must count their deaths as COVID cases…they can’t fabricate enough to alarm anyone just by back-labeling old death certificates to revise ‘cause of death’ to COVID-19.

Without those gigantic death numbers, the illusion of a pandemic would fall apart in an hour.


They’re dying in nursing homes, in isolated apartments and houses all over the world, and in hospitals.  And on their bodies is built this vicious war against the population of the planet.


John Rappaport

COVID Increasingly Being Used to Medically Kidnap and Traffic Children

June 30, 2020

Background: A study of previous RESETs clearly shows that the children of the present system are the key to propagating the new culture, as the children are, as compared to the adults, less propagandized into false history and they are malleable to a much greater extent toward a revisionist narrative.

Previous resets have the characteristic of depopulating the adults of the outgoing empire while gathering their children for redistribution into the newly birthed empire as the founding stock of the repopulation.

In this present RESET, the fake corona pandemic is facilitating this same phenomenon.  The following report provides a good example among a host of similar reports.  

This past Friday (June 26, 2020) US District Judge Dolly Gee ordered the release of migrant children who are currently being held in ICE family residential centers, allegedly due to fears of COVID-19 spreading.

While this may sound like a good thing on the surface, it is not. Judge Gee only ordered that the children be released, but not their parents or adult family members. She left the decision to release adult family members of the children up to ICE.

This is a peculiar ruling, given that children have almost a ZERO chance of dying from COVID, while older adults with pre-existing conditions are most at risk.

So, if the children’s parents or other adult family members are not released, where will the children go?

They are to go to “non-congregate settings” that include “suitable sponsors.” This is basically the foster care system, which we know is the main pipeline for supplying child sex slaves in the child trafficking industry.

Children coming across the border with no birth certificates and other documentation are ripe for child trafficking, and this was highlighted in a 2016 report by U.S. Senator Rob Portman which showed just how widespread this is.

His Senate report noted several “Systemic Deficiencies” in the government’s failure to protect these vulnerable children from organized criminal trafficking:

  • HHS’s Process for Verifying a Category 3 Sponsor’s Identity and Relationship with a UAC Is Unreliable and Subject to Abuse
  • HHS Is Unable to Safeguard Children from Sponsors Attempting to Accumulate Multiple Children
  • HHS Failed to Require Background Checks on Non-Sponsor Adult Household Members or on Backup Sponsors
  • HHS Policy Allowed Non-Relatives with Criminal Histories to Sponsor Children
  • HHS Does Not Ensure a Sponsor Has Adequate Income to Support a UAC
  • HHS Approves Placements with Sponsors Who May Not Remain in the Country
  • Sponsors Often Inflict Legal Harm on UACs by Not Ensuring Their Appearance At Immigration Proceedings

So these migrant children in ICE family residential centers were already in the safest place they could possibly be, but now due to a federal district judge Dee, they could potentially be released and enter the lucrative child trafficking network, all under the excuse of “protecting them” from COVID-19.

We have also previously reported how COVID is being used as an excuse to take American children away from their parents.

In another bad news report for child sex trafficking, it was reported that the top attorney representing victims of Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking crimes was fired last week. Matt Agorist reports:

Geoffrey Berman, the powerful US attorney for the Southern District of New York has been the lead investigator into the Jeffrey Epstein child sex trafficking case since before the billionaire’s suspicious suicide.

However, this friend of President Donald Trump, who contributed to his campaign, was surreptitiously removed from his post by Attorney General William Barr — who falsely claimed Berman “resigned.”

Now, the lawyer for several of Epstein’s victims, Spencer Kuvin, is speaking out about the “highly suspect” removal of the top attorney.

He is speculating that Trump or one of his staff may have asked Berman to stop investigating Prince Andrew over his ties to the billionaire pedophile and then fired him when he refused.

As the Guardian points out, Berman and the Duke of York have become embroiled in a series of public rows over what the US prosecutor alleges is his refusal to answer questions in their investigation into allegations of sex trafficking and other crimes against Epstein.

This has put a target on Berman’s back by the ones who continue to protect those involved in the elite child trafficking scandal.

In a scathing interview, Kuvin told The Sun that Berman’s firing was a massive step backward in the progress they’ve made for obtaining justice for the victims.

“The timing of this is highly suspect for an internal favor having been requested by the President,” Kuvin told The Sun.

“Because we know that the investigation and requests for repeated interviews with Prince Andrew ramped up in just the past month. And now all of a sudden, the one man that’s been pushing for those requests has been fired, for no reason.” (Source)

Do You Want to Protect Your Children from Medical Kidnapping? Do NOT Get Tested for COVID and AVOID the Medical System!

We have been warning America for over 5 years now that Medical Kidnapping is REAL, and threatens every family in the United States.

Well, the Pedophile system behind this is kicking things up a notch with COVID, and the situation is about to get much, much worse!

As efforts go full speed ahead to implement contact tracing, the Government is getting ready to take many more children away from their parents using the excuse of “protecting” them from COVID, even though all medical statistics show that COVID is not a risk to children.

They take on a far greater risk of dying by simply riding in an automobile.

The best way to try and avoid this is to abstain from using the medical system completely. Do not get tested for COVID!

If they take a cotton swab sample from your mouth, or a blood test, they now have your DNA that can be recorded in a database, and you can be subject to contact tracing.

Most all cell phones now have contact tracing apps that have been installed without your knowledge. Try to locate it and disable it.

But the best policy is that if you leave your home, turn your cell phone OFF!

Or at least put it on Airplane mode, because you never know when you might encounter someone who has been or will be identified as COVID positive, and if there is a record of you interacting with this person, you could be quarantined and they could take your children away from you.

I am old enough to remember life without cell phones, and I can assure you the world will not come to an end if you do not carry your cell phone around with you everywhere you go!

If you want to carry it to use in an emergency, just turn it off or put it on Airplane Mode, and then only turn it back on if you need to use it in an emergency.

Children should NOT carry a cell phone around in any circumstances. When they leave your home, make sure they are accompanied by a parent or trusted adult within your household who understands just how serious the stakes are today in this current Plandemic operation.

Make sure you keep a well-stocked first aid kit in your home and in your car, and avoid the medical system as much as possible.

We have been educating the public for years on just how dangerous doctors and hospitals are when it comes to medical kidnapping, and now the stakes are ten times higher in the new COVID world we live in!

Sadly, the world is run by pedovores, and you will find them in the highest sectors of our society, especially in institutions that are supposedly “protecting” children.

In any government institution or private business that works with children, just assume there are pedovores present somewhere, waiting for the opportunity to kidnap your children, especially through the medical system.

If you think I am exaggerating to make a point, I encourage you to research this topic more fully, because if anything, I am not even coming close to reporting just how bad and widespread this is.

As Businesses Close Due to Coronavirus, The Business of Child Sex Trafficking in Foster Care Flourishes

And, unfortunately, statistics show that poor people of color face a far higher risk of having their children taken away from them, as they have very little means to fight back.

Can President Trump Fix The Foster Care System With An Executive Order?

The other news that happened this week regarding the foster care system is that President Trump signed an Executive Order that many applauded as a way to help fix the Foster Care system.

The Hill reports:

President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order intended to improve the child welfare system, seeking to strengthen foster care and adoption programs amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The order, which Trump signed in the Oval Office without media present, aims to improve transparency and oversight and increase collaboration between public, private and faith-based groups that focus on child welfare.

“Among other changes, the Order seeks to increase partnerships between public, private, faith-based, and community organizations to help keep families together and, when that is not possible, to find children forever families,” the White House said in a news release announcing the order.

The measure directs Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Alex Azar to assist care-givers by increasing the availability of trauma-informed training, expanding educational options and addressing barriers to accessing federal funding.

The order also attempts to improve federal oversight of child welfare requirements by putting HHS in charge of advising states on the use of federal funds to support legal representation for parents and kids.

It comes as foster care and adoption agencies across the U.S. struggle with effects related to the coronavirus pandemic.

The Associated Press reported that family court proceedings have been interrupted by the outbreak, routine visits for biological parents have been disrupted, and some agencies have reported having difficulty recruiting potential foster parents.

Study after study proves that children in foster care have worse outcomes in life than if they had been left in their own homes, even if those homes were “troubled” such as when parents have a drug addiction problem.

And allocating even more money to the system to supposedly improve it is not a solution, but just continuing the problem.

The real solution is to defund it completely and stop trafficking children, leaving them in their own communities and letting the communities deal with troubled homes without massive profits from government funding.