Who Really Owns the World 3

“If men were born free, they would, so long as they remained free, form no conception of good and evil.” – Baruch Spinoza

You may wonder why I am presenting such a large amount of information about who owns the world on this ‘wellness’ site.  You were birthed and began living a ‘life’.  But you did not create the environment into which you entered.  You trust your parents that this life-environment is OK and maybe go along without giving it too much thought.  Just like your parents did.

I have asked many people, over the years, what they think the purpose of their life is.  The answers have been many and varied, but are rarely profound or the product of deep contemplation or insight.  I hear things like…”I am here because god made me and the bible says this and that”. Or, “I am here to have children, to help others, to accumulate wealth, to make the world better, to learn something, or there is no reason”.

You were born into a family that is part of a culture that has been formed by a local collective experience over a period of time. You appeared somewhere along the time line and picked up a position in the existing culture that offered you opportunities to learn things and participate in the culture in some capacity. Your place in this life is usually opportunity based.  For example, you grow up and the culture is looking for people to do things and you choose a thing that seems interesting or rewarding.  The culture has educated you, whether formally or informally, to reach the capacity to do certain things that the collective has a need for someone to do, at this particular point in time. And you’re it. Does this now define your reason for existence?

In other words, the circumstances of your existence are arbitrary unless you specifically apply yourself to a study and analysis of them to determine something otherwise.  Should you have the wisdom and determination to undertake such a study, and should you have the capacity and skills to do it objectively, with an open mind, you cannot avoid discovering that you are living a lie which disregards your very purpose for choosing to enter this domain of existence.  Furthermore, you will just be perpetuating the lie onto the lives of your children and enabling others to float along with the current trends, thus wasting their own lives in the process.

You may be inclined to think “so what”, it’s my life and I am perfectly happy riding the innertube to wherever the stream is taking me.  With this attitude, you are mistaken in your unfounded belief that circumstances surrounding your life are benign and harmless, thus affording you this freedom.  Without realizing it, you have been birthed into an extremely hazardous environment that enslaves you to invest yourself into producing the outcomes desired by others and which are definitely not to your benefit, although the delusion presents the false illusion that you are free and working for your own interests.  Slaves who think they are free and working for their own interests are far more productive than those who are overtly in bondage. 

For those who do not know and understand their origins, and their present circumstances, it is impossible to gain even the slightest concept of ones purpose for this existence, let alone fulfill it.

Not long ago, overt circumstances were quite different, but no less detrimental. When the collective circumstances were outright feudal, you knew who were the king and the royals.  You knew where your place was.  They tell you this was long ago in history and it’s no longer the way things are.  This is part of your public education, which is part of the Matrix, which is, by means of technocracy, so much more subtle.  Although covert, it is no less feudal today.  The prominent monarchies are not the relics of the past, as they appear, but even more powerful and all encompassing in their dominion over the world.  They have found that fraud and deceit work better and corporate law grants them the avenue to own all resources and means of production.  They also get to establish the active theaters of the apparent ’productive sectors’. 

The US had its heyday during the past 200 years, since the most recent ‘reset’.  The new more thorough and rapid ‘heydays’ are also much more destructive, and leave the territories in a desperate state of abuse.  The US has off-shored its remaining viable technology to China and Asia, the emerging productive sector for the next 200 years.  The new ‘reset’ is happening as you read this.  The Queen has ordered the “useless eaters” to be disposed of, the usual result of all ‘resets’.

Britain is the Kingdom of the World

It is safe to say that Britain is the sneakiest and most dominant of the world’s power mongers.  While ignorant people are idolizing the ‘royals’ and thinking they are retiring people with good intentions toward the world, they are, in fact, the real terrorists in every aspect of civilization.  After WW2, they appeared to divest their empire and return the property of dominated peoples to self-rule.  By appearance sake, they are just passive figureheads of an olden and bygone era of empire.

This happens to be just exactly what they hoped the world would think.  Now they can enjoy the role of benefactor and accept all the good will and kudos.  However, they have not given up one single dime in this deal.

 Before the fake independence ceremonies, they set up the whole system of control and exploitation by means of corporations under their control and ownership that produce far more wealth than direct colonialism, without the hassle and the bad reputation.  They extract the wealth created by their former colonies by owning the corporations that own the natural resources and means of production.  The common people are even more enslaved than ever while the fat cats continue to skim all of the profits. The people get to borrow fake money to purchase back the land that was literally stolen from them and take on the yoke of willing and unknowing slaves.  The best slaves are the ones who think they are free and working for their own benefit.

This is just as true for the US as for India and Zimbabwe.  The US is and has always been a colony of Britain.  The people of the US have always thought themselves to be independent and free. So has a great portion of the rest of the world on every continent.  It is a clever contrivance and masterful indoctrination of the masses.

The most insidious aspect of this exploitation is how it was done and the underlying ideology of why it was done.

This is a very revealing story that has been kept tightly under wraps from the world and impacts literally every person alive.

Origins of the Five Eyes and Fake News

Michael McKibben of Americans4Innovation.org leads a team of researchers and forensic accountants who gather data to create “indictable evidence”, as they call it, which would not just stand up in a court of law but win a legal case. McKibben is working with Douglas Gabriel of American Intelligence Media to discuss his latest research project, which has resulted in what may be the most important revelation in modern times: that the Mainstream Media is and has been, since 1909, joined at the hip with national and corporate intelligence agencies. In fact, the original intelligence agencies were founded and staffed by journalists.  This is prior to the FBI, CIA, NSA, MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.

Michael McKibben: I can confidently say this: we have discovered the origins of modern intelligence and that origin is in the British Parliament and it is staffed with newspaper men and women from around the world and has been since the beginning.

Newspapers and TV run intelligence. That’s what we’ve discovered…It’s not the other way around!

The newspaper men and women of the world, mostly men, in 1909 formed an organization called the Empire Press Union…the purpose of that union was to get all of the major newspapers from around the world…including the Commonwealth, including American newspapers – and they recruited these people and that became what we now call MI5 and MI6 and GCHQ.

And then in the States, it’s called FBI, CIA and NSA. It has its origins on July 29th of 1909. We have the proof.

Douglas Gabriel: …not only have you found the roots of Fake News, which is in corporate intelligence – and we can see, by that the date and the timing, that this was when the British East India Company had just been folded into the British government and it seems as if the corporate interests of the British East India Company were the overriding factors.

Now, what’s shocking to me is…no one has ever pointed out the sources of not only MI5 and MI6 but MI1 through MI19. You’ve discovered what is called the Home Defense and the Colony Defense.

Michael McKibben: “Home” was MI5 and “Colonial” was MI6.


This stunning revelation explains the antics of the Mainstream Media and why it is staffed by people like MSNBC’s John Brennan, the former CIA Director and CNN’s recent hire of Andrew McCabe, the former FBI Deputy Director.

It explains how intelligence first and foremost serves corporate interests, as in the British East India Company (aka “The Company”) and it sheds light on the worldview that informed them, when we see that the intelligence agencies with a domestic focus, like MI5 and the FBI were called “Home” and those an international focus, like MI6 and CIA were termed “Colonial”, as if the rest of the world were considered a colony.

It explains why the CIA is often referred to as “The Company”

Sound crazy? Michael McKibben has the indictable evidence

July 29, 1909, 120 years ago, the British White Supremacists took charge of the 20th Century.

Research will disclose hard proof that Britain is the source of modern weaponized intelligence and propaganda… to this day.

COMMITTEE OF IMPERIAL DEFENCE [Subcomms MI5,MI6]. (Jul. 29, 1909). Committee Report that led to the founding of MI5 (Home Defence) and MI6 (Colonial Defence), HC Deb 29 July 1909 vol 8 cc1381-432. UK Parliament, Hansard.

Committee of Imperial Defence. (Accessed Aug. 24, 2019). Committee Report to UK Parliament on Jul. 29, 1909 that led to the founding of MI5 (Home Defence) and MI6 (Colonial). Wikipedia.

Correspondent. (Jul. 23, 1909). EMPIRE PRESS UNION formed, published Sep. 07, 1909, Issue No. 14622, Dunedin, New Zealand via National Library of New Zealand, Ref. No. ODT19090907.2.6. Otago Daily Times.

Henry S. Wellcome. (Jun. 01, 1909 – ca. Jul. 1909). THE EVOLUTION OF JOURNALISM ETCETERA – International / Imperial Press Conference, 1909, Great Britain (incl. Lord Burnham, Sirs Edward and Harry Levy-Lawson). Burroughs Wellcome. FULLY INDEXED, BOOKMARKED, SEARCHABLE. 27.1 MB.

The White Supremacists ran cover for the establishment of MI5 and MI6 using the Imperial Press Conference, 1909 to recruit War Correspondents (Daily Telegraph, Daily Mail, Reuters, Financial Times, the Times, Manchester Guardian, Daily Express, BBC, New York Times, Chicago Tribune, Daily Mirror, Fleet Street, etc.) and (propaganda) writers from across the Commonwealth.

How Did Cecil Rhodes Steal Africa From the Africans?

This story is not the only story, but it serves as an illustrative example of how and what happened to unsuspecting sovereign peoples all throughout the world whose lands contained valuable natural resources coveted by the British imperialist empire. 

The British East India Company, in parallel with the Dutch East India Company operated throughout the world to exploit poorer and simpler peoples for the purpose of abscounding with their national treasure.  This was accomplished, to a large extent, by simply invading the continents, identifying the locations of valuable resources and then capturing the natives and selling them to the slave ships.  The once free people found themselves in horrible circumstances, chained and transported to some foreign destination where they were paraded in front of slave buyers, bought and taken to a new life of bondage and toil.

In this simple manner, the lands containing the diamonds, gold, ores, forests, etc. were stripped of the rightful owners, leaving the land available to be literally stolen by arrogant invaders, who considered this to be a manifest destiny. Americans have heard this term.  They operated on the principle that the resources, left in the hands of the rightful owners, would not be utilized to the highest order possible.  Yet, in their hands, the resources would be better utilized for the ‘benefit of humanity’.  In other words, they were Eugenicists, who felt entitled, on that basis alone, to rob, murder, enslave others who they deemed unworthy of owning valuable resources that they coveted.  They then justified this to the world based on principles of Eugenics.  The world seemed fine with this

With mercenary armies and slavers at their beckoning, supplied by the empirical governments, such as Great Britain, they just did whatever they needed to do to secure the plunder for themselves and their country with utter disregard for the fate of the humanity they had selected to exploit. 

North of the Zambezi, the natives have long known about the suppression of free speech, about the bloody redistribution of land along racial lines, about slavers, about politicians happy to employ armed – and sometimes uniformed – mobs to kill their opponents. These are practices imported to this region, along with the railways, by the British.

Unlike the African press, the Western media rarely invokes the name of Cecil John Rhodes: nearly a century after his death – on 26 March 1902 – his name is more associated with Oxford Scholarships than with mass murder. It’s easier to focus on the region’s more recent, less Anglo white supremacists: Ian Smith, for instance, who – despite his Scottish background – seems cut from the same stuff as those Afrikaner politicians who nurtured and maintained apartheid farther south.

But it was Rhodes who originated the racist “land grabs” to which Zimbabwe’s current miseries can ultimately be traced. It was Rhodes, too, who in 1887, told the House of Assembly in Cape Town that “the native is to be treated as a child and denied the franchise. We must adopt a system of despotism in our relations with the barbarians of South Africa”. In less oratorical moments, he put it even more bluntly: “I prefer land to niggers.”

For much of the century since his death, Rhodes has been revered as a national hero. Today, however, he is closer to a national embarrassment. But his presence is more strongly felt – and resented – in the territories that once bore his name. Delegates at the Pan Africanist Congress  argued that “the problems which were being blamed on President Robert Mugabe were created by British colonialism, whose agent Cecil Rhodes used armed force to acquire land for white “settlers”. When Zimbabwe gained independence in 1980, Rhodes’s name was wiped from the world’s maps, but the British corporations continued to own all resources and means of production.

But there is no way to really erase the damage already done.  Only the very elite strata of world dominance realize that these countries are corporate owned by Britain in ways that are not visible to the people who believe their country is once again their own.  Yes, they have the miserable jobs working for the corporations that are not owned by anyone in the country in which they operate.  The profits from the labor of the citizens is drained out the country and siphoned into the coffers of the Queen.  This is just a prototype of how it is set up all throughout the world, especially and including the US.

 Rhodes connived his way to wealth in a lawless frontier culture, then used that fortune to fund a private invasion of East Africa. He bought newspapers in order to shape and control public opinion. He brokered secret deals, issued bribes and used gangs of mercenaries to butcher his opponents, seizing close to a million square miles of territory from its inhabitants.

Rhodes was born in the summer of 1853, the fifth son of a parson. A sickly, asthmatic teenager, he was sent to the healthier climate of his brother’s cotton plantation in Natal. The pair soon became involved in the rush to exploit South Africa’s diamond and gold deposits. When Rhodes began his studies at Oriel College, he returned to South Africa each vacation to attend to his mining interests – which, by his mid-thirties, had made him, in today’s terms, a billionaire. By 1891, he had amalgamated the De Beers mines under his control, giving him dominion over 90 per cent of the world’s diamond output. He had also secured two other important positions; Prime Minister of the British Cape Colony, and president of the British South Africa Company, an organization that was formed – in the manner of the old East India companies – to pursue expansionist adventures for which sponsoring governments did not have the stomach or the cash. The result of his endeavors produced new British annexations: Nyasaland (now Malawi), Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) and Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe).

Rhodes: “Great Britain is a very small island. Great Britain’s position depends on her trade, and if we do not open up the dependencies of the world which are at present devoted to barbarism, we shall shut out the world’s trade. It must be brought home to you that your trade is the world, and your life is the world, not England. That is why you must deal with these questions of expansion and retention of the world.”

After Rhodes’s fatal heart attack on 26 March 1902, many changes in empirical structure were made. Rhodes had been the crude mercenary killer who the world had noticed and taken resentment towards.  The Crown was in need of a face-lift in light of its blood-smeared image.  They tried to make the Rhodes Scholarship into a worthy philanthropic cause.  The scholarship is, in fact, a way for training certain selected young men for a career in the foot-steps of Rhodes.  Students attend 2 years of special training at Oxford, specifically designed, not as a general preparatory education, but as a specialist in exploitation of what was considered assets of unworthy owners who were intrinsically inferior, hence should be robbed of their property,  which was taken into the hands of the superior white Anglos who could make proper use of it. There was, and is, nothing noble about anything done by Cecil Rhodes, or his ilk.

A good way to change one’s image is through the media, which is able to create and establish the day-to-day reality of most of the world’s citizens.  In fact, if utilized properly, the media can not just report on matters of interest, but actually create and instigate matters of interest.  It can actually create intelligence before there is anything to report at all.

In 1909, the Empire Press Union was established, not as a news reporting organ for the media, but as an asset for reporting what was being planned in the meeting rooms  of the elite power mongers of the British empire. 

One of the earth changing events on the planning board of empire was the rise of Bolshevism and the takeover of tsarist Russia.  The cast of characters was assembled and preparations set underway.  The Empire Press Union could establish the certainty of the planned event and garner public support.  The media required field agents to organize and bring the events to life.

The Fabian Society, formed in Britain in 1884, engaged itself in establishing a global One-World democratic-socialist government.  The Fabians gave birth to communism as part of the plan to overthrow the Russian government, eliminating the tsars from the face of the earth, and showing the world the wonderful benefits of communism.

The Russian Revolution was a pair of revolutions in 1917 which dismantled the Tsarist autocracy and led to the rise of the Soviet Union. The Russian Empire collapsed with the abdication of Emperor Nicholas II and the old regime was replaced by a provisional government during the first revolution of February 1917.  The October Revolution, officially known in Soviet literature as the Great October Socialist Revolution, and commonly referred to as Red October, the October Uprising, the Bolshevik Revolution, or Bolshevik Coup was a revolution in Russia led by the Fabian Bolsheviks and Vladimir Lenin, the instrument of the larger Russian Revolution of 1917. It took place with an armed insurrection in Petrograd on 7 November 1917.

You do not hear of the British involvement in the Russian revolution.  It’s not good for business.  But it brought unimaginable suffering to the innocent peoples of Russia, the hapless victims of British imperialism again.  While the women were fighting over a rotten potato to feed their family for dinner, all the spoils of the vast landmass were on the table for the pickings.  And the slaves were starving and willing to work for a pittance.  The British pawns, Lenin and Marx were in their glory selling the books bearing their names, authored by the Fabians.  The men were at the front, fighting the British war, WW1.  This war was about putting Germany out of business, the only way the Brits could compete with the superior German industrial product preferred by consumers all over the world.

The revisionist history books claim that WW1 was started over the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.  This assassination was perpetrated by the same stereotypical crazed lone gunman killer that has become so immensely popular in today’s FBI playbook.  It was not the cause of WW1 but it was used by the media to garner the support for the war which was started by  Great Britain.  If you want to associate a name with starting WW1, that would be the queen’s bulldog, Winston Churchill.  No less flagrant was the starting of WW2, again by Britain and the Queen’s same bulldog, the drunken big-mouthed Churchill.

The US got sucked into WW1 and WW2 by the same drunken lout, with a little help from some more ‘false-flag’ events, like Pearl Harbor.  The presumed leaders of the US have no choice but to heed the orders from the Queen, who is the superior in command by a couple of light-years.  In WW2, we have Hitler as the lone crazed gunman who is stoned out of his mind with power and greed.  Hitler was led along by the Brits and encouraged to invade Poland and continue making himself look bad.  Of course, the whole idea of Hitler as the jew-hater was part of the scheme to make him a prime target of world hatred.  There was no holocaust or gas chambers.  The Queen’s Zionists were only too happy to carry off the holocaust hoax to gain world sympathy and later, an ‘untouchability’ from any source, immediately branded as anti-semitic and sued by the ADL. There were forced labor camps which had jewish inmates, but a quick study of public birth and death records will reveal that the death rate for jews was totally consistent with that of other races at that time.

To get the record straight, the British invasion of Russia, WW1, and WW2 were all British designed, using jewish puppets for whom fake authorships of books and philosophies were attributed to make it look like grass-root events that killed more than 65 million people, robbed and starved hundreds of millions more, giving the impression to the world that these people were fighting for their own cause. This is where the real “Holocaust” took place at the hands of the jews at the behest of the Crown.

Who Controls the Media Controls the Minds of Common Men

The Reality TV Show of the Trump Coup and Mueller Report

Please correct all those fake news channels calling it a deep-state coup. It was a British sideshow coup to seemingly threaten the United States President. It was conducted from the highest levels of the British inner Fleet Street cabal from the Queen, her Privy Council, the Pilgrims Society and the media. This also includes: Alison Saunders’ conspiracy with Bruce and Nellie Ohr, Arvinder Sambei with Robert Mueller, Robert Hannigan with John Brennan, Richard Dearlove, Mark Malloch-Brown, George Soros, Nick Clegg, Geoffrey Pattie. Call it what it is: a display of power and the usual distraction for the TV addicts to keep their attention focused on the drama.   The British Monarch is the power-monger of the entire world and must be noted as such. 

Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)

The Coucil on Foreign Relations – CFR’s influence in setting Washington’s foreign policy agenda was once derided as “conspiracy theory.”

But, as is usually the case, that “conspiracy theory” is now a simple truism that is openly joked about by the conspirators themselves.

We are not ‘conspiracy theorists’ but the scholars whose analysis reveals the conspirator’s conspiracies.

What you may not know is that the CFR is in fact a branch of a slightly older, slightly less-known organization: the Royal Institute of International Affairs. The idea for the group was hammered out at an informal session during the 1919 Paris peace conference.

The Institute was formalized the next year, first as the British Institute of International Affairs, and then, after receiving its Royal Charter, as the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

The group has become synonymous with Chatham House, its headquarters in St. James’ Square, London, and is widely recognized among foreign policy experts as the most influential think tank in the world.

In the years since its inception, the RIIA has opened branches in countries across the British Commonwealth and around the world, including the Council on Foreign Relations, born largely from the same 1919 Paris meeting that birthed the Institute itself, the Australian Institute of International Affairs, the South African Institute of International Affairs, the Pakistan Institute of International Affairs, the Canadian International Council, and similar organizations.

Officially, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, like its various branch organizations, is a non-profit, non-governmental think tank that promotes analysis of international issues and world affairs in topics such as energy, environment and resources, international economics, international security, and international law.

Also like its branch organizations, the majority of the group’s publications and proceedings are open to the public and freely available via their website or their journal, International Affairs.

You’ll need an “Oxford Academic” account if you want to access International Affairs online to read hot takes like “World politics 100 years after the Paris peace conference” by David Lloyd George’s great-granddaughter and former Rhodes Trustee Margaret MacMillan.)

The organization is funded by partners, patrons and a list of corporate members that read like a Who’s Who of the corporatocracy, including Chevron, AIG, Bloomberg, Toshiba, Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Lockheed Martin, Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil, and dozens of other corporations, institutions and foreign governments.

Chatham House consistently attracts some of the best known speakers on a wide range of topics, releasing reports that set the global policy agenda, not only for Britain, but for much of the rest of the developed world as well.

Although the majority of its activities are publicly accessible, it is, perhaps tellingly, for its policy on keeping certain meetings private that the organization is best known. The policy is called The Chatham House Rule and states:

“When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.”

The rule is ostensibly invoked to encourage debate on contentious issues, the theory being that prominent individuals would not be willing or able to discuss their full views on these subjects if their identity and affiliations were to be publicly known.

Some of the most infamous and criticized secretive meetings in the world, including the Bilderberg conference, adhere to Chatham House Rules, inviting charges of secrecy and hidden influence.

When it comes to a group like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, it is hard to argue that such charges are misplaced.

That the group publishes its International Affairs magazine under the auspices of Oxford University speaks to the think tank’s historical roots.

Born from the ashes of WWI, the RIIA was brought into existence by the same people that brought about “The WWI Conspiracy.” The “Great War” was in part engineered by a secret society formally created by Cecil Rhodes in 1891.

Rhodes’ society was designed to function on what G. Edward Griffin has termed “The Quigley Formula,” wherein a small clique creates a larger organization that they populate with like-minded collaborators from whom they keep secret the real aims and goals of the society. By this method, groups of hundreds or even thousands of people can be directed towards certain ends by a small group of conspirators. The Free Masons are another international organization working under this principle.

In recent years, the RIIA, the most visible mouthpiece of this secret society’s legacy, has been responsible for reports on why gold is not a viable alternative to the current international monetary system, an analysis of the 2009 Iranian election that informed reports around the globe about the “irregularities” of that election, an op-ed from the British Foreign Secretary urging for a thoroughgoing weaponization of cyberspace, and many other influential documents, publications, conferences and presentations.

In the end, what is perhaps most intriguing to those who are interested in examining how power functions in society is not necessarily the secretive origins of a group like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, or even the way that it has covertly manipulated, shaped and controlled British foreign policy for decades, or how it has managed to wield such considerable influence over world affairs through its various branch organizations.

Instead, what is most fascinating about Chatham House is that it is so very much open.  Many of its meetings and proceedings are publicly available. Its partners and corporate members are published on its website. Its journal is published openly and made available to the public.

The RIIA is rarely discussed as an important power center in 21st century society. In some ways, perhaps this is its greatest accomplishment: to hide its enormous influence and its ongoing role in steering global geopolitics, not by hiding under a blanket of secrecy like the Bilderberg Group, Skull and Bones, or other secret societies, but by putting itself so much in the public spotlight that it seems mundane.

It should be noted, after all, that this is precisely the way that Rhodes envisioned such an organization to function, and the continued existence and influence of that idea, manifested most openly in Chatham House, the CFR, and their brethren think tanks around the world, might serve as the perfect example of how some of the world’s biggest secrets are hidden in plain sight.

End of AngloZionism

Macron’s Speech Confirms My Prediction… the End of AngloZionism

This has been the conclusion of many of my recent blogs. The implications are critical for the Western world. A hegemony built on a house of cards has been the formula for Western over-consumption and abuses of the rest of the world for the past 100 years. The era of the West is finished, The viable technology has been “off-shored” to the Eastern world during the recent 40 – 50 years. The new term for Westerners, coined by the Queen, is “Useless Eaters”. Everyone seems to think this is funny and of no consequence.

The single most amazing event of the past couple of weeks was the absolutely astonishing speech French President Emmanuel Macron made in front of an assembly of ambassadors.

Macron is the speaker of the message, but it is comig from the Rothschilds

Here is an informal translation of Macron’s speech:

The international order is being shaken in an unprecedented manner, by the great upheaval that is undoubtedly taking place for the first time in our history, in almost every field and with a profoundly historic magnitude. The first thing we observe is a major transformation, a geopolitical and strategic re-composition. We are undoubtedly experiencing the end of Western hegemony over the world.

We were accustomed to an international order which, since the 18th century (the last reset), rested on a Western hegemony, mostly French in the 18th century, by the inspiration of the Enlightenment; then mostly British in the 19th century thanks to the Industrial Revolution and, finally, mostly American in the 20th century due to the 2 great conflicts and the economic and political domination of this power.

 Things change. And they are now deeply shaken by the mistakes of Westerners in certain crises, by the choices that have been made by Americans for several years which did not start with this administration, but which lead to revisiting certain implications in conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere (NEOCONS and the Project for a New American Century), and to rethinking a deep, diplomatic and military strategy, and sometimes elements of solidarity that we thought were intangible for eternity, even if we had constituted together in geopolitical moments that have changed. (The events of 911 were the necessary catalyst to initiate support for the misguided ‘War on Terror’.)

And then there is the emergence of new powers whose impact we have probably underestimated for a long time. China is at the forefront, but also the Russian strategy, which has, it must be said, been pursued more successfully in recent years. India is emerging. These new economies that are also becoming powers, not only economic, but political, and think themselves as real “civilized states” now come not only to shake up our international order but who also come to weigh in on the economic order and to rethink the political order and the political imagination that goes with it, with much dynamism and much more inspiration than we currently have. Look at India, Russia and China. They have a much stronger political inspiration than AngloEuropeans today. They think about our planet with a true logic, a true philosophy, an imagination that we’ve lost.

Now let’s unpack these key statements one by one:

1) “ great upheaval that is undoubtedly taking place for the first time in our history in almost every field and with a profoundly historic magnitude”

Here Macron sets the stage for some truly momentous observations: what will be discussed next is not only a major event, but one without precedent in history (whether French, European or American). Furthermore, what will be discussed next, affects “almost every field” and with huge historical implications.

2) “We are undoubtedly experiencing the end of Western hegemony over the world”

 What is important is that even a Rothschild-puppet like Macron had to finally speak these words.

From now on, the notion of the end of the western hegemony on the planet is no more relegated to what the leaders of the Empire and their propaganda machine like to call “fringe extremists” and has now fully entered the (supposedly) “respectable” and “mainstream” public discourse. If you have been reading my blogs with any regularity, you already know that I have been predicting this for a long time.  If you have not been reading them, you can go back and read them now.  This is a confirmation of the extent of my understanding of reality in this world of lies and propaganda.

3) “by the mistakes of Westerners in certain crises, by the choices that have been made by Americans for several years”

While the internal contradictions of western materialism in general, and of AngloZionist Capitalism specifically, have been catching up with the Western World and while an eventual catastrophic crisis was inevitable, it is also certainly true that western leaders mostly did it to themselves . In this context, I would single out the following politicians for a nomination to a medal for exceptional service in the destruction of the western hegemony over our long-suffering planet: Donald Trump, Barak Obama, George Bush, the Clintons,  François Hollande and Emmanuel Macron (yes, he too even if he now changes his tune!), Angela Merkel, of course, and then last but not least, every single British Prime Minister since Margaret Thatcher (maybe with special commendation for Teresa May). All these named, and a long long list of predecessors get the credit as flunkies in the service of the ‘World-Masters’.

4) “ the emergence of new powers whose impact we have probably underestimated for a long time. China is at the forefront, but also the Russian strategy, which has, it must be said, been pursued more successfully in recent years”

Yes, it’s not only China. Russia too is a major competitor, and a very successful one at that, hence the admission that in spite of all the efforts of the AngloZionist elites not only did the Empire not succeed in breaking Russia, but Russia has been very successful in defeating the western efforts. Finally, in military terms, Russia has achieved more than parity. In fact, It can be argued that at least in terms of quality the Russian armed forces are ahead in several crucial technologies (hypersonic missiles, air defenses, electronic warfare etc.) even while she still lags behind in other technologies (mostly truly obsolete things like aircraft carriers). But most crucial is the political victory of Russia:  five years after the Euromaidan and the liberation of Crimea from the Nazi yoke, the USA is far more isolated than Russia. 

5) “real “civilized states” which now come not only to shake up our international order

Of course, Macron did not only mean Russia here, but also India and China. Still, and although the Russian nation is much younger than the one of China or, even more so India, 1000 years of Russian civilization does deserve to be listed next to these two other giants of world history in contrast to the US with 200 years. And what is absolutely certain is that China and India could never build the new international order they want without Russia, at least for the foreseeable future. In spite of all the very real progress made recently by the Chinese armed forces (and, to a lesser degree, also the Indian ones), Russia still remains a much stronger military power than China. Russia, China and India are all former empires which have had their turn in past reset periods which lasted much longer than those of recent history.  Just by their size and geography, these are “un-invadable” countries who all present a distinct model of development and who want a multi-polar international order which would allow them to safely achieve their goals. In other words, Macron understands that the future international order will be dictated by China, Russia and India and not by any combination of western powers. Quite an admission indeed!

6) “ Look at India, Russia and China. They have a much stronger political inspiration than AngloEuropeans today. They think about our planet with a true logic, a true philosophy, an imagination that we’ve lost.”

This is the “core BRICS” challenge to the Empire: China and Russia have already established what the Chinese call a “Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Coordination for the New Era”.  If they can now extend this kind of informal but extremely profound partnership to India next, then the BRICS will have a formidable future (especially after the Brazilian people give the boot to Bolsonaro and his US patrons). And yes, Macron is spot on: China and, especially, Russia have a fundamentally different worldview and, unlike the western one, theirs does have “much stronger political” goals (Macron used the word “aspirations”), “a real philosophy and imagination” which the West has lost, completely. But one way or the other, and for the first time in 1000 years, the future of our planet will not be decided anywhere in the West, not in Europe (old or “new”), but in Asia, primarily by the Russian-Chinese alliance. The AngloZionist Empire is probably the last one in history, definitely the last western one.

Now we should not be naïve here, Macron did not suddenly find religion, grow a conscience or suddenly become an expert on international relations. There is, of course, a cynical reason why he is changing his tune. In fact, there are several such reasons.

First, an aspect of ‘Prime Directive’ requires the pre-informing of humans prior to large-scale high-impact events that are going to have a major impact on the World Order.

Second, all of Europe is in free fall socially, economically and, of course, politically. And with a total nutcase in power in London dealing with Brexit and with Angela Merkel’s apparently never-ending political agony, it is only logical for a French head of state to try to step in.

Culturally and spiritually, Russia is very much part of Europe. Geographically, economically and politically there is simply no way for any imaginable alliance of European states to save Europe from its current predicament without Russian help. Like it or not, that is a fact, irrespective of whether politician or some commentator realizes this or not. Macron probably figured out that the so-called “East Europeans” are nothing but cheap prostitutes doing whatever Israel wants them to do.  Germany is collapsing under the weight of Merkel’s “brilliant” immigration policy while the UK under BoJo is busy trying to self-destruct at least as fast as the USA under Trump. Macron is right. If united, Russia and France could build a much safer Europe than the one we see slowly and painfully dying before our eyes today. But he is also wrong if he thinks that Russia can be “re-invited” back into the AngloZionist sphere of influence. In that context, Putin’s reply to the question of whether Russia was willing to return to the G8 is very telling: first he said that if the G7 wants to come back to Russia, Putin would welcome that, but then he also added that the G7/8 is useless without China and India.

It will be interesting to see if the current G7 will ever agree to mutate into a new G10 which would make Russia, China and India the most powerful block (or voting group) of this new forum. Macron’s words seem to be indicating that this option is at least being discussed behind closed doors. Frankly, considering how quickly the G7 is becoming utterly irrelevant, one can expect it to be gradually phased out and replaced by the (objectively much more relevant) G20.

Finally, there are Trump’s desperate efforts into getting Russia back into the G8 which are very transparently linked to the current trade war he is losing and geostrategic competition between the US and China. The offer is useless to Russia, but Russia does not want to needlessly offend anybody and that is why Putin did not publicly rebuff Trump or directly refuse to come to Miami: instead, he approved of the general concept, but offered a better way to go about it.

Conclusion:  Macron reads the writing on the wall and obeys his Rothschild Masters to reveal this critical information, although in a subtle manner, as is always the case.

Whatever his motives to say what he said, Macron is no idiot and neither are his advisors. Neither is this a “one off” thing.  Every word Macron spoke is putting everybody on notice (including the Ukrainians, the US, the EU and the Russians, of course). In fact, Macron has already invited Putin to participate in a Normandy Format meeting in Paris in the very near future. If that meeting eventually does take place, this will mean that the organizers gave Putin guarantees that this will not just be the usual waste of time and that some serious results will finally be obtained. That, in turn, means that somebody – probably the French – will have the unpleasant task of telling the Ukrainians that the party is over and that they now need to get their act together and start implementing the Minsk Agreements, something which Zelenskii might or might not try to do, but which the real gun-toting Ukranazis will never accept. Thus, if the West is really serious about forcing Kiev to abide by the Mink Agreements, then the West has to finally give-up its self-defeating Russophobic hysteria and substantially change their tone about the Ukraine. To invite Putin to Paris just to tell him again that Russia (which is not even a party to the Minsk Agreements) “must do more” makes zero sense.

When does the plug get pulled on the Western population? There is ample evidence all around that this is underway at this moment. However, Westerners have a very juvenile concept of time frames. 2025 seems like a reasonable date.