My blogs have repeatedly informed you that your body already contains 380 trillion viruses at all times.  Using the PCR tester or the antigen tester will reveal a ‘positive’ for any virus at all times, assuming the tester is functional.  This does not, in any way, indicate that you are infected or diseased, or are likely to become so. Even though almost countless viruses inhabit your body at all times, there is only a minor threat, that you have easily survived every year of your life, without even giving it a thought.

The fake experts are trying to tell you that the presence of virus will be very serious or fatal.  This is a ridiculous lie.  What is going to surely kill you, if you fall for the lies, is the vaccine.

  Like the microbiome, which hosts over 30 trillion bacteria, the virome is a normal component of your body.  You should not be alarmed at this well-known and common fact.  Every healthy body will be able to maintain a healthy balance of these elements and allow them to perform their useful functions within the body. Your own body is a literal virus making machine, contributing hundreds of virus to the world on a daily basis. Your 3 trillion eukaryote cells replicate on a regular schedule based on wear and tear from their individual functions. Bones replicate slowly but intestine cells replicate every day or two.

This also means that disease or infection is NOT caused by person-to-person exchange of any bodily or microbial materials, such as viruses.  It is certainly impossible to contract disease by inhaling air, or touching door knobs or being in close contact with other humans or animals.  That is simply not how disease works. Fauci would like to see you believe that viruses are transferred this way, and, once finding their way into your body, inevitably attack and sicken or kill you. Please remember that viruses are dead. They do not stalk you, or plan to enter your body, nor try to infect or sicken you. They are dead molecules than can only become a part of a living eukaryote cell by rare accident, when it fails to be disposed of, hangs up on a ‘receptor site and is used as raw material to form another DNA strand. Your immune system will very quickly identify this eukaryote as a defective foreign entity and kill it.

You do not ‘catch’ pathogens that then make you sick.  There is no ‘catching’ involved in mechanism of disease.  You simply make yourself sick by bad diet, bad lifestyle, lack of sun exposure and fear (worry).  It is not complicated and keeping yourself healthy is a matter of overcoming ignorance.  You are never taught in public education how to achieve and maintain bodily health. Fortunately, it is very simple and the needed education is readily available to you, in this information age, from blogs like this one.

We most certainly have dip-shits who spend your money weaponizing viruses and bacteria in their well-appointed government laboratories.  These are inevitably patented and can be verified by anyone who wants to look into it. These are not naturally occurring and fortunately, are unstable, mutating their way into extinction quite rapidly.

 ‘THEY’ can taint your atmosphere every year to bring in the new flu or cold, which already has a name under which the patent is issued, and, most miraculously, always has a new vaccine, available by the hundreds of millions of serum phials, that is supposed to be designed specifically to counteract their new version of the seasonal flu.  Vaccines do not work, never have and never will.  That is simply not how things work.  Only your own body, in a state of health, will quickly and easily make everything right again.  There is no doctor, especially any allopath, that has ever cured any body of anything.  Your own body will easily and quickly heal itself.

You may disagree, citing cases of health issues for which people are hospitalized and given pills or shots.  In fact, the more time you spend in a hospital taking pills and shots, the more likely you are to have an extended recovery period or premature death.  Nothing is being done to correct your diet, life-style or fears and the pills and shots are toxic poisons that not only do not cure anything, but complicate your body’s proven healing processes.

With the fabricated corona virus crisis, it is important to get past the bullshit being fed to you by the talking heads on TV.  Let’s take a look at one aspect of how the virome really functions:

Note:  The following is a highly technical extract from a report issued by researcher virologists.  It is offered to those who wish to obtain a more in-depth understanding of the complexity and the biological nature of viruses.

The gut virome: the ‘missing link’ between gut bacteria and host immunity.

Indrani MukhopadhyaJonathan P. SegalSimon R. CardingAilsa L. Hart, and Georgina L. Hold

Go to:


The human gut virome includes a diverse collection of viruses that infect our own cells as well as other commensal organisms, directly impacting on our well-being. Despite its predominance, the virome remains one of the least understood components of the gut microbiota, with appropriate analysis toolkits still in development. Based on its interconnectivity with all living cells, it is clear that the virome cannot be studied in isolation. Here we review the current understanding of the human gut virome, specifically in relation to other constituents of the microbiome, its evolution and life-long association with its host, and our current understanding in the context of inflammatory bowel disease and associated therapies. We propose that the gut virome and the gut bacterial microbiome share similar trajectories and interact in both health and disease and that future microbiota studies should in parallel characterize the gut virome to uncover its role in health and disease.

Keywords: gut virome, gut microbiota, inflammatory bowel disease, host:microbiota interactions, microbial therapeutics, microbial dynamics

Key points

  • The human intestinal microbiome represents one of the most complex ecosystems on Earth and has taken millions of years to coevolve.
  • DNA and RNA viruses that collectively make up the intestinal virome outnumber bacterial cells by 10:1, and include viruses which infect eukaryotic cells, endogenous retroviruses, bacterial viruses (i.e. bacteriophages) and archaeal viruses that infect archaea. Infecting simply means that the dead viruses are accidently admitted into the interior of eukaryotic cells, where they are mistakenly used as raw materials in the process of mitosis, cell replication, producing a defective cell.
  • Diet is an important and constant environmental and lifestyle factor that can influence the gut microbiome, including its viral component.
  • Transkingdom interactions between virome components and bacteria highlights that there are additional layers of complexity to consider in terms of host–microbial homeostasis.
  • Current microbial therapeutics including fecal microbial transplantation need to consider the contribution of the virome.
  • Further research into the interconnectivity of the virome with other elements of the microbiome is essential to fully define the role of the gut virome in human health.


The human intestinal microbiota comprising bacteria, viruses, fungi, multicellular parasites and archaea represents one of the most complex ecosystems on Earth. It has coevolved over millions of years to help shape and influence human development, and in particular immune defences.1 The DNA and RNA viruses that collectively make up the intestinal virome are at least equivalent in number to bacterial cells,2 although on gut mucosal surfaces and within the mucus layers they may outnumber bacterial cells by 20:1.3 Each gram of human gut content is estimated to contain at least 108–109 virus-like particles (VLPs), the vast majority of which are crAssphage (cross-assembly phage), which are DNA phages belonging to the family Podoviridae Viruses, have cross-kingdom interactions with other organisms within the microbiota that together with host genetic variation can change the host (human) phenotype. These virus-driven phenotypic changes can be beneficial to the host or increase the risk of disease.6,7 Currently, it is estimated that less than 1% of the virome has been sequenced, leaving the bulk of the virome yet to be characterized.8

Getting access to the virome.

To study the virome, Virus-like-Particles (VLPs) are separated from cellular components, usually using a combination of filtration, density centrifugation and enzymatic treatments to eliminate free nucleic acids.9 The nucleic acids are then sequenced and analyzed. Compared to the bacterial component of the intestinal microbiome, the intestinal virome has been under-investigated and largely ignored, in large part due to the limited tools available for their identification and classification. Recent advances in high-throughput, next-generation sequencing has allowed detailed and in-depth analysis of microbial communities (metagenomics), leading to the identification of new microbial species, which has only recently been applied to the characterization of the virome.10 There are, however, too few reference viromes, and those that do exist are dominated by unknown sequences with 60–90% of the reads often lacking functional or taxonomic annotations (the ‘viral dark matter’).  Currently, it is estimated that roughly 1% of the virome has been sequenced, leaving the bulk yet to be characterized.8

Human gut virome: main players

Eukaryotic viruses

Sequencing of eukaryotic viral communities in fecal samples from children has identified Picobirnaviridae, Adenoviridae, Anelloviridae and Astroviridae family members, and species such as bocaviruses, enteroviruses, rotaviruses and sapoviruses.12 In addition, disease-associated viruses such as herpesviruses, polyomaviruses, anelloviruses, adenoviruses, papillomaviruses, polyomaviruses, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are also present in the intestinal viromes of some individuals, indicating that the gastrointestinal (GI) tract contains viruses capable of infecting host cells. As the majority of humans remain asymptomatic (not sick) it has been proposed that these pathogenic viruses (pathobionts) have become part of the metagenome of normal individuals, with the majority rarely causing disease and remaining dormant within the host.6,13 Experiments in germ-free and antibiotic-treated mice have shown that the bacterial microbiome can promote the replication and in some cases persistence of enteric viruses13 with the efficient transmission of mouse mammary tumor virus requiring intestinal bacteria.14 Interactions between viruses and bacteria, and other constituents of the intestinal microbiome, are therefore important in influencing the course and outcome of virus infections.15


Microbial viruses modulate their bacterial hosts directly through affecting their mortality and through horizontal gene transfer, and indirectly by reprogramming host metabolism. The human GI tract contains an estimated 1015 bacteriophages (phages; the phageome) which may represent the richest concentration of biological entities on Earth.16 Phages can be functionally categorized based on the lifecycle they adopt after infecting host cells.17 Lytic (virulent) phages lyse the cells they infect by hijacking the host cell’s replication mechanism to package and produce more phages and lytic enzymes that cause cell lysis and the release of newly formed phages from the cell. By contrast, temperate phages incorporate their genetic material into the host cell chromosome as prophages and replicate alongside the host cell. In some instances, temperate phages do not integrate and exist as circular or linear plasmids within the host bacterial cell.18 A third category are pseudolysogenic phages, which upon infecting a cell neither integrate stably into the host genome nor co-opt cell replication machinery, or kill the host cell.17 Recently, analysis of the viral fraction of existing metagenomic studies identified a DNA phage called crAssphage which, due to limitations in our ability to identify phage sequences, had been overlooked in previous studies.5 CrAssphages are highly abundant in the gut microbiome, it has been predicted, based on host co-occurrence profiling that crAssphage infect Bacteroides species. However, our understanding of crAssphage is limited as they have only recently been isolated in culture.5

Acquisition of gut virome communities over time

Bacterial microbiome communities are established at birth and evolve over time to become ‘adult-like’ bacterial communities.1922 While our knowledge of gut bacterial communities is relatively informed, we have a poor understanding of gut virome acquisition. The absence of microscopically detectable VLPs in the first faecal samples (meconium) of newborns is consistent with the intestinal virome being predominantly acquired postnatally.23 Within a week of birth, VLP numbers reach 108/g in faeces, with the initial colonizers originating from a combination of dietary, maternal and/or environmental sources.23 The infant virome develops in parallel with the bacterial microbiome, with evidence of contractions and shifts in the phage community with age as bacterial communities expand and diversify.24 By adulthood, an individuals’ virome reaches a peak, with 80% of viruses persisting over a 2.5-year period (Table 1).12,24 Eukaryotic viruses, including adenovirus, cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus, enterovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, respiratory syncytial virus and human parvovirus B19, have all been detected in amniotic fluid of healthy mothers delivering healthy babies.25 Transmission of viruses such as HIV, hepatitis, influenza, rubella, CMV and herpes zoster virus through the placenta or vaginally are also well recognized;26 however, the influence these viruses may have on the gut virome and the wider gut microbiome is unclear. Other factors known to affect the establishment of the infant gut microbiome include mode of delivery,20,27 breast versus bottle feeding28 and smoking.29 These factors have yet to be investigated and appreciated in terms of the gut virome.

Table 1.

Virus communities within the human gut.

Gut bacteriophages
Mostly double-stranded and single-stranded DNA phages:
Myoviridae, Podoviridae, Siphoviridae, Inoviridae and Microviridae
DNA viruses:
RNA viruses
Definitive pathogenic eukaryotic viruses infecting the gut
Rotavirus, norovirus, astrovirus, adenovirus (serotypes 40 and 41), enterovirus (only adenovirus is DNA virus, rest are all RNA viruses).

Lim and colleagues characterized changes to the gut virome in the first few months of life and found that the gut bacteriophage community structure was composed primarily of a rich and diverse collection of phages, with the majority deriving from the Caudovirales order.26 They also showed that eukaryotic viral population richness was low in infancy and expanded thereafter, while bacteriophage richness was greatest in early life and decreased with age;24 by 24 months of age there was a marked shift towards an increased relative abundance of Microviridae. In the infant, members of the Picornaviridae, Adenoviridae, Astroviridae, Anelloviridae, Reoviridae and Caliciviridae families were prominent but did not persist throughout early development.24,30 The increase in Microviridae species was not driven by a particular bacteriophage, with bacteriophage and bacterial richness being inversely correlated in an age-dependent manner.24 Overall, these findings suggest that the microbiome shifts from a high bacteriophage–low bacterial diversity community at 0 months towards a low bacteriophage–high bacterial diversity community by 24 months of age.24 It has been established that the gut microbiota is dominated by fewer bacterial species at this age, suggesting that bacteriophage diversity is unsustainable longitudinally because of this lower bacterial richness.

Shifts in the virome richness parallels the age at which the infant bacterial microbiome approaches its peak and an adult composition.19,21 which is consistent with phages playing a role in modulating bacterial community structure and function through their ability to lyse and kill host bacteria.31,32 This further supports the hypothesis that the gut bacteriome and virome follow similar developmental trajectories.

Differences in the gut virome between monozygotic twins sharing the same in-utero environment were explored by Reyes and colleagues,33 who identified virome differences between healthy twin pairs and twin pairs discordant for developing malnutrition. Specifically, they found that members of the Anelloviridae and Circoviridae could discriminate discordant from concordant healthy pairs,33 suggesting that specific virome signatures are associated with, although not necessarily mediators of, malnutrition. Unlike infant twins, adult twins harboured gut viromes substantially different from those of their co-twins or mother, consistent with environmental factors driving virome community structure and, by implication, function. Diet is an important and constant environmental and lifestyle factor34 that can influence the gut microbiome, including its viral component. The viromes of unrelated individuals consuming the same diet show gradual convergence and similar viral community structure.35 Thus, as with the bacterial component of the intestinal microbiome, the genetic constitution of an individuals’ virome is a reflection of their genome, lifestyle and behaviour, with medication and age being particularly important.36

Understanding the link between virome and other microbiome constituents is currently constrained by a lack of standardized protocols for virome analysis, which are required for efficient isolation and analysis. New developments in metagenomics,37 enrichment cultures38 and bioformatics39,40 tools are urgently required to improve our ability to define and characterize viromes.

Go to:

Environmental factors impact on the gut virome

Gut bacterial density changes over time under the influence of inherited and environmental factors. While gut bacterial densities change in response to environmental factors, the gut virome is relatively more stable within an individual.33,42 This has been demonstrated in a longitudinal assessment of an individual in whom more than 80% of the viral contigs remained stable over a period of 2.5 years.12 The effect of diet on the gut virome was investigated by Reyes and colleagues, who found that when individuals were put on similar diets, a large amount of variance existed between them in terms of their gut virome.33 Minot and colleagues challenged this theory and suggested that diet had an effect on the gut virome.10 They found that when patients were put on an identical diet, the gut virome composition became more similar, but not identical, between patients. Kim and colleagues found that mucosal and luminal viromes of obese mice fed a high-fat, high-sucrose ‘Western’ diet were significantly enriched with temperate phages of the Caudovirales order.43 The discrepancy in findings may represent the small study numbers, the constraints and variability in methodologies and subject material while exposing the relative lack of our understanding of the gut virome.

Other environmental exposures, such as antibiotic use and location, can substantially affect the gut virome.44 Antibiotics enrich phage-encoded genes that confer resistance via disparate mechanisms to the administered antibiotic, as well as encode genes that confer resistance to other unrelated antibiotics.45 However, another study has suggested that the data had inflated false positives due to relaxed thresholds for in silico detection of antibiotic resistance genes.46

Interconnectivity of the virome with other elements of the microbiome and its role in human health

Transkingdom microbiome interactions between viruses and bacteria can influence host health and disease.26 Intestinal antiviral immunity is reliant on Gram-negative commensal-dependent NF-ĸB signalling, while enteric viral infection protects against intestinal damage and pathogenic bacteria.8,13 Transkingdom interplay adds therefore an additional layer of complexity in terms of host–microbial homeostasis.

By acting as a vehicle for horizontal gene transfer, phages can influence bacterial evolution, diversity and metabolism.12,16 Surprisingly phage populations appear more stable in faecal microbial transplantation (FMT) experiments compared to bacterial communities.47 The pathways and mechanisms of transfer of phage-encoded genes including antibiotic resistance48 or virulence factors49 requires a more complete understanding of the functionality of the virome. Phage populations may be more complex than a mere reflection of bacterial communities, making it likely they contribute directly to disease development, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)42,50 and other GI conditions. Conversely, it may be possible to reinvent/repurpose centuries-old phage therapy to deliver health benefits by, for example, returning the patient to a eubiotic state, which is the intention of FMT. However, currently there is little consideration of viral populations in such approaches and it is imperative that donor screening of viromes as well as all components of the gut microbiota is implemented in this age of precision medicine.51

Coevolutionary dynamics of gut bacteriophages and bacteria

Several hypothetical models have been proposed to account for phage-driven intestinal dysbiosis (Figure 1).52 In the ‘Kill the Winner’ model, phages target and kill dominant commensal bacteria that are usually growing the fastest, thus reducing their numbers in the GI tract. The model relies on the specific bacterial population being relatively high within the community as phages cannot actively move and so rely on opportunistic contact with their bacterial host (or prey) in order to infect and reproduce. This approach is therefore only a consideration for dominant members of an ecosystem, with only limited evidence of this occurring within the gut.53 Even contrived models of the gut microbiota, with the composition stacked towards a single bacterial strain (E. coli) alongside coliphage infection, fail to demonstrate the phenomena.54 It is possible that the physical structure and physiological nature of the gut environment restricts such interactions and protects bacterial populations from phage contact.

Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms of phage-driven intestinal dysbiosis. 

In the ‘Kill the Winner’ model, phages target and kill dominant commensal bacteria that are usually growing the fastest, thus reducing their numbers in the GI tract. In the ‘Biological Weapon’ model, commensal bacteria use the phages they carry as weapons to kill competing bacteria, causing a decrease in bacteria, leading to dysbiosis. The ‘Community Shuffling’ model proposes that environmental stressors such as antibiotic therapy, oxidative stress or inflammation can trigger the introduction of prophage into bacteria, resulting in lytic infection of symbiotic bacteria, altering the relationship between symbionts and pathobionts. The ‘Emerging new bacterial strain’ model suggests the potential to increase virulence through acquisition of genetic material – in effect establishing lysogeny in the host rather than inducing lysis.

Another mechanism is the ‘Biological Weapon’ model, whereby commensal bacteria use the phages they carry as weapons to kill competing bacteria, leading to dysbiosis. By killing competitor bacteria, phages indirectly benefit their host. This model may play an important role in protection against pathogens, although additional experimental evidence is lacking. Within the gut environment, competition experiments between lysogen and sensitive strains of E. faecalis in monocolonized mice showed a transient enrichment of lysogen over sensitive strains.55

The ‘Community Shuffling’ model proposes that environmental stressors such as antibiotic therapy, oxidative stress or inflammation trigger the introduction of prophage into bacteria, resulting in lytic infection of symbiotic bacteria, altering the relationship between symbionts and pathobionts.56 Subinhibitory concentrations of certain antibiotics, including quinolones or beta-lactams, can drive this phenomenon in various gut bacteria.57 Inflammation, through the exacerbation of oxidative stress, may also be responsible for prophage induction.50

In addition to the three models described, which rely on the phages’ ability to lyse their hosts, phages can also transfer genes to bacteria to modify their phenotype, which is seen in the ‘Emerging New Bacterial Strain’ model – in effect establishing lysogeny in their host rather than lysing it. Within the complex environment of the gut, what drives these differential behaviours is unknown, but it is vital to understanding the phage–bacterial ecosystem. Several gut metagenomics studies have highlighted the potential of the virome to confer antibiotic resistance,10,45 and that this behaviour can facilitate the transfer of large bacterial DNA segments between strains. Further supporting this theory, it has been shown that the bacteriophage are able to control bacterial biological functions through the bacteriophage transcription factors during the lysogenic cycle. Specifically, it has been shown that during lysogeny the phage transcription factor Cro can activate the enterohaemorrhagic E. coli type III secretion system (T3SS), which has been shown to enhance the virulence of the bacteria.58 Mathematical modelling of the interaction suggests that the nested infection networks affecting phage and bacteria dynamics may involve a much more complex multi-type Lotka–Volterra framework.59 This logistic equation mathematically plots population growth when two species are competing for similar resources within the same environment.

Conversely, gut bacteria simultaneously evolve and develop microbial defence mechanisms against predatory bacteriophages. The most well studied is the restriction modification system involving bacterial restriction endonucleases which cleave double-stranded phage DNA.60 To prevent destruction of its own DNA, methyl groups are added.61 Bacteria can also block or hide their membrane receptors to limit phage propagation,62 or increase production of competitive inhibitors that render phage receptors unavailable to phage docking.63 As a failsafe, bacteria can also self-destruct by ‘abortive infection’, preventing spread of the infection to neighboring cells.64

The bacterial defense mechanism currently gaining most interest in the context of the gut microbiota is CRISPR-Cas.65,66 CRISPR (clustered regularly interspersed palindromic repeats) loci together with their associated cas genes provide acquired immunity and defense by bacteria. CRISPR-Cas interfere with phage replication and can play a significant role in microbial community structure, including within the gut microbiota, although they are not infallible.67 The importance of this phenomena within the gut microbiota requires deep sequencing metagenomics studies to allow CRISPR-Cas systems to be studied.

These evolutionary survival tactics by the bacteriophages and bacteria makes for a dynamic and constant arms race, often referred to as the Red Queen race/hypothesis in which both parties are ‘continuously running to stay in the same place’ or evolving in equal measure but keeping pace with each other, resulting in a zero-sum game. In an experimental model that highlights this, a novel bacteriophage, p10 (related to Myovirus Felix O1), its host E. coli strain LF82 and an Ecoli strain MG1655 (to which p10 cannot bind), a virulent bacteriophage was able to adapt by utilizing the gut microbiota to mutate and infect the Ecoli strain MG1655 within a murine gut but not in vitro. This suggests that the gut microbiota are key intermediates for phage mutations, allowing them to switch host and to exist.68 Understanding more about the mechanisms that maintain relationships and the balance between bacteriophages and bacterial populations in the gut is crucial in understanding the perturbations that occur in the healthy gut microbiota which result in diseased states such as IBD and cancer.

Most studies have focused on the dysbiotic process in bacterial populations, wherein there is a shift from symbiotic to pathogenic. Four different scenarios can occur with respect to the bacteriophage and the bacterial population which can either suggest manifestations of disease or stable equilibrium states leading up to inflammation. If the bacterial richness increases with a parallel increase in the richness of the bacteriophage component, it would signify that the latter are proliferating simply as a result of more host bacteria to prey open. Conversely, a decrease in both components could be interpreted as scarcity of bacterial prey adversely impacting the bacteriophages. However, an increase in bacteriophage richness with a concomitant decrease in bacterial richness has a totally different connotation as it implies that the former is the driver and orchestrator of these changes. This pattern of changes has been documented in IBD in the seminal paper by Norman and colleagues.42 Finally, the combination of increased bacterial richness accompanied by a decrease in bacteriophage richness implies that the bacteria have a survival advantage and are the initiators of change. It is imperative that robust disease definitions are adhered to in disease conditions to elucidate the exact nature of the perturbation of the intricate relationship of bacteriophages and bacteria in the gut.

The recent increase in metagenomic studies will allow these interactions to be interrogated in more detail in the coming years. This approach has already led to discovery of hitherto unknown viruses. A particularly striking case of a virus discovered via metagenomics is crAssphage, which is by far the most abundant human-associated virus known, comprising up to 90% of sequences in the gut virome.69 The significance of these viruses in health or disease is still not clear.

The gut virome in GI diseases

When considering the role of the enteric virome in the aetiopathogenesis of GI diseases, the bridge from association to causation needs to be crossed. Enteric eukaryotic viruses and bacteriophages can kill host cells and bacteria respectively to release potential activators of chronic inflammation. The role of the bacterial microbiome as a possible intermediary in this interaction has been documented in Atg16/1-deficient mice, where murine norovirus induced pathological changes that were akin to Crohn’s disease (CD), a chronic relapsing and remitting IBD, and these changes were abolished with antibiotics.70 A further experimental model has shown that pretreatment with an antiviral cocktail caused mice to display more severe dextran sulphate sodium-induced colitis when compared with mice that were not pretreated, highlighting that the virome may play a protective role against colitis. Furthermore, they found mice that were reconstituted with TLR3+7 agonists had resolution of their colitis and suggested that the resident intestinal virome through TLR3- and TLR7-mediated IFN-β secretion by plasmacytoid dentritic cells plays a protective role in gut inflammation.71 These experimental model suggests the importance of the virus–bacterial-host interactions in GI diseases and highlights the importance of viruses as initiators of inflammation (Figure 2). However, evidence for specific viruses acting as triggers for IBD has not been validated in human studies72 and a full understanding of the role of the virome is needed.73 With newer metagenomic methods it is now possible to study the ‘entire virome’ as a cohesive ecological unit that can change as a whole and impact on host immunity and result in disease. The entire viral genetic material can now be assessed, but a large proportion of this cannot be correctly annotated as the viral database is still quite rudimentary. With increasing additions of sequences in the coming years, the identification and understanding of the gut virome will continue to improve.

Figure 2. Schematic representation of the alteration of the enteric virome and bacteriome in inflammatory bowel disease. 

There is an expansion of bacteriophages with increased richness of the gut virome and an associated decrease in richness and diversity of the gut bacteria leading to ‘microbial dysbiosis’, which could be the trigger for chronic inflammation in IBD. Alteration of the viral–bacterial dynamics may also lead to increased bacterial lysis and release of microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) that could attract inflammatory cells in the lamina propria. The luminal changes could also be an ‘epiphenomenon’ as a result of the inflammatory cascade.

Inflammatory bowel disease

Evidence suggests that a core healthy gut phage community is reduced or altered in patients with IBD (Table 2).7476 This was first suggested by Lepage and colleagues, who identified higher numbers of bacteriophages by epifluorescence microscopy in mucosal samples of patients with CD compared to controls.50 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) identified bacteriophages as members of the Siphoviridae, Myoviridae and Podoviridae, which was confirmed by DNA sequencing. It was noted that patients with CD had more VLPs per biopsy than healthy individuals. Additionally, there were fewer VLPs per biopsy from ulcerated mucosa of CD patients than non-ulcerated specimens. In an experimental model it has been shown that the gut inflammation is the driver for bacteriophage transfer; specifically, it was shown that transfer of the prophage SopEΦ between two Salmonella Typhimurium strains SL1344 and ATCC14028S, was increased in the presence of gut inflammation, with a >55% lysogenic conversion to ATCC14028S compared to a lysogenic conversion reduction of 105 in the absence of any inflammation.77

UC, ulcerative colitis; CD, Crohn’s disease; HC, Healthy controls.

Metagenomic surveys have confirmed these virome alterations in patients with CD.74,78,79 Ileal biopsies, colonic biopsies and gut washes from paediatric CD patients and ileal biopsies from control patients78 identified the same three Caudovirales family members identified by TEM.50 Although the largest number of virus sequence matches were found in the patients with CD, the study lacked an in-depth analysis of differences in richness and diversity of the gut virome in these patients. This finding was replicated by Wang and colleagues in their analysis of colonic biopsies from IBD patients and controls, wherein a difference in both abundance of viruses and diversity within the virome was noted.79 There was a suggestion that viral abundance and diversity were associated with differences in the bacterial composition within the colon, suggesting a role of the gut virome in bacterial dysbiosis.

The report from Pérez-Brocal, on the other hand, was the first to use metagenomics to systematically analyze the correlation of the viral and bacterial components of the microbiome in patients with CD.74 The study confirmed the presence of the same three dominant Caudovirales family members but in contrast showed decreased diversity and abundance of viral sequences in patients with CD as opposed to controls. They also found a parallel decrease in diversity and abundance of bacteria in CD patients, which has been replicated in multiple other studies. One of the key findings from the analysis of viral sequences was an over-representation of Synechococcus phage S CBS1 and Retroviridae family of viruses in CD patients, identifying them as potential disease biomarkers.

A more definitive study highlighting the interaction of the gut virome and its intrinsic interplay with bacteria was carried out on a cohort of UK IBD patients and their healthy household contacts [12 household controls, 18 CD and 42 ulcerative colitis (UC)] and subsequently validated in two US IBD cohorts.42 A significant expansion of Caudovirales bacteriophages in both CD and UC patients was noted. No such distinction was noted with richness or diversity of Microviridae, suggesting that the bacteriophage increase was restricted to certain taxa. Significant reductions in bacterial diversity and richness were observed in both CD and UC patients, which was inversely correlated with the expansion of Caudovirales bacteriophages. This led to speculation that the viral changes were the primary driver in the process, with secondary shifts in the bacterial population. The exact reason for the expansion of the Caudovirales bacteriophages was unknown, but could have been related to diet or activation of prophages from commensal gut bacteria. Although Caudovirales bacteriophages expanded in both CD and UC patients in the US cohorts, the specific relationships between bacteriophage and bacterial taxa seen in the UK cohort were not seen. Bacteroidaceae bacterial families were correlated inversely with several Caudovirales taxa in CD, but Caudovirales were positively correlated with Enterobacteriaceae, Pasteurelloacaeae and Prevotellaceae in CD. These correlations were not present in UC patients, suggesting a (environmental/lifestyle) distinction between these two subgroups of patients.

The relationship of phages and their bacterial ‘prey’ was studied in IBD patients from the cohort of Norman and colleagues, with specific reference to Faecalibacterium prausnitzii.80 A higher occurrence and proportion of some F. prausnitzii temperate phages in patients with IBD suggests that this increased activity is possibly related to the depletion of F. prausnitzii. This result is clinically very pertinent since IBD patients have been documented to have a lower abundance of F. prausnitzii in their microbiota.81 The mechanistic relationship of the phages and their bacterial hosts needs to be studied to elucidate the causative role of the virome in IBD.

Most studies on gut viral populations have focused on DNA viruses, of which bacteriophages make up the largest cohort and the methods utilized do not address or include RNA and enveloped viruses.42 This obvious deficiency needs to be addressed as many pathogenic enteric viruses are RNA viruses. However, a small study on two normal participants found that the majority of RNA viruses detected in the faeces were plant pathogens and most likely diet-derived.82 The likelihood of such dietary-acquired bacteriophages acting as triggers for changing gut bacterial populations and initiating inflammation is an attractive hypothesis that needs to be validated. Conversely, the transient contact of diet-derived RNA with the bacterial population in the lumen and the gut immune system brings into question their importance in the pathogenesis of IBD.

Current microbial therapeutics and consideration of the virome

With recent advancements in sequencing technology the diversity of the enteric human virome is being increasingly revealed, leading to new possibilities for altering the gut microbiota to prevent or treat disease or to reduce disease risk. Recognizing that the gut microbiota can be manipulated by diet, smoking, prebiotics, antibiotics, probiotics, synbiotics and FMT,83 attempts have been made to restore human health utilizing a variety of these approaches. However, there is a paucity of data reflecting their impact on the gut virome.

FMT is a successful treatment for refractory Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), with cure rates of 87%.84 FMT also shows promise in IBD, although additional studies are required as current findings indicate donor selection is crucial for successful outcome.8588 While shifts in bacterial communities using FMT are well established, less is known on its role in altering the gut virome and its influence on disease activity. A recent study assessing FMT in the treatment of CDI showed that CDI patients who responded to FMT took on a more significant donor-derived enteric virome component compared to nonresponders. In addition, all recipients infused with donor feces containing greater Caudovirales richness than the recipient were cured.51 Furthermore, it suggested that responders to FMT has significantly lower eukaryotic virome richness than nonresponders at baseline.89 These studies highlight that restoration of virome communities are as important as the bacterial component, with donor selection – based on virome characteristics – needing to become more considered. A further study reported outcomes following treatment of CDI using sterile aecal filtrate transfer.90 This filtrate contained only the bacterial debris, proteins, antimicrobial compounds, metabolic products and oligonucleotides/DNA rather than intact microorganisms. Following the fecal filtrate administration, fecal samples were dominated by Lactococcus bacteriophages and the phageome of the patient was substantially altered, which persisted after 6 weeks. Broecker and colleagues used FMT to treat CDI and found phages were equally abundant in the treatment-responsive patient and donor.91 They also found that a healthy microbiota appears to be characterized by low phage abundance and that patients receiving FMT established a virome that was similar to that of the donor.47 They therefore suggested that FMT transferred a core population of viruses. Significantly, on longer-term follow up they found phage communities of the treated patient remained similar to those of the donor in composition diversity and richness. These studies suggest that FMT may in some way alter the gut virome, but limitations in our ability to fully characterize the gut virome limits our understanding of how they are transferred and their specific role in response to FMT.

The metagenomic assessment of the gut virome has also been performed in a solitary patient with refractory CDI who was followed up over a period of nearly 5 years after FMT.47,92 In this study, the virome profile remained stable and donor-like over the period of sequential follow up, suggesting stabilization of the gut virome over time. There are no definitive phages identified against C. difficile so far and this may preclude their definitive role in causation of this infection.93 However, the virome may play a role in clearance of CDI, as the study by Zuo and colleagues showed that recipients treated with donor feces consisting of a greater richness of Caudovirales than that of the recipient were all cured with FMT.51

Only a single study to date has reported on changes in the virome of FMT in the context of IBD. The study by Chehoud and colleagues investigated the impact of a single healthy adult donor and three pediatric UC recipient patients who received 22–30 FMT treatments over the course of 6–12 weeks. Using metagenomics, samples from the donor and the three recipients (before, during and after FMT treatment) were assessed and showed that treatment of UC using FMT was associated with the transfer of numerous temperate phages, but no viruses corresponding to pathogenic viruses that infect human cells were detected.94 The authors proposed that the transfer of phages was a characteristic of FMT although the stability of phage populations or the long-term clinical significance of phage transfer requires further investigation.


Characterization of the gut virome is still in its infancy, with a requirement for new viruses to be identified and characterized in order that its full functional impact can be defined. We are a very long way from proving Koch’s postulates of disease causality for the gut virome and its constituents. Major questions remain in order to allow the field to move forward (Box 2). The continued evolution of high-throughput sequencing accessibility is allowing our understanding of the gut virome to increase exponentially, but this still lags behind our ability to interrogate other components of the gut microbiota. The ‘elephant in the room’ remains that our understanding of viromes to date is principally built and based on fragments of sequences and fragmented genomes of prophages which may not generate productive/infective phages. It is highly possible that the gut virome may be an undiscovered entity in understanding disease pathways that contribute to the inflammatory process. However, in order to discover this, consideration of the gut virome needs to parallel that of gut bacterial and fungal diversity. Once the intrinsic tripartite relationship between the three components of the gut microbiome is clearly understood and its alteration documented in IBD, the field of microbial-based IBD therapeutics will be transformed.

Major questions that remain to be answered in order to allow the gut virome field to move forward.

How should controls be selected? What is an appropriate control/comparator group for virome studies in different healthy or diseased cohorts? Such a group needs to account or exclude key confounders of individual microbiome variability, such as age, sex, lifestyle, environment, geography and behavior that can all to some extent impact on the structure and function of microbiomes in the short or long term. The use of related individuals living in the same household and environment may be a better comparator group than unrelated randomly sourced individuals.
2. What sampling approach to use? Cross-study comparisons of datasets is difficult if not impossible due to differences in sample collection, handling, storage and processing (e.g. VLP isolation, DNA/RNA extraction, sequencing platforms and parameters). There is an urgent need to develop standardized protocols and establish Gold Standard procedures and protocols.95
3. Viromics. There is currently no open-access, easy-to-use bioinformatics pipeline that uses raw sequence reads that can remove host DNA, search for bacterial contaminants, and assign taxonomy and functionality to viruses within a sample. Innovative viromics tools have recently been described for characterizing aquatic viromes (e.g. iVirus96), although their application to human virome analyses is limited by the need to incorporate modifications to filter out nonviral sequences.


Contributed by

Contributors: All authors contributed equally to the literature search, preparation of figures and panels, and writing of the manuscript.

Funding: IM and GH would like to acknowledge support from the Fellowship Support Award (Grant code: RG12724-15) through the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (ISSF @ Aberdeen).

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest in preparing this article.

Glossary: Antibiotic resistance: the ability of bacteria and other microorganisms to resist the effects of an antibiotic to which they were once sensitive.

Bacteriophage: any virus that can infect and live within a bacterium, replicating itself and which usually destroys its host.

Bioinformatics: computational approaches to the analysis, management and storage of biological data.

Colitis: inflammation of the colon/large intestine.

CRISPR: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats are segments of prokaryotic DNA that can be used to facilitate genome editing.

Dysbiosis: an imbalance in microbial diversity that is usually characterized by a decrease in specific members and an increase in other members – usually with less beneficial properties.

Enrichment cultures: growth medium with specific factors that will support the growth of a particular microorganism while inhibiting the growth of others.

Faecal biotherapy: classification of all processes that transfer faecal microbes from a donor to a recipient.

Faecal microbial transplantation (FMT): the process of transferring faecal bacteria from a donor (healthy individual) to a recipient.

Gram-negative commensal-dependent NF-ĸB signalling: The process through which Gram-negative commensal bacteria in the gut activate NF-kappaB immune signaling to maintain a constant state of physiological inflammation in the gut.

Gut bacterial community: the collection of bacteria which resides in the gut. In humans this usually comprises predominantly of members of the Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria phyla.

Gut virome: the collection of viruses that inhabits the gut environment and which is known to be highly individual.

High-throughput sequencing: techniques that allow the genetic code of the DNA sequence to be elucidated through the use of rapid analysis methods.

Horizontal gene transfer: movement of genetic material between organisms rather than through vertical transmission – that is, parent to offspring.

Host–microbial homeostasis: the coevolution of the host and its resident commensal microbiota to the mutual benefit of all stakeholders.

Immunocompromised: a state in which an individual’s immune system is weakened or absent and therefore less able to fight infections.

Immunosuppression: a reduction in the activation or efficacy of the immune system

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): an umbrella term for chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel, including CD and UC.

Intestinal microbiome: the collective genomes of all microorganisms in the gut ecosystem.

Metagenomic sequencing: direct sequencing or genetic analysis of all genomes contained within a sample.

Microbial transfer experiment: transfer of microbial material from a donor to a recipient.

Monozygotic twins: twins who develop from one zygote, meaning they share identical genetic information.

Pathobionts: any potentially pathological or disease-causing organism.

Prebiotic: nondigestible foodstuff that induces the growth or activity of microorganisms (e.g. bacteria and fungi) that contribute to the well-being of their host.

Precision medicine: medical care designed to optimize therapeutic benefit for specific patients based on individual patient profiling.

Probiotic: live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host.

Refractory C. difficile infection: antibiotic resistant C. difficile infection.

Restriction modification system (bacterial): a bacterial defence system against invading foreign unmethylated DNA, such as from phages and plasmids. Unmethylated DNA sites are recognized and cleaved by specific bacterial restriction endonucleases.

Transkingdom interactions: signalling/communication between organisms belonging to different phylogenetic kingdoms, such as bacteria and viruses.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM): a form of microscopy derived from electrons that have been passed through a specimen and in which the whole image is formed.

Virulence factor: molecules produced by microorganisms to enhance their ability to colonize their host.

Virus-like particles (VLPs): multimeric, often multiprotein nanostructure assembled from viral structural proteins.

Western diet: a diet containing high levels of fat and sugar compared to a standard diet, to mimic the high caloric intake of the diet of the Western world.

Search strategy and selection criteria: References for this review were identified through searches of PubMed, Medline and Embase with the search terms ‘gut microbiota’, ‘virome’, ‘bacteriophage’, ‘inflammatory bowel disease’ and ‘metagenomics’, without language restrictions, from their origin until April 2018. We focused on original articles, reviews and meta-analyses. Articles were also identified through searches of the authors’ own files. Only papers published in English were reviewed. We included literature and other data sources that we judged to be important and timely contributions to this topic. The final reference list was generated on the basis of originality and relevance to the broad scope of this review.

Contributor Information

Indrani Mukhopadhya, Gastrointestinal Research Group, Division of Applied Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK Gut Health Group, The Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.

Jonathan P. Segal, St. Mark’s Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, UK Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK.

Simon R. Carding, Gut Microbes and Health Research Programme, The Quadram Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

Ailsa L. Hart, St. Mark’s Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, UK Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, Department of Surgery and Cancer, London, UK.

Georgina L. Hold, Microbiome Research Centre, St George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2217, Australia.

Medical Science Researchers with infinitely more intelligence, integrity and knowledge do not agree with Fauci, Birx, Gates or Trump, who are all just opportunistic politicians who can demand that you believe their lies under coercive force, duress, and threat of punishment or death.  These tyrants can and are forcing you to take so-called preventive measures that will ultimately kill you and your family.

I realize most will not take the time to educate themselves on the subject, but just stop, take a breath, turn off the TV and think for a minute.  There is not one single thing they are saying and doing that makes even one ounce of sense.  Are you so addled that you can no longer think or apply logic to a situation?  Before you get your mask on, stand in the vaccination line maintaining social distancing, think, think and think some more.  Once you accept the vaccine, there is no retreat. 

From 911 To Corona Vaccines


Part I: The Plan for Total RESET of the World

Let us start with a coup attempt on the US, a US presidential assassination and a successful US coup, all committed by the same family. Prescott Bush attempted a fascist coup in 1933.

His son GHW Bush was heavily involved in assassinating J.F. Kennedy.

 When he became president, GHW Bush stole trillions from the US. Ambassador, Lee Wanta, with the help of Reagan, amassed a fortune of $2.7 trillion, funds earmarked by Reagan to pay America’s national debt, restore the nation’s infrastructure and fund a world free of debt based currencies. “However, after Reagan left office and George H.W. Bush assumed the Presidency, Ambassador Wanta was kidnapped and imprisoned in Switzerland, transferred to an American prison where he was held without due process for years and the money disappeared, taken by the Bush family.

GHW Bush then helped his son, George, become an unelected president, with the assistance of his son, Jeb, who rigged the Florida vote, and by depending on the vote of the Supreme Court which gave the presidency to George Bush Junior, though he ran second in the popular vote, even with the rigging. GHW Bush, flush with trillions, may have helped some justices decide on what side their vote was buttered. What is amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion US dollars, equivalent to the entire GNP of the United States for several years. Once in office, buildings almost immediately began to fall, buildings that were structurally designed not to fall, buildings for which the Bush’s provided security, buildings that had been ensured for billions from terrorism immediately beforehand, buildings that contained criminal evidence on SEC and FBI cases. As they fell, ‘put’ orders, placed on stock of the airlines involved, were paying out $40 billion to insiders. Buildings fell as they never had before. They fell, though, remarkably consistent with rigging for controlled demlition.

According to secret and long-hidden documents obtained for Body of Secrets, the Joint Chiefs of Staff drew up and approved plans for what may be the most corrupt plan ever created by the U.S. government. [Not quite]. In the name of anti-Communism, they proposed launching a secret and bloody war of terrorism against their own country, a massive ‘false-flag’ to trick the American public into supporting ill-conceived wars to be immediately launched against Iraq and Cuba. Six more Persian Gulf nations would be invaded in succession.

The Cuba war was code named Operation Northwoods, the plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war. The specifics are similar in terms of high-jacking planes and using drones. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft could appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the Government of Cuba. An aircraft at Elgin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area.

At a designated time, the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone [a remotely controlled unmanned aircraft]. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft would be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point, the passenger-carrying aircraft would descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Elgin AFB, where arrangements would have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status.

The drone aircraft meanwhile would continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone would be transmitting on the international distress frequency a “May Day” message stating it is under attack by Cuban MiG aircraft. The transmission would be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft triggered by radio signal. This would allow ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) radio stations in the Western Hemisphere, to tell the U.S. what had happened to the aircraft instead of the U.S. trying to “sell” the incident. Finally, there was a plan to “make it appear that Communist Cuban MiGs had destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack. It was a particularly believable operation given the decade of shoot downs that had just taken place.

What may be one the most corrupt plans ever created by the U.S. government, was more than eclipsed by George Bush, his cronies, and his handlers, for the plan executed on 9/11, involved killing four plane loads of civilian passengers and more than 3,000 civilians in NYC, before even more people died overseas.

The whole plan also dovetailed with the desires of a think tank named ‘Project for a New American Century’ (PNAC). The PNAC program, in a nutshell: America’s military must rule out even the possibility of a serious global or regional challenger anywhere in the world. The regime of Saddam Hussein must be toppled immediately, by U.S. forces, if necessary, and the entire Middle East must be reordered according to an American plan.

 PNAC’s most important study notes that selling this plan to the American people will likely take a long time, “absent some catastrophic catalyzing event – like a new ‘Pearl Harbor” (PNAC, Rebuilding America’s Defenses (1997), p.51).

PNAC’s policy document, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses,” openly advocated for total global military domination.

The original signatories are listed here for people to see, who sought this and their connections:

 · Elliott Abrams, a former Reagan-era Assistant Secretary of State for Inter-American Affairs. During the Iran/Contra scandal, Abrams pleaded guilty to two misdemeanor counts of lying to Congress but was later pardoned by the first Bush administration. He subsequently became president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He then became a member of Bush’s National Security Council.

 · Gary Bauer, a Republican presidential candidate in 2000, who currently is president of an organization named American Values.

· William J. Bennett, who served during the Reagan and first Bush administrations as U.S. Secretary of Education and Drug Czar. Upon leaving government office, Bennett became a “distinguished fellow” at the conservative Heritage Foundation, co-founded Empower America, and established himself as a self-proclaimed expert on morality with his authorship of The Book of Virtues.

· Jeb Bush, the son of former President George Herbert Walker Bush and brother of current President George W. Bush. At the time of PNAC’s founding, Jeb Bush was a candidate for the Florida governor’s seat, a position which he currently holds.

· Dick Cheney, the former White House Chief of Staff to Gerald R. Ford, six-term Congressman, and Secretary of Defense to the first President Bush, was serving as president of the oil-services giant Halliburton Company at the time of PNAC’s founding. He subsequently became U.S. vice president under George W. Bush.

· Eliot A. Cohen, a professor of strategic studies at John Hopkins University

· Paula Dobriansky, vice president and director of the Washington office of the Council on Foreign Relations. Currently Dobriansky serves in the Bush administration as Undersecretary of State for Global Affairs.

· Steve Forbes, publisher, billionaire, and Republican presidential candidate in 1996 and 2000. Forbes has also campaigned actively on behalf of the “flat tax,” which would reduce the federal tax burden for wealthy individuals like himself.

· Aaron Friedberg, professor of politics and international affairs; Director, Center of International Studies; Director, Research Program in International Security, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University.

· Francis Fukuyama, author of The End of History and the Last Man; Dean of the Faculty and Bernard L. Schwartz Professor of International Political Economy at the Paul H. Nitzke School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University. Appointed to the President’s Council on Bioethics by George W. Bush, January 2002.

· Frank Gaffney – conservative columnist; founder and president of the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C. Web-site:

· Fred C. Ikle, “distinguished scholar” at the Center for Strategic and International Studies

· Donald Kagan, professor of history and classics at Yale University and the author of books including While America Sleeps: Self-Delusion, Military Weakness, and the Threat to Peace Today; A Twilight Struggle: American Power and Nicaragua, 1977-1990; and The Origins of War and the Preservation of Peace. Kagan is also a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a contributing editor at the Weekly Standard and a Washington Post columnist, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Alexander Hamilton fellow in American diplomatic history at American University. Past experience includes: Deputy for Policy in the State Department’s Bureau of Inter-American Affairs (1985-1988); State Department’s Policy Planning Staff member (1984-1985); speechwriter to Secretary of State George P. Shultz (1984-1985); foreign policy advisor to Congressman Jack Kemp (1983); Special Assistant to the Deputy Director of the United States Information Agency (1983); Assistant Editor at the Public Interest (1981).

· Zalmay Khalilzad, an Afghan-American who was the only Muslim among the group’s original signatories and the only signatory who was not a native-born U.S. citizen. Khalilzad became the Bush administration’s special envoy to Afghanistan after the fall of the Taliban as well as is special envoy to the Iraqi opposition to Saddam Hussein. Khalilzad has written about information warfare, and in 1996 (in pre-Taliban days), he served as a consultant to the oil company Unocal Corporation (UNOCAL) regarding a “risk analysis” for its proposed pipeline project through Afghanistan and Pakistan.

· William Kristol, PNAC’s chairman, is also editor of the Weekly Standard, a Washington-based political magazine. His past involvements have included: lead of the Project for the Republican Future, chief of staff to Vice President J. Danforth Quayle, chief of staff to Secretary of Education William J. Bennett under the Reagan administration, taught politics at the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.

· I. Lewis Scooter Libby, who later became chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney.

· Norman Podhoretz, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and author of works such as Patriotism and its Enemies.

· J. Danforth Quayle, former vice president under President George Herbert Walker Bush and a presidential candidate himself in 1996.

· Peter W. Rodman, who served in the State Department and the National Security Council under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Herbert Walker Bush, became the current Bush administration’s Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security affairs in 2001.

· Stephen P. Rosen, Beton Michael Kaneb Professor of National Security and Military Affairs at Harvard University.

· Henry S. Rowen was president of the RAND Corporation from 1967-1972. He served under former presidents Reagan and Bush as chairman of the National Intelligence Council (1981-83) and Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Affairs (1989-91). He currently holds the title of “senior fellow” at the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace

· Donald H. Rumsfeld served former President Gerald R. Ford as chief of transition after Richard M. Nixon’s resignation, later becoming Ford’s chief of staff and secretary of defense from 1974-75. He subsequently served from 1990-93 as CEO of General Instrument Corporation and later as Chairman of the Board of Gilead Sciences, a pharmaceutical company. In 1998 he served as chairman of the bi-partisan US Ballistic Missile Threat Commission. Under President George W. Bush, he once again assumed the post of Secretary of Defense.

· Vin Weber, a former Republican congressman from Minnesota, is now a well-connected lobbyist who has represented such firms as AT&T, Lockheed Martin and Microsoft. Weber is also vice chairman of Empower America and a former fellow of the Progress and Freedom Foundation. · George Weigel, a Roman Catholic religious and political commentator, is a “senior fellow” at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.

· Paul Dundes Wolfowitz, formerly Dean and Professor of International Relations at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, became Undersecretary of Defense for President George W. Bush in 2001.

Part Two:

The Plan for Total Domination of the World – Bioweapons

Most people now know or are learning that 9/11 was an inside job – that the US government attacked its own people to remove people’s rights here and to generate a home-made justification for wars in the Middle East that would give them billions in oil and opium.

Some people are impressed by a building falling that wasn’t even hit by a plane, others by how all the buildings fell into their own foot print and how rapidly, for all the world just like a planned demolition.

Others are affected by seeing that no plane hit the Pentagon at all. 9/11 FACT: The Pentagon Was Hit by A Cruise Missile from The US military arsenal.

 People know that 9/11 led to the Patriot Act and Homeland Security, TSA, and laws and executive orders that gutted the Constitution, based on terrorism committed by the US government itself. But the country should refer to 9/11-Anthrax not just 9/11 because without including the anthrax attack and what it led to, the public misses the full picture.

 9/11 was only the first part of an immense plan for a full scale attack on the US and anthrax was critical to getting the second part of the plan into place. The anthrax attack came shortly after 9/11. The country was attacked twice. And that anthrax, too, came from the US government – to be exact, from the Fort Detrick and the US bioweapons lab run by USAMRIID, the United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Disease. As with 9/11, others were blamed for the anthrax attack – a single scientist with 25 years experience at USAMRIID and with no history of political involvement or mental instability. He is alleged to have committed “suicide” and the FBI closed the case. But Sen. Leahy says: ‘It’s not closed’

In the case of 9/11, it is not closed anymore. People are asking for a war crimes tribunal. As for what is planned now, it must be stopped. The 9/11 military attack led to the Patriot Act and the Department of Homeland Security and the war in Iraq (and beyond). The attack was highly visible and so was passing the laws, even if the contents were not investigated thoroughly. But the Anthrax bioweapon attack was more by stealth. And though it killed very few people, it was also instrumental in the push for the war in Iraq because, among others, it was sent to two Senators who had been opposing Bush’s plan for war. They took it as a message and stopped objecting.

But, more significantly, for the second part of the plan, the anthrax attack led to Pandemic laws and arrangements that virtually no one noticed. Yet the anthrax part of the 9/11-Antrhax attack is actually the much more deadly part of the plan to attack the US. The intent is to kill hundreds of millions. The laws set up power to do literally anything to Americans, themselves, and to strip every single asset and resource here.

In preparation for the second part of 9/11 and starting before it, under Clinton and continuing under Bush and Obama, the US government has spent a fortune building concentration camps and gas chambers, both with rail tracks into them, and boxcars with shackles welded into them.

“The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist.” – Winston Churchill, Nov. 21, 1943 Those boxcars now contain guillotines at the head of them. The article refers to them as UN box cars.

Perhaps even more incredibly, Obamacare includes coding from the UN and WHO which have no legal right to insert anything into US law, and that was put there by Homeland Security. It begins by describing the authority that would decide on execution, but what is described does not resemble in any way a civilian criminal trial by jury. Then it lists as “death by legal execution” the following means of killing almost none of which are forms of legal execution in the US.


Legal Execution

All executions performed at the behest of the judiciary or ruling authority [whether permanent or temporary] as:

· asphyxiation by gas

· beheading, decapitation (by guillotine)

· electrocution

· hanging

· poisoning

· shooting

· other specified means [???]

· Injury undetermined whether accidentally or purposely inflicted [Torture? Human experimentation? Satanic sacrifice?]

The list leaves off cannibalism which may, however, be included under the last two items and is relevant given recent indictments of the Pope and the Head of the Church of England for participation in the 9th Circle Cult which participates in exactly that.

These archives clearly indicate a premeditated plan for centuries by the Jesuits to ritually murder kidnapped newborn babies and then consume their blood, born of a twisted notion of deriving spiritual power from the lifeblood of the innocent and thereby assuring the political stability of the Papacy in Rome. There also exists a quest for immortality, or life extension believed to be derived drinking the adrenochrome (adrenalized blood of children who are tortured to produce adrenalin).  

Every Pope was expected to, and did in fact, participate in these monstrous rituals … These acts are not only genocidal but systemic and institutionalized in nature, and indict the Roman Catholic Church and the Jesuits as a whole, and every Pope since at least in the year 1773.

“I was there, I saw the whole thing. I was told they were kids from the juvenile detention centers in Brussels. They were let loose naked in the forest and hunted down and shot. The killers included Prince Friso of Holland and his wife’s friend, the billionaire George Soros, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, and Prince Albert of Belgium. After they shot down the young ones, they cut off the boys’ penises and held them up like trophies, cheering and applauding.”

The Kennedy assassination is also linked to the Vatican and the Jesuits. How many high-ranking political figures involved in the second phase of the plan for an all out attack on the US are also connected to the Vatican and Jesuits and are involved in the 9th Circle.  (See video below)

This is far from a side issue. For people to begin to comprehend that a large group of people organized an incredibly complex scheme to murder passengers on four planes, at least 3000 more in NYC, thousands of US service men, and over a million Iraqis, as well as what is additionally planned, which would far exceed all that, one needs some reference point for that astronomical level of depravity. The war plans, of course, did not stop with Iraq.  In fact, seven Persian Gulf nations were ultimately slated for attack and domination by the US and its forces.

The Pope drinking the blood of murdered newborn babies and George Soros and European royalty celebrating the hunting down and murdering and dismembering of children, perhaps give a reference point. And since there are guillotines now mounted in UN boxcars with shackles, the fascination with decapitation by Catholic leaders, stands out, as does the Vatican’s power at the UN. So, it’s relevant to note the bodies of 800 children found stuffed into a septic tank at a Catholic home for unwed mothers and children. babies-found-in-septic-tank-at-former-irish-home-for-unwed-mothers/

They were ritually decapitated and dismembered and are a reminder of an unfathomable disconnect between shows of piety or concern put on for the public and the deeds done out of view. (Did the nun in the background participate in murdering children in the photo?)

We are reminded of two presidents, one who stood in front of buildings that he’d had a part in bringing down, while professing his care about the thousands he’s helped kill in his drive for a war in which over a million died. One who wiped his eye over children allegedly shot at an elementary school in his quest to remove arms from the American public, while his DOJ was sending weapons to drug cartels in Mexico and while his DHS purchased a billion rounds of ammunition

, and he knows that boxcars with shackles and guillotines are waiting for millions of Americans.

During Bush’s two terms he did two interlocking things, without Congress, that arrange for a coup and for the invasion of the US by foreign troops and he got the states to agree to laws governing that coup and giving power to the invaders.

1. He wrote two presidential orders – 51 and 20 which lay out justifications for a president suspending the Constitution and Congress (but not restoring either) and the president then ruling alone with DHS, which 9/11 had established. Those two orders describe a coup.

2. He signed onto International Health Regulations with the WHO by which the WHO’s mere declaration of a level 6 pandemic emergency – no clear definition and no proof needed (hype, drama, hazmat costumes, and fake “exponential” numbers are sufficient).

The WHO and UN troops come into the US to take over at the local level through health crisis committees or declaration of Medical Martial Law. He pre-arranged for an invasion of the US by foreign troops and a foreign entity, both run by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds (the bankers) and they, by the Jesuits.

Later, Obama and Kerry officially signed a treaty (Kilgali Principles) with the UN providing for the automatic takeover of any US city or state merely upon the declaration of a state of Martial Law.  Over 1,000,000 fully armed and equipped UN troops are currently stationed within the US at the present time, awaiting activation.

 3. The state pandemic laws arrange for the WHO and UN (the Rockefellers, Rothschilds and UN troops) to micromanage financial plunder, asset stripping, forced human experimentation, and genocide at the local level, with all of it pushed through by Bush with the aid of the CDC (CIA).

So, the United States of American, as a constitutional and sovereign country, and the lives of hundreds of millions of Americans hang by a man-made bioweapon named Ebola, or COVID. The words of Phillip, the literal Nazi husband of Elizabeth Windsor, who herself has been indicted for the genocide of First Nation children in Canada, come to mind.

Philip, with his wife, both murderous pedovores: “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” This phrase has been repeated by none other than Bill Gates, regarding his own reincarnation. What is planned is the 2020 RESET, mass depopulation of Americans, and indentured peripheral nations comprising the empire, under a “health” charade of saving American lives from a pandemic, created by none other than themselves.

 The plan, a conspiracy of such gargantuan proportions that only the very greatest power of the homo capensis ‘blue-bloods’ could be behind it. It brings together epidemic disease and terrorism as a combined tool of mass murder. There is no question that vaccines have been selected as the means to intentionally and covertly administer the mechanism of the coordinated and selective kill. It is meant to create a medical drama leading to moving forward with “help” in the form of martial law, quarantines and forced vaccinations, drugs and chemicals on the entire population of the “American Empire”, as is occurring already in some states.

Exposing the truth of the 9/11 attack as an inside job makes it possible to expose, starkly, the murderous intent of “leaders” in the US and their handlers, and their absolute ease in killing the American people, as well as the people of other indentured nations, such as Canada, Britain, Western Europe, Australia and New Zealand.  Perhaps even sense their delight at their clever attack and its novelty.

But without the viral piece of 9/11 (Anthrax), the more hellish truth is missed: “They” are not finished and what comes next is even more disguised for they intend to blame a virus once again for their mass murder.

They murdered by the millions in 1918 and blamed a virus and even up to today, people fear innocent components of nature, rather than the true killers. How has a virus, a dead encapsulated waste product of cellular mitosis, become an insidious cunning invisible invader of the human body, with intention to cause harm?  How can a dead pod, an exosome, containing molecules discarded by replicating eukaryotes, ejected from the cell as dead waste products, gain this cunning?  The answer is…it can’t! 

Virus are so numerous and tiny, that occasionally one is accidently re-admitted into the interior of another eukaryote and contaminates the cell on the next replication cycle, making a defective copy of itself. So, you get a little ‘cold’, your immune system wipes out the foreign intruder and life goes on with hardly a notice.

But one can hardly ignore the annual ritual of the newly created and manufactured fake vaccines, supposedly able to target with precision the latest patented creation of the Ft. Detrick/U. of MD. efforts to distribute its flu viruses.  These vaccines have supposedly been studied, a novel vaccine has been developed and tested, manufactured by the billions by the time the new fake virus attacks during ‘flu season’? Thus, the public, in its ignorance, learns to believe lies about viruses’ non-existent intelligence and the efficacy of fake vaccines.  Have you not learned from your own life experience that there is neither any pill, nor vaccine that can cure or provide immunity against the common cold?  

As the Rockefeller’ pharmaceutical industry that put Hitler into office and now runs the WHO, CDC, etc. busily prepares Ebola/COVID, it’s time to realize that same industry has been killing continuously with drugs, drugs that kill more people than all their wars, while netting $trillions of profit.

 And it’s time to face that the 1918 “flu” did not kill millions of people. it was a fiction even larger than WMDs in Iraq. The world must realize the enormity of the lie it has been living with since 1918 and the unwarranted fear of disease that lie produced. It is a world shaping lie. And that gargantuan lie is repeated ceaselessly by the CDC and WHO.

Global fear of the non-existent Spanish flu is paramount because it directs people away from the actual killer – ‘vaccines’, and the men behind them. The lie of a flu killing millions provides the necessary basis of the false threat of Ebola/COVID. Expose the false fear of the Spanish flu and one sees it hides the fact that vaccines, not a virus at all, were central to the deaths of upwards of 20-50 million people. These deadly tuberculosis injections kept the fake flu going on steroids.

Once one removes fear of an invented flu, one can see the stark truth. Vaccines caused global mass murder. Vaccines were and are Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction. When one looks, one can see Bush harking back to 1918 in promoting his fascist pandemic laws and one can also see the glaring reality of what vaccines actually did.

You see, they can put anything they want into a vaccine serum vial while claiming it has any capabilities they want to attribute to it.  The public is trusting and ignorant.  They do not even know their own origins and history, no matter how many years of public education they have suffered through.

At this moment, there is a world in ‘lock down’, hiding enmasked, in fear, in their own homes, scared shit-less that they will become infected by a common virus that has existed since billions of years before humans were cloned by the Anunnaki. They are glued to the TV, presenting ‘cases’ of existence of a virus that is in the human virome of everyone living on this planet.  Now, the report on infections, 100% fabricated.  Then the mortality report, showing 0.10 %, but only because they have killed some elderly people with existing mortal disease.  If you are quaking in your boots over this, then you really need to question your fitness for the ordeals of normal life.

In the last century, our country and the world have been hit by several fake influenza pandemics — and viruses from birds, pigs, bats and monkeys deemed guilty for all of them. This is the best that the Pentagon can come up with. The first, which struck in 1918, killed over half-a-million Americans and more than 20 million people across the globe… Bush. If we check back in history to that 1918 flu period, we will see that it suddenly struck just after the end of World War I, when our soldiers were returning home from overseas. That was the first war in which all the known vaccines were forced on all the servicemen. This mish-mash of poison drugs and putrid proteins of which the vaccines were composed, caused such widespread disease and death among the soldiers that it was the common talk of the day, that more of our men were being killed by medical shots than by enemy shots from guns.

 Thousands were invalided home or to military hospitals, as hopeless wrecks, before they ever saw a day of battle. The death and disease rate among the vaccinated soldiers was four times higher than among the unvaccinated civilians. But this did not stop the vaccine promoters. Vaccine has always been big business, and so it was continued doggedly in the face of public criticism.

Now, I don’t know about you, but I have seen the massive pig and chicken farms where your food is grown.  They are slimy cesspools of urine and feces in which the animals must exist in horribly overcrowded conditions.  There are no requirements at all for waste control and sanitation…anything that might raise the market prices.  I have absolutely no doubt that these giant pits of animal waste are producing disease of every kind on a massive scale.

Otherwise, all the birds, bats, monkeys and farm animals that I see are vastly healthier than the sick and obese people I see around.  I do not believe that animals, who are allowed to live in nature, are disease-causers.  But this is the convenient explanation you believe in, without even a shred of knowledge.

Go back to 1918 for the truth

Vaccine not virus responsible for Spanish flu Thursday, May 08, 2003.

RYLE DWYER writes on the horror of the 1918-20 pandemic which the propaganda says was caused by Spanish flu (Irish Examiner, May 1). “How did they know it was the virus of Spanish flu that killed millions of civilians and soldiers? How did the ‘Spanish’ get blamed for this disaster of Public Health? What does this even mean? This disaster occurred when viruses were almost unknown to medical science, pretty much like the present day.

It took a British science team to identify the first virus in man in 1933, so far as so-called ‘modern medicine’ or Rockefeller medicine is concerned. As regards the origin of the outbreak, he relates that a senior US army officer suggested that the Germans might have been responsible for the bug as part of their war effort, by spreading it in theatres or where large numbers of people assembled…further examples of ignorance of even the most basic attributes of viruses. 

Ryle would have us believe that all those American soldiers who died from noncombatant causes may have died from Spanish flu. But US Army records show that seven men dropped dead after being vaccinated. A report from US Secretary of War, Henry L Stimson, not only verified these deaths but also stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of yellow fever vaccination during only six months of the war.

 That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given to recruits. Army records also reveal that after vaccination became compulsory in the US Army in 1911, not only did typhoid increase rapidly, but all other vaccinal diseases increased at an alarming rate. After America entered the war in 1917, the death rate from typhoid vaccination rose to the highest point in the history of the US Army. The deaths occurred after the shots were given in sanitary American hospitals and well supervised army camps in France, where sanitation had been practiced for years.

The report of the Surgeon-General of the US Army shows that during 1917 there were admitted into the army hospitals 19,608 men suffering from anti-typhoid inoculation and vaccinia. This takes no account of those whose vaccine diseases were attributed to other causes. The army doctors knew all these cases of disease and death were due to vaccination and were honest enough to admit it in their medical reports. When army doctors tried to suppress the symptoms of typhoid with a stronger vaccine, it caused a worse form of typhoid paratyphoid. But when they concocted an even stronger vaccine to suppress that one, they created an even worse disease, Spanish flu.

After the war, this was one of the vaccines used to protect a panic-stricken world from the soldiers returning from WWI battlefronts infected with dangerous diseases. One must add to the pharmaceutical murder by vaccines, the deaths from pharmaceutical drugs, in that day, aspirin.

What is astounding is that up until today, the pharmaceutical industry that put Hitler into office (with the Rockefellers funding them) and those who direct that industry today, have gotten away scot free with 20-50 million deaths caused by their ineptitude.

The truth of millions of vaccines deaths in 1918 has been suppressed for almost 100 years. And now, the same forces behind those earlier deaths hope for 1000 times more deaths worldwide. Their business model has depended for some time on fear and the creation of disease.

And now their political and military model does as well. It is an immense problem for them that a cure exists for any and ALL diseases they generate. And that cure is your body, that is the only source of cures, and it is free of charge. All that you must do is give your body healthy natural foods, sun exposure, physical exercise and eliminate all fear.

And while their medical system falls back on being infinitely flawed and spins out more and more vaccines and drugs to “address” each disease, the cure could not be more simple in how it works.

That it is a cure for polio has been suppressed for more than a have a century.

And during that time, its capacity to cure cancer and heart disease, as well as all viruses and toxins and radiation poisoning has also been denied or covered up. The Mayo Clinic, using rigged studies, was instrumental in discrediting its nontoxic capacity to cure cancer. It is simply a state of creating a very unhealthy body.  Your body fluids are acidic. Your cells cannot burn glucose in a normal carboxylic acid cycle, and are forced into a fermentation process.  Ultimately, you cannot live in a state of fermentation. They are not planning to tell you about this because there is no more reason to fund cancer research and the cure is free.  The GDP of the US is based solely on spending the same currency over and over.  Medical care has become over 30% of the spending.  This Ponzi economy requires infinite year to year growth.  Take out the unnecessary medical spending and your GDP is going to deep-six instantly and fatally.

Along with war, drugs, child trafficking, and politics, there is nothing left of the economy.  This is basically why the RESETs come at 200 year intervals.  When the current hegemonic empire inevitably reaches this point, only the RESET can solve the problem.  The now wasted hegemon must be destroyed and a new RESET period begins with a new hegemon of empire. Over the next 200 year period, this new hegemon will be given the means to build a successful empire, finally reaching hopeless corruption by the end of the period, at which point another RESET changes the venue, and so on.

One of the greatest scientists who ever lived was labeled a quack, constant false “medical” warnings of the cure causing kidney stones were put out, and pharmaceutic industry that creates disease and their agency arm, the FDA, have worked to ban the cure in its most powerful form.

But the cure stands on the shoulders of one of the greatest scientists to ever live, and the only scientist in the world to ever win two independent Nobel prizes,

 So, it is not only the truth of 9/11 that must come out, so people can see their own government attacked them with military weapons, but three major and suppressed medical truths must be exposed if this plan to murder millions of Americans with biologic weapons of mass destruction is to be stopped.

1. The truth that the millions of 1918 deaths were caused by vaccines and drugs

2. The truth of vaccines being intentionally used to sicken, sterilize and kill

3. The truth that pharmaceutical drugs have been killing more people than wars.

4. The truth that there is cure for all disease (including even weaponized Ebola)

And in exposing the plan to use bioweapons, trigger martial law, and then to mass murder in the US, it is insufficient to focus on the Bush family’s role in all this. Their role is so obvious, and yet everything about 9/11 and even more so about the plan to use a disease as the means to a coup and a Holocaust, have been immensely devious. So, one might assume that the visible perpetrators such as the Bushes, Cheney, Rockefellers, Kissinger etc. are not the main hands in what is occurring but are hiding themselves. The one linking element behind all the groups involved (the UN, the WHO, the CIA, etc.), and that is the Jesuits. And their own vows speak of killing by stealth and sickness.

The Council of Trent and the Jesuit Oath continue to be fulfilled as we remember a portion of the Fourth Vow of the Professed Jesuit: “I do further promise and declare, that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, . . . I will secretly use the poison cup . . . As I at any time may be directed so to do by any agent of the Pope or superior of the Brotherhood of the holy faith of the Society of Jesus.” {20}

Jesuits run the Council on Foreign Relations (Rockefeller, Kissinger, ….), the Knights of Malta, Shriner Freemasonry, the Opus Dei, the Club of Rome, the Illuminati, the Knights of Columbus and the Mafia.

The United Nations is under Jesuit control, which means that the WHO, an agency of the UN that claims to be in charge of all global “health,” is as well. An invasion of the US by the UN and WHO would essentially be a take over of the country by Jesuits and the Vatican. This makes following any pronouncements of WHO or UN about Ebola/COVID or any vaccines, suicidal for the US and for its people.

The plan to initiate a RESET in the US is glaringly clear from the trappings of concentration camps, gas chambers, boxcars, the Patriot Act that is modeled on Hitler’s Enabling Act, the militarization of DHS, the NDAA (which allows for taking away any American without a warrant, a charge, a lawyer, or any trial, and to do so permanently), etc.

But what may not be so obvious, even to those who see all that has been put in place, is that the Jesuits and Vatican which arranged the assassination of John Kennedy, control so many secret societies, political groups, and US leaders, are the ones who planned the earlier RESETs down to the finest detail.

In WW2, death camps were arranged in a Pentagram with spokes radiating out to the Vatican of Pope Pius. As the ley lines of the death pentagram are extended out, they each cross through or terminate in places with an immense matrix plotted to link together extremes of human suffering, terror and death. The extreme fascist plans and their remarkable similarity to Nazi Germany, become the tip off as to the Jesuit/Vatican role in this plan.

Treasonous, Jesuit-controlled, CFR Advisors, 1999 #202 Cyrus R. Vance, former Secretary of State Shriner, Freemason Henry A. Kissinger, former Secretary of State Shriner, Freemason David Rockefeller, CFR Presider and the Black Pope’s International Banker having replaced J. P. Morgan.

 Annual Report: Council on Foreign Relations, (New York: The Harold Pratt House, 1994, p. 60; 1999, p. 54).

 The Jesuit “poison cup” today includes Ebola vaccines and drugs, just as vaccines and drugs killed in the tens of millions in 1918. Both can be expected to sicken and kill. That vaccines and drugs have been used to sterilize, sicken and kill for a very long time becomes obvious in simply reading Kissinger’s report, the WHO’s request for a virus to kill T cells, or looking carefully at what is in all the mandated vaccines for American children.

The world has not known of this on-going genocide in Africa and or even the sterilization, crippling and murders of American children.

Kissinger, a war criminal, has been fascinated by and urged the use of vaccines as a means of covert genocide in the early 1970s. National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. This memorandum, drafted by Henry Kissinger, led directly to the unleashing of experimental vaccines on the unsuspecting public. 3 million Filipinos ages 12-48 were given a test vaccine that ruined their health. North American Black & Native American Women were each given the same vaccine resulting in sterility rates of 25% & 35% respectively. The directive came from the WHO and was directly tied to Kissinger’s report.

The WHO, seen in a true light, reveals itself to be a vicious death-spreading UN agency. It followed a 1972 report issued by the World Health Organization which referred to a virus requested which would selectively destroy the Human T Cell System.

It sited countries as targets for “initial population reduction experimentation to be implemented around the year 2000”. They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia & Columbia for study. Which, co-incidentally, shortly preceded the outbreak of HIV/Aids in Africa, America & elsewhere. The determining factor most common in Aids victims is the breakdown of the T Cell system in the body. Another coincidence? No2/bulletin_1972_47%282%29_211-227.pdf

And sterilization by vaccine has been going on since Auschwitz During WWII, the Nazis experimented on people at Auschwitz to develop vaccines that sterilize at routine doctor’s appointments under the guise of medical treatment. In July 1942 Lieutenant General Rudolf Brandt, Himmler’s personal advisor (Strzelecka 1996), contacted Clauberg, asking on behalf of Himmler, [how long it would take] to sterilize 1000 Jewesses. The Jewesses themselves should not know anything about it. As the SS Reich Leader [Himmler] understands it, you could give the appropriate injection during a general examination. This use of vaccines to sterilize continued beyond WWII, including under the aegis of WHO, where the intent was hidden.

Wiliam Engdahl reports that: “… since the 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation had funded the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich, including well into the Third Reich”. They praised the forced sterilization of people by Hitler’s Germany, and the Nazi ideas on race “purity.” It was John D. Rockefeller III, a life-long advocate of eugenics, who used his “tax free” foundation money to initiate the population reduction neo-Malthusian movement through his private Population Council in New York beginning in the 1950’s. [This became part of the UN.]

Some chronology of government involvement in eugenics after WWII.

From Eugenics and the Nazis — the California connection by Edwin Black In 1970, George H W Bush authored the Family Planning Act which funded the sterilization of Native American women.

And “The idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World is also not new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved as early as 1972 in a major project together with WHO and others to perfect another “new vaccine” [that would appear to be to prevent tetanus but would covertly sterilize]. es.html

And if one wants to comprehend that those behind the Third Reich did not stop but set themselves up with the UN, established right after WWII – and with many Nazi scientists and doctors brought to the US by the CIA and the Bushes under Operation Paperclip – one has only to look at what the UN’s “child-caring” agency, UNICEF, did to North African Sephardic children right after WWII and the establishment of the UN.

The last post indicated that the Vatican was responsible for the murder of Sephardic Jews in Rhodes, in Salonika and elsewhere at the very end of WWII, in a last minute sweep. Only 5 years later, 100,000 Sephardic Jewish children whose families had escaped the Nazi sweep of Sephardim from the Balkans and Greek Islands, were massively irradiated upon entering Israel. The xrays – 3,500 times stronger than “normal” – sterilized the children and, of those who did not die soon after, most have died early over time, from cancers.

 What the global “health agencies” and the UN are doing has nothing to do with health. They are manufacturing disease and attempting to make them as virulent and deadly as possible. Author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional?, Horowitz says the swine-bird-human flu strain, reported to be found first in Mexico in late-March 2009, could have only come from Dr James S. Robertson and his colleagues in association with the US Centre for Disease Control and vaccine manufacturer Novavax, Inc, which was ready to profit from the release he says.

Nobody else takes H5N1 Asian-flu infected chickens to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines their proteins with H1N1 viruses from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in some swine-flu genes from pigs, then reverse engineers them to infect humans, he said.

Their white coats, however, are not long enough to hide their jackboots which have become horrifyingly apparent in West Africa. IS GEORGE SOROS ATTEMPTING A COLOUR REVOLUTION IN WEST AFRICA? GLOBALISTS MAKE POWER GRAB AFTER ORCHESTRATING EBOLA CRISIS





The plan below is meant to protect humanity from vaccines by inspecting them first. This makes perfect sense yet is precisely what the WHO (echoed by the CDC) is now saying there is no time for. “In the event that mandatory vaccinations are legislated under conditions of a supposed/genuine Pandemic we are calling for independent research of the vaccines – by a team of licensed health care professionals of our choosing, before delivering them to the distribution centers.

All vaccines will be tested for contamination & safety. Ongoing monitoring of those vaccinated will be kept in an up-to-date data system. If the WHO or their distributors are discovered to be willfully spreading a toxic product they will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the Law. We will mandate a public investigation to root out those responsible & justice will be served. In this respect we will also hold our own Governments fully accountable.

Wait a minute…who is going to be responsible for vaccine safety?  Some agencies that have no power to oppose the ruling elite.

They are right to focus on the vaccines but it’s crucial to see that the Jesuits only need the propaganda about Ebola to be intense enough (as in the WHO’s exponential Ebola morbidity and death numbers – “whether real or promulgated” -and the WHO claims it can’t be contained) that the WHO can “be seen” to be acting logically by declaring a level 6 pandemic.

But that declaration is not a medical one. It is a military declaration and a declaration of intent to invade any country signed onto the International Health Regulations which “asks” for help. Obama asks. After that, all hell breaks loose, Obama suspends the Constitution and Congress, declares martial law, completes a long-planned coup with the help of DHS, the US is invaded by foreign troops and mass murder and plunder begin…after the population is disarmed by the UN troops.

 It’s why the removal of arms is so critical to their plan. Total disarmament of the public is what Hitler ordered before the intended public takeover.

And below is the UN plan for the total disarmament of the American population. The perpetrators behind this plan are: the Black Pope, the Pope, the Bushes, the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Obama, the head of the UN, the head of the WHO, the head of the CDC, the head of DHS, the head of the CIA, Bill Gates, George Soros, etc.

The catastrophe that is planned is dependent on three things: 1. IGNORANCE of the true history of who’s been killing people with vaccines for nearly a hundred years, and FEAR based on that ignorance.

2. WHO and CDC LIES that Ebola/COVID is out of control It isn’t.

They claim it is uncontainable and has no cure.  There is a simple nontoxic cure:

The WHO is putting out “exponential numbers”. .html

3. Getting Ebola/COVID into people’s bodies via vaccines and then using untested, unknown “rushed” vaccines to “save people” (kill them). The UN and WHO, with help from Doctors without Borders, are already managing to infect people by running vaccine campaigns that coincide with outbreaks of Ebola/COVID.

4. Suppressing knowledge that a full cure for Ebola exists. And it is one that address what Ebola specifically does – create a super scurvy.

 Ebola is an unusual sort of disease. It spreads by international health organizations and feeds on media propagated fear, it comes with quarantines, starvation and murder, and countries break out with military take overs.

 The cure is also unusual

 It is simple and nontoxic, it destroys all viruses and can cure all diseases, toxins and infections.

It cures fear of disease itself, and if exposed widely, it could stop, reverse and cure military take overs. And in one form, it doesn’t require doctors at all to reach IV levels of potency.

This country has for the most part woken up to 9/11. Now it must rapidly wake up to 9/11, Anthrax, Ebola/COVID, and to its “disease = coup = mass murder” reality and to the existence of a cure for all disease. To do that we must understand who is behind it all, including the suppression of mankind being free of disease.

It can easily be seen that the identity of Jesuit political thought with the objectives of Nazi-Fascism makes it imperative to conceal it from the American public. Were it otherwise, the Catholic Church would suffer complete loss of its prestige in the United States — in the eyes of Catholics and non-Catholics alike.”

Behind the Dictators, Leo H. Lehmann, 1942, Irish ex-priest

 “When the time is right the Black Pope will give the order and the post Protestant Reformation American culture, as we know it today, will be no more! His Masonic Shriners, Knights of Malta and Knights of Columbus on Wall Street will cause an economic collapse resulting in the anarchy of an inner-city race war led by his Black Supremacist Nation of Islam.

The Constitution will be suspended and martial law will be declared by a final presidential executive order. America’s Commander-in-Chief will truly be a fascist dictator backed by the economic might of the Knights of Malta. “In fulfilling The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, the Jesuit Oath and the Council of Trent, he, like other fascist dictators of the past, will make a treaty with Rome called a “Concordat.”

The guns will be confiscated and the process of recycling the planet will begin in earnest! Alaska will be the American Siberia run by Jesuit Inquisitors. The Jesuits’ “relentless war” on behalf of their own Master’s intent to continue exploiting the planet will continue for what it has to give.  Their key to the end of the US population is a weaponized virus and its “cure,” a weaponized vaccine.


This is a lot of data that covers events back to 911, The Project for a New American Century, The PNAC traitors and terrorists, right up to the present day of COVID, Lockdowns, Race Riots and the vaccine.  PNAC players were drafting the playbook back in 1997.  Even at that time, this was not a new idea.  It was planned and conceived at a much earlier date, spanning many Bilderberg meetings, even the very foundation of Kissinger’s Council on Foreign Relations and Brzezinski’s Tri Lateral Commission.

You’re thinking this corona virus, the lockdowns and the race riots are all something new and spontaneous, that just happened to us during the past few months. The governments have responded adequately and will pull us through. You could hardly be more wrong. 

You’re thinking this is all going to return to ‘normal’ soon and, though a little beat up, we are going to get through it all and eventually be right back where we started.  You could hardly be more wrong.

You’re thinking the race riots are legitimate movements to bring more equality to the societies.

You’re thinking that the full resources of our sophisticated medical establishment is working feverously on a vaccine to save us, and make us immune forever from this insidiously evil and cunning corona virus.

You are dead wrong on all accounts.

Your life, and that of your family, could be saved.  But not if you continue to drink the cool aid and stand around with your head up your ass most of the time.  If this is the best plan you have, then you won’t even see it coming.

A world revolutionary RESET is taking place, a ‘once every 200 years event is underway. Time for the ‘end of the old empire’ and the ‘beginning of empire’ for the new hegemon. The old empire is now decrepit, despicable, greedy, wasteful, corrupt, fat, sick, narcissistic, delusional, destructive, etc.  It knows little more than how to kill, rob and anything else needed to keep the cocaine and the opium flowing. 

Its human resources are all dedicated to the preparation of ‘junk food’…for each other to eat and grow fat and sick.  From a once great position as the world’s hegemon, this empire now must be destroyed to rid the planet of its greatest threat.  But most of all, it is no longer productive as far as exploiting the planet’s resources for the benefit of its real Masters.

This is a repeating cycle that seems to take about 200 years for each repetition.  The new hegemon, China, is on the outset of its 200 years.  The Masters will again reap the products of productive enterprise.  The venue of the retired empire seems to be in the process of being returned to its rightful owners, the Amerinds.